基于多维感知数据融合的工业遗存开发时序研究

陈相如; 陈婕文; 范高林; 蒲文娟; 鲁子良

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG25072301

基于多维感知数据融合的工业遗存开发时序研究

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG25072301

长安大学建筑学院, 西安 710061

基金项目:

西安市社会科学规划基金项目（24QL46）；中央高校基本科研业务费项目（300102410101）。

详细信息

作者简介:
陈相如，主要从事空间感知与行为设计方向研究，2021905921@chd.edu.cn。

通讯作者:
蒲文娟，博士，主要从事城乡遗产保护、遗产数字化方向研究，pwj1130@chd.edu.cn。

计量
- 文章访问数: 22
- HTML全文浏览量: 9
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2025-07-23
- 网络出版日期: 2026-11-07

Research on the Development Sequence of Industrial Heritage Based on Multi-Dimensional Perception Data Fusion： a Case Study of Xi’an Baqiao Thermal Power Plant

School of Architecture, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710061, China

摘要

摘要: 在城市更新持续深化的背景下，西安作为典型老工业城市，面临大量工业遗存活化利用的现实需求。受更新资源有限、改造周期较长等因素制约，全面改造难以同步推进，因而需要识别具有较高公共关注度和空间带动潜力的关键节点，形成分阶段、渐进式的开发时序。以西安灞桥热电厂为例，面向工业遗存向文化展览类公共空间转型，构建融合语义认知、视觉关注与主观偏好的多维感知数据分析框架。首先，基于用户生成内容（User-Generated Content，UGC）提取公众讨论中的空间节点、行为特征与情绪体验，识别具有代表性的高关注对象；其次，通过虚拟现实眼动追踪试验记录注视初始时间、首次注视持续时间、总注视持续时间、平均注视持续时间和注视次数，检验不同建筑节点的视觉吸引力与注意分配特征；最后，结合试验后问卷与现场调研问卷，从空间吸引力、历史记忆、情感记忆、外观美感、游客识别度和再利用价值等方面确认公众偏好。研究表明：锅炉房a段在语义热度、视觉关注和主观评价中均表现突出，可作为优先活化的核心节点；烟囱等要素具有较强的场所识别性和情感联结，可作为后续协同提升对象。基于三类感知数据的交叉验证，形成由“公众认知聚焦—视觉注意验证—主观偏好确认”逐层推进的开发时序识别方法。
- 工业遗存 /
- 开发时序 /
- 语义分析 /
- 眼动追踪 /
- 公共感知
Abstract: Amid the continuing advancement of urban regeneration， Xi’an， a representative old industrial city， faces a pressing need to reactivate a large stock of industrial heritage. Because renewal resources are limited and redevelopment cycles are long， simultaneous large-scale transformation is often impractical. Therefore， it is necessary to identify key nodes characterized by high public attention and strong spatial catalytic potential， and to establish a phased development sequence. Taking the Xi’an Baqiao Thermal Power Plant as a case study， this study develops a multidimensional perception-data framework for the adaptive reuse of industrial heritage as cultural exhibition-oriented public space. First， based on User-Generated Content （UGC）， this study extracts spatial nodes， behavioral characteristics， and emotional experiences from public discourse. Second， a virtual-reality eye-tracking experiment is conducted to record time to first fixation， first fixation duration， total fixation duration， average fixation duration， and fixation count， and to assess visual attraction and attention allocation across architectural nodes. Third， post-experiment and on-site questionnaires are combined to confirm public preferences in terms of spatial attraction， historical memory， emotional memory， visual aesthetics， visitor recognition， and reuse value. The results show that Boiler House Section a performs strongly across semantic salience， visual attention， and subjective evaluation， indicating that it can serve as the core node for priority activation. The chimney and related elements exhibit strong place identity and emotional attachment， and can serve as subsequent coordinated renewal targets. Through cross-validation of the three types of perceptual data， this study establishes a progressive method for identifying development sequencing， advancing from public-cognition focus to visual-attention verification and subjective-preference confirmation.
- industrial heritage /
- development sequence /
- semantic analysis /
- eye-tracking /
- public perception

HTML全文

参考文献(62)

[1]	宋雨菲,林子晟,李晓艳. 存量背景下后工业景观的设计策略研究[J]. 设计,2024,9（6）:112-119.
[2]	杨程程. 工业遗产适应性更新的城市公共空间转向:以宁波渔轮厂为例[J]. 城市观察,2023（2）:84-92.
[3]	李孜. 西安工业遗产价值及保护利用模式研究[D]. 西安:西北大学,2022.
[4]	羊烨,李振宇. 工业遗产改造中共享策略对城市可持续更新影响的研究[J]. 工业建筑,2021,51（3）:8-14.
[5]	陈金龙. 城市更新背景下工业遗产建筑再生利用中的空间叙事与功能置换策略[J]. 工程建设标准化,2025（9）:58-65.
[6]	白雪燕,童明. 城市微更新:从网络到节点,从节点到网络[J]. 建筑学报,2020（8）:10-15.
[7]	ZHANG M. The state-led approach to industrial heritage in China’s mega-events:capital accumulation,urban regeneration,and heritage preservation[J]. Built Heritage,2024（8）:30.
[8]	PIERDICCA R,PAOLANTI M,QUATTRINI R,et al. A visual attentive model for discovering patterns in eye-tracking data-a proposal in cultural heritage[J]. Sensors,2020,20（7）:2101.
[9]	WU Y,LI N,XIA L,et al. Visual attention predictive model of built colonial heritage based on visual behaviour and subjective evaluation[J]. Humanities& Social Sciences Communications,2023,10:869.
[10]	WANG Y,WANG S,PAN Y,et al. Immersive virtual reality and computer vision for heritage:visual evaluation and perception of the industrial heritage sites along the Yunnan-Vietnam railway（Yunnan section）[J]. Heritage Science,2024,12:36.
[11]	梁晨,陈亚斌,孙洋洋. 从散点到网络:工业遗存保护利用的新模式探索:以成都市东郊记忆功能区为例[C]// 美丽中国,共建共治共享:2024中国城市规划年会. 合肥:2024:373-386.
[12]	国家发展和改革委员会.“十四五”新型城镇化实施方案[EB/OL].（2022-07-12）[ 2025-08-27]. https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xwdt/tzgg/202207/t20220712_1330365_ext.html.
[13]	国家发展和改革委员会.《“十四五”新型城镇化实施方案》系列专家解读之四:推进新型城市建设,让城市更加宜居宜业[EB/OL].（2022-07-18）[ 2025-08-27]. https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/fggz/fgzy/xmtjd/202207/t20220718_1330902.html.
[14]	ZHENG X,CHEN T,ZHENG C,et al. Unlocking public engagement in reused industrial heritage:weighting point evaluation method for cultural expression[J]. Buildings,2024,14（9）:2695.
[15]	SERRANO-ESTRADA L,MARTÍ P,BERNABEU-BAUTISTA Á,et al. Mapping heritage engagement in historic centres through social media insights and accessibility analysis[J]. Land,2024,13（12）:1972.
[16]	ZHANG A Y. Placing arts districts in markets:a case study of 798 arts district in Beijing[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,2019,43（6）:1028-1045.
[17]	SHIN Y J. The adaptive reuse design strategies-focused on the case of the Tate Modern architectural competition[J]. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering,2024,24（1）:1-16.
[18]	SAVOIE É,SAPINSKI J P,LAROCHE A M. Key factors for revitalising heritage buildings through adaptive reuse[J]. Buildings and Cities,2025,6（1）:103-120.
[19]	TAN X H,ALTROCK U. Resistance to being listed industrial heritage？ The conflicts and dilemma of heritage-making during land banking in Guangzhou[J]. Urban Planning,2024,9:81-89.
[20]	NOCCA F,BOSONE M,ORABONA M. Multicriteria evaluation framework for industrial heritage adaptive reuse:the role of the‘intrinsic value’[J]. Land,2024,13（8）:1266.
[21]	MUKHERJEE A,BANERJI H. Disparities in expert and community perceptions of industrial heritage and implications for urban well-being in West Bengal,India[J]. NPJ Heritage Science,2025,13:44.
[22]	RIPP M,CLIFFORD J. Heritage-based urban development[J]. Encyclopedia,2025,5（2）:82.
[23]	WU X,YU L,FANG H,et al. Research on the protection and reuse of industrial heritage from the perspective of public participation-a case study of northern mining area of Pingdingshan,China[J]. Land,2022,11（1）:16.
[24]	ZHANG F,LIU Q,ZHOU X. Vitality evaluation of public spaces in historical and cultural blocks based on multi-source data:a case study of Suzhou Changmen[J]. Sustainability,2022,14（21）:14040.
[25]	王新宇,李彦,李伟健,等. 城市更新视角下的公共空间品质评估方法:基于移动感知技术的探索[J]. 国际城市规划,2024,39（1）:21-29.
[26]	XIE Y,LIU H,HU M. Low-altitude visual communication and tourist perception:a case study of historic urban zones in China[J]. Journal of Urban Planning and Tourism,2023,58（3）:88-101.
[27]	LIU R,WANG T. Immersive media and cultural memory transmission in heritage tourism[J]. Tourism Tribune,2021,36（10）:72-82.
[28]	张永霖,王力,董仁才,等. 基于景感生态学的城市视觉感知量化研究:以北京市中心为例[J]. 生态学报,2024,44（20）:9146-9158.
[29]	YANG C,LIU T. Social media data in urban design and landscape research:a comprehensive literature review[J]. Land,2022,11（10）:1796.
[30]	REN S,CHEN X,ZHANG H. Emotional landscape analysis of cultural ecosystem services in heritage parks:a deep learning approach using social media data[J]. Urban Ecosystems,2025,28（3）:96.
[31]	BAI N,NOURIAN P,LUO R,et al. Heri-graphs:a workflow of creating datasets for multi-modal machine learning on graphs of heritage values and attributes with social media[PP/OL]. arXiv,2022-05-16[ 2025-08-27]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.07545. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2205.07545.
[32]	GULHAN D,DURANT S,ZANKER J M. Similarity of gaze patterns across physical and virtual versions of an installation artwork[J]. Scientific Reports,2021,11:18913.
[33]	THROSBY D,ZEDNIK A,ARAÑA J E. Public preferences for heritage conservation strategies:a choice modelling approach[J]. Journal of Cultural Economics,2021,45（3）:333-358.
[34]	QIAO T,GAO Y,TAN T. Museum interactive space design from enactive perception perspective[C]// Affective and Pleasurable Design. Cham:Springer,2022:161-169.
[35]	HAN X,LI Z,CAO H,et al. Multimodal spatio-temporal data visualization technologies for contemporary urban landscape architecture:a review and prospect in the context of smart cities[J]. Land,2025,14（5）:1069.
[36]	李代超,钟淑媛,虞虎. 景观功能评价研究进展[J]. 生态学报,2024,44（16）:7401-7415.
[37]	LI W,YE X,ZHU B. A decision-making model for the adaptive reuse of‘buildings of control and reform’:the Nossa Senhora Village,Macau[J]. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,2025,12:231.
[38]	MA P,LI X,LAN D. A dual strategy in the adaptive reuse of industrial heritage buildings:the Shanghai West Bund waterfront refurbishment[J]. Buildings,2023,13（7）:1582.
[39]	FOULSHAM T,KINGSTONE A. Fixation-dependent memory for natural scenes:an experimental test of scanpath theory[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,2013,142（1）:41-56.
[40]	赵学军.“ 156 项”建设项目对中国工业化的历史贡献[J]. 当代中国史研究,2021,28（4）:45-56.
[41]	Global Energy Monitor. Baqiao power station[EB/OL].[ 2025-08-27]. https://www.gem.wiki/Baqiao_power_station.
[42]	北极星火力发电网. 功勋电厂,关停[EB/OL].（2025-01-18）[ 2025-08-27]. https://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/2025-01-18/doc-inefkytt4013024.shtml.
[43]	朱晓航. 基于UGC模式的跨境电商平台营销策略研究:以小红书为例[J]. 中国商论,2023（1）:36-38.
[44]	ZHANG S,LI Z,LIU S. Understanding perceptions of tourism impact on quality of life in traditional earthen-wooden villages:insights from residents and tourists in Meishan[J]. Buildings,2024,14:2670.
[45]	WEI Y,CHEN M. Tracing the evolution of tourist perception of destination image:a multi-method analysis of a cultural heritage tourist site[J]. Sustainability,2025,17（12）:5476.
[46]	ZHAO J H,SHI J Y,ZHUO L. BEV perception for autonomous driving:state of the art and future perspectives[J]. Expert Systems with Applications. 2024,258,125103.
[47]	FLEURY A,NOURRIT D,BARDY B G. Multi-scale collaborative virtual environments:integrating global and local scales of analysis[J]. Presence:Teleoperators and Virtual Environments,2010,19（1）:29-41.
[48]	KANDA K,ISHIWATARI H,WATANUKI K. Relationship between bird’s-eye view cognition and visual search behavior[C]// Fukuda.S. Affective and Pleasurable Design. AHFE 2023 International Conference. San Francisco:2023,192-201.
[49]	HE B,XU Y,HE Y,et al. EEGET-RSOD:a simultaneous EEG and eye-tracking dataset for remote sensing object detection[J]. Scientific Data,2025,12:651.
[50]	申申,龚建华,李文航,等. 基于虚拟亲历行为的空间场所认知对比实验研究[J]. 武汉大学学报（信息科学版）,2018,43（11）:1732-1738.
[51]	孙淑亭,徐苏斌,青木信夫. 工业用地转型中遗产社区认同研究[J]. 中国文化遗产,2022（3）:41-48.
[52]	DE LA FUENTE SUÁREZ L A. Subjective experience and visual attention to a historic building:a real-world eye-tracking study[J]. Frontiers of Architectural Research,2020,9（4）:774-804.
[53]	李宾,朱育帆. 后工业景观中场地历史的再现:以首钢北区设计为例[J]. 风景园林,2023,30（6）:46-53.
[54]	段建强. 遗产之镜:城市更新中后工业景观的3种历史观念[J]. 风景园林,2023,30（6）:54-60.
[55]	邱思嘉,宝力格,徐静,等.“风景-遗存”对公众时空行为的影响机制研究:以首钢工业遗址公园为例[J]. 风景园林,2025,32（3）:41-48.
[56]	李渊,罗疑惠,赵炜. 基于网络文本分析的工业遗产游客感知研究:以成都市东郊记忆为例[J]. 华中建筑,2021,39（12）:91-96.
[57]	徐然,夏海山. 建筑立面视觉特征识别的量化研究与评价:基于视觉显著性模型的分析方法[J]. 新建筑,2019（6）:26-31.
[58]	霍海鹰,吕典. 基于视觉敏感性的非对称建筑立面视觉均衡量化研究[J]. 吉林建筑大学学报,2020,37（6）:43-48.
[59]	魏方,徐静,樊懋,等. 可持续更新背景下后工业景观的连贯性与易读性感知研究[J]. 风景园林,2023,30（6）:27-34.
[60]	李渊,梁嘉祺,赵龙,等. 遗产价值视角下旅游者空间感知与计算研究综述[J]. 地球信息科学学报,2024,26（2）:274-302.
[61]	刘艳晓,宋飏,马美娜,等. 工业遗产旅游价值评估指标体系构建与实证:以东北地区为例[J]. 中国生态旅游,2023,13（2）:293-304.
[62]	李慧民,田卫,闫瑞琦. 旧工业建筑（群）再生利用评价指标体系构建[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报（自然科学版）,2013,45（6）:772-777.