Static Bearing Capacity Tests on Spatial DKT- Shaped Circular Hollow Section Tubular Intersecting Joints
-
摘要: 为了研究节点几何尺寸及偏心率对空间DKT形圆钢管相贯节点应力和应变分布、受力性能、破坏模态及节点极限承载能力的影响规律,对3个非偏心和2个偏心空间DKT形圆钢管相贯节点进行了试验研究和有限元数值模拟,对比了5个空间DKT形圆钢管相贯节点试验试件的承载性能、变形和破坏模态,并利用有限元分析软件对试件进行了有限元模拟。研究结果表明:有限元分析的承载力、变形等结果与试验结果吻合较好;支主管平面内角度由30°(SJ1)增至60°(SJ3)时,节点承载力下降约4.88%;偏心距增至88 mm(SJ4)和110 mm(SJ5)时,试验所得承载力较非偏心节点(SJ3)分别降低26.7%和17.9%。通过分析试验和有限元得到的应力、应变分布,探明节点达到极限承载力时,斜支管与主管连接位置进入了塑性状态,但节点破坏并非由截面塑性控制,而是变形控制。
-
关键词:
- 空间DKT形圆钢管相贯节点 /
- 力学性能 /
- 极限承载力 /
- 静力试验 /
- 有限元分析
Abstract: To investigate the influence of geometric dimensions and eccentricity on the stress-strain distribution, mechanical properties, failure modes, and ultimate bearing capacity of spatial DKT-shaped circular hollow section tubular intersecting joints, experimental studies and finite element analysis were conducted on three non-eccentric and two eccentric spatial DKT-shaped circular hollow section tubular intersecting joints. Through experimental study, the bearing capacity, deformation, and failure modes of the five spatial DKT-shaped circular hollow section tubular intersecting joint specimens were compared. Finite element simulations were conducted on the specimens using the finite element analysis software. The analysis results of bearing capacity, deformation, etc. were in good agreement with the test results. The results of the study showed that: when the in-plane angle between the brace and the chord increased from 30°(SJ1) to 60°(SJ3), the joint bearing capacity decreased by approximately 4.88%; when the eccentricity increased to 88 mm(SJ4) and 110 mm(SJ5), the bearing capacity decreased by 26.7% and 17.9%, respectively, compared with that of the non-eccentric joint (SJ3). Through the analysis of stress and strain distributions obtained from tests and finite element analysis, it was found that when the joint reaches its ultimate bearing capacity, the connection area between the brace and the chord enters a plastic state; however, the failure of the joint is not governed by section plasticity, but rather by deformation control. -
[1] 杨国贤,陈廷国. 受拉T型管节点静承载力分析的实用计算法[J]. 大连工学院学报,1987(2):101-106. [2] 张志良 沈祖炎,陈学潮. 方管节点极限承载力的非线性有限元分析[J]. 土木工程学报,1990,23(1):12-22. [3] 朱邵宁,舒兴平. 空间KK型圆钢管相贯节点极限承载力非线性有限元分析[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2003(增刊1):109-111. [4] 石永久,祝磊,王元清. 弦管轴向应力对TX型和XX型矩形管节点轴向承载力的影响[J]. 空间结构,2005(1):8-12. [5] 崔国勇. 几何参数对直接焊接KK型间隙方管节点静力性能影响的研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2010. [6] 刘远征,袁波,宋志丹. 加劲肋加强T型方管相贯节点抗震性能分析[J]. 贵州大学学报(自然科学版),2015,32(6):112-117. [7] 王龙飞,戴岳,张大长. 钢管塔正负偏心K形相贯节点的极限承载力研究[J]. 建筑钢结构进展,2019,21(1):89-94. [8] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 钢结构设计标准:GB 50017—2017[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018. [9] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 空间网格结构技术规程:JGJ 7—2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010. [10] 全国钢标准化技术委员会. 金属材料 拉伸试验 第1部分:室温试验方法:GB/T 228.1—2021[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2021. [11] 全国钢标准化技术委员会. 钢及钢产品力学性能试验取样位置及试样制备:GB/T 2975—2018[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2018. [12] 陈以一,陈扬骥. 钢管结构相贯节点的研究现状[J]. 建筑结构,2002,32(7):52-55. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 16
- HTML全文浏览量: 5
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0
登录
注册
E-alert
登录
注册
E-alert
下载: