Finite Element Analysis of Seismic Performance of Concrete Columns Confined by Bidirectional Spiral Stirrups
-
摘要: 针对较高抗震要求的钢筋混凝土柱中箍筋间距过小而导致施工困难的问题,以及混凝土柱发生的箍筋“解锁”现象,提出双向螺旋箍筋约束混凝土柱,并对其抗震性能展开有限元分析。基于已有试验研究,采用ABAQUS软件进行数值模拟分析,验证了模型的合理性,基于此模型,深入分析轴压比、混凝土强度、箍筋间距和直径、配箍形式等参数对其抗震性能的影响,并与单位体积内含钢量相同的薄壁钢管混凝土柱进行对比分析,进一步研究其约束效果。研究结果表明:混凝土柱的延性随着轴压比的增大而降低,而其承载力先随轴压比的增大而增大,当轴压比超过0.5之后,承载力开始下降;延性分别随着混凝土强度与箍筋间距的增加而降低,其承载力随混凝土强度的增加而增加,随箍筋间距的增加而降低;增加箍筋直径可提高柱的延性及承载力;箍筋间距相同时,双向螺旋箍筋约束混凝土柱的承载力要高于单向螺旋箍筋约束混凝土柱;在相同配箍率时,双向螺旋混凝土柱的延性均优于单向螺旋混凝土柱,但不同配箍形式对承载力影响不大;体积配箍率相同时,对比双向螺旋箍筋约束混凝土柱和薄壁圆钢管混凝土柱,前者的延性性能更好,抗震性能更加优越。Abstract: To address the construction difficulties caused by excessively small stirrup spacing in reinforced concrete columns with high seismic demands, as well as the issue of stirrup “unlocking”, this study proposed a concrete column confined by bidirectional spiral stirrups and conducted a finite element analysis on its seismic performance. Drawing upon existing experimental research, numerical simulations were performed using ABAQUS software, and the model’s validity was verified. Based on the validated model, the effects of various parameters, including the axial compression ratio, concrete strength, stirrup spacing, stirrup diameter, and stirrup configuration, on the seismic performance were systematically analyzed. Furthermore, the confinement effect of thin-walled circular steel tubular columns with an equivalent volumetric steel ratio was investigated for comparison. The results indicated that the ductility of the concrete columns decreased as the axial compression ratio increased. In contrast, the bearing capacity initially increased with increasing axial compression ratio but began to decline after the ratio exceeded 0.5. Higher concrete strength and larger stirrup spacing led to reduced ductility. While increased concrete strength enhanced the bearing capacity, larger stirrup spacing reduced it. Increasing the stirrup diameter improved both ductility and bearing capacity. Under identical stirrup spacing, the concrete columns with bidirectional spiral stirrups exhibited a higher bearing capacity than those with unidirectional spiral stirrups. For an equivalent volumetric stirrup ratio, the bidirectionally confined columns demonstrated better ductility than their unidirectional counterparts, without a significant compromise in bearing capacity. At an equivalent volumetric stirrup ratio, the concrete columns confined by bidirectional spiral stirrups demonstrated superior ductility and offered enhanced seismic performance compared to the thin-walled circular steel tubular columns.
-
[1] XIAO Y,HE W,CHOI K. Confined concrete-filled tubular columns[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2005,131(3):488-497. [2] XIAO Y,SAKINO K,TOMII M. Ultimate moment and mechanical behavior of reinforced concrete short circular columns confined in steel tube[J]. Transactions of Japan Concrete Institute,1987,9:389-396. [3] XIAO Y,WU H. Retrofit of reinforced concrete columnsusing partially stiffened steel jackets[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2003,129(6):725-732. [4] CHEN G M,FU M Q,ZHANG J J,et al. FRP spiral strip-confined concrete columns:Stress-strain behavior and size effect[J]. Structures,2023,57:105223. [5] WANG J,XIAO H,LU L,et al. Axial stress-strain model for concrete in partially FRP wrapped reinforced concrete columns[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2024,416:135028. [6] AHMAD T,SEREEN M. Design and reliability analysis of FRP-reinforced concrete columns[J]. Structures,2020,28:1580-1588. [7] SAATCIOGLU M,GRIRA M. Confinement of reinforced concrete columns with welded reinforcement grids[J]. ACI Structural Journal,1999,96(1):29-39. [8] 叶列平,陆新征,赵世春.汶川地震建筑震害分析[J].建筑结构学报,2008,29(4):1-9. [9] 李宏男,肖诗云,霍林生.汶川地震震害调查与启示[J].建筑结构学报,2008,29(4):10-19. [10] 王清湘,赵国藩,林立岩.高强混凝土柱延性的试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,1995,16(4):22-31. [11] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.混凝土结构设计标准:GB/T 50010—2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2024. [12] American Concrete Institute. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary simplified chinese language:ACI 318CS14[S]. Michigan:American Concrete Institute,2016. [13] 祖坤,熊二刚,宋良英.高强混凝土构件力学性能研究综述[J].硅酸盐通报,2019,38(10):3178-3192. [14] HINDI R,TURECHEK W. Experimental behavior of circular concrete columns under reversed cyclic loading[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2008,22(4):684-693. [15] 冯鹏,强翰霖,叶列平.材料、构件、结构的“屈服点”定义与讨论[J].工程力学,2017,34(3):36-46. [16] CUSSON D,PAULTRE P. Stress-strain model for confined high-strength concrete[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,1995,121(3):468-477. [17] PENZIEN J. Dynamic response of elasto-plastic frames[J]. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers,1962,127(2):1-14. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 43
- HTML全文浏览量: 9
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
登录
注册
E-alert
登录
注册
E-alert
下载: