Li Yi, Zhao Wen, Yan Yunqi. METHOD OF CONTINUAL ANALYSIS FOR SYSTEM RELIABILITY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(10): 26-28,39. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200510009
Citation:
Cai Jiangyong. IMPROVING SUGGESTION ON CALCULATION METHOD OF FRICTION LOSS IN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2004, 34(4): 94-95,75. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200404029
Li Yi, Zhao Wen, Yan Yunqi. METHOD OF CONTINUAL ANALYSIS FOR SYSTEM RELIABILITY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(10): 26-28,39. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200510009
Citation:
Cai Jiangyong. IMPROVING SUGGESTION ON CALCULATION METHOD OF FRICTION LOSS IN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2004, 34(4): 94-95,75. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200404029
IMPROVING SUGGESTION ON CALCULATION METHOD OF FRICTION LOSS IN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE STRUCTURE
Received Date: 2003-05-06Publish Date:
2004-04-20
Abstract
Through an analysis of friction coefficient and two key factors of friction in prestressed concrete structure, the shortage of current calculation method is pointed out and corresponded improving suggestion is put forward as well.
References
WILBY C B.后张法预应力混凝土.北京:中国铁道出版社, 1985.65～70
[2] 杜振辰, 现代预应力混凝土结构, 中国建筑工业出版社, 1988.124～129
[3] 李伟兴, 黄鼎业, 等, 超长预应力束孔道摩擦的探讨及应用.结构工程师, 1999(3):14～17
Relative Articles
[1] ZHOU Wansen, ZHONG Jufang, ZHANG Yanhong, HU Xiao. Research on Time-Frequency Parameter Prediction Models of Ground Motion [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(12): 177-185. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22110105
[2] SUN Xiaoyun, HUANG Linjie, ZENG Bin, SHI Zheng, XIE Qin. Analysis of Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Concrete Frame Structures Characterized by Low Prestressing and Slope Friction [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(10): 38-45. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24091003
[3] SUI Weining, MA Yong, YANG Haitao, WU Jinguo. Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of a New Connection Joint Between PC External Wall Panel and Steel Frame with Frictional Energy Dissipation [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(5): 109-117. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22011501
[4] LIU Hang, LI Mu, YANG Xuezhong, HAN Mingjie, TIAN Yuji. Experimental Research on Seismic Performance of Self-centering Prefabricated RC Frame Structures [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(1): 65-73. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21062601
[5] HUANG Linjie, ZENG Bin, ZHOU Zhen, ZHANG Wenqing, SANG Chenxu, ZHANG Jingru. Influence of Joint Stiffness After Gap Opening on Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Prestressed Concrete Frames with Variable Friction Dampers [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(12): 88-93. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22072916
[6] CHANG Zhaoqun, LIU Boquan, HAN Meng, BAI Tao, XING Guohua, WANG Shuangbing. DESIGN AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF AN INNOVATIVE SELF-CENTERING FRICTION DAMPER [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(9): 138-142,221. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20080402
[7] HUANG Ming, LIU Ye, DING Yi, LYU Qingfang. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON SELF-CENTERING CLB ROCKING WALL EQUIPPED WITH CFD [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(10): 40-46,61. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21042509
[8] HAN Tengfei, XU Gang, LI Liang, LI Xiaodong, XI Xiangdong. RESEARCH AND APPLICATION OF SHEAR RESISTANCE OF FRICTION CONNECTION WITH HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(11): 133-136. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201909120001
[9] HUANG, Linjie, ZHOU, Zhen. INVESTIGATION ON INFLUENCE OF INFILL WALLS ON HIGHER MODE EFFECT OF SELF-CENTERING PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRAME STRUCTURES [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(1): 34-39. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202001007
[10] MENG, Shaoping, CAI, Xiaoning. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON PRESTRESSED SELF-RESETTING CONCRETE FRAME STRUCTURE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(1): 1-6. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202001001
[11] MA, Junfeng, ZHOU, Zhen. HYSTERICAL BEHAVIOR OF AN UPPER-BOTTOM FRICTION DAMPER SELF-CENTERING PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM-COLUMN CONNECTION WITH HIDDEN CORBEL [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(1): 16-21,124. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202001004
[14] Liu Pengfei, Zhao Qilin, Jiang Kebin, Gao Hesheng. THEORETIC RESEARCH ON FRICTION LOSS OF PRE-STRESS IN LARGE-SPAN CONCRETE BRIDGE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(10): 64-67. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201110016
[15] Wu Yingjun, Chen Zhihua, LüQing. RESEARCH AND APPLICATION OF ROLL CABLE-STRUT JOINT IN SUSPEND-DOME [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(8): 27-29,34. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201008007
[16] Wu Zhuanqin, Zeng Zhaobo, Shang Renjie, Liu Jingliang. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON FRICTION COEFFICIENT OF RETARD-BONDED PRESTRESSING STRAND [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(11): 20-23. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200811006
[17] Cai Jiangyong. IMPROVING SUGGESTION ON CALCULATION METHOD OF FRICTION LOSS IN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE STRUCTURE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(4): 94-95,75. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200404029
Cited by Periodical cited type(1) 1. 张文超，李帅. 结构抗震时程分析输入地震波选择方法研究. 砖瓦. 2024(07): 73-75 .
Other cited types(4)
Proportional views
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Amount of access Chart context menu Abstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads Statistics Abstract Views HTML Views PDF Downloads 2024-04 2024-05 2024-06 2024-07 2024-08 2024-09 2024-10 2024-11 2024-12 2025-01 2025-02 2025-03 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Class Distribution FULLTEXT : 14.4 % FULLTEXT : 14.4 % META : 84.0 % META : 84.0 % PDF : 1.5 % PDF : 1.5 % FULLTEXT META PDF Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Area Distribution 其他 : 8.2 % 其他 : 8.2 % China : 1.5 % China : 1.5 % 上海 : 0.5 % 上海 : 0.5 % 保定 : 0.5 % 保定 : 0.5 % 信阳 : 0.5 % 信阳 : 0.5 % 北京 : 4.1 % 北京 : 4.1 % 南通 : 0.5 % 南通 : 0.5 % 南阳 : 0.5 % 南阳 : 0.5 % 厦门 : 0.5 % 厦门 : 0.5 % 台州 : 0.5 % 台州 : 0.5 % 呼和浩特 : 0.5 % 呼和浩特 : 0.5 % 嘉兴 : 0.5 % 嘉兴 : 0.5 % 大庆 : 0.5 % 大庆 : 0.5 % 天津 : 0.5 % 天津 : 0.5 % 太原 : 0.5 % 太原 : 0.5 % 宁波 : 0.5 % 宁波 : 0.5 % 宿州 : 1.0 % 宿州 : 1.0 % 常德 : 0.5 % 常德 : 0.5 % 廊坊 : 1.0 % 廊坊 : 1.0 % 延安 : 0.5 % 延安 : 0.5 % 张家口 : 5.2 % 张家口 : 5.2 % 无锡 : 1.5 % 无锡 : 1.5 % 昆明 : 0.5 % 昆明 : 0.5 % 晋城 : 0.5 % 晋城 : 0.5 % 朝阳 : 0.5 % 朝阳 : 0.5 % 杭州 : 1.5 % 杭州 : 1.5 % 桂林 : 0.5 % 桂林 : 0.5 % 沈阳 : 0.5 % 沈阳 : 0.5 % 深圳 : 0.5 % 深圳 : 0.5 % 潍坊 : 0.5 % 潍坊 : 0.5 % 芒廷维尤 : 11.9 % 芒廷维尤 : 11.9 % 芝加哥 : 3.1 % 芝加哥 : 3.1 % 苏州 : 0.5 % 苏州 : 0.5 % 蚌埠 : 1.0 % 蚌埠 : 1.0 % 西宁 : 34.5 % 西宁 : 34.5 % 西安 : 0.5 % 西安 : 0.5 % 贵阳 : 1.5 % 贵阳 : 1.5 % 运城 : 5.7 % 运城 : 5.7 % 邯郸 : 0.5 % 邯郸 : 0.5 % 郑州 : 1.5 % 郑州 : 1.5 % 金华 : 0.5 % 金华 : 0.5 % 长沙 : 0.5 % 长沙 : 0.5 % 阳泉 : 2.1 % 阳泉 : 2.1 % 黄冈 : 0.5 % 黄冈 : 0.5 % 其他 China 上海 保定 信阳 北京 南通 南阳 厦门 台州 呼和浩特 嘉兴 大庆 天津 太原 宁波 宿州 常德 廊坊 延安 张家口 无锡 昆明 晋城 朝阳 杭州 桂林 沈阳 深圳 潍坊 芒廷维尤 芝加哥 苏州 蚌埠 西宁 西安 贵阳 运城 邯郸 郑州 金华 长沙 阳泉 黄冈
Login
Register
E-alert
DownLoad: