套筒灌浆缺陷影响下的装配整体式混凝土剪力墙抗震性能分析

杨海军; 纪萌; 付素娟; 吴文斌; 蒋亚贤; 伍莎

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG22032505

套筒灌浆缺陷影响下的装配整体式混凝土剪力墙抗震性能分析

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22032505

1. 河北建筑工程学院, 河北张家口 075000;
2. 张家口市工程力学分析重点实验室, 河北张家口 075000;
3. 河北省建筑科学研究院有限公司, 石家庄 050227

基金项目:

河北省建设科技研究计划项目(2021-2092)。

详细信息

作者简介:
杨海军,男,1969年出生,博士,教授。电子信箱:103923399@qq.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 100
- HTML全文浏览量: 7
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 1
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-03-25

Experimental Study on the Effects of Grout Defects on the Seismic Performance of PC Shear Walls

1. Hebei University of Architecture, Zhangjiakou 075000, China;
2. Zhangjiakou Key Laboratory of Engineering Mechanics Analysis, Zhangjiakou 075000, China;
3. Hebei Academy of Building Research Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050227, China

摘要

摘要: 为研究套筒灌浆缺陷对装配整体式混凝土剪力墙抗震性能的影响,设计并制作了3个缺陷程度递增的足尺寸剪力墙试件和1个无缺陷对比试件,对其进行拟静力试验并对试件破坏过程、承载力、刚度和耗能能力进行分析。结果表明:相对于无缺陷试件,灌浆缺陷对开裂荷载的影响不大,但会导致试件的滞回曲线产生不同程度的捏缩;随着缺陷程度的增加,试件的屈服荷载、峰值荷载及耗能能力均会下降,屈服荷载分别下降了3%、8%、15%,峰值荷载下降了5%、12%、14%,总能耗分别下降了4%、8%、12%。
- 装配式剪力墙 /
- 套筒连接 /
- 灌浆缺陷 /
- 拟静力试验
Abstract: In order to study the influence of sleeve grouting defects on the seismic performance of assembled integral concrete shear wall, three full-size shear wall specimens with increasing defect degrees and a defect-free comparative specimen were designed and produced, and the simulated static test was carried out to analyze the failure process, bearing capacity, stiffness and energy consumption capacity of the specimen. The results show that compared with the defect-free specimen, the grouting defect has little effect on the cracking load, but it will lead to different degrees of pinching of the hysteresis curve of the specimen. With the increase of defects, the yield load, peak load and energy consumption capacity of the specimen will decrease. The yield load will decrease by 3%, 8%, 15%, the peak load will decrease by 5%, 12%, 14%, and the total energy consumption will decrease by 4%, 8%, and 12%, respectively.
- precast shear wall /
- sleeve connection /
- grout defects /
- quasi-static tests

HTML全文

参考文献(17)

[1]	王霁云.不同连接方式装配式剪力墙抗震性能研究[D].合肥: 安徽建筑大学,2020.
[2]	GU Q, DONG G, WANG X, et al. Research on pseudo-static cyclic tests of precastconcrete shear walls with vertical rebar lapping in grout-filled constrained hole[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019,189:396-410.
[3]	解琳琳,李晓园,李爱群,等.灌浆套筒连接装配式剪力墙的易损性模型[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,51(6): 935-941.
[4]	李蕊. 采用套筒连接方式的预制装配式剪力墙抗震性能研究[D].广州: 广州大学,2019.
[5]	成然.预制装配式套筒灌浆连接混凝土剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[D].西安: 长安大学,2018.
[6]	AHMAD B A R,GOH H M,YUSOF A. Grouted pipe with double spirals for precast concrete connections[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials,2015,4113(789/790):1134-1139.
[7]	韩志攀,牛彦平,高宇甲,等.装配式联肢剪力墙抗震性能影响因素分析[J].建筑结构,2021,51(增刊2):1150-1154.
[8]	屈魏超,雷远德.单排套筒和双排套筒连接的装配式钢筋混凝土联肢剪力墙基础隔震结构受力性能对比研究[J].建筑结构,2021,51(增刊1):980-987.
[9]	HAN Q, WANG D, ZHANG Y, et al. Experimental investigation and simplified stiffness degradation model of precast concrete shear wall with steel connectors[J/OL]. Engineering Structures, 2020[2022-03-25].https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029620312554.
[10]	郑清林.灌浆缺陷对套筒连接接头和构件性能影响的研究[D].北京: 中国建筑科学研究院, 2017.
[11]	XU F, WANG K, WANG S, et al. Experimental bond behavior of deformed rebars in half-grouted sleeve connections with insufficient grouting defect [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 185: 264-274.
[12]	王伟. 考虑套筒灌浆缺陷的装配式剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[D].南京: 东南大学,2019.
[13]	向绪儒,顾箭峰,李佳栩,等.灌浆缺陷对半灌浆套筒连接件强度的影响[J].武汉工程大学学报,2021,43(6):657-663.
[14]	XIAO S, WANG Z L, LI X M, et al. Study of effects of sleeve grouting defects on the seismic performance of precast concrete shear walls[J/OL]. Engineering Structures, 2021[2022-03-25]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014102962034434.
[15]	CAO Z J, LI Q W. Effect of connection deficiency on seismic performance of precast concrete shear wall-frame structures[J/OL]. Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami,2019[2022-03-25]. https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1793431119400050.
[16]	王占文,陈建伟,鞠士龙,等.加载方式和锚固长度对钢筋套筒灌浆连接性能影响试验研究[J].工业建筑,2021,51(4):118-125 ,171.
[17]	陈旭东,刘运林.钢筋套筒灌浆连接件锚固性能试验研究[J].河南城建学院学报,2020,29(2):8-14.