Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 56 Issue 8
Aug.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Ming, JIANG Yuan, ZHANG Ao, ZHU Hao. Experimental and Numerical Simulations of Wind Loads on Open Building Canopies[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2026, 56(8): 110-120. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG25032502
Citation: LI Ming, JIANG Yuan, ZHANG Ao, ZHU Hao. Experimental and Numerical Simulations of Wind Loads on Open Building Canopies[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2026, 56(8): 110-120. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG25032502

Experimental and Numerical Simulations of Wind Loads on Open Building Canopies

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG25032502
  • Received Date: 2025-03-25
    Available Online: 2026-11-06
  • This study addresses the mechanism by which wind loads act on roof-attached canopies under complex interference conditions, which remains inadequately understood. Combining wind tunnel tests and numerical simulations, this study systematically investigated the effects of building height and wind direction angle on the wind pressure distribution on canopies. Wind tunnel tests were conducted using a 1∶50 scale model in a simulated Class B topographic wind field, and the effects of building heights (6 m, 12 m, 18 m, 24 m) and wind direction angles (0°-45°) on mean and extreme wind pressures were analyzed. Numerical simulations employed the NSRFG method to generate turbulent boundary layers and large eddy simulation (LES) to analyze flow field characteristics, revealing the dynamic response mechanism of wind loads through vorticity distribution and flow structure. The results showed that building height significantly influenced the wind load on canopies, with a critical height of 12 m identified. At this height, the extreme wind pressure coefficient reached -3.0, and the wind load exhibited the strongest directional sensitivity at a wind direction angle of approximately 25°. The wind pressure distribution was dominated by cylindrical and conical vortices. Local negative pressure peaks were caused by vortex separation at the windward edge, and a “double negative effect” was formed by the superposition of positive pressure on the lower surface and negative pressure on the upper surface, which collectively enhanced the overall wind suction. Numerical simulations further indicated that at a height of 12 m, the cylindrical vortex size and wake vortex intensity were the largest, covering the entire canopy surface and causing a sharp increase in wind load. This study clarified the dynamic evolution mechanism of wind pressure on roof-attached canopies under complex interference conditions, providing a theoretical basis for the wind-resistant design of such structures and validating the effectiveness of the combined experimental and numerical simulations.
  • loading
  • [1]
    HUI Y,TANG Y,YANG Q,et al. A wakeoscillator model for predicting VIV of 4to1 rectangular section cylinder[J]. Nonlinear Dynamics,2024,112(11):8985-8999.
    [2]
    HUI Y,LIU Z,GUO K,et al. A mathematical model of nonlinear aerodynamic damping for highrise buildings[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics,2024,150(5):04024021.
    [3]
    SAKIB F A,STATHOPOULOS T,BHOWMICK A K. A review of wind loads on canopies attached to walls of lowrise buildings[J]. Engineering Structures,2021,230:111656.
    [4]
    ROY A K,AHUJA A K,GUPTA V K. Wind pressure distribution on flat canopy roofs[C]// Recent Advances in Civil Engineering(RACE-07). Bhubaneswar:2007:1-10.
    [5]
    彭仪普,于风晓,谢稳江,等. 沿海地区站台柱Y型雨棚风压分布特征研究[J]. 工业建筑,2025,55(3):196-203.
    [6]
    ROBERTSON A P,MORAN P. Comparisons of fullscale and windtunnel measurements of wind loads on a freestanding canopy roof structure[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,1986,23:113-125.
    [7]
    ROBERTSON A P. Design wind loads for ridged canopy roof structures[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,1986,24(3):185-192.
    [8]
    UEMATSU Y,STATHOPOULOS T,IIZUMI E. Wind loads on freestanding canopy roofs:part 1 local wind pressures[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,2008,96(6/ 7):1015-1028.
    [9]
    COLLIERS J,MOLLAERT M,DEGROOTE J,et al. Prototyping of thin shell wind tunnel models to facilitate experimental wind load analysis on curved canopy structures[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,2019,188:308-322.
    [10]
    COLLIERS J,DEGROOTE J,MOLLAERT M,et al. Mean pressure coefficient distributions over hyperbolic paraboloid roof and canopy structures with different shape parameters in a uniform flow with very small turbulence[J]. Engineering Structures,2020,205:110043.
    [11]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009—2012[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012.
    [12]
    戴益民,蒋荣正,高阳,等. 罩棚与低矮建筑表面风压相互干扰影响规律[J]. 湖南科技大学学报(自然科学版),2016,31(3):51-57.
    [13]
    蒋荣正. 罩棚式低矮建筑表面风压的风洞试验和数值模拟研究[D]. 长沙:湖南科技大学,2016.
    [14]
    沈国辉,李懿鹏,韩康辉,等. 高层建筑外附雨棚的表面风压和气动力系数[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2023,50(7):120-129.
    [15]
    PALUCH M J,LOREDO-SOUZA A M,BLESSMANN J. Wind loads on attached canopies and their effect on the pressure distribution over archroof industrial buildings[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,2003,91(8):975-994.
    [16]
    GOYAL R,AHUJA A. The distribution of pressure near the corners of flat canopy attached to the gable roof building[C]// The Fifth International Symposium on Computational Wind Engineering(CWE-2006). Yokohama:2006:427-430.
    [17]
    WEN L,HATAKEYAMA T,SATO K,et al. Wind force coefficients for the design of supporting systems of large canopies attached to lowand mediumrise buildings with flat roofs[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,2020,207:104429.
    [18]
    ZISIS I,STATHOPOULOS T. Windinduced pressures on patio covers[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2010,136(9):1172-1181.
    [19]
    ZISIS I,RAJI F,CANDELARIO J D. Largescale wind tunnel tests of canopies attached to lowrise buildings[J]. Journal of Architectural Engineering,2017,23(1):B4016005.
    [20]
    CANDELARIO J D,STATHOPOULOS T,ZISIS I. Wind loading on attached canopies:Codification study[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2014,140(5):04014007.
    [21]
    ROH H W,KIM H R. Wind pressure distribution on canopies attached to tall buildings[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology,2011,25(7):1767-1774.
    [22]
    胡晓兵,杨易. 基于NSRFG方法的标准地貌风场大涡模拟研究[J]. 工程力学,2020,37(9):112-122.
    [23]
    周晅毅,祖公博,顾明. TTU标准模型表面风压大涡模拟及风洞试验的对比研究[J]. 工程力学,2016,33(2):104-110.
    [24]
    COOK N J,MAYNE J R. A novel working approach to the assessment of wind loads for equivalent static design[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,1979,4(2):149-164.
    [25]
    杨庆山,陈飞新,赵乐,等. 基于大涡模拟的大气边界层湍流强度对低矮房屋风荷载特性影响研究[J]. 工程力学,2021,38(12):25-38.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (20) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return