Numerical Simulations on Three Rows of Stepped Anti-Slide Piles Against Filling Slopes on Hillsides
-
摘要: 针对新型抗滑支挡结构——三排阶梯形抗滑桩,以某填方边坡为例,采用有限差分法FLAC3D探讨了三排阶梯形抗滑桩的受力特征、支护效果以及岩土参数对抗滑桩受力特性的影响。研究表明:三排阶梯形抗滑桩各组成构件具有共同作用、协调变形,侧向刚度大、抵抗侧向变形能力强的特点,在边坡填方中,便于施工,能很好地抑制坡体变形;三排阶梯形抗滑桩工作时,在桩梁搭接处易产生拉应力集中,且后桩桩背受拉最强,中桩次之,前桩最弱,下部横梁易产生剪应力集中,且下梁受剪高于上梁;随着回填土内摩擦角的减小,抗滑桩各构件内力逐渐增大,且增加幅度越来越大;随着填土内摩擦角的增大,抗滑桩变形逐渐减小,且幅度越来越小。Abstract: In view of a new type of anti-slide retaining structure-three rows of stepped anti-sliding piles,based on a certain actual filling slope,the mechanical characteristics, supporting effects, and influence of geotechnical parameters on mechanical characteristics of three rows of stepped anti-slide piles were discussed by the finite difference software FLAC3D. The analysis results indicated that the members of stepped anti-slide piles were of the collaborative work, coordinated deformation, large lateral stiffness,strong resistance to lateral deformation and convenient construction during filling of slopes, which could better constrain the deformation of slopes. the tensile stress concentration was easy to occur at connections between piles and beams; the tension in the back of rear piles was largest and took the second place in intermediate piles, the tension in the front pile was smallest. The lower beam was prone to shear stress concentration, and the lower beam was sheared stronger than the upper beam; as the internal friction angle of the backfill decreased, the internal forces in each member of the anti-slide piles increased,and the growth rates were increasing. With the increase of the internal friction angle of fillers, the deformation of anti-slide piles gradually decreased, and the growth rates were decreasing.
-
[1] 肖世国.边(滑)坡治理中h型组合抗滑桩的分析方法及工程应用[J].岩土力学,2010(7):2146-2152. [2] 王羽.h型抗滑桩设计计算方法研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2011. [3] 欧明喜. h型抗滑桩力学机理及其工程应用研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2012. [4] 张永杰,李侑军,曹文贵,等.大型滑坡预应力锚索h型抗滑桩处置方法研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2014(5):57-63. [5] 张永杰,周欢,冯夏庭,等.h型抗滑桩简化计算方法及其影响因素分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2016(增刊1):2935-2943. [6] 姚裕春,李安洪,苏谦.陡坡椅式桩板结构受力模式及计算方法分析[J].铁道工程学报,2016(8):71-76. [7] 刘新荣,欧明喜,郑颖人,等.h型抗滑桩抗滑机制模型试验研究[J].土木建筑与环境工程,2013(2):33-37,91. [8] 白皓,王武斌,廖知勇,等.软岩陡坡椅式桩支挡结构受力变形模型试验研究[J].岩土力学,2015(增刊2):221-228. [9] 白皓,杨智翔,梁栋,等.横向荷载下椅式桩板墙模型试验研究[J].工业建筑,2018,48(9):111-116,175. [10] ZHAO B, WANG Y S, WANG Y, et al. Retaining mechanism and structural characteristics of h type anti-slide pile (hTP pile) and experience with its engineering application[J]. Engineering Geology, 2017, 222:29-37. [11] 罗忠行,牛建东,李泽玮,等.深基坑h型双排桩的变形计算及优化分析[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2020(7):1720-1727. [12] 熊传祥,张满,陈誉.h型支挡结构的试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2022,55(7):108-120. [13] 欧孝夺,唐迎春,崔伟,等.h型抗滑桩模型试验及数值模拟[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2012(9):1936-1943. [14] 许佳佳,王晓健. h型抗滑桩加固边坡的优化分析[J].水电能源科学, 2016, 34(2):113-115. [15] 李洋,李元松,王亚军. h型抗滑桩的受力特性及优化设计[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2016, 38(2):173-177. [16] 宁宇,黄青富,郝李坤,等.联合h型桩在滑坡体阻滑中应用数值模拟研究[J].科学技术与工程,2021(23):10004-10012. [17] 李兵,赵如雄,马洪生,黄俊杰.圆截面h型抗滑桩受力与变形分析[J].地下空间与工程学报,2021(增刊2):1023-1027. [18] 罗勇,姜波,李春峰,等.h型抗滑桩滑坡治理中的变形特性及内力研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2017(6):1702-1710. [19] 杨义奎.h型抗滑桩计算分析及工程应用[D].成都:西南交通大学,2015. 期刊类型引用(6)
1. 刘宏欣,贾水钟,李杰,李亚明,张仪放,蔡艳清,潘法超. 部分包覆钢-混凝土组合梁柱节点抗震性能试验研究. 建筑结构. 2024(04): 18-23 . 百度学术
2. 贾水钟,刘宏欣,李亚明,孙求知,张朕磊,钱桦. 工艺孔对大截面部分包覆钢-混凝土组合梁受弯性能影响的试验研究. 建筑结构. 2024(04): 9-17 . 百度学术
3. 李康,李俊华,王维宸,周培松,盛雷军,刘铨,陈国灿. 装配式钢筋混凝土叠合次梁-PEC主梁节点受力性能. 建筑结构学报. 2024(S1): 14-24 . 百度学术
4. 陆天宇,杨克家,李杰,蒋路,楼汉忠. 波浪腹板PEC梁抗震延性性能试验研究. 地震工程与工程振动. 2024(05): 108-117 . 百度学术
5. 龚树红,陈刚,顾明明,胡夏闽. 部分包覆钢-混凝土组合梁在负弯矩作用下的刚度分析. 钢结构(中英文). 2023(06): 51-60 . 百度学术
6. 樊俊威,章雪峰,张豪,高伦浩,傅林峰,俞晨达. 部分包覆钢-混凝土组合蜂窝框架梁抗震设计研究. 建筑结构. 2023(S1): 1852-1855 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(3)
-

计量
- 文章访问数: 128
- HTML全文浏览量: 21
- PDF下载量: 12
- 被引次数: 9