YU Zheng, SUN Hongyang, WANG Lijun. SEISMIC PERFORMANCES OF SINGLE-STORY INDUSTRIAL FACTORY BUILDINGS UNDER ELASTIC STRUCTURE DESIGN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(12): 55-63. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201907170003
Citation:
YU Zheng, SUN Hongyang, WANG Lijun. SEISMIC PERFORMANCES OF SINGLE-STORY INDUSTRIAL FACTORY BUILDINGS UNDER ELASTIC STRUCTURE DESIGN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2020, 50(12): 55-63. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201907170003
YU Zheng, SUN Hongyang, WANG Lijun. SEISMIC PERFORMANCES OF SINGLE-STORY INDUSTRIAL FACTORY BUILDINGS UNDER ELASTIC STRUCTURE DESIGN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(12): 55-63. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201907170003
Citation:
YU Zheng, SUN Hongyang, WANG Lijun. SEISMIC PERFORMANCES OF SINGLE-STORY INDUSTRIAL FACTORY BUILDINGS UNDER ELASTIC STRUCTURE DESIGN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2020, 50(12): 55-63. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201907170003
SEISMIC PERFORMANCES OF SINGLE-STORY INDUSTRIAL FACTORY BUILDINGS UNDER ELASTIC STRUCTURE DESIGN
1. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;
2. MCC Capital Engineering & Research Incorporation Limited, Beijing 100176, China;
3. School of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
4. Huachengboyuan Engineering Technology Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100052, China
Received Date: 2020-05-19Available Online:
2021-03-31
Abstract
Standard for Seismic Design of Industrial Buildings is being compiled, in which the structural categories are divided into three categories: plastic structure, elastic-plastic structure and elastic structure. Moreover, the structural performance coefficient q used in all kinds of types is proposed to adjust the seismic effect combination. For elastic structures, it is proposed that the performance coefficient q =2.0 and q h =2.5 can be used for seismic calculation. In this study, the existing single-story single-span and multi-span bent structure were taken as examples and considered as elastic structure, the plane calculation model was established by using the improved PKPM software. The seismic effect was calculated under different fortification intensities. Under the intensity when the stress ratio of the column exceeded 1.0 for the first time, the elastic-plastic time history analysis of large earthquakes was carried out. It was clarified that the single-story industrial factory building would not collapse in large earthquakes on the premise of meeting the requirements of elastic structure design.
References
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 钢结构设计标准:GB 50017-2017[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2018.
王立军. 框架厂房空间结构地震反应分析[J]. 工业建筑, 1993,23(1):7-15.
侯林涛, 施刚. 单层厂房钢结构动力弹塑性分析[C]//中国钢结构协会结构稳定与疲劳分会第16届(ISSF-2018)学术交流会暨教学研讨会论文集. 2018:266-277.
FEMA. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings:FEMA 356[S]. Washington, D. C:Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
Relative Articles
[1] Huang Wei, Zhang Min, Zhang Chenghua, Jiang Xiaoping, Hou Lina. STUDY OF METHOD OF DISPLACEMENT-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN OF MULTI-LAYER ECOLOGICAL COMPOSITE WALL STRUCTURE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(09): 68-73.
[2] Shu Biqing, Zheng Juan. DETECTION APPRAISAL AND STRENGTHENING OF A BENT FRAME STRUCTURE PLANT [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(06): 139-142. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201406030
[3] Liu Wei, Shu Ganping, Shi Mingzheng. SEISMIC DESIGN OF A SUPER-HIGH TWINS TOWERS IN TAICANG AND MECHANICAL ANALYSIS FOR ITS KEY JOINTS [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(10): 174-178. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201310035
[4] He Jing. STUDY ON PROBLEMS AND STRATEGY OF INDUSTRIAL BUILDING DESIGN IN CHINA [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(1): 62-65,103. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201201011
[5] Song Shi-jun, Liu Jia, Le Jia-long. GREEN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING DESIGN OF CAOFEIDIAN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INDUSTRIAL PARK [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(10): 9-13. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201210003
[6] Zhang Bing, Dai Hang, Meng Xia. THE ELEMENTS, PRINCIPLES, PATTERN AND A DESIGN PRACTICE FOR REVITALIZATION OF INDUSTRIAL BUILDING HERITAGE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(6): 20-24,82. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201206006
[7] Li Junfeng, Xu Yan, Yang Xiaodong. OPTIMIZATION DESIGN OF HIGH-RISE SHEAR WALL STRUCTURE WITH STAGGERED STORIES [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(12): 151-155. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201212033
[8] Zhao Yuxing, Yang Qing, Li Liyong. SEISMIC DESIGN BY SEMI-SLIP-SUPPORTED STAIRS FOR REASONABLE STRUCTURAL SYSTEM OF THE FRAME BUILDING [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(1): 94-97,148. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201201018
[9] Liu Zhilin, Yin Fang, Gong Zheng. INSPIRATIONS FROM DESIGN OF GERMAN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING SPACE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(5): 43-46,49. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201105010
[10] Wang Yuze. PRACTICE ON ENERGY CONSERVATION DESIGNS FOR INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(10): 15-19. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz20081005
[11] Pan Zhihong, Li Aiqun. PERFORMANCE-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN METHOD FOR BUILDINGS:DISCUSSION ON APPLICATION OF "GENERAL RULE FOR PERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC DESIGN OF BUILDINGS" TO DESIGN OF BUILDINGS [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(7): 103-106. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200807026
[12] Zhang Zhiqiang, Zhang Ke, Zhao Feng, Li Bo. CALCULATION AND ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE(RC) BENT FRAME WITH COLUMNS REMOVED [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(12): 110-112. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200812029
[13] Gu Yan, Yan Xiaoling. APPLICATION OF MODERN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONCEPTION TO INDUSTRIAL ARUHITECTURAL DESIGN [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(8): 107-108. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200708028
[14] Zhou Huazhang, Wu Yue, Li Xin. RESEARCH ON THE RESPONSE SPECTRUM OF ASEISMIC DESIGN FOR CABLE -TRUSS -SUPPORTED GLASS CURTAIN WALLS [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(10): 76-79. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200710021
[15] Ye Xiaoqun. THE MEANING OF INDUSTRY ARCHITECTURAL CREATION FOR BRINGING FORTH NEW IDEAS OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SUBJECT [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(11): 45-47,55. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200611011
[16] Leng Yu-han, Liu Yang. INTERFACE ACTIONS OF ENCLOSURES FOR INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(4): 34-35,22. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200604010
[17] Zou Yun, LüXilin. THEORY AND METHOD OF PERFORMANCE-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(9): 1-5.
[18] Song Zhangshu. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF LONG-SPAN AND HEAVY-LOAD INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION FRAME STRUCTURE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(1): 89-92. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200501028
[19] Qian Jiaru, Li Gengqin. STUDY ON APPLICATION OF SPECIAL-SHAPED COLUMNS TO BUILDINGS WITH SEISMIC FORTIFICATION INTENSITY 8 [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(2): 28-32. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200402010
[20] Fu Zhiqian. HERALD OF THE TIMES AND ESSENCE OF TECHNOLOGY AND ART:THINKING ON AESTHETICS OF STRUCTURAL TECHNOLOGY IN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(9): 64-65. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200409019
Proportional views
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Amount of access Chart context menu Abstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads Statistics Abstract Views HTML Views PDF Downloads 2024-05 2024-06 2024-07 2024-08 2024-09 2024-10 2024-11 2024-12 2025-01 2025-02 2025-03 2025-04 0 2 4 6 8 10 Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Class Distribution FULLTEXT : 4.9 % FULLTEXT : 4.9 % META : 90.1 % META : 90.1 % PDF : 4.9 % PDF : 4.9 % FULLTEXT META PDF Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Area Distribution 其他 : 11.9 % 其他 : 11.9 % 其他 : 0.7 % 其他 : 0.7 % China : 4.2 % China : 4.2 % 上海 : 2.8 % 上海 : 2.8 % 伊利诺伊州 : 0.7 % 伊利诺伊州 : 0.7 % 北京 : 11.9 % 北京 : 11.9 % 南通 : 0.7 % 南通 : 0.7 % 南阳 : 0.7 % 南阳 : 0.7 % 周口 : 0.7 % 周口 : 0.7 % 咸阳 : 0.7 % 咸阳 : 0.7 % 嘉兴 : 0.7 % 嘉兴 : 0.7 % 天津 : 4.2 % 天津 : 4.2 % 宜昌 : 0.7 % 宜昌 : 0.7 % 宣城 : 0.7 % 宣城 : 0.7 % 常德 : 0.7 % 常德 : 0.7 % 廊坊 : 0.7 % 廊坊 : 0.7 % 张家口 : 0.7 % 张家口 : 0.7 % 恩施 : 0.7 % 恩施 : 0.7 % 晋城 : 0.7 % 晋城 : 0.7 % 朝阳 : 0.7 % 朝阳 : 0.7 % 杭州 : 0.7 % 杭州 : 0.7 % 武汉 : 0.7 % 武汉 : 0.7 % 沈阳 : 0.7 % 沈阳 : 0.7 % 泉州 : 0.7 % 泉州 : 0.7 % 济南 : 1.4 % 济南 : 1.4 % 淄博 : 0.7 % 淄博 : 0.7 % 漯河 : 2.8 % 漯河 : 2.8 % 石家庄 : 0.7 % 石家庄 : 0.7 % 芒廷维尤 : 10.5 % 芒廷维尤 : 10.5 % 芝加哥 : 0.7 % 芝加哥 : 0.7 % 西宁 : 16.1 % 西宁 : 16.1 % 贵阳 : 0.7 % 贵阳 : 0.7 % 运城 : 10.5 % 运城 : 10.5 % 邯郸 : 0.7 % 邯郸 : 0.7 % 郑州 : 1.4 % 郑州 : 1.4 % 重庆 : 2.1 % 重庆 : 2.1 % 长沙 : 3.5 % 长沙 : 3.5 % 其他 其他 China 上海 伊利诺伊州 北京 南通 南阳 周口 咸阳 嘉兴 天津 宜昌 宣城 常德 廊坊 张家口 恩施 晋城 朝阳 杭州 武汉 沈阳 泉州 济南 淄博 漯河 石家庄 芒廷维尤 芝加哥 西宁 贵阳 运城 邯郸 郑州 重庆 长沙
Login
Register
E-alert
DownLoad: