Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
LU Sheng'an, WANG Wei, XIAO Li. Evaluation of Soil Structure Characteristics of Wenzhou Soft Clay and Analysis of Tunnelling Disturbance with Tunnel Boring Machines[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(11): 1-10,20. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG23051908
Citation: LU Sheng'an, WANG Wei, XIAO Li. Evaluation of Soil Structure Characteristics of Wenzhou Soft Clay and Analysis of Tunnelling Disturbance with Tunnel Boring Machines[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(11): 1-10,20. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG23051908

Evaluation of Soil Structure Characteristics of Wenzhou Soft Clay and Analysis of Tunnelling Disturbance with Tunnel Boring Machines

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG23051908
  • Received Date: 2023-05-19
  • Wenzhou has deep structural soft soil. To study the deformation of soft soil during metro tunnel construction, a typical section of the soil layer in Wenzhou Rail Transit Line M1 was taken as the research object. Based on the inherent compression characteristics of remolded soil, consolidation compression tests were conducted on intact and remolded specimens, to evaluate structure characteristics respectively from strength and deformation. Simultaneously, a three-dimensional elastic-plastic finite element model for the stratum and the shield tunnel was constructed by the software of PLAXIS 3D, to study the disturbance laws, the distribution of disturbance degrees, the additional settlement of the structural soil layer tunnelled with tunnel boring machines. The results indicated that the soft clay in the Wenzhou area was of strong structure, and the strength and deformation characteristics were influenced by the structure. The yield stress could not be used as an index to evaluate the structure of under-consolidated soil. The construction disturbance could be divided into the preliminary development stage, the rapid development stage and the stable stage, and different stages were influenced by different disturbance factors. The tunnelling with tunnel boring machines would caused larger additional settlement of strata after construction, which mainly concentrated in the soil around shield tunnels. Therefore, it was necessary to reinforce the stratum before construction.
  • [1]
    MITCHELL J K. On the yielding and mechanical strength of Leda clay[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1976(3):297-312.
    [2]
    李广信,张丙印,于玉贞.土力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2013:28-30.
    [3]
    LEROUEIL S, TAVENAS F, BRUCY F, et al. Behavior of destructured natural clays[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1979, 105(GT6):759-778.
    [4]
    LEROUEIL S, VAUGHAN P R. The general and congruent effects of structure in natural soils and weak rocks[J].Géotechnique, 1990, 40(3):467-488.
    [5]
    BURLAND J B. On the compressibility and shear strength of natural clays[J]. Géotechnique, 1990, 40(3):329-378.
    [6]
    AKAGI T. Effect of mandrel-driven sand drains on strength[C]//Proc of the 9th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 1977.
    [7]
    施建勇,赵维炳,艾英钵,等.砂井施工对软黏土扰动的研究[J].河海大学学报, 1997, 25(2):30-33.
    [8]
    王立忠,丁利,吴承章.施工扰动对软土强度的影响[J].工业建筑, 2001, 31(9):48-50.
    [9]
    张诚厚.两种结构性黏土的土工特性[J].水利水运科学研究, 1983(4):65-71.
    [10]
    NAGARAJ T S, MURTHY B R S, VATSALA A, et al. Analysis of compressibility of sensitive soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1990, 116(GT1):105-118.
    [11]
    CHANDLER R J. Clay sediments in depositional basin:the Geotechnical Cycle[J]. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 2000, 33(1):7-39.
    [12]
    HONG Z. Effect of sample disturbance on mcvhanical properties of natural soils[D]. Japan:Saga University, 1997.
    [13]
    CARTER J P, LIU M D. Virgin Compression of structured soils[J]. Géotechnique, 1999, 49(1):43-57.
    [14]
    HVORSLEV M J. Subsurface exploration and sampling of soil for civil engineering purposes[M]. Vicksburg:Waterways Experiment Station,1949.
    [15]
    魏汝龙,软黏土的强度和变形[M].北京:人民交通出版社,1987.
    [16]
    李涛,钱寿易.土样扰动影响的评价及其先期固结压力的确定[J].岩土工程学报, 1987(5):21-30.
    [17]
    LADD C C, LAMBE T W. The strength of "undisturbed" clay determined from undrained test, laboratory shear testing of soils[C]//ASTM Special Technical Publication. West Conshohocken:ASTM International,1963.
    [18]
    CHEN R P, LI Z C, CHEN Y M,et al. Failure investigation at a collapsed deep excavation in very sensitive organic soft clay[J/OL]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2015, 29(3)[2023-05-19]. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) CF.1943-5509.0000557.
    [19]
    徐永福,陈建山,傅德明.盾构掘进对周围土体力学性质的影响[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2003, 22(7):1174-1179.
    [20]
    王军.结构性软土地基的固结沉降及稳定研究[D].杭州:浙江大学, 2002.
    [21]
    孙钧,周健,龚晓南,等.受施工扰动影响土体环境稳定理论与变形控制[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 32(10):1261-1269.
    [22]
    MENG F Y, CHEN R P, KANG X. Effects of tunneling-induced soil disturbance on the post-construction settlement in structured soft soils[J]. Tunnelling&Underground Space Technology, 2018(80):53-63.
    [23]
    SKEMPTON A W. Notes on the compressibility of clays[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, 1946, 102(1/2/3/4):205-209.
    [24]
    陈云敏,胡琦,陈仁朋.杭州地铁湘湖车站基坑坍塌引起的基底土深层扰动与沉降分析[J].土木工程学报, 2014, 47(7):110-117.
    [25]
    李作勤.有结构强度的欠压缩土的力学特性[J].岩土工程学报,1982, 4(1):34-45.
    [26]
    沈珠江.软土工程特性和软土地基设计[J].岩土工程学报,1998, 20(1):100-110.
    [27]
    BJERRUM L. Engineering geology of Norwegian normally-consolidation marine clays as related to settlements of buildings[J]. Géotechnique,1967, 17(2):83-118.
    [28]
    COTECCHIA F, CHANDLER R J. A general framework for the mechanical behaviour of clays[J]. Géotechnique,2000,50(4):431-447.
    [29]
    李忠超.软黏土中轨道交通地下深开挖工程变形及稳定性研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2015.
    [30]
    罗敏敏,陈赟,周江.小应变土体硬化模型参数取值研究现状与展望[J].工业建筑,2021,51(4):172-180.
    [31]
    PLAXIS B V. PLAXIS 3D Reference Manual 2018[M/OL].[2023-05-19].https://www.cisec.cn/support/file/9c246B743FC5BC8C93BA3289873AC18B637031174330309226.pdf.
    [32]
    孟凡衍.软黏土地层施工扰动对盾构盾构隧道和地基工后沉降影响[D].杭州:浙江大学,2019.
    [33]
    SALEHNIA F, COLLIN F,LI X L, et al. Coupled modeling of excavation damaged zone in boom clay:strain localization in rock and distribution of contact pressure on the gallery's lining[J]. Computers and Geotechnics,2015,66:396-410.
    [34]
    NAGARAJ T S, MURTHY B, VATSALA A, et al. Analysis of Compressibility of Sensitive Soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1990, 116(1):105-118.
    [35]
    SCHMERTMANN J M. The undisturbed consolidation behavior of clay[J/OL]. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 1955, 120(1)[2023-05-19]. https://doi.org/10.1061/TACEAT.0007231.
    [36]
    陈云敏,胡琦,陈仁朋.杭州地铁湘湖车站基坑坍塌引起的基底土深层扰动与沉降分析[J].土木工程学报,2014,47(7):110-117.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]WANG Jian, PAN Hong, LUO Guanyong, CAO Hong. Research on Transversal Settlement Characteristics of Strata Caused by Large Diameter in Shield Tunneling Slurry Pressure Balance[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(4): 158-165. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23073101
    [2]XIE Xiongyao, ZHANG Naiyuan, ZHOU Biao, WANG Xiaojia. ANALYSIS ON EVOLUTION LAWS AND CAUSES OF STRUCTURE PERFORMANCES FOR COASTAL IMMERSED TUNNELS IN SOFT SOIL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(7): 1-5,24. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20102911
    [6]Wei Bingxu, Liu Bin, Ouyang Yunqing, Liu Xiong. THE EFFECT OF DRYING-WETTING CYCLES ON EXPANSIVE SOIL STRUCTURE AND ITS INDUCED VARIATIONS IN STRENGTH[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(8): 99-103. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201508018
    [7]Shao Guoxin. THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF FREEZING METHOD OF CONNECTED AISLE FOR THE METRO SHIELD TUNNELS IN NINGBO SOFT SOIL STRATUM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(11): 148-152. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201311033
    [8]Zhang Xiangdong, Liu Jiashun, Zhang Zhecheng. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON STRUCTURAL PARAMETERS OF FUXIN AEOLIAN SOIL UNDER DYNAMIC LOADS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(8): 83-89. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201308018
    [9]Yang Aiwu, Yan Shuwang, Du Dongju. STUDY ON RHEOLOGICAL DIACHRONIC PROPERTY CONSIDERING STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOFT DREDGER FILL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(6): 106-111,37. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201206023
    [10]Tang Liangliang, Chen Zhanglong, Shan Bo, Yu Chuang. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONSOLIDATION COEFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE CONSOLIDATION STRESS OF SOFT CLAY UNDER COMPRESSION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(5): 79-81. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201005016
    [11]Hou Wei, Yao Yangping, Niu Lei. UNIFIED HARDENING MODEL FOR STRUCTURALLY OVER-CONSOLIDATED CLAYS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(8): 14-16,58. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200808004
    [12]Liu Yonghai, Zhu Xiangrong, Wu Jian, Chang Linyue. GENETIC ANALYSIS OF SOFT SOIL STRUCTURE AND EXPERIMENT ON ITS INFLUENCE ON ENGINEERING PROPERTIES IN NINGBO AREA[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(3): 68-71114. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200803019
    [13]Zai Jinmin, Wang Xudong, Yu Chuang. RESEARCH ON THE SOIL ADDITIONAL STRESS AND SIMPLIFIED SETTLEMENT CALCULATION OF COMPOSITE PILE FOUNDATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(5): 24-27. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200505006
    [14]Qu Jili, Ge Xiurun. ANALYSIS OF CHARACTERISTICS OF SETTLEMENT TROUGH INDUCED BY SHIELD CONSTRUCTION IN SOFT SOIL AREA[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(1): 42-46. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200501013
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(0)

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.5
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.8 %FULLTEXT: 9.8 %META: 82.1 %META: 82.1 %PDF: 8.1 %PDF: 8.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.4 %其他: 8.4 %上海: 2.1 %上海: 2.1 %佛山: 1.8 %佛山: 1.8 %兰州: 0.4 %兰州: 0.4 %北京: 7.4 %北京: 7.4 %南京: 3.9 %南京: 3.9 %南昌: 0.7 %南昌: 0.7 %南通: 0.7 %南通: 0.7 %厦门: 0.4 %厦门: 0.4 %吉安: 0.4 %吉安: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.7 %呼和浩特: 0.7 %唐山: 0.7 %唐山: 0.7 %嘉兴: 1.1 %嘉兴: 1.1 %天津: 2.8 %天津: 2.8 %太原: 0.7 %太原: 0.7 %宁波: 1.1 %宁波: 1.1 %安康: 0.7 %安康: 0.7 %安阳: 0.4 %安阳: 0.4 %宜宾: 0.4 %宜宾: 0.4 %宜春: 0.4 %宜春: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %巴黎: 0.7 %巴黎: 0.7 %常德: 1.4 %常德: 1.4 %广州: 0.7 %广州: 0.7 %张家口: 1.8 %张家口: 1.8 %成都: 1.1 %成都: 1.1 %扬州: 0.4 %扬州: 0.4 %昆明: 0.7 %昆明: 0.7 %晋城: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 2.1 %杭州: 2.1 %柳州: 0.7 %柳州: 0.7 %沈阳: 2.8 %沈阳: 2.8 %沧州: 0.4 %沧州: 0.4 %济南: 1.1 %济南: 1.1 %海口: 0.4 %海口: 0.4 %淄博: 1.1 %淄博: 1.1 %深圳: 2.5 %深圳: 2.5 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %漯河: 1.1 %漯河: 1.1 %烟台: 0.4 %烟台: 0.4 %盐城: 0.4 %盐城: 0.4 %石家庄: 2.8 %石家庄: 2.8 %福州: 1.8 %福州: 1.8 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %绵阳: 0.4 %绵阳: 0.4 %聊城: 0.4 %聊城: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 9.8 %芒廷维尤: 9.8 %荆州: 0.4 %荆州: 0.4 %衡水: 0.4 %衡水: 0.4 %衢州: 0.7 %衢州: 0.7 %西宁: 11.2 %西宁: 11.2 %西安: 3.2 %西安: 3.2 %达州: 2.5 %达州: 2.5 %运城: 1.8 %运城: 1.8 %郑州: 2.8 %郑州: 2.8 %重庆: 1.1 %重庆: 1.1 %金华: 0.4 %金华: 0.4 %银川: 2.1 %银川: 2.1 %长春: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长沙: 1.4 %长沙: 1.4 %青岛: 0.7 %青岛: 0.7 %香港: 0.4 %香港: 0.4 %其他上海佛山兰州北京南京南昌南通厦门吉安呼和浩特唐山嘉兴天津太原宁波安康安阳宜宾宜春宣城巴黎常德广州张家口成都扬州昆明晋城朝阳杭州柳州沈阳沧州济南海口淄博深圳湖州漯河烟台盐城石家庄福州秦皇岛绵阳聊城芒廷维尤荆州衡水衢州西宁西安达州运城郑州重庆金华银川长春长沙青岛香港

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (233) PDF downloads(24) Cited by(1)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return