Comparative Study on the Seismic Performance of Retrofitted Multi-Story Masonry Structures in High-Seismic-Intensity Regions
-
摘要: 为研究不同抗震加固技术对高烈度地区砌体结构抗震性能的提升效果,以天津某砌体结构工程为研究对象,探究其在7度(0.1g)、8度(0.2g)和9度(0.4g)地震水准下,分别输入Tianjin波、El Centro波和人工波下的动力响应与抗震性能。从损伤分布、层间位移角及顶层加速度三方面,对比了耕缝加筋、隔震与未隔震结构的性能差异。结果显示:耕缝加筋技术能有效限制墙体洞口角部斜向裂缝的扩展,通过钢筋约束控制局部损伤,但对层间位移角和顶层加速度的控制效果有限;隔震支座可显著抑制结构损伤,使上部砌体在高烈度下基本保持弹性工作状态;隔震结构各层层间位移角较未隔震结构减小51.91%~96.28%(X向)与39.99%~87.11%(Y向),在所有工况下均满足“完好”性能水准;顶层加速度峰值衰减率达55.81%~88.79%(X向)与47.20%~88.64%(Y向)。Abstract: To investigate the effectiveness of different strengthening techniques in improving the seismic performance of masonry structures in high-seismic-intensity regions, this study took a masonry structure in Tianjin as a case study. The dynamic responses and seismic performance of the structure were examined under seismic intensities of VII (0.1g), VIII (0.2g), and IX (0.4g) by applying ground motion inputs including the Tianjin wave, the El Centro wave, and artificial waves. Performance differences among the original structure, the bed-joint reinforced structure, and the seismically isolated structure were compared in terms of damage distribution, inter-story drift ratio, and floor acceleration. The results indicated that the bed-joint reinforcement technique effectively restrained the propagation of diagonal cracks at the corners of wall openings and controlled local damage through the restraint provided by rebars, while its effect on controlling inter-story drift ratios and roof acceleration was limited. The seismic isolation bearings significantly suppressed global structural damage, allowing the upper masonry to remain essentially elastic even under high-intensity excitation. Compared with the non-isolated structure, the inter-story drift ratios of the isolated structure were reduced by 51.91%-96.28% (X-direction) and 39.99%-87.11% (Y-direction), satisfying the “intact” performance level under all scenarios, while the reduction in peak roof acceleration reached 55.81%-88.79% (X-direction) and 47.20%-88.64% (Y-direction).
-
[1] 清华大学土木工程结构专家组,西南交通大学土木工程结构专家组,北京交通大学土木工程结构专家组.汶川地震建筑震害分析[J].建筑结构学报,2008,29(4):1-9. [2] 黄思凝,袁一凡,孟庆利,等.由玉树地震结构震害看村镇房屋抗震[J].世界地震工程,2011,27(2):77-82. [3] 谭皓,李杰,张电吉,等.玉树大地震砌体结构房屋震害特征[J].工程抗震与加固改造,2011,33(5):133-139. [4] 蔡晓光,孙有为,郭晓云.芦山地震建筑震害统计分析[J].自然灾害学报,2015,24(6):112-119. [5] 朱宏平,周方圆,袁涌.建筑隔震结构研究进展与分析[J].工程力学,2014,31(3):1-10. [6] 周锡元,阎维明,杨润林.建筑结构的隔震、减振和振动控制[J].建筑结构学报,2002,23(2):2-16. [7] 张又超,王毅红,权登州,等.低矮砌体结构隔震与非隔震振动台对比试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2018,51(1):91-99. [8] 周巧玲,赵仕兴,彭敏,等.既有多层砌体结构教学楼隔震加固设计[J].建筑结构,2023,53(7):18-23. [9] 张吉柱,姚秋来,杨燕艳,等.隔震技术在既有砌体结构加固中的应用研究[J].工程抗震与加固改造,2024,46(1):48-55. [10] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.混凝土结构设计规范:GB 50010-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015. [11] 刘桂秋.砌体结构基本受力性能的研究[D].长沙:湖南大学,2005. [12] 肖遥,底欣欣,黄河.砖砌体单轴压缩与拉伸应力应变关系[J].世界地震工程,2019,35(1):210-219. [13] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009-2012[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012. [14] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2016. [15] 杨玉成,杨柳,高云学,等.现有多层砖房震害预测的方法及其可靠度[J].地震工程与工程振动,1982,2(3):75-86. [16] 熊立红.多层混凝土砌块结构性态抗震研究[D].哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所,2005. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 32
- HTML全文浏览量: 10
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
登录
注册
E-alert
登录
注册
E-alert
下载: