Wang Runsheng, Zhu Ning, Gao Qi. DISSCUSSION OF PROTECTION AND REUSE OF QINGDAO INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(1): 14-16. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201301004
Citation:
Wang Runsheng, Zhu Ning, Gao Qi. DISSCUSSION OF PROTECTION AND REUSE OF QINGDAO INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2013, 43(1): 14-16. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201301004
Wang Runsheng, Zhu Ning, Gao Qi. DISSCUSSION OF PROTECTION AND REUSE OF QINGDAO INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(1): 14-16. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201301004
Citation:
Wang Runsheng, Zhu Ning, Gao Qi. DISSCUSSION OF PROTECTION AND REUSE OF QINGDAO INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2013, 43(1): 14-16. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201301004
DISSCUSSION OF PROTECTION AND REUSE OF QINGDAO INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE
Received Date: 2012-02-19
Publish Date:
2013-01-20
Abstract
Through introduction to the development of the protection of industry heritage,it was analyzed the status quo of protection of Qingdao industry heritage and referred to the excellent instance,finally,the following conclusions were got: for the target,it was mainly contained that tracing urban memory and enhancing the suitability of industrial heritage;for the strategies,mainly contained the emphasis on the truth of industrial heritage,the rational way of protection and reuse,and the concrete strategies.
References
国际工业遗产保护委员会(TICCIH).关于工业遗产的下塔吉尔宪章[EB/OL].百度文库. http//wenkubaidu. com/view /bcb9812e453610661 edqf499.
[2] 刘伯英,李匡.北京工业建筑遗产保护与再利用体系研究[J].建筑学报,2010(12):1-6.
[3] 江丽君,舒平,侯薇.冲突、多样性与公众参与--美国建筑历史遗产保护历程研究[J].建筑学报,2011(5):43-47.
[4] 吴晨,王亮.复兴:首钢铸钢清理车间厂房的演变再生[J].建筑学报,2010(12):44-55.
Proportional views
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Amount of access Chart context menu Abstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads Statistics Abstract Views HTML Views PDF Downloads 2024-06 2024-07 2024-08 2024-09 2024-10 2024-11 2024-12 2025-01 2025-02 2025-03 2025-04 2025-05 0 2 4 6 8 10
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Class Distribution FULLTEXT : 27.9 % FULLTEXT : 27.9 % META : 72.1 % META : 72.1 % FULLTEXT META