Research and Application of In-Situ Reconstruction and Expansion of Sanfang Tunnel
-
摘要: 为解决我国老旧铁路隧道病害严重影响行车安全的问题,以日伪时期修建的Ⅴ级围岩浅埋条件下的图佳铁路下行线三房隧道工程为例,对其采用简单病害整治方案、左侧绕行新建隧道、右侧绕行新建隧道、原位扩建隧道4种病害整治方案。对比分析4种方案的优缺点,适用条件,采用超前衬砌背后空洞松散堆积体检测、超前径向注浆和超前小导管支护后分段分台阶切割既有衬砌的开挖方法,人工或者机械开挖、必要时静态爆破,对上行线隧道进行监测,减少对近距离上行线隧道的影响,保证上行线隧道的运营安全。采用MIDAS有限元软件进行隧道分台阶开挖时的拱顶、地表沉降分析。结果表明:原位扩建隧道在地层、施工技术相同条件下,原隧道位于新建隧道下部的位置关系最优。Abstract: In order to solve the problem that the diseases of old railway tunnels in our country seriously affect the safety of train operation. Taking the Sanfang Tunnel project of the down line of the Tumen-Jiamusi Railway, which was built under the shallow-buried conditions of grade V rock mass during the Japanese occupation period as an example, four disease treatment schemes were adopted: simple disease treatment scheme, new tunnel detour on the left side, new tunnel detour on the right side, and in-situ expansion tunnel. The advantages and disadvantages of four schemes were compared and analyzed, as well as their applicable conditions. The excavation method of detecting the voids and loose accumulations behind the lining, performing advanced radial grouting and advanced small pipe support, and then cutting the existing lining in stages and sections was adopted. Manual or mechanical excavation was carried out, and static blasting was used when necessary. The tunnel on the upline was monitored to reduce the impact on the nearby upline tunnel and ensure its operational safety. The arch top and ground surface sedimentation analysis of the tunnel's excavation step by step was conducted using the MIDAS finite element software. Then, proposing to use in-situ tunnel expansion and discussing its feasibility. result The results show that under the same geological and construction technology conditions, the optimal position relationship is that the original tunnel is located below the new tunnel.
-
Key words:
- transportation capacity /
- railway tunnel /
- tunnel diseases /
- disease treatment /
- reconstruction
-
[1] 田四明,王伟,杨昌宇,等. 中国铁路隧道 40 年发展与展望[J]. 隧道建设(中英文),2021,41(11):1903-1930. [2] 王剑宏,解全一,刘健,等. 日本铁路隧道病害和运维管理现状及对我国隧道运维技术发展的建议[J]. 隧道建设(中英文),2020,40(12):1824-1833. [3] LIN J P. Existing operational railway tunnel water leakage causes and remediation technologies[J]. Advanced Materials Research,2014,1004-1005:1444-1449. [4] 江强,李晓. 新华路隧道病害原因分析与治理建议[J]. 现代隧道技术,2018,55(增刊2):519-525. [5] 赵勇. 铁路隧道拱部病害凿除模筑对衬砌影响研究[J]. 铁道工程学报,2021,38(6):53-57. [6] 王风,高阳. 朔黄重载铁路隧道病害分析与整治[J]. 石家庄铁道大学学报(自然科学版),2025,38(1):8-14. [7] 王风波,淡涌强,陈立伟. 既有铁路隧道病害成因分析及治理措施[J]. 工程技术研究,2024,9(22):161-163. [8] 尚苏海,张添翔. 运营铁路隧道排水不良病害综合整治技术[J]. 铁道工务,2024,2(5):82-86. [9] 杨赟. 铁路隧道衬砌裂缝病害整治措施研究[J]. 江西建材,2024(3):247-248. [10] ZHU C F,WANG K,WANG L S. Some thoughts on treatment of tunnel diseases in high altitude and cold regions[C]∥ E3S Web of Conferences. Sanya:2021. [11] 李科. 隧道二次衬砌欠厚整治技术探究[J]. 金属矿山,2018(4):82-87. [12] 张丽霞. 重载铁路隧道衬砌病害套衬整治关键技术及应用[J]. 铁道建筑,2024,64(6):114-118. [13] 蓝祝荣. 既有铁路新茶盘沟隧道衬砌病害整治技术研究[J]. 价值工程,2024(11):71-74. [14] 王飞,胡力学,胡永占. 侯月线桃坪隧道病害成因及改造方案研究[J]. 现代隧道技术,2019,56(1):192-199. [15] 高菊茹,贵逢涛,袁玮,等. 既有线铁路隧道病害整治技术与设备发展现状[J]. 现代隧道技术,2018,55(1):7-16. [16] 姬海东,张海涛,宋效凯. 用于既有线隧道病害综合整治的多功能维修车研发[J]. 建筑机械,2024(9):10-15. [17] 李荆,吴海龙,何前途,等. 基于 AHP-TRIZ 的铁路运营隧道病害治理台车方案设计研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文),2024,44(4):801-809. [18] 马伟斌,柴金飞. 运营铁路隧道病害检测、监测、评估及整治技术发展现状[J]. 隧道建设(中英文),2019,39(10):1553-1562. [19] 李健超,柴雪松,马学志,等. 铁路隧道衬砌表观病害等级评定研究[J]. 铁道建筑,2023,63(4):73-76. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 21
- HTML全文浏览量: 7
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
登录
注册
E-alert
登录
注册
E-alert
下载: