自复位装配式混凝土框架结构抗震性能试验研究

刘航; 李牧; 杨学中; 韩明杰; 田玉基

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG21062601

自复位装配式混凝土框架结构抗震性能试验研究

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21062601

1. 北京市建筑工程研究院有限责任公司, 北京 100039;
2. 北京交通大学土木建筑工程学院, 北京 100044

基金项目:

北京市自然科学基金项目（8202023）。

详细信息

作者简介:
刘航,男,1971年出生,博士,教授级高级工程师。电子信箱:liuhang71@sina.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 139
- HTML全文浏览量: 19
- PDF下载量: 12
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-06-26
- 网络出版日期: 2022-04-24

Experimental Research on Seismic Performance of Self-centering Prefabricated RC Frame Structures

1. Beijing Building Construction Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100039, China;
2. School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

摘要

摘要: 提出了一种采用新型连接节点构造的自复位装配式混凝土框架结构。设计并制作了两榀单层单跨框架结构试件，包括一榀现浇混凝土框架和一榀新型装配式混凝土框架。其中，对装配式混凝土框架结构进行了两次拟静力试验，第二次试验是在第一次试验完成后并更换结构的耗能钢筋进行的。试验结果表明：新型装配式混凝土框架结构的承载能力和耗能能力略低于现浇混凝土框架结构，但延性较现浇框架有较大提高，层间位移角超过1/50时，承载力仍无下降趋势；另外，装配式混凝土框架结构在第一次试验后的残余变形约为现浇框架结构的15%，构件损伤轻微，结构可以实现自主复位；装配式框架结构在第二次试验中的承载力较第一次试验略有下降，残余变形有所增大，仍然具有一定的自主复位能力，结构损伤仍较轻微，说明其经过简单地更换耗能钢筋就可以实现抗震能力的基本恢复。
- 自复位 /
- 装配式混凝土框架 /
- 水平低周反复荷载试验 /
- 无黏结预应力筋 /
- 耗能钢筋
Abstract: A new self-centering prefabricated RC frame structure was proposed. Two single-floor and one-bay frame specimen were designed and constructed, including one cast-in-situ concrete frame and one new type of prefabricated RC frame. Two quasi-static tests were carried out for the self-centering prefabricated RC frame specimen, and the second test was carried out after the completion of the first test and the energy-dissipation rebars of the structure were replaced. The results showed that the bearing capacity and energy-dissipation capacity of the new prefabricated RC frame was slightly lower than the conventional concrete frame, but the ductility was enhanced substantially compared with the conventional concrete frame. When the drift ratio was larger than 1/50, the bearing capacity of the prefabricated RC frame still did not decrease. The residual deformation of the new prefabricated RC frame after the first quasi-static test was approximately 15% of that of the cast-in-situ concrete frame. The damage degree of the components was slight and the self-centering performance of the structure could be achieved. The bearing capacity of the new prefabricated RC frame in the second test was decreased slightly, and the residual deformation was larger compared with the results of first test. The self-centering performance still existed, and the damage degree of component was still slight. It could be shown that the seismic performance of the new self-centering prefabricated RC frame could be basically restored through the simple replacement of the energy-dissipation rebar.
- self-centering /
- prefabricated concrete frame /
- quasi-static test /
- unbonded prestressed tendons /
- energy-dissipation rebar

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

[1]	OYGUC R, TOROS C, ABDELNABY A E. Seismic behavior of irregular reinforced-concrete structures under multiple earthquake excitations[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 104:15-32.
[2]	HOSSEINPOUR F, ABDELNABY A E. Fragility curves for RC frames under multiple earthquakes[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 98:222-234.
[3]	周颖, 吴浩, 顾安琪. 地震工程:从抗震、减隔震到可恢复性[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(6):1-12.
[4]	吕西林, 全柳萌, 蒋欢军. 从16届世界地震工程大会看可恢复功能抗震结构研究趋势[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2017, 37(3):5-13.
[5]	XIE L L, QU Z. On civil engineering disasters and their mitigation[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2018, 17(1):1-10.
[6]	PRIESTLEY M J N. Overview of PRESSS research program[J]. PCI Journal, 1991, 36(4):50-67.
[7]	PRIESTLEY M J N. The presss program current status and proposed plans for phase III[J]. PCI Journal, 1996, 41(2):22-40.
[8]	PRIESTLEY M J N, SRITHARAN S, CONLEY J R, et al. Preliminary results and conclusions from the presss five-story precast concrete test building[J]. PCI Journal, 1999, 44(6):42-67.
[9]	ENGLEKIRK R E.Design-construction of the paramount-a 39-story precast prestressed concrete apartment building[J]. PCI Journal, 2002, 47(4):56-71.
[10]	SARTI F, SMITH T, PALERMO A, et al. Experimental and analytical study of replaceable buckling-restrained fuse-type (BRF) mild steel dissipaters[C]//NZSEE Conference. New Zealand:2013.
[11]	PAMPANIN S, KAM W Y, HAVERLAND G, et al. Expectation meets reality:seismic performance of post-tensioned precast concrete southern cross endoscopy building during the 22nd Feb 2011 christchurch earthquake[C]//NZ Concrete Industry Conference.[s.n.]:2011.
[12]	SONG L L, GUO T, GU Y, et al. Experimental study of a self-centering prestressed concrete frame subassembly[J]. Engineering Structures, 2015, 88:176-188.
[13]	GUO T, SONG L L, CAO Z, et al. Large-scale tests on cyclic behavior of self-centering prestressed concrete frames[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2016, 113(6):1263-1274.
[14]	吕西林, 姜淳, 卢煦. 自复位钢筋混凝土框架结构及其拟静力试验[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2018, 50(3):73-81.
[15]	刘航, 王胜, 王海深, 等. 预应力自复位装配式混凝土框架节点抗震性能研究[J]. 建筑技术, 2018, 49(1):50-53.