Internalized Neighborhood: Strategies and Practice for Regenerating Industrial Megastructures
-
摘要: 针对工业巨构空间在城市更新中面临的肌理割裂与活力缺失问题,研究提出“内化的街区”这一适应性更新理念。研究认为,此类空间的更新应超越建筑本体的单一改造,致力于将城市街区的空间组织逻辑(包括其人性化尺度、功能复合性、公共流线与渗透界面)系统性地“内化”至建筑内部,从而实现从孤立巨构向城市活力节点的根本性转变。系统构建了由“尺度转换-功能复合-流线重构-界面模糊”组成的四维空间重构策略框架,并以上海华谊万创新所8号楼改造为例,详细阐释了“化整为零”“多维流线”与“立体公园”等具体设计手法协同作用,将工业厂房转化为一个功能多元、流线丰富、内外交融的“内化街区”。实践表明,该策略能有效织补城市肌理,提升空间环境品质与公共价值,为工业遗产的适应性再生提供了新的理论视角与实践路径。Abstract: To address the challenges of fragmented urban fabric and lack of vitality faced by industrial megastructures in urban renewal, this study proposes the adaptive renewal concept of the “internalized neighborhood”. The research posits that the regeneration of such spaces should transcend singular modifications to the building structure itself. Instead, it should focus on systematically “internalizing” the spatial logic of an urban neighborhood—including its human-scale proportions, functional hybridity, public circulation networks, and permeable interfaces—into the building interior. This approach facilitates a fundamental transformation from an isolated megastructure into a vibrant urban node. The paper systematically constructs a four-dimensional spatial restructuring framework comprising “Scale Transformation, Functional Hybridity, Circulation Reorganization, and Interface Blurring”. Using the renovation of Building 8 at Shanghai Huayi Wanchuang Park as a case study, it elaborates on how specific design techniques—namely “disaggregation”, “multi-level circulation networks”, and a “three-dimensional park”—synergistically interact to convert an industrial plant into an “internalized neighborhood” characterized by diverse functions, rich circulation paths, and seamless integration between interior and exterior. The study demonstrates that this strategy effectively mends the urban fabric, enhances spatial quality and public value, offering a new theoretical perspective and practical pathway for the adaptive regeneration of industrial heritage.
-
[1] 高德宏.空间的重构与冲突:文化建筑巨构在城市中心[J].城市建筑,2009(12):43-46. [2] 王建国,蒋楠.后工业时代中国产业类历史建筑遗产保护性再利用[J].建筑学报,2006(8):8-11. [3] 刘伯英.迈向城市复兴:新常态下存量工业资源的再生[J].建筑与文化,2015(8):18. [4] 阳建强,罗超.后工业化时期城市老工业区更新与再发展研究[J].城市规划,2011,35(4):80-84. [5] 张松.上海黄浦江两岸再开发地区的工业遗产保护与再生[J].城市规划学刊,2015(2):102-109. [6] 章明,于一凡,沈兵,等.“城市滨水工业遗产廊道转型研究”主题沙龙[J].城市建筑,2017(22):6-13. [7] 谢涵笑,冒亚龙,陈建华.既有城市工业区功能提升与改造评价体系建构研究[J].重庆建筑,2023,22(5):5-11. [8] 黄山.构成学视角下单层旧工业建筑空间改造设计研究[D].郑州:郑州大学,2023. [9] 李勤,周帆,邸巍,等.存量开发视角下的大空间工业厂房改造为体育建筑的可行性研究[C]//2021年工业建筑学术交流会论文集(上册).北京:2021:34-41. [10] LIU Y." Sharing Mosaic":study on regeneration strategy of industrial heritage in urban design:take Hanyang iron factory as an example[C]//Annual Conference Proceedings of the XXVIII International Seminar on Urban Form.Glasgow:2022:1407-1414. [11] 薄宏涛.存量时代下工业遗存更新的策略与路径[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2021. [12] ZHU Y C,LI Z Y.‘Sharing’as a critical framework for waterfront heritage regeneration:a case study of Suzhou creek,Shanghai[J].Land,2024,13(8):1280-1299. [13] 肖诚.无锡运河汇1958[J].建筑实践,2024(4):172-173. [14] 同济大学建筑设计研究院(集团)有限公司原作设计工作室.上海市武夷路MIX320城市更新项目[J].建筑实践,2023(7):110-119. [15] 王辉.时间、空间、结构:沈阳东贸库改造设计纪实[J].建筑学报,2022(3):64-69. [16] 薄宏涛.模糊空间界限让建筑融于城市[J].城市建筑空间,2023,30(10):42-46. [17] 章明,张姿,张洁,等.“丘陵城市”与其“回应性”体系:上海杨浦滨江“绿之丘”[J].建筑学报,2020(1):1-7. [18] 徐光耀.致敬百年包豪斯的上海工业遗存更新实践:大中华正泰橡胶厂园区改造项目[J].新建筑,2023(3):46-49. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 29
- HTML全文浏览量: 7
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
登录
注册
E-alert
登录
注册
E-alert
下载: