Exploration of the Transformation Models of Village-Level Industrial Parks in Guangzhou from the Perspective of Power Relations

YE Changdong; LI Wenhao; YANG Jiaping; HUANG Jianlin; CHEN Dangran; CHEN Weixuan

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG25012702

Volume 55 Issue 6

Jun. 2025

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2025 > 55(6): 54-62

YE Changdong, LI Wenhao, YANG Jiaping, HUANG Jianlin, CHEN Dangran, CHEN Weixuan. Exploration of the Transformation Models of Village-Level Industrial Parks in Guangzhou from the Perspective of Power Relations[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(6): 54-62. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG25012702

Citation:

YE Changdong, LI Wenhao, YANG Jiaping, HUANG Jianlin, CHEN Dangran, CHEN Weixuan. Exploration of the Transformation Models of Village-Level Industrial Parks in Guangzhou from the Perspective of Power Relations[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(6): 54-62. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG25012702

Citation:

YE Changdong, LI Wenhao, YANG Jiaping, HUANG Jianlin, CHEN Dangran, CHEN Weixuan. Exploration of the Transformation Models of Village-Level Industrial Parks in Guangzhou from the Perspective of Power Relations[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(6): 54-62. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG25012702

PDF( 0 KB)

Exploration of the Transformation Models of Village-Level Industrial Parks in Guangzhou from the Perspective of Power Relations

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG25012702

1. College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China;
2. Key Laboratory of South China Tropical and Subtropical Natural Resources Monitoring, Ministry of Natural Resources, Guangzhou 510642, China;
3. Shuangshui Institute of Natural Resources Management, Xinhui District Bureau of Natural Resources, Jiangmen 529000, China;
4. Shenzhen Tourism College, Jinan University, Shenzhen 518053, China

Received Date: 2025-01-27

Abstract

Abstract

This paper examines the transformation of village-level industrial parks in Guangzhou， with particular attention to the role of power relations in shaping decisions. It explores how various stakeholders interact and influence the transformation process， identifying three distinct modes： those led by operating entities， by the government， and by village collectives. The operating entities utilise their management rights to foster enterprise growth and increase asset value by providing professional services and improved facilities. In contrast， the government employs its administrative powers to promote industrial upgrading and enhance spatial quality through policy guidance and financial support. Meanwhile， the village collectives focus on developing their collective economy and improving local community environments through their ownership rights. This paper examines the differences among these three modes in terms of power bases， main objectives， stakeholder interests， property rights configurations， risk allocations， profit mechanisms and timelines， key transformation content， and power interaction mechanisms. It further examines the operational pathways of power relations and their spatial effects. The paper reveals the multidimensional and non-unilateral nature of power relations， proposing adherence to the principle of “power adaptation” when selecting a transformation mode. The chosen mode should align with the area's current development stage while comprehensively considering the rights and interests of all stakeholders.
- village-level industrial park,
- power relations,
- multiple stakeholders,
- transformation mode

FullText(HTML)

References(21)

References

[1]	HSING Y. The great urban transformation:politics of land and property in China[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,2010.
[2]	郑琰.农村集体地权界定的治理逻辑及其路径分化:基于珠三角地区村级工业园改造的比较案例研究[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2024,41(2):96-113.
[3]	陈颀.从"一元垄断"到"二元垄断":土地开发中的地方政府行为机制研究[J].社会学研究,2019,34(2):25-48 ,242-243.
[4]	田莉,孙玥.珠三角农村地区分散工业点整合规划与对策:以广州市番禺工业园区整合规划为例[J].城市规划学刊,2010(2):21-26.
[5]	广州市工业和信息化局.广州市村级工业园整治提升三年行动计划(2019-2021年)[EB/OL].(2019-08-08)[2019-10-17]. https://gxj.gz.gov.cn/zt/gzscjgyyzzts/content/mpost_2617638.html.
[6]	孟谦,吴雅馨,吴军.广州市村级工业园存量工业用地临时更新路径重构[J].规划师,2022,38(7):100-108.
[7]	王京海.产权博弈与重构:城市工业园区转型机制研究[D].南京:南京大学,2017.
[8]	蔡立玞,何继红,梁雄飞,等.存量低效工业园区改造全周期监管策略:以佛山市顺德区村级工业园升级改造实践为例[J].规划师,2021,37(6):45-49 ,55.
[9]	梁雄飞,李汉飞,朱墨,等.村级工业园升级改造助推高质量发展的新举措:以佛山市《顺德区高质量推动村级工业园升级改造总体规划》为例[J].规划师,2021,37(4):51-56.
[10]	BARZEL Y. Economic analysis of property rights[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1989.
[11]	朱介鸣.发展规划的实证分析:论强化规划塑造城市的机制[J].城市规划学刊,2009(1):18-22.
[12]	YUNG E H K,SUN Y. Power relationships and coalitions in urban renewal and heritage conservation:the Nga Tsin Wai Village in Hong Kong[J]. Land Use Policy,2020,99,104811.
[13]	FOUCAULT M. Discipline and punish:the birth of the prison,trans[M]. London:Penguin Books,1979.
[14]	米歇尔·福柯.权力的眼睛[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1997.
[15]	MICHEL F. Power,moral values,and the intellectual[M]. Paris:Material Culture Press,1982:107-120.
[16]	仝志辉.村庄规划为何失去创造性:Y村规划知识生产的权力关系分析[J].城市规划,2023,47(9):78-83 ,95.
[17]	肖铭,徐小雨.微观权力视角下旧城改造困境的对比研究:以广州恩宁路和成都曹家巷为例[J].规划师,2021,37(2):56-61.
[18]	何冬华,杜金莹,刘玉亭,等.尺度重构视角下的土地再开发增值空间分配:以广州海珠湾枢纽地区为例[J].热带地理,2022,42(4):509-518.
[19]	杨凌凡,罗小龙,唐蜜,等.尺度重构视角下开发区整合转型机制研究:以江苏省为例[J].经济地理,2022,42(6):33-44.
[20]	张衔春,杨宇,单卓然,等.珠三角城市区域治理的尺度重组机制研究:基于产业合作项目与交通基础设施项目的比较[J].地理研究,2020,39(9):2095-2108.
[21]	李鲁奇,马学广,鹿宇.飞地经济的空间生产与治理结构:基于国家空间重构视角[J].地理科学进展,2019,38(3):346-356.