Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
QU Zhihao, HUANG Feng, Zheng Aichen, GAO Xiaoye. Experimental Study on the Influence of Joint Fillers on the Crack Initiation Strength of Rock Masses[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(8): 175-179. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21062915
Citation: QU Zhihao, HUANG Feng, Zheng Aichen, GAO Xiaoye. Experimental Study on the Influence of Joint Fillers on the Crack Initiation Strength of Rock Masses[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(8): 175-179. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21062915

Experimental Study on the Influence of Joint Fillers on the Crack Initiation Strength of Rock Masses

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21062915
  • Received Date: 2021-06-29
    Available Online: 2022-12-01
  • Three kinds of materials—cement, mud and gypsum, were used as fillers to fill jointed rock specimens with single crack, and uniaxial compression tests were conducted on the specimens. The analytical expression about initiation strength of crack for closed crack under uniaxial compression was established and numerical simulations were performed to further study it. The results showed that under uniaxial compression, the initiation strength of crack for specimens simulated by the friction coefficient theory was basically consistent with the peak strength from indoor tests. The larger the friction coefficients of fillers were, the less easier the damage of jointed rock masses, and the initiation strength of crack for rock masses with fillers was greatly improved than that without fillers. The peak strength of cement-filled jointed specimens was highest and mud-filled jointed specimens was lowest. Shear failure was the main failure mode of specimens filled with mud, the failure form of specimens filled with cement and gypsum was complex. With the increase of filler strength, the failure mode of jointed rock mass would change from shear failure to tension failure.
  • [1]
    吴雪萍, 邱一平, 曹兴国, 等. 单轴压缩下含闭合裂纹大理岩板裂纹扩展的研究J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2015(7):30-33.
    [2]
    WU S, LI K, YANG Z, et al. Complex analytical study of the stability of tunnel-surrounding rock in a layered jointed rock mass[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020. DOI: 10.1155/2020/5473059.
    [3]
    KULATILAKE P, HE W, UM J, et al. A physical model study of jointed rock mass strength under uniaxial compressive loading[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2015, 34(3/4). DOI: 10.1016/S1365-1609(97)00123-8.
    [4]
    XIONG L X, CHEN H J, LI T B, et al. Experimental study on the uniaxial compressive strength of artificial jointed rock mass specimen after high temperatures[J]. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, 2018(4): 201-213.
    [5]
    邵伟, 陈有亮, 周有成. 单轴压缩条件下含闭合双裂纹体岩石类材料的破坏机理[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 17(2): 216-220.
    [6]
    LIU G, JIANG Q H, XIONG F, et al. Experimental study of crack propagation and deformation of multiple-jointed rock mass[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37:151-158.
    [7]
    张波, 李术才, 张敦福,等. 含充填节理岩体相似材料试件单轴压缩试验及断裂损伤研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2012(6):1647-1652.
    [8]
    史玲,蔡美峰,赵坚.充填节理破坏机理及实验[J].北京科技大学学报, 2012, 34(3): 253-259.
    [9]
    周喆, 张亮, 侯恒军. 填充对节理岩体力学特性及能量演化的影响研究[J]. 水利水电技术, 2020,51(7):117-123.
    [10]
    刘婷婷, 李建春, 李海波,等. 剪切速率对平直充填节理的剪切力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2017,38(7):1967-1973

    ,1989.
    [11]
    杨庆, 王超. 基于扩展有限元的压剪复合断裂数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2011(增刊2):568-572.
    [12]
    王辉, 高召宁, 孟祥瑞,等. 单一闭合裂纹在单轴压缩下对岩体破裂过程的影响[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2015(2):56-61.
    [13]
    刘福生, 薛一峰, 杨杰. 填充节理直剪试验颗粒流模拟[J]. 水利水电技术, 2020, 51(3):163-174.
    [14]
    高啸也. 断层破碎带隧道围岩变形破坏机理研究[D]. 重庆:重庆交通大学, 2018.
    [15]
    李银平, 伍佑伦, 杨春和. 岩石类材料滑动裂纹模型[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(2):278-284.
    [16]
    YOON J. Application of experimental design and optimization to PFC model calibration in uniaxial compression simulation[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2007, 44(6):871-889.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LAN Tao, LI Zexu, ZHANG Boya, GAO Ruixiang, YOU Yong. Experimental Research on Slip Factors of Corroded Slip-Critical Weathering High-Strength Bolted Connections[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(9): 95-103. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG23080410
    [2]JI Jun, HUANG Geng, ZHANG Wenxue, WU Shukang. Calculation of Lateral Pressure of Formwork Based on Stratified Summation Method[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(4): 179-185. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21040204
    [3]WANG Jingfeng, WANG Wanqian, ZHANG Rong, LIU Chao, ZHANG Huijie, WANG Can. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON SHEAR PERFORMANCES OF PREFABRICATED COLD-FORMED THIN-WALL STEEL WALLS FILLED WITH LIGHT WEIGHT POLYMER MORTAR[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(7): 145-150,202. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20070402
    [4]WU Shukang, ZHANG Wenxue, JI Jun, LU Xiangtao. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH OF LATERAL PRESSURE ON SELF-COMPACTING CONCRETE FORMWORKS CONSIDERING TIME-VARYING PROPERTIES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(8): 120-125. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21010409
    [7]Xue Hao Chen Zongping Fan Jie Chen Yuliang Xue Jianyang, . RESEARCH ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF RECYCLED AGGREGATE FILL WALL MATERIAL AND ITS STRENGTH DAGRADATION IN DISASTER ENVIRONMENTS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(7): 89-94. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201507019
    [8]Liu Rong, Shi Jianyong. ANALYSIS OF SETTLEMENT MECHANISM AND MODEL FOR MSW BASED ON INTERIOR COLUMNAR LANDFILL TEST[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(12): 98-103. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201312018
    [9]Luo Sihai, Hu Wei, Pan Xiaoqing, Deng Tongfa, Yang Zeping. COMPARISON OF COMPRESSION BEHAVIOR OF SOIL AFTER PRE-DENSIFICATION BY STATIC OR DYNAMIC LOADS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(10): 68-71. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201110017
    [10]Shao Guoxin, Tu Yongqing. TEST STUDY ON THE DAMPING PROPERTIES OF POLYMER FILLED STEEL TUBES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(3): 124-127. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201003027
    [11]Song Mingzhi, Xu Juehui, LüHenglin, Wang Yong. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON ANTI-SLIDING COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION TYPE HIGH-STRENGTH BOLT CONNECTORS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(12): 102-104. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200912025
    [12]Wu Zhuanqin, Zeng Zhaobo, Shang Renjie, Liu Jingliang. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON FRICTION COEFFICIENT OF RETARD-BONDED PRESTRESSING STRAND[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(11): 20-23. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200811006
    [13]Cai Jiangyong. IMPROVING SUGGESTION ON CALCULATION METHOD OF FRICTION LOSS IN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(4): 94-95,75. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200404029
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 经来旺,蒋浩杰,郑霖. 不同填充裂纹位置与尺寸下的类岩石试样破坏研究. 山东煤炭科技. 2024(04): 123-127 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-0305101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.0 %FULLTEXT: 9.0 %META: 90.7 %META: 90.7 %PDF: 0.3 %PDF: 0.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.2 %其他: 11.2 %其他: 1.9 %其他: 1.9 %Austell: 0.6 %Austell: 0.6 %Canton: 0.3 %Canton: 0.3 %Clemmons: 0.3 %Clemmons: 0.3 %Malvern: 0.3 %Malvern: 0.3 %The Bronx: 0.6 %The Bronx: 0.6 %上海: 0.6 %上海: 0.6 %信阳: 0.3 %信阳: 0.3 %北京: 2.5 %北京: 2.5 %南京: 0.6 %南京: 0.6 %南通: 0.3 %南通: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %圣保罗: 0.9 %圣保罗: 0.9 %圣安吉洛: 0.9 %圣安吉洛: 0.9 %天津: 0.9 %天津: 0.9 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %密蘇里城: 1.2 %密蘇里城: 1.2 %布雷登顿: 0.3 %布雷登顿: 0.3 %常德: 0.9 %常德: 0.9 %广州: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %张家口: 1.2 %张家口: 1.2 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %拉斯维加斯: 0.3 %拉斯维加斯: 0.3 %无锡: 1.9 %无锡: 1.9 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %泽西: 0.3 %泽西: 0.3 %漯河: 1.2 %漯河: 1.2 %石嘴山: 0.6 %石嘴山: 0.6 %纽瓦克: 0.3 %纽瓦克: 0.3 %纽约: 0.6 %纽约: 0.6 %绍兴: 0.3 %绍兴: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 36.8 %芒廷维尤: 36.8 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %苏州: 1.9 %苏州: 1.9 %蒙哥马利: 0.3 %蒙哥马利: 0.3 %蚌埠: 0.3 %蚌埠: 0.3 %西宁: 19.6 %西宁: 19.6 %西安: 0.3 %西安: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %运城: 2.8 %运城: 2.8 %郑州: 0.6 %郑州: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %阿伦敦: 0.3 %阿伦敦: 0.3 %青岛: 0.3 %青岛: 0.3 %马鞍山: 0.9 %马鞍山: 0.9 %高原牧场: 0.3 %高原牧场: 0.3 %其他其他AustellCantonClemmonsMalvernThe Bronx上海信阳北京南京南通嘉兴圣保罗圣安吉洛天津宣城密蘇里城布雷登顿常德广州张家口扬州拉斯维加斯无锡晋城朝阳泽西漯河石嘴山纽瓦克纽约绍兴芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州蒙哥马利蚌埠西宁西安贵阳运城郑州长沙长治阿伦敦青岛马鞍山高原牧场

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (290) PDF downloads(1) Cited by(1)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return