Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Shen Jiajia, Tong Genshu, Deng Hua. STUDY ON SOME KEY PROBLEMS RELATED TO CRANE BEAM-RAIL SYSTEM UNDER WHEEL PRESSURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(10): 132-139. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201410027
Citation: Shen Jiajia, Tong Genshu, Deng Hua. STUDY ON SOME KEY PROBLEMS RELATED TO CRANE BEAM-RAIL SYSTEM UNDER WHEEL PRESSURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(10): 132-139. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201410027

STUDY ON SOME KEY PROBLEMS RELATED TO CRANE BEAM-RAIL SYSTEM UNDER WHEEL PRESSURE

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201410027
  • Publish Date: 2014-10-30
  • Three typical problems of the crane beam-rail system under wheel pressure were studied using ANSYS and the corresponding conclusions were given. Firstly,the local compressive stress on the edge of the crane beam web in discontinuous rail case was analyzed numerically. A formula for the maximum bearing stress amplification factor corresponding to the case of track discontinuity was brought up. Secondly,the contribution of rail flexural rigidity to the elastic stability of the web under wheel pressure was studied. It was found that the function of the rail was limited only to diffuse the stress; if the stress distribution on the web was given,the flexural rigidity of the upper edge rail had no impact on the web stability. Finally,the stability analysis of web without moment influence was conducted. And an approximate formula was proposed for elastic buckling coefficient of web under wheel pressure.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHU Qunhong, TONG Ji, TONG Genshu. Effects of Openings on Steel Beams and its Design Suggestions[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(1): 90-97. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21122107
    [2]XIE Nan, PAN Mingdong, ZHENG Haitao. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON DYNAMIC AMPLIFICATION FACTORS OF VERTICAL LOADS ON TEMPORARY SUPPORTS FOR INNER CLIMBING TOWER CRANES OF SHENWAN HUIYUN CENTER DURING CLIMBING STAGES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(9): 156-160. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20041201
    [3]SU Sanqing, HAN Song, WANG Wei, LI Yu, JIANG Hao. ANALYTICAL STUDY OF THE BEARING CAPACITY FOR DOWEL-TYPE CONNECTIONS IN GLUED TIMBER WITH SLOTTED STEEL PLATES BASED ON THE BEAM ON ELASTIC FOUNDATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(9): 143-149. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20121417
    [5]Liu Hongyan, Li Houen, Huang Yushi, LüShuran. DISPLACEMENT CALCULATION OF NEARBY UNDERGROUND PIPELINE CAUSED BY DEEP EXCAVATION BASED ON FIELD TEST OF GROUND DISPLACEMENT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(10): 72-74,94. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201110018
    [6]Wang Zanzhi, Bao Naomin. DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF KIRCHHOFF PLATE ON TWO-PARAMETER ELASTIC FOUNDATION UNDER MOVING RANDOM LOAD[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(11): 93-97. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201011023
    [7]Wu Erjun, Yan Wei. STUDY ON MAGNIFICATION COEFFICIENT OF BEAM MOMENT IN REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(12): 39-42. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201012011
    [8]Wang Zanzhi, Jiang Linyan, Xin Lifeng, Tian Yi, Li Xingyao, Huang Shibin, Tang Xianyuan, Hu Xizhang. FREE VIBRATION ANALYSIS OF THE BEAM INTERACTION WITH THE VISCOELASTIC FOUNDATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(10): 57-61. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200910015
    [9]Fan Dewei, Li Dayong, Zhang Xuechen. ANALYSIS OF VERTICAL DISPLACEMENT AND INNER FORCES IN BURIED PIPELINES CAUSED BY METRO TUNNELING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(9): 85-89. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200909018
    [10]Yao Qianfeng, Zhang Jiancai, Huang Wei, Wei Xiao, Ma Jing, Yin Qixiang. ANALYSIS OF INTERNAL FORCE CALCULATION OF FRAME-SUPPORTED MULTI-RIBBED SLAB STRUCTURE WALL BEAMUNDER VERTICAL LOAD[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(1): 19-23. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200801005
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-0305101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 8.6 %FULLTEXT: 8.6 %META: 91.4 %META: 91.4 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 3.4 %其他: 3.4 %其他: 0.8 %其他: 0.8 %Australia: 0.5 %Australia: 0.5 %Canada: 0.2 %Canada: 0.2 %China: 1.6 %China: 1.6 %Norman: 0.3 %Norman: 0.3 %Rochester: 0.5 %Rochester: 0.5 %United Kingdom: 0.2 %United Kingdom: 0.2 %[]: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %上海: 3.8 %上海: 3.8 %下莱茵: 0.2 %下莱茵: 0.2 %中山: 0.5 %中山: 0.5 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %丽水: 0.2 %丽水: 0.2 %九江: 0.2 %九江: 0.2 %亚特兰大: 0.5 %亚特兰大: 0.5 %佛山: 0.6 %佛山: 0.6 %信阳: 0.3 %信阳: 0.3 %六安: 0.3 %六安: 0.3 %兰州: 1.1 %兰州: 1.1 %内蒙古锡林郭勒锡林浩特: 0.2 %内蒙古锡林郭勒锡林浩特: 0.2 %凉山: 0.2 %凉山: 0.2 %剑桥: 0.2 %剑桥: 0.2 %北京: 8.8 %北京: 8.8 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南京: 3.4 %南京: 3.4 %南宁: 0.5 %南宁: 0.5 %南昌: 0.9 %南昌: 0.9 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %厦门: 0.6 %厦门: 0.6 %台州: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %合肥: 0.9 %合肥: 0.9 %吉隆坡: 0.2 %吉隆坡: 0.2 %周口: 0.6 %周口: 0.6 %咸宁: 0.3 %咸宁: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.5 %哈尔滨: 0.5 %唐山: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %埃克塞特: 0.2 %埃克塞特: 0.2 %大庆: 0.3 %大庆: 0.3 %大连: 0.2 %大连: 0.2 %天津: 1.1 %天津: 1.1 %太原: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %威海: 0.3 %威海: 0.3 %宁波: 0.5 %宁波: 0.5 %安庆: 0.2 %安庆: 0.2 %宜昌: 0.3 %宜昌: 0.3 %宜春: 0.3 %宜春: 0.3 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %宿州: 0.2 %宿州: 0.2 %密蘇里城: 0.3 %密蘇里城: 0.3 %崇左: 0.2 %崇左: 0.2 %平顶山: 0.3 %平顶山: 0.3 %广州: 1.7 %广州: 1.7 %广西桂林: 0.3 %广西桂林: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %延安: 0.2 %延安: 0.2 %开封: 0.2 %开封: 0.2 %开罗: 0.3 %开罗: 0.3 %张家口: 0.5 %张家口: 0.5 %张家界: 0.2 %张家界: 0.2 %怒江: 0.2 %怒江: 0.2 %成都: 1.1 %成都: 1.1 %揭阳: 0.2 %揭阳: 0.2 %无锡: 0.9 %无锡: 0.9 %昆明: 2.3 %昆明: 2.3 %晋中: 0.2 %晋中: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 3.1 %杭州: 3.1 %枣庄: 0.2 %枣庄: 0.2 %桂林: 0.2 %桂林: 0.2 %武威: 0.2 %武威: 0.2 %武汉: 3.3 %武汉: 3.3 %汕头: 0.2 %汕头: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.9 %沈阳: 0.9 %泰州: 0.3 %泰州: 0.3 %洛阳: 1.6 %洛阳: 1.6 %济南: 1.9 %济南: 1.9 %淄博: 0.3 %淄博: 0.3 %淮南: 0.6 %淮南: 0.6 %淮安: 0.5 %淮安: 0.5 %深圳: 1.4 %深圳: 1.4 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %渭南: 0.2 %渭南: 0.2 %湘潭: 0.3 %湘潭: 0.3 %湛江: 0.5 %湛江: 0.5 %漯河: 0.2 %漯河: 0.2 %濮阳: 1.4 %濮阳: 1.4 %焦作: 0.3 %焦作: 0.3 %玉林: 0.2 %玉林: 0.2 %珠海: 0.2 %珠海: 0.2 %白城: 0.5 %白城: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.5 %福州: 0.8 %福州: 0.8 %科珀斯克里斯蒂: 0.5 %科珀斯克里斯蒂: 0.5 %绍兴: 0.3 %绍兴: 0.3 %聊城: 0.2 %聊城: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 14.1 %芒廷维尤: 14.1 %芜湖: 0.3 %芜湖: 0.3 %芝加哥: 1.1 %芝加哥: 1.1 %苏州: 0.9 %苏州: 0.9 %茂名: 0.2 %茂名: 0.2 %荆门: 0.2 %荆门: 0.2 %西宁: 3.6 %西宁: 3.6 %西安: 3.3 %西安: 3.3 %贵港: 0.2 %贵港: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %费利蒙: 0.3 %费利蒙: 0.3 %达州: 0.2 %达州: 0.2 %邢台: 0.2 %邢台: 0.2 %郑州: 1.6 %郑州: 1.6 %都伯林: 0.2 %都伯林: 0.2 %重庆: 2.2 %重庆: 2.2 %镇江: 0.3 %镇江: 0.3 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %阳江: 0.2 %阳江: 0.2 %阿什本: 0.5 %阿什本: 0.5 %阿拉善盟: 0.2 %阿拉善盟: 0.2 %雅安: 0.2 %雅安: 0.2 %青岛: 1.6 %青岛: 1.6 %马鞍山: 0.5 %马鞍山: 0.5 %驻马店: 0.2 %驻马店: 0.2 %其他其他AustraliaCanadaChinaNormanRochesterUnited Kingdom[]上海下莱茵中山临汾丽水九江亚特兰大佛山信阳六安兰州内蒙古锡林郭勒锡林浩特凉山剑桥北京十堰南京南宁南昌南通厦门台州合肥吉隆坡周口咸宁哈尔滨唐山嘉兴埃克塞特大庆大连天津太原威海宁波安庆宜昌宜春宣城宿州密蘇里城崇左平顶山广州广西桂林廊坊延安开封开罗张家口张家界怒江成都揭阳无锡昆明晋中朝阳杭州枣庄桂林武威武汉汕头沈阳泰州洛阳济南淄博淮南淮安深圳温州渭南湘潭湛江漯河濮阳焦作玉林珠海白城石家庄福州科珀斯克里斯蒂绍兴聊城芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥苏州茂名荆门西宁西安贵港贵阳费利蒙达州邢台郑州都伯林重庆镇江长沙阳江阿什本阿拉善盟雅安青岛马鞍山驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1095) PDF downloads(36785) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return