Design and Analysis of a Lightweight Modular Integrated Steel Platform Supported by Climbing Cones and Tripod Brackets

LIU Yutao; WANG Lijun; HUANG Shan; HUANG Sumeng

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG25090205

Volume 56 Issue 10

Oct. 2026

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2026 > 56(10): 145-154

LIU Yutao, WANG Lijun, HUANG Shan, HUANG Sumeng. Design and Analysis of a Lightweight Modular Integrated Steel Platform Supported by Climbing Cones and Tripod Brackets[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2026, 56(10): 145-154. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG25090205

Citation:

LIU Yutao, WANG Lijun, HUANG Shan, HUANG Sumeng. Design and Analysis of a Lightweight Modular Integrated Steel Platform Supported by Climbing Cones and Tripod Brackets[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2026, 56(10): 145-154. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG25090205

Citation:

PDF( 2282 KB)

Design and Analysis of a Lightweight Modular Integrated Steel Platform Supported by Climbing Cones and Tripod Brackets

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG25090205

1. Zhongtian Construction Group Corp. Ltd., Hangzhou 310020, China;
2. Zhejiang Kaijia Construction Technology Corp. Ltd., Huzhou 313216, China

Received Date: 2025-09-02
Available Online: 2026-11-06

Abstract

Abstract

To enhance the layout flexibility， modularity， and economic efficiency of integrated steel platforms， a lightweight modular integrated steel platform supported by climbing cones and tripod brackets was developed for a super high-rise project in Ningbo. This system incorporates innovative assembled connections and a climbing-cone anchorage system， achieving comprehensive performance improvements in modularity， lightweight design， and high reusability. To evaluate its safety， finite element simulations， climbing-cone bearing capacity tests， and on-site load tests were conducted. The results demonstrated that during both the working and jacking stages， the platform exhibited good overall stiffness， with maximum displacements within code-specified limits， a maximum member stress ratio below 0.82， and sufficient reserve capacity. The climbing-cone anchorage system showed a shear capacity safety factor greater than 2.93， indicating high reliability. Furthermore， the structural stresses measured during the on-site load test closely aligned with the finite element analysis results.
- climbing cones,
- tripod brackets,
- integrated steel platform,
- finite element analysis,
- climbing-cone bearing capacity test,
- load test

FullText(HTML)

References(19)

References

[1]	余地华,侯玉杰,艾心荧,等.天津高银117大厦新型抗侧移模块化低位顶升钢平台模架体系设计关键技术[J].施工技术,2015,44(23):1-6.
[2]	周杰刚,崔旭旺,王开强,等.武汉中心可变微凸支点匣套型顶升模架体系关键施工技术[J].施工技术,2013,42(19):12-17.
[3]	廖鸿,杜福祥,袁渊,等.重庆国金中心集成式施工平台系统设计与施工技术[J].施工技术,2016,45(20):117-120.
[4]	林海,龚剑,倪杰,等.广州新电视塔工程核心筒顶部4层施工技术[J].施工技术,2009,38(6):10-14.
[5]	徐伟,孙旻,骆艳斌,等.上海环球金融中心整体钢平台模板体系动力可靠性分析[J].建筑技术,2008,39(5):336-339.
[6]	陈逯浩,朱毅敏,徐磊,等.超高层连体分叉核心筒整体提升钢平台模架体系研究[J].建筑结构,2022,52(12):115-120.
[7]	王小安,王明亮,王庆春,等.大型集成组装式造楼平台装备连接构造及分析[J].建筑结构,2022,52(12):102-108.
[8]	王巩凡.超高层建筑顶升模架关键系统的研究与设计[D].西安:西安工业大学,2021.
[9]	曾凡奎,刘新钊,潘壮,等.超高层建筑的顶升模架结构施工模拟与监测[J].工业建筑,2021,51(11):127-131.
[10]	白雪,马海彬,姚传勤,等.超高层建筑顶升模板体系设计及模态分析[J].工业建筑,2013,43(5):14-17.
[11]	龚剑,赵传凯,杨振宇.筒架支撑式整体钢平台模架体系风致响应研究[J].建筑结构学报,2016,37(12):49-57.
[12]	张龙龙,黄玉林,左自波,等.超高层巨型整体钢平台模架称重监测单元开发与试验[J].建筑结构,2021,51(增刊1):2258-2264.
[13]	马未,王小安,秦鹏飞.钢柱与筒架交替支撑式整体钢平台模架体系[J].建筑施工,2020,42(11):2089-2092.
[14]	秦鹏飞,王小安,穆荫楠,等.钢梁与筒架交替支撑式整体爬升钢平台模架的模块化设计及应用[J].建筑施工,2018,40(6):919-921.
[15]	刘玉涛,陈万里,黄苏梦,等.轻量化整体液压顶升式钢平台在宁波曼哈顿大厦项目中的应用[J].施工技术(中英文),2024,53(14):35-40.
[16]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.钢结构设计标准:GB 50017-2017[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018.
[17]	舒兴平.高等钢结构分析与设计[M].北京:科学出版社,2006.
[18]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.整体爬升钢平台模架技术标准:JGJ 459-2019[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2019.
[19]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.混凝土物理力学性能试验方法标准:GB/T 50081-2019[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2019.