Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 52 Issue 7
Oct.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION  > 2022  >  52(7): 159-172,47
ZHAO Yong, DOU Hongqiang, WANG Peng, SUN Yongxin. Safety Assessment and Optimization of High-Voltage Transmission Towers Affected by Blasting Vibration of Adjacent Outlet Tunnel Based on Infinite Element Boundary[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(4): 22-28. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21042308
Citation: ZHOU Ziqian, GAO Wen, HE Qiushi, LIN Borong, HAN Yuqiao. Artificial Intelligence Exploration in Architectural Design-From Generative Design to Intelligent Decision-Making[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(7): 159-172,47. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21090801
shu

Artificial Intelligence Exploration in Architectural Design-From Generative Design to Intelligent Decision-Making

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21090801

  • 1. College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;

  • 2. School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;

  • 3. Key Laboratory of Eco-Planning & Green Building, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100084, China

  • Received Date: 2021-09-08
    Available Online: 2022-10-28
    Abstract
  • Architectural design is a complex process, which not only needs knowledge and experience of architects but also their imagination and creativity. Artificial intelligence (AI) technology can digitize the architectural theory and design experience, improve the efficiency of the design process, and also provide more ideas for design. To solve different problems in architectural design, a variety of AI technologies have been applied and many methods have been proposed. Relevant achievements in the past five years were summarized and sorted out from the perspective of design problems, AI technologies and solutions. And the research status and development trends were analyzed. The summarization revealed distribution features of relevant researches in recent years. In the design task, the most popular issues were the layout and shape, which reached 42% and 26% of the reports respectively, and in AI technology, the most extensive application was optimization algorithms and neural networks, which accounted for 41% and 22% of the reports respectively. However, the application of AI in the field of architectural design has not formed a unified theoretical system yet, facing a crucial challenge of generality and standardization.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(17)
  • [70]
    BOMFIM K, TAVARES F. Building facade optimization for maximizing the incident solar radiation[C]//Proceedings of the 37th eCAADe and 23rd SIGraDi Conference. 2019:171-180.
    [71]
    STEINØ N. Mapping the architectural genome:a preliminary study of facade syntax[C]//Proceedings of the 35th eCAADe Conference. 2017:453-462.
    [72]
    DE LUCA F, WORTMANN T. Multi-objective optimization for daylight retrofit[C]//Proceedings of the 38th eCAADe Conference. 2020:57-66.
    [73]
    李煜, 李玲玲, 刘滢. 光舒适导向的体育运动训练馆顶界面采光口参数化设计研究[C]//2020计算性设计国际学术论坛. 2020:413-429.
    [74]
    丁炜豪, 俞天琦, 吴玉冬, 等. 地下交通枢纽天窗采光模拟与形式优化研究[C]//2020计算性设计国际学术论坛. 2020:382-392.
    [75]
    GERBER D, PANTAZIS E. Design exploring complexity in architectural shells:interactive form finding of reciprocal frames through a multi-agent system[C]//Proceedings of the 34th eCAADe Conference. 2016:455-464.
    [76]
    孙澄,韩昀松.基于计算性思维的建筑绿色性能智能优化设计探索[J].建筑学报,2020(10):88-94.
    [77]
    SEBESTYEN A, TYC J. Machine learning methods in energy simulations for architects and designers:the implementation of supervised machine learning in the context of the computational design process[C]//Proceedings of the 38th eCAADe Conference. 2020:613-622.
    [78]
    SINGH M M, SCHNEIDER-MARIN P, HARTER H, et al. Applying Deep learning and databases for energy-efficient architectural design[C]//Proceedings of the 38th eCAADe Conference.2020:79-87.
    [79]
    TAKIZAWA A. Estimating potential event occurrence areas in small space based on semi-supervised learning[C]//Proceedings of the 34th eCAADe Conference.2016:169-178.
    [80]
    TARABISHY S, PSARRAS S, KOSICKI M, et al. Deep learning surrogate models for spatial and visual connectivity[J]. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 2020, 18(1):53-66.
    [81]
    BROWN L, YIP M, GARDNER N, et al. Drawing recognition-integrating machine learning systems into architectural design workflows[C]//Proceedings of the 38th eCAADe Conference. 2020:289-298.
    [82]
    HUANG W, HAO Z. Architectural drawings recognition and generation through machine learning[C]//Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA). 2018.
    [83]
    UZUN C, ÇOLAKOGLU M B. Architectural drawing recognition:a case study for training the learning algorithm with architectural plan and section drawing images[C]//Proceedings of the 37th eCAADe and 23rd SIGraDi Conference.2019:29-34.
    [84]
    张荷花,顾明.BIM模型智能检查工具在审查平台及消防审查中的应用[J].土木建筑工程信息技术,2021,13(1):1-7.
    [85]
    张荷花,顾明.BIM模型智能检查工具研究与应用[J].土木建筑工程信息技术,2018,10(2):1-6.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]HAN Zhifan, WANG Xin. Optimal Design of MTMD Vertical Vibration-Reduction for Horizontal Structures Based on the Combination of Optimal Parameters[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(4): 46-53. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23061103
    [2]LIN Shuchao, FAN Guangli, KANG Jinjun, ZHOU Yijun. OPTIMIZATION DESIGN AND FEM VERIFICATION OF VARIABLE CURVATURE-FRICTION PENDULUM SYSTEMS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(3): 128-135. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201906030005
    [3]ZHOU Yiyi, SHU Zhan, ZHOU Changfeng, JIA LiangJiu. DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION OF NEGATIVE POISSON'S RATIO OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION STEEL PLATE BASED ON INTELLIGENT CONSTRUCTION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(2): 137-142,157. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202002021
    [4]Wu Jie. OPTIMIZATION OF THE BIDIRECTIONAL BEAM STRING STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(04): 140-145.
    [5]Zhou Kui, Zhou Kun, Ning Nana, Yu Jinxin. THE SAFETY IMPACT MONITORING ANALYSIS OF HIGHWAY TUNNEL BLASTING EXCAVATION CLOSE TO EXISTING CIVIL DEFENSE ENGINEERING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(08): 144-150.
    [6]Lin Xiangen. COMPARISON OF RELEVANT CHARACTERISTICS OF OPTIMIZED PORTAL FRAME WITH TRADITIONAL DESIGN AND A CHOICE OF SEVERAL REASONABLE DESIGN PARAMETERS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(7): 135-138. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201307030
    [7]Wang Yuanqing, Zong Liang, Zhang Tianshen, Gao Xiaolei. DAMAGE DETECTING AND SAFETY APPRAISAL OF THE XIDAN ALUMINUM OVERPASS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(9): 144-148. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201309028
    [8]Zhang Yin, Lu Junlong, Huang Wei, Zhang Weifeng, Tian Jie. ANALYSIS OF OPTIMUM DESIGN OF PILE-RAFT FOUNDATION OF ECOLOGICAL COMPOSITE WALL STRUCTRUE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(8): 37-40,11. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201208008
    [9]Xie Jian, He Fei. OPTIMIZATION DESIGN ON THE ROOF OF LARGE LNG TANK[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(4): 78-81,98. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201204017
    [10]Li Junfeng, Xu Yan, Yang Xiaodong. OPTIMIZATION DESIGN OF HIGH-RISE SHEAR WALL STRUCTURE WITH STAGGERED STORIES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(12): 151-155. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201212033
    [11]Qiang Yue, He Jian, He Yunxiang, Ge Xinguang, Li Chuangdi, Wu Hengbin. OPTIMAL DESIGN OF WIND-INDUCED VIBRATION STRUCTRURE WITH TMD DEVICES BASED ON IMPROVED GENETIC ALGORITHM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(5): 84-87. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201105019
    [12]Chen Shaojie, Duan Jingmin, Zhao Hongbo. THE IMPROVED ANT COLONY ALGORITHM BASED ON THE OPTIMAL DESIGN OF TRUSS STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(1): 55-58,101. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201001015
    [13]Sui Jieli, Wang Shaoling, Jia Zhilin. DISCUSSION ON OPTIMIZATION DESIGN OF HOUSES IN SOCIALIST NEW RURALITY BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF ENERGY-SAVING AND POLLUTANT REDUCTION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(7): 128-130. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200807032
    [14]Yin Yue, Chen Zhihua, Li Shun, You Qizhi, Wang Yifeng. OPTIMUM DESIGN RESEARCH ON STEEL FRAME PRE-HEATER TOWER OF CEMENT KILN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(5): 109-112. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200805026
    [15]Lin Xiangen, Sheng Ermai. OPTIMAL DESIGN OF PORTAL FRAME UTILIZING PENALTY FUNCTION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(8): 86-88. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200808022
    [16]Zong Gang, Lou Menglin. AN APPLICABLE OPTIMAL DESIGN METHOD OF TUNED LIQUID DAMPERS FOR MULTI-MODE CONTROL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(2): 32-36,31. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200702008
    [17]Wang Fa-wu, Tang Gan, Yang Jie. OPTIMAL LATERAL DEFLECTION DESIGN OF TALL BUILDINGS OF FRAMES AND SHEAR WALLS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(6): 38-42. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200606013
    [18]Zhang Jingjing. OPTIMIZATION DESIGN OF SECTIONAL HEIGHT OF CONTINUOUS BEAM OF REINFORCED CONCRETE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(11): 50-52,13. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200511015
    [19]Zhang Jingjing. OPTIMIZATION DESIGN FOR NORMAL SECTION OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FLEXURAL MEMBERS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(2): 100-102. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200502028
    [20]Chen Mingzhong, Zhou Chenghui. ANALYSIS OF OPTIMUM DESIGN FOR PILED RAFT FOUNDATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(7): 36-39. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200407010
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 荣慕宁，顾雅彬，郑明，聂鑫，樊健生，刘宇飞. 大体积混凝土底板微振动控制能力的测试与分析. 地震工程与工程振动. 2024(04): 115-124 .
    2. 武洋，王迎，王满玉，刘晓，郝国鹏，吴文洪，覃宇辉. 某水库爆破开挖对高压输电线塔的振动影响评价. 水电与新能源. 2024(09): 44-47 .
    3. 林生凉. 基于数值模拟的隧道爆破振动对石刻文物的安全性评估. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2023(06): 36-42 .

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-062025-072025-080100200300400
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 5.8 %FULLTEXT: 5.8 %META: 92.6 %META: 92.6 %PDF: 1.5 %PDF: 1.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 29.9 %其他: 29.9 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %China: 0.1 %China: 0.1 %Kennedy Town: 0.1 %Kennedy Town: 0.1 %Norman: 0.1 %Norman: 0.1 %Research: 0.2 %Research: 0.2 %Taichung: 0.1 %Taichung: 0.1 %三明: 0.0 %三明: 0.0 %上海: 3.3 %上海: 3.3 %东京都: 0.1 %东京都: 0.1 %东莞: 5.2 %东莞: 5.2 %临沂: 0.3 %临沂: 0.3 %丹东: 0.0 %丹东: 0.0 %九江: 0.0 %九江: 0.0 %伊利诺伊州: 0.0 %伊利诺伊州: 0.0 %佛山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %俄勒冈: 0.0 %俄勒冈: 0.0 %六盘水: 0.0 %六盘水: 0.0 %北京: 6.6 %北京: 6.6 %十堰: 0.8 %十堰: 0.8 %南京: 1.3 %南京: 1.3 %南宁: 0.3 %南宁: 0.3 %南平: 0.0 %南平: 0.0 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南通: 0.5 %南通: 0.5 %厦门: 0.3 %厦门: 0.3 %台北: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %台州: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %吕梁: 0.0 %吕梁: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.0 %哈尔滨: 0.6 %哈尔滨: 0.6 %唐山: 0.0 %唐山: 0.0 %喀什: 0.0 %喀什: 0.0 %嘉兴: 1.1 %嘉兴: 1.1 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %大阪: 0.1 %大阪: 0.1 %天津: 3.1 %天津: 3.1 %太原: 0.3 %太原: 0.3 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %安庆: 0.2 %安庆: 0.2 %安康: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %安阳: 0.1 %安阳: 0.1 %宜春: 0.1 %宜春: 0.1 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %宿迁: 0.1 %宿迁: 0.1 %岳阳: 0.0 %岳阳: 0.0 %崇左: 0.1 %崇左: 0.1 %巴黎: 0.1 %巴黎: 0.1 %常州: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %平凉: 0.1 %平凉: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %广州: 1.8 %广州: 1.8 %廊坊: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.3 %开罗: 0.1 %开罗: 0.1 %弗吉: 0.0 %弗吉: 0.0 %张家口: 0.1 %张家口: 0.1 %张家界: 0.1 %张家界: 0.1 %徐州: 0.2 %徐州: 0.2 %惠州: 0.0 %惠州: 0.0 %意法半: 0.0 %意法半: 0.0 %成都: 1.8 %成都: 1.8 %扬州: 2.5 %扬州: 2.5 %新乡: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.3 %无锡: 0.3 %昆明: 0.9 %昆明: 0.9 %晋中: 0.1 %晋中: 0.1 %晋城: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.0 %来宾: 0.0 %来宾: 0.0 %杭州: 2.5 %杭州: 2.5 %格兰特县: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.1 %桂林: 0.1 %桂林: 0.1 %楚雄: 0.0 %楚雄: 0.0 %武汉: 0.9 %武汉: 0.9 %氹仔: 0.0 %氹仔: 0.0 %汕头: 0.1 %汕头: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %沧州: 0.0 %沧州: 0.0 %泉州: 0.0 %泉州: 0.0 %泰州: 0.0 %泰州: 0.0 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %济宁: 0.1 %济宁: 0.1 %济源: 0.0 %济源: 0.0 %海口: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %淮安: 0.0 %淮安: 0.0 %深圳: 1.2 %深圳: 1.2 %温州: 0.9 %温州: 0.9 %渭南: 0.0 %渭南: 0.0 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %湛江: 0.1 %湛江: 0.1 %滨州: 0.3 %滨州: 0.3 %漯河: 7.0 %漯河: 7.0 %漳州: 0.0 %漳州: 0.0 %潍坊: 0.2 %潍坊: 0.2 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %珠海: 0.2 %珠海: 0.2 %白沙: 0.0 %白沙: 0.0 %盐城: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.7 %石家庄: 0.7 %福州: 0.4 %福州: 0.4 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %绍兴: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %肇庆: 0.1 %肇庆: 0.1 %自贡: 0.1 %自贡: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 6.4 %芒廷维尤: 6.4 %芜湖: 0.0 %芜湖: 0.0 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %苏州: 0.5 %苏州: 0.5 %荆门: 0.1 %荆门: 0.1 %莆田: 0.0 %莆田: 0.0 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %西宁: 1.9 %西宁: 1.9 %西安: 0.9 %西安: 0.9 %许昌: 0.0 %许昌: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %赤峰: 0.0 %赤峰: 0.0 %运城: 0.3 %运城: 0.3 %连云港: 0.0 %连云港: 0.0 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 1.4 %郑州: 1.4 %重庆: 0.7 %重庆: 0.7 %铁岭: 0.0 %铁岭: 0.0 %锦州: 0.0 %锦州: 0.0 %长春: 0.5 %长春: 0.5 %长沙: 1.8 %长沙: 1.8 %长治: 0.0 %长治: 0.0 %阜新: 0.0 %阜新: 0.0 %青岛: 0.5 %青岛: 0.5 %驻马店: 0.1 %驻马店: 0.1 %鹰潭: 0.0 %鹰潭: 0.0 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %龙岩: 0.1 %龙岩: 0.1 %其他其他Central DistrictChinaKennedy TownNormanResearchTaichung三明上海东京都东莞临沂丹东九江伊利诺伊州佛山俄勒冈六盘水北京十堰南京南宁南平南昌南通厦门台北台州合肥吕梁呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨唐山喀什嘉兴大连大阪天津太原宁波安庆安康安阳宜春宣城宿迁岳阳崇左巴黎常州常德平凉平顶山广州廊坊开罗弗吉张家口张家界徐州惠州意法半成都扬州新乡无锡昆明晋中晋城朝阳来宾杭州格兰特县桂林楚雄武汉氹仔汕头沈阳沧州泉州泰州洛阳济南济宁济源海口淮安深圳温州渭南湖州湛江滨州漯河漳州潍坊烟台珠海白沙盐城石家庄福州秦皇岛绍兴肇庆自贡芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥苏州荆门莆田衡水衡阳西宁西安许昌贵阳赤峰运城连云港邯郸郑州重庆铁岭锦州长春长沙长治阜新青岛驻马店鹰潭黄冈齐齐哈尔龙岩

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2752) PDF downloads(52) Cited by(4)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return