RESEARCH ON TANG YANG OF ANCIENT BUILDINGS IN THE FORBIDDEN CITY

ZHOU Qian

doi:10.13204/j.gyjz202003032

Volume 50 Issue 3

Mar. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2020 > 50(3): 182-189

Jia Bo, Liu Ganbin, Xu Li, Shi Xiangfeng. INFLUENCE OF SHAFT CONSTRUCTION IN METRO TUNNEL ON ADJACENT BUILDINGS AND REINFORCEMENT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(8): 121-125. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201108029

Citation:

ZHOU Qian. RESEARCH ON TANG YANG OF ANCIENT BUILDINGS IN THE FORBIDDEN CITY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(3): 182-189. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202003032

Citation:

ZHOU Qian. RESEARCH ON TANG YANG OF ANCIENT BUILDINGS IN THE FORBIDDEN CITY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(3): 182-189. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202003032

PDF( 9287 KB)

RESEARCH ON TANG YANG OF ANCIENT BUILDINGS IN THE FORBIDDEN CITY

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202003032

ZHOU Qian

Institute of Gugong Studies, Palace Museum, Beijing 100009, China

Received Date: 2020-02-10

Abstract

Abstract

Tang Yang means building model sample of building in Qing dynasty. Tang Yang in the Forbidden City was used to be submitted to the emperor for preview. A Tang Yang can show the all-around information of a Qing dynasty building such as appearance, constitution, decoration, color and so on. The Tang Yang of Yanxi Palace indicated that the building characteristics of Lingzhao Veranda in Qing dynasty were very similar to those of other buildings in the Forbidden City. The Tang Yangs in the Forbidden City were made by Lei family, whose members of 7 generations contributed the design and construction of the emperors’ buildings in Qing dynasty. The scientific value of Tang Yang is that it can truly reflect the building information, its manufacture and installation are also convenient. Besides, it provides valuable historical information for buildings of Qing dynasty, and deeply represents the architectural culture of the palace buildings in Qing dynasty.
- Tang Yang,
- ancient buildings in the Forbidden City,
- Lei family

FullText(HTML)

References(38)

References

张淑娴.装修图样:清代宫廷建筑内檐装修设计媒介[J].江南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2014,13(3):113-121.

梁国志.钦定国子监志·卷五十四[EB/OL].https://ctext.org/wiki.pl?if=gb&chapter=951612&remap=gb#p168.

李斗.扬州画舫录[M].北京:中华书局,1997:393.

俞进化.清东陵与西陵[M].北京:北京出版社,1981:50-51.

周苏琴.亭台楼阁方寸间样式雷烫样遗珍探秘[J].中华遗产,2005(4):108-112.

郭璐.隋大兴城市规划的知识体系:以历史人物为线索的文献考察[J].城市规划,2019(3):9-16.

李越,赵波,刘畅.故宫博物院藏"养心殿喜寿棚"烫样著录与勘误[J].故宫博物院院刊,2016(3):55-73.

闫宏斌.故宫为何也有烂尾楼[J].前线,2011(4):62-63.

章乃炜.清宫述闻[M].北京:故宫出版社,2009:572-573.

朱庆征.方寸之间的宫廷建筑:紫禁城·延禧宫烫样[J].紫禁城,2006(7):88-91.

卓媛媛.故宫长春宫大木结构特点初步分析[J].故宫学刊,2015(2):312-322.

毛宪民.紫禁城内水晶宫之谜[N].中国档案报,2001-12-21(008).

徐珂.清稗类钞[M].北京:中华书局,1984:153.

章乃炜.清宫述闻[N].北京:故宫出版社,2012:572.

周乾.紫禁城古建筑烫样[J].北京档案,2017(10):41-43.

周乾.紫禁城古建筑防火的传统方法[J].工业建筑,2019,49(4):212-214.

梁思成.中国建筑与中国建筑师[J].文物参考资料,1953(10):53-69.

王其亨.雷发达太和殿上梁传说的真相[J].新建筑,1988(4):71-72.

史箴,何蓓洁.雷金玉新识[J].故宫博物院院刊,2014(5):99-117.

史箴,何蓓洁.雷发达新识[J].故宫博物院院刊,2011(4):81-94.

端木泓.圆明园新证:乾隆朝圆明园全图的发现与研究[J].故宫博物院院刊,2009(1):22-36.

郭黛姮.圆明园与样式雷[J].紫禁城,2011(4):8-19.

何蓓洁,王其亨.皇帝的建筑师清代样式雷世家[J].紫禁城,2019(2):17-31.

段伟.样式雷图档与清代皇家建筑研究[J].档案学研究,2017(2):126-128.

朱启钤.样式雷考[J].中国营造学社汇刊,1933,4(1):88.

何蓓洁,荣幸."养心殿东暖阁添搭彩台与明瓦木棚烫样"辨析[J].故宫博物院院刊,2019(9):21-37.

刘彤彤,何蓓洁.样式雷与清代皇家园林[J].中国园林,2008(6):17-22.

张宝章.清代样式雷的经典传承:建筑大师雷廷昌生平[J].遗产与保护研究,2016(3):83-88.

张威,陈秀.朱启钤《样式雷考》疏证[J].文物,2003(12):67-76.

周乾.深藏在故宫里的古老"3D打印"技术[N].科技日报,2019-12-13(008).

蒋博光.样式雷和烫样[J].古建园林技术,1993(1):45-47.

周乾,闫维明,纪金豹.故宫太和殿抗震构造研究[J].土木工程学报,2013,46(增刊1):117-122.

周乾.《周易》思想对紫禁城古建筑营建的影响[J].中国文物科学研究,2017(3):66-71.

周乾.论《考工记》对紫禁城营建的影响[J].白城师范学院学报,2017,31(4):1-4.

周乾.紫禁城古建筑中的儒家文化思想考释[J].创意与设计,2019(5):11-16.

周乾.紫禁城屋顶的瑞兽[N].科技日报,2019-06-21(008).

周乾.紫禁城数字趣话[N].科技日报,2019-08-30(008).

罗哲文,骆中钊.风水学与我国古代建筑的规划营造[J].古建园林技术,2008(2):10-16.

Relative Articles

[1]	QIAO Wenqi, LIU Fuying, CHEN Ying. Research on Styles and Design Motivations of Architectural Heritage of Railway Stations in Japan[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(4): 238-245. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23081811
[2]	ZHOU Qian. STUDY ON SOIL WORK OF ANCIENT BUILDINGS IN THE FORBIDDEN CITY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(5): 204-211,203. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20052404
[3]	MAO Xiaofei, WANG Xi, HU Fuli, ZHANG Wei. ANALYSIS ON THE PEDESTAL DISEASE AND MOISTURE FIELD OF TONGXIN MOSQUE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(2): 184-189. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202002028
[4]	ZHOU Qian, LI Ying. STRENGTHENING TECHNIQUES FOR ANCIENT BUILDINGS IN THE FORBIDDEN CITY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(2): 190-197. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202002029
[5]	ZHOU. CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES OF PAVING FLOOR WITH GOLDEN BRICK IN BUILDINGS IN THE FORBIDDEN CITY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(1): 197-201,74. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202001031
[6]	ZHOU Qian. RESEARCH ON CULTURE OF COSTFUL BOX IN ROOF OF BUILDINGS IN THE FORBIDDEN CITY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(4): 168-174,155. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202004029
[16]	Ji Wenmei, Niu Tingting. STUDY OF PROTECTION MODE AND USE FOR HUIZHOU ANCIENT BUILDINGS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(05): 16-20.
[17]	Ma Hui, Xu Jianyang, Zhao Hongtie. ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE OF ANCIENT TIMBER BUILDINGS ON THE HIGH PEDESTAL UNDER RANDOM EARTHQUAKE EXCITATIONS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(02): 45-49. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201402011
[18]	Yang Haobo, Qian Deling, Peng Xiaobing, Cheng Hong, Xie Yijun. DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR RESEARCH OF UNREINFORCED AND REINFORCED ANCIENT ARCHITECTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(11): 131-135. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201311029
[19]	Zhao Hongtie, Zhang Fengliang, Xue Jianyang, Ma Hui, Zhang Xicheng. SHAKING TABLE TEST AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF THE ROOF IN ANCIENT TIMBER STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(8): 46-48. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201108013
[20]	Zhang Weixi, Chen Ping, Zhao Dong Zhang, Yanqiang. APPLICATION OF UNDERPINNING BY MANUAL PIPE-JACKING IN THE CONSERVATION OF HISTORICAL MASONRY CONSTRUCTIONS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(3): 127-130,62. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201103025