美国既有建筑抗震鉴定评估标准体系演进及与中国对比

冉俣; 黄选明; 卢宇飞; 张新江

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG25031105

美国既有建筑抗震鉴定评估标准体系演进及与中国对比

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG25031105

冉俣^1,2,3,
黄选明^1,2,3, ,,
卢宇飞^1,2,3,
张新江^1,2,3

1. 中国建筑科学研究院有限公司, 北京 100013;
2. 建研院检测中心有限公司, 北京 100013;
3. 国家建筑工程技术研究中心, 北京 100013

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划（2023YFC3804300，SQ2024YFC3800248）。

详细信息

作者简介:
冉俣,硕士,高级工程师,一级建造师,一级注册结构工程师,主要从事建筑鉴定与加固研究,2426527669@qq.com。

通讯作者:
黄选明,博士,研究员,主要从事建筑鉴定与加固研究,huangxuanming@cabr.com.cn。

计量
- 文章访问数: 11
- HTML全文浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2025-03-11
- 网络出版日期: 2026-06-06

Evolution of the U.S. Seismic Evaluation Standard System for Existing Buildings and a Comparative Analysis with China

RAN Yu^1,2,3,
HUANG Xuanming^{1,2,3
, ,},
LU Yufei^1,2,3,
ZHANG Xinjiang^1,2,3

1. China Academy of Building Research, Beijing 100013, China;
2. CABR Testing Center Co., Ltd., Beijing 100013, China;
3. National Engineering Research Center of Building Technology, Beijing 100013, China

摘要

摘要: 介绍了美国既有建筑标准体系和抗震鉴定评估技术方法，并对FEMA P-154-2015快速视觉筛查法和ASCE/SEI 41-23三级评估流程进行了重点阐述。美国对于既有建筑的整治，采用“分级筛查－差异化评价－针对性加固”的分级模式，具有灵活、高效等优势，但也有其局限性。对比中美两国标准，结合我国实际提出：定义“基准建筑”简化评价流程；完善性能化评估方法作为传统鉴定方法的补充等建议，为“一带一路”建设项目提供技术参考，也为既有建筑的科学规范管理以及城市更新提供思路。
- 既有建筑 /
- 标准体系 /
- 抗震鉴定 /
- 性能化评估 /
- FEMA P-154-2015 /
- ASCE/SEI 41-23 /
- 快速筛查 /
- 城市更新
Abstract: This paper introduces the U.S. standard system for existing buildings， analyzes the seismic evaluation techniques， and focuses on the FEMA P-154-2015 rapid visual screening method and the ASCE/SEI 41-23 three-level evaluation process. The United States adopts a grading mode characterized by “graded screening， differentiated evaluation， and targeted reinforcement” for the governance of existing buildings. This mode offers the advantages of flexibility and high efficiency， while also having certain limitations. By comparing the standards of the two countries and considering China's actual conditions， this paper proposes recommendations， such as defining benchmark buildings to simplify the evaluation process and improving performance-based assessment methods to complement traditional appraisals. It aims to provide technical references for construction projects under “the Belt and Road” initiative， thereby offering insights for the scientific and standardized management of existing buildings as well as for urban renewal.
- existing buildings /
- standard system /
- seismic appraisal /
- performance-based evaluation /
- FEMA P-154-2015 /
- ASCE/SEI 41-23 /
- rapid screening /
- urban renewal

HTML全文

参考文献(24)

[1]	FILIPPIDOU F，JIMÉNEZ-NAVARRO J P. Achieving the cost-effective energy transformation of Europe’s buildings［J］. Energies，2019，12（16）：3069.
[2]	National Institute of Building Science. Moving forward：findings and recommendations from the Consultative Council［R］. Washington，DC：National Institute of Building Sciences，2018.
[3]	Energy Information Administration U.S.. Residential energy consumption survey data：structural and geographic characteristics［EB/OL］.（2020-03-30）［2025-03-10］. https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/data/2020/#structural.
[4]	Energy Information Administration U.S.. Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey（CBECS）2018：building characteristics summary（Table B 1. 1）［EB/OL］.（2021-06）［2025-03-10］. https://www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/data/2018/pdf/CBECS_2018_Building_Characteristics_ Flipbook.pdf.
[5]	ZHANG Y，FUNG J F，COOK D，et al. Benefit-cost analysis for earthquake-resilient building design and retrofit：state of the art and future research needs［J］. Natural Hazards Review，2024，25（3）：03124001.
[6]	United States Geological Survet. New USGS map shows where damaging earthquakes are most likely to occur in the US［EB/OL］.（2024-01-16）［2025-03-10］. https://www.usgs.gov/news/national-news-release/new-usgs-map-shows-where-damaging-earthquakes-are-most-likely-occur-us.
[7]	FEMA. Hazus estimated annualized earthquake losses for the United States:FEMA P-366［R］. Washington，DC：FEMA，2023.
[8]	高迪，程志军，李小阳. 美国建筑技术法规简介（上）［J］. 工程建设标准化，2015（6）：44- 48.
[9]	张萌，潘华，李金臣. 美国建筑抗震设计的法规体系与设计地震动的确定［J］. 震灾防御技术，2017，12（2）：256- 267.
[10]	FEMA. Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards:a handbook［M］. Washington，DC：Government Printing Office，2017.
[11]	PEKELNICKY R，ENGINEERS S D，POLAND S E C，et al. ASCE 41-13：seismic evaluation and retrofit rehabilitation of existing buildings［C］// Proceedings of the SEAOC. 2012：1- 12.
[12]	郑士举，蒋利学. 美国既有建筑抗震性能评估标准简介及与我国标准的对比［J］. 建筑结构，2024，54（5）：54- 61.
[13]	COOK D，SEN A，LIEL A，et al. ASCE/SEI 41 assessment of reinforced concrete buildings:benchmarking nonlinear dynamic procedures with empirical damage observations［J］. Earthquake Spectra，2023，39（3）：1721- 1754.
[14]	Applied Technology Council. Guidelines for performance-based seismic design of buildings:FEMA P-58［S］. Washington，DC：FEMA，2018.
[15]	罗开海，王亚勇. 中美欧抗震设计规范地震动参数换算关系的研究［J］. 建筑结构，2006，36（8）：103- 107.
[16]	LEYENDECKER E V，HUNT R J，FRANKEL A D，et al. Development of maximum considered earthquake ground motion maps［J］. Earthquake Spectra，2000，16（1）：21- 40.
[17]	林拥军，肖恬煦，张曾鹏，等. 基于层次分析法- 隶属度理论的混凝土框架结构安全性模糊综合评价方法［J］. 工业建筑，2022，52（10）：28- 38.
[18]	肖从真，李建辉，马天怡，等. 既有建筑结构加固改造与性能提升现状与发展［J］. 工业建筑，2024，54（1）：20- 30.
[19]	程绍革. 建筑抗震鉴定技术标准的历史与发展［J］. 建筑科学，2013，29（11）：57- 61.
[20]	BEKTAŞ N，KEGYES-BRASSAI O. Conventional RVS methods for seismic risk assessment for estimating the current situation of existing buildings:a state-of-the-art review［J］. Sustainability，2022，14（5）：2583.
[21]	AYDOGDU H H，DEMIR C，KAHRAMAN T，et al. Evaluation of rapid seismic safety assessment methods on a substandard reinforced concrete building stock in Istanbul［J］. Structures，2023，56：104962.
[22]	International Code Council Inc. International existing building code：IEBC-2024［S］. Country Club Hills，IL：International Code Council Inc.，2024.
[23]	高迪，程志军，李小阳. 美国建筑技术法规简介（下）［J］. 工程建设标准化，2015（7）：49- 53.
[24]	GRANT A，ATKINSON C L. Residential wind loss mitigation case study：an analysis of insurance claim data for hurricane michael［J］. climate，2023，11（12）：237.