Zhang Yingzhi, Liu Maosheng, Li Yedong. DISCUSSION ON COMPRESSIVE STIFFNESS COEFFICIENT Cz OF NATURAL SUBSOIL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(06): 10-13. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201406003
Citation:
Zhang Yingzhi, Liu Maosheng, Li Yedong. DISCUSSION ON COMPRESSIVE STIFFNESS COEFFICIENT Cz OF NATURAL SUBSOIL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2014, 44(06): 10-13. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201406003
Zhang Yingzhi, Liu Maosheng, Li Yedong. DISCUSSION ON COMPRESSIVE STIFFNESS COEFFICIENT Cz OF NATURAL SUBSOIL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(06): 10-13. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201406003
Citation:
Zhang Yingzhi, Liu Maosheng, Li Yedong. DISCUSSION ON COMPRESSIVE STIFFNESS COEFFICIENT Cz OF NATURAL SUBSOIL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2014, 44(06): 10-13. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201406003
DISCUSSION ON COMPRESSIVE STIFFNESS COEFFICIENT Cz OF NATURAL SUBSOIL
Abstract
According to the deformation characteristics of soil,compressive stiffness coefficient Cz formula was proposed.
The formula was obtained by using ideas from the code of the USSR. Soil mechanic parameter was modified to match the
actual conditions of subsoil in China. Lumped parameter method based on the elastic half space theory was also referenced
in the formula. The method was taken as a complement for Code for Dynamic Machine Foundation Design.
References
Relative Articles
[1] ZHENG Juan, WU Xiao, LAI Xiuying, CHEN Shuo. Experimental Study on Micro Deformation Characteristics of Remolded Saturated Cohesive Soil at Different Loading Rates [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(4): 122-125,73. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21021603
[2] LU Zhengzheng, CHENG Yuan, LI Pengfei, SONG Chao. Lateral Soil Spring Stiffness in Modal Analysis for Foundation of Centrifugal Hypergravity and Interdisciplinary Experiment Facility [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(7): 145-150. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21071406
[5] Xie Yan, Tan Xiaohui, Shen Mengfen, Yu Wei, Xu Quan. STUDY OF SOIL-WATER CHARACTERISTIC CURVE OF FIBER MODIFIED EXPENSIVE SOIL [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(10): 91-95. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201410019
[6] Du Yongfeng, Li Zhuohang, Li Hui. STUDY ON STRUCTURAL DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION BASED ON THE RELATIVE ELEMENT STIFFNESS COEFFICIENT [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(8): 39-42. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201308008
[7] Luo Sihai, Gong Tianjie. INFLUENCE OF CONFINED IMPACT ON DEFORMATION AND STRENGTH BEHAVIOR OF COHESIVE SOILS [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(3): 81-85. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201103016
[8] Wang Sufang, Chen Yiyi. STIFFNESS COEFFICIENT METHOD TO CALCULATE THE INITIAL STIFFNESS OF END-PLATE JOINT IN SLENDER STEEL FRAME [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(10): 126-131. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201010028
[9] Peng Shiming. PREDICTION OF DEFORMATION OF PRESTRESSED COMPOSITE SOIL NAILING WALLS BASED ON VERHULST MODEL [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(8): 65-68. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200908017
[10] Chen Qihui, Zhang Xin, Sun Jianping, Guo Qiuying. CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN OF COMPOSITE SOIL NAILING TECHNOLOGY FOR CONTROLLING SLOPE DISPLACEMENT [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(5): 115-118. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200805028
[11] Zhou Qiujuan, Chen Xiaoping, Zeng Lingling. RESEARCH ON NEURAL NETWORK MODEL OF DEFORMATION BEHAVIOR OF SOFT SOIL [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(6): 48-53. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200806014
[12] Song Linhui, Mei Guoxiong, Zai Jinmin, Cui Xiaodong. MECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF RETAINING STRUCTURE CONSIDERING DEFORMATION AND ITS APPLICATION [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(7): 53-57. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200707016
[13] Lei Huayang, Li Hongqi, Wan Zirui, Liu Hongjun, Ye Jinshui, Wang Pei. ANALYSIS AND FIELD TEST OF THE DEFORMATION CHARACTERISTIC OF CONSTRUCTION WASTE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(1): 34-36. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200601011
Proportional views
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Amount of access Chart context menu Abstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads Statistics Abstract Views HTML Views PDF Downloads 2024-05 2024-06 2024-07 2024-08 2024-09 2024-10 2024-11 2024-12 2025-01 2025-02 2025-03 2025-04 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Class Distribution FULLTEXT : 15.3 % FULLTEXT : 15.3 % META : 84.7 % META : 84.7 % FULLTEXT META
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Area Distribution 其他 : 15.3 % 其他 : 15.3 % Belgium : 1.4 % Belgium : 1.4 % China : 2.8 % China : 2.8 % Egypt : 1.4 % Egypt : 1.4 % United States : 1.4 % United States : 1.4 % [] : 2.8 % [] : 2.8 % 丽水 : 1.4 % 丽水 : 1.4 % 兰州 : 1.4 % 兰州 : 1.4 % 北京 : 12.5 % 北京 : 12.5 % 台州 : 1.4 % 台州 : 1.4 % 弗吉 : 1.4 % 弗吉 : 1.4 % 张家口 : 1.4 % 张家口 : 1.4 % 扬州 : 1.4 % 扬州 : 1.4 % 昆明 : 1.4 % 昆明 : 1.4 % 杭州 : 1.4 % 杭州 : 1.4 % 湖州 : 1.4 % 湖州 : 1.4 % 漯河 : 1.4 % 漯河 : 1.4 % 芒廷维尤 : 36.1 % 芒廷维尤 : 36.1 % 芝加哥 : 1.4 % 芝加哥 : 1.4 % 衢州 : 5.6 % 衢州 : 5.6 % 西宁 : 4.2 % 西宁 : 4.2 % 邯郸 : 1.4 % 邯郸 : 1.4 % 其他 Belgium China Egypt United States [] 丽水 兰州 北京 台州 弗吉 张家口 扬州 昆明 杭州 湖州 漯河 芒廷维尤 芝加哥 衢州 西宁 邯郸