The Conception and Practice of a Pan-University Spatial Model for Industrial Heritage Sites and Their Cultural Transformation:Taking Dongfang Chemical Plant Renewal Design as an Example
-
摘要: 文化引领工业遗存地更新转型已成风尚,并成为消费主义的资本附庸,逐渐丧失了本有的生活性内核与文化多样性,尤其是地处中心区位的此类更新,其未来发展的定位和价值导向至关重要。基于对工业遗存地文化转型研究与实践的系统梳理以及文化空间发展的趋势性分析,提出“知识经济时代的城市中心是大学”的战略构想与“泛大学空间”模式,旨在重塑其可持续发展的文化内核。从大学理念、模式内涵、基本形态、建筑属性和实操要点等方面提炼其构造机理,指引出一种以培育创意生活与创新文化为价值导向、围绕创新活动的不确定性来构造新型生产关系的空间逻辑,进而结合城市设计实践予以论证。最后对未来“大学之城”图景进行展望,以期整合并重构泛大学化的创新空间体系,回归城市的创新本质。Abstract: The renewal and transformation of industrial heritage sites guided by culture has become fashionable, but lots of them are capital vassals of consumerism, gradually losing their inherent core of life and cultural diversity. Especially for such renewal projects in central urban areas, their position and value orientation of future development are crucial. Based on the system arrangement of cultural transformation studies and practices of industrial heritage sites, along with an analysis of cultural space development trends, this paper put forward the strategic conception of "universities would be the urban center in the era of knowledge economy" and a pan-university spatial model in order to reshape the cultural core that could support its sustainable development. Later, the construction mechanism of this model was extracted from several aspects of university concept, mode connotation, basic forms, architectural attributes and operation points, then showed a spatial logic oriented toward cultivating creative life and innovative culture as values, constructing new production relations around the uncertainty of innovation activities, combined with the practice of urban design. Finally, the university city prospect in future was preliminarily revealed in order to integrate and reconstruct the innovative space system of pan-university and return to the innovative essence of cities.
-
[1] 逯百慧,边兰春,王康. 关系重构与空间变迁:一个工业遗产更新转型案例[J]. 工业建筑,2023,53(12):1-10. [2] 王晶,李浩,王辉. 城市工业遗产保护更新:一种构建创意城市的重要途径[J]. 国际城市规划,2012(3):60-64. [3] 刘抚英. 工业遗产保护与再利用模式谱系研究:基于尺度层级结构视角[J]. 城市规划,2016(9):84-96,112. [4] 李和平,肖瑶. 文化规划主导下的城市老工业区保护与更新[J]. 规划师,2014(7):40-44. [5] 刘雪娇,郭嘉盛. 城市更新语境下基于价值导向的工业遗产再利用探索[J]. 城市发展研究,2022(5):80-85. [6] 徐苏斌,仲丹丹. 高校带动下的文化产业与工业遗产再利用协同发展[J]. 城市发展研究,2015(11):14-19. [7] 孙淼,李振宇. 中心城区工业遗存地用地特征与更新设计策略研究[J]. 城市规划学刊,2019(5):92-101. [8] 孟璠磊,扈亚宁. 工业遗产临时性利用开发:以阿姆斯特丹西煤气厂为例[J]. 国际城市规划,2022(6):127-133. [9] 张杰,刘岩,魏炜嘉. 遗产地保护利用全流程实施的“DIBO方案”:以景德镇河东老城工业遗产保护利用系列项目为例[J]. 城乡规划,2021(1):9-17. [10] 何小欣. 当代博物馆的复合化设计[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015. [11] 哈罗德·R·斯内德科夫. 文化设施的多用途开发[M]. 梁学勇,杨小军,林璐,译. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2008. [12] 姜珺. 作为建筑史观念性重译的建筑:评非常建筑新作中国美术学院良渚校区[J]. 时代建筑,2021(6):87-98. [13] 赵汀阳. 论可能生活:一种关于幸福和公正的理论[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004. [14] 卡尔·雅斯贝尔斯. 大学之理念[M]. 邱立波,译. 上海:上海人民出版社,2007. [15] 杨超. 要素还原:一种建筑和城市设计的极简主义方法论[J]. 工业建筑,2023,53(7):32-42,101. [16] 孙晨光,朱文一. 布鲁斯·卡兹“城市创新区”理论的解读及其对北京的启示[J]. 城市设计,2018(1):22-33. -

计量
- 文章访问数: 62
- HTML全文浏览量: 7
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0