State of the Art on Mechanical Properties of Precast Prestressed Concrete Structures (for Buildings and Utility Tunnels)

XUE Weichen; ZHANG Baozheng; CHEN Shengyang; JIANG Jiafei; GUO Dapeng

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG24100801

Volume 54 Issue 10

Oct. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2024 > 54(10): 9-20

XUE Weichen, ZHANG Baozheng, CHEN Shengyang, JIANG Jiafei, GUO Dapeng. State of the Art on Mechanical Properties of Precast Prestressed Concrete Structures (for Buildings and Utility Tunnels)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(10): 9-20. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24100801

Citation:

XUE Weichen, ZHANG Baozheng, CHEN Shengyang, JIANG Jiafei, GUO Dapeng. State of the Art on Mechanical Properties of Precast Prestressed Concrete Structures (for Buildings and Utility Tunnels)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(10): 9-20. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24100801

Citation:

XUE Weichen, ZHANG Baozheng, CHEN Shengyang, JIANG Jiafei, GUO Dapeng. State of the Art on Mechanical Properties of Precast Prestressed Concrete Structures (for Buildings and Utility Tunnels)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(10): 9-20. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24100801

PDF( 15578 KB)

State of the Art on Mechanical Properties of Precast Prestressed Concrete Structures (for Buildings and Utility Tunnels)

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24100801

School of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200082, China

Received Date: 2024-10-08
Available Online: 2024-11-06

Abstract

Abstract

Precast prestressed concrete structures, possessing the characteristics of both precast concrete structures and prestressed concrete structures, exhibit promising application prospects in the fields of construction and infrastructure. The paper systematically summarized the research progress made by domestic and international research teams, including the authors’ group, on the mechanical properties of precast prestressed concrete frames, shear walls, and utility tunnel structures. The research objects primarily encompassed two types of precast prestressed concrete frame structures (with precast and cast-in-situ joint cores), precast prestressed concrete shear wall structures, and precast prestressed concrete utility tunnel structures. Existing research indicates that all three structures possessed excellent bearing capacity and deformation recovery capability. Precast prestressed concrete frame structures with precast joint cores exhibited limited ductility and energy dissipation capability, displaying typical semi-rigid characteristics, while those with cast-in-situ joint cores demonstrated good seismic performance. Precast prestressed concrete shear wall structures primarily underwent rigid body rotation during seismic events, with no significant damage or residual deformation to the main wall body, but their ductility and energy dissipation capacity were unsatisfactory. Precast prestressed concrete utility tunnel structures demonstrated good waterproof performance, high bearing capacity and recovery capability. Furthermore, the applications and codes for these three types of structures were summarized. Finally, the research prospects for precast prestressed concrete structures were discussed.
- precast prestressed concrete structures,
- frame,
- shear wall,
- utility tunnel,
- mechanical bearing capacity,
- ductility,
- energy dissipation,
- design methods

FullText(HTML)

References(66)

References

[1]	PAULAY T, PRIESTLEY M J N. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings[M]. New York: Wiley, 1992.
[2]	薛伟辰. 现代预应力结构设计[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2003.
[3]	BLAKELEY R W G, PARK R. Seismic resistance of prestressed concrete beam-column assemblies [J]. Journal Proceedings, 1971, 68(9): 677-692.
[4]	STONE W C, CHEOK G S, STANTON J F. Performance of hybrid moment-resisting precast beam-column concrete connections subjected to cyclic loading [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1995, 92(2): 229-249.
[5]	CHEOK G S, STONE W C, KUNNATH S K. Seismic response of precast concrete frames with hybrid connections [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1998, 95(5): 527-539.
[6]	梁培新, 郭正兴. 新型装配整体式不对称混合连接节点试验研究[J]. 施工技术, 2010, 39(3): 63-65.
[7]	PRIESTLEY M J N. Overview of PRESSS research program[J]. PCI Journal, 1991, 36(4): 50-57.
[8]	NAKAKI S D, ENGLEKIRK R E. PRESSS industry seismic workshops: concept development[J]. PCI Journal, 1991, 36(5): 54-61.
[9]	STANTON J F, HAWKINS N M, HICKS T R. PRESSS project 1.3: connection classification and evaluation [J]. PCI Journal, 1991, 36(5): 62-71.
[10]	PRIESTLEY M J N. The PRESSS program:current status and proposed plans for phase III [J]. PCI Journal, 1996, 41(2): 22-40.
[11]	MACRAE G A,PRIESTLEY M J N. Precast post-tensioned un-grouted concrete beam-column subassemblage tests:structural systems research report No SSRP 94/10[R]. San Diego, La Jolla, USA:University of California, 1988.
[12]	PRIESTLEY M J N, MACRAE G A. Seismic tests of precast beam-to-column joint subassemblages with unbonded tendons [J]. PCI Journal, 1996, 41(1): 64-81.
[13]	PRIESTLEY M J N, TAO J. Seismic response of precast prestressed concrete frame with partially debonded tendons[J]. PCI Journal, 1993, 38(1): 58-69.
[14]	柳炳康, 张瑜中, 晋哲锋, 等. 预压装配式预应力混凝土框架接合部抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2005, 26(2): 60-65 ,116.
[15]	种迅, 孟少平, 潘其健. 后张预应力预制混凝土框架梁柱节点抗震性能试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2012(12):38-44.
[16]	种迅,孟少平,潘其健,等.部分无黏结预制预应力混凝土框架及其节点抗震能力研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2007(4):55-60.
[17]	LIAO X, ZHANG B, XUE W. Cyclic loading response of precast concrete beam-column connections with partially bonded draped prestressing tendon[J]. Engineering Structures, 2024, 302, 117435.
[18]	PRIESTLEY M J N, SRITHARAN S, CONLEY J R,et al. Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test building [J]. PCI Journal, 1999, 44(6):42-67.
[19]	柳炳康, 宋满荣, 黄慎江, 等. 三层预压装配式预应力混凝土框架抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2011, 32(9): 99-106.
[20]	薛伟辰, 廖显东. 装配整体式部分粘结预应力混凝土框架结构抗震性能研究报告[R]. 上海: 同济大学, 2015.
[21]	LYU X, CUI Y, LIU J, et al. Shaking table test and numerical simulation of a 1/2-scale self-centering reinforced concrete frame [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2015, 44(12): 1899-1917.
[22]	薛伟辰, 胡翔.装配整体式自复位混凝土框架结构抗震性能研究报告[R]. 上海: 同济大学, 2019.
[23]	XUE W, XU Z, YANG Y. Experimental studies on precast prestressed concrete spatial frame[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2011, 108(3): 370-377.
[24]	ENGLEKIRK R E. Design-construction of the Paramount:a 39-story precast prestressed concrete apartment building[J]. PCI Journal, 2002, 47(4): 56-71.
[25]	廖显东.预制预应力混凝土框架结构体系研究与应用进展[J].建筑结构,2015,45(22):65-70.
[26]	PCI. Seismic design of precast/prestressed concrete structures: PCI MNL 140-12[S]. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Precast Concrete Institute, 2007.
[27]	ACI. Design specification for unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete special moment frames satisfying ACI 374.1 (ACI 550.3-13) and Commentary:ACI 550.3-13[S]. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute, 2013.
[28]	AIJ. Draft of Japanese design guidelines for precast construction of equivalent monolithic reinforced concrete buildings: AIJ 2000[S]. Tokyo: Architectural Institute of Japan, 2000.
[29]	NZS. Concrete structures standard. Part 1: The design of concrete structures: NZS 3101-2006[S]. Auckland :Council of Standard New Zealand, 2006.
[30]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 装配式混凝土建筑技术标准: GB/T 51231—2016[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2017.
[31]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 预应力混凝土结构抗震设计标准:JGJ/T 140—2019[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2019.
[32]	上海市住房和城乡建设管理委员会. 装配整体式混凝土公共建筑设计标准:DG/TJ 08-2154—2022[S]. 上海:同济大学出版社,2022.
[33]	KURAMA Y, SAUSE R, PESSIKI S, et al. Lateral load behavior and seismic design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1999, 96(4): 622-632.
[34]	KURAMA Y, PESSIKI S, SAUSE R, et al. Seismic behavior and design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls [J]. PCI Journal, 1999, 44(3): 72-89.
[35]	SOUDKI K A, RIZKALLA S H, DALKIW R W. Horizontal connections for precast concrete shear walls subjected to cyclic deformations Part 2: Prestressed connections [J]. PCI Journal, 1995, 40(5): 82-96.
[36]	PEREZ F J, SAUSE R, PESSIKI S. Analytical and experimental lateral load Behavior of unbonded posttensioned precast concrete walls [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, 2007, 133(11): 1531-1540.
[37]	ERKMEN B, SCHULTZ A E. Self-centering behavior of unbonded, post-tensioned precast concrete shear walls [J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2009, 13(7): 1047-1064.
[38]	RESTREPO J I, RAHMAN A. Seismic performance of self-centering structural walls incorporating energy dissipators [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, 2007, 133(11): 1560-1570.
[39]	SMITH B J, KURAMA Y C, MCGINNIS M J. Design and measured behavior of a hybrid precast concrete wall specimen for seismic regions [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, 2011, 137(10): 1052-1062.
[40]	SMITH B J, KURAMA Y C, MCGINNIS M J. Behavior of precast concrete shear walls for seismic regions: comparison of hybrid and emulative specimens [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, 2013, 139(11): 1917-1927.
[41]	孙巍巍, 孟少平, 蔡小宁. 后张无粘结预应力装配式短肢剪力墙拟静力试验研究 [J]. 南京理工大学学报, 2011, 35 (3): 422-426.
[42]	吴浩, 吕西林, 蒋欢军, 等. 预应力预制混凝土剪力墙抗震性能试验研究 [J]. 建筑结构学报, 2016, 37 (5): 208-217.
[43]	党像梁, 吕西林, 周颖. 底部开水平缝摇摆剪力墙抗震性能分析 [J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2013, 33 (5): 182-189.
[44]	党像梁, 吕西林, 周颖. 底部开水平缝预应力自复位剪力墙试验设计及结果分析 [J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2014, 34 (6): 103-112.
[45]	党像梁, 吕西林, 周颖. 底部开水平缝预应力自复位剪力墙试验研究及数值模拟 [J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2014, 34 (4): 154-161.
[46]	陈适才, 闫维明, 李振宝, 等. 底部开缝预应力剪力墙结构力学性能的有限元分析 [J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2010, 30 (6): 631-636.
[47]	WELDON B D, KURAMA Y C. Nonlinear behavior of precast concrete coupling beams under lateral loads [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2007, 133(11): 1571-1581.
[48]	BARBACHYN S M, KURAMA Y C, MCGINNIS M J, et al. Testing and behavior of a coupled shear wall structure with partially post-tensioned coupling beams [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2016, 113(1): 111-124.
[49]	SHEN Q, KURAMA Y C. Nonlinear behavior of posttensioned hybrid coupled wall subassemblages [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, 2002, 128(10): 1290-1300.
[50]	GUO T, WANG L, XU Z, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of jointed self-centering concrete walls with friction connectors [J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 161: 192-206.
[51]	CATTANAC A, PAMPANIN S. 21st century precast: the detailing and manufacture of NZ’s first multi-storey PRESSS building [C]//Proceedings of the 2008 New Zealand Concrete Industry Conference. Rotorua, New Zealand:2008.
[52]	PAMPANIN S. Reality-check and renewed challenges in earthquake engineering: implementing low-damage structural systems from theory to practice [J]. Bulletin of The New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 45(4): 137-160.
[53]	STEVENSON M, PANIAN L, KOROLYK M, et al. Post-tensioned concrete walls and frames for seismic-resistance a case study of the David Brower Center [C]//Proceedings of the SEAOC. Berkeley,USA:2008: 1-8.
[54]	ACI. Acceptance criteria for special unbonded post-tensioned precast structural walls based on validation testing and commentary: ACI ITG 5.1-07[S]. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute, 2007.
[55]	ACI. Requirements for design of a special unbonded post-tensioned precast shear wall satisfying ACI ITG-5.1 and commentary: ACI ITG 5.2-09[S]. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute, 2009.
[56]	薛伟辰, 王庆华, 陈盛扬,等. 单、双舱槽型拼装混凝土综合管廊受力性能试验研究报告[R]. 上海: 同济大学, 2020.
[57]	寇有振. 预制预应力综合管廊受力性能研究[D]. 西安:长安大学,2018.
[58]	张铨婧. PC钢棒连接下的预制综合管廊的接头受力性能研究[D]. 广州:华南理工大学,2018.
[59]	胡翔,薛伟辰,王恒栋.上海世博园区预制预应力综合管廊接头防水性能试验研究[J].特种结构,2009,26(1):109-113.
[60]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 城市综合管廊工程技术规范: GB 50838—2015[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社,2015.
[61]	上海市建设和交通委员会. 世博会园区综合管沟建设标准:DG/TJ 08-2017—2007[S].上海:2007.
[62]	上海市城乡建设和管理委员会. 综合管廊工程技术规范: DGJ 08-2017—2014[S].上海:同济大学出版社,2014.
[63]	胡翔,薛伟辰.预制预应力综合管廊受力性能试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2010,43(5):29-37.
[64]	薛伟辰, 陈盛扬. 双舱槽型拼装混凝土综合管廊环向加载试验研究报告[R]. 上海: 同济大学, 2024.
[65]	PIMENTEL M, COSTA P. Behavior of reinforced concrete box culverts under high embankments [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2009, 135(4):366-375.
[66]	日本PC共同沟协会.预制拼装共同沟[EB/OL]. https://www.nipponhume.co.jp/pdf/pckyo201109.pdf.