Research on Welding Residual Stress Distribution in Double-Sided Welded U-Rib Steel Bridge Decks Based on Fatigue Cracking Mode
-
摘要: 为研究残余应力对钢桥面板双面焊疲劳性能的影响,通过数值模拟方法对双面焊U肋钢桥面板焊接过程及残余应力分布进行了研究,探究参数变化下双面焊U肋钢桥面板顶板-U肋4种开裂模式残余应力的分布规律,得到不同开裂模式下U肋钢桥面板残余应力分布经验公式。结果表明:双面焊顶板-U肋4种开裂模式沿板厚方向的横向残余拉应力均呈现出拉-压-拉的分布规律,拉应力最大达241.5 MPa;对于T1开裂模式(外焊趾开裂沿板厚方向扩展),顶板由12 mm增加到20 mm,压应力峰值从68 MPa增加到93 MPa,增幅达35.8%,拉应力由155.9 MPa增加到199.6 MPa,增幅为28.0%;U肋厚度影响较小,坡口角度的增加可使横向拉应力和压应力减小;对于T2开裂模式(内焊趾开裂沿板厚方向扩展),板厚对压应力峰值的影响较小,拉应力由186.7 MPa增加到242.9 MPa,增大约30.1%,但U肋厚度和焊接工艺变化对此处影响较小。Abstract: In order to study the influence of residual stress on the fatigue performance of double-sided welded steel bridge decks, the welding process and residual stress distribution of double-sided welded U-rib steel bridge decks were studied by numerical simulations. It examined the effects of parameters on the residual stress distribution for four cracking modes in the roof-to-U-rib connection of double-sided welded U-rib steel bridge decks. Empirical formulas were derived to predict the residual stress distribution under these different cracking modes. The results showed that the transverse residual tensile stress for all four cracking modes exhibited a tension-compression-tension distribution pattern along the thickness direction. The maximum tensile stress observed was 241.5 MPa. For the T1 cracking mode (characterized by crack propagation at the outer weld toe through the plate thickness), increasing the roof thickness from 12 mm to 20 mm caused the peak compressive stress to rise from 68 MPa to 93 MPa (a 35.8% increase), while the tensile stress increased from 155.9 MPa to 199.6 MPa (a 28.0% increase). The U-rib thickness showed minimal effect, but increasing the groove angle reduced both the transverse tensile stress and compressive stress. For the T2 cracking mode (characterized by crack propagation at the inner weld toe through the plate thickness), the plate thickness had little influence on the peak compressive stress. However, the tensile stress increased from 186.7 MPa to 242.9 MPa, representing an increase of approximately 30.1%. Both the U-rib thickness and groove angle demonstrated negligible effects on the T2 mode.
-
Key words:
- steel bridge deck /
- double-sided welding /
- residual stress /
- numerical simulation /
- cracking mode
-
[1] D. 拉达伊. 焊接热效应[M]. 熊第京,郑朝云,史耀武,译.北京:机械工业出版社,1997:8-12. [2] 王伟,王亚飞,周尚猛. 面板-纵肋连接疲劳试验及残余应力分布研究[J]. 铁道工程学报,2021(5):60-64. [3] 张清华,郭亚文,李俊,等. 钢桥面板纵肋双面焊构造疲劳裂纹扩展特性研究[J]. 中国公路学报,2019(7):49-56. [4] 蒋斐,吉伯海,王益逊,等. 2种新型顶板-U肋构造细节的疲劳性能研究[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2020(10):1391-1397. [5] 张清华,罗鹏军,徐恭义,等. 新型镦边纵肋与顶板焊接构造细节疲劳性能试验[J]. 中国公路学报,2018,31(5):42-52. [6] 张清华,郭亚文,李俊,等. 钢桥面板纵肋双面焊构造疲劳裂纹扩展特性研究[J]. 中国公路学报,2019,32(7):49-56. [7] MASAHIRO S,NAOTO N,AKIKO T,et al. Effect of inside fillet weld on fatigue durability of orthotropic steel deck with trough ribs[J]. Anthology of Steel Structure Theory,2014,21(81):65-77. [8] 钱骥,许振波. 正交异性钢桥面板新型双面焊肋-板接头残余应力研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2020,39(11):51-58. [9] 周思廷. 全熔透U肋加劲正交异性钢桥面板焊接残余应力研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学,2018. [10] 孟凡超,张清华,谢红兵,等. 钢桥面板抗疲劳关键技术[M]. 北京:人民交通出版社,2018. [11] European Committee for Standardisation. Eurocode 3,design of steel structures:EN 1993-2∶2005[S]. Brussels,Belgium:European Committee for Standardisation,2005. [12] 赵秋. U肋加劲板焊接残余应力与受压稳定计算方法研究[D]. 上海:同济大学,2010. [13] 刘小渝. 磁测法测试钢结构桥梁的焊接残余应力[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2010,29(1):38-41. [14] 陈向荣,赵智云,姜圆圆. 宽厚比超限的箱型截面焊接残余应力试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2010,43(增刊2):281-285. [15] ZHANG Q H,MA Y,CUI C,et al. Experimental investigation and numerical simulation on welding residual stress of innovative double-side welded rib-to-deck joints of orthotropic steel decks[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2021,179(3):106544. [16] 日本道路场会. 道路橘示方害·同解(橘编)[M]. 东京:丸善株式会社,2012. [17] AASHTO. LRFD bridge design specifications:AA SHTO LRFD-14[S]. Washington,D C:American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials,1998. [18] 中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路钢结构桥梁设计规范:JTG D64—2015[S]. 北京:人民交通出版社,2015. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 18
- HTML全文浏览量: 5
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
登录
注册
E-alert
登录
注册
E-alert
下载: