Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 56 Issue 1
Jan.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
GUAN Yongying, TONG Hongliang, JIN Rencai, GONG Chao, CHEN Xiangyu, LIANG Zihao, LI Eryao, ZHANG Sumei. Experimental Research on the Influence of Axial Compression Ratio on the Performance of Reinforced Concrete Grid Walls[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2026, 56(1): 1-10. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24122303
Citation: GUAN Yongying, TONG Hongliang, JIN Rencai, GONG Chao, CHEN Xiangyu, LIANG Zihao, LI Eryao, ZHANG Sumei. Experimental Research on the Influence of Axial Compression Ratio on the Performance of Reinforced Concrete Grid Walls[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2026, 56(1): 1-10. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24122303

Experimental Research on the Influence of Axial Compression Ratio on the Performance of Reinforced Concrete Grid Walls

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24122303
  • Received Date: 2024-12-23
    Available Online: 2026-02-26
  • Publish Date: 2026-01-22
  • Prefabricated reinforced concrete walls have high lateral stiffness, low deformation capacity, and are prone to shear brittle failure. By regularly arranging openings on the wall, the failure modes of the wall under lateral force can be adjusted, and the ductility of the wall can be increased. Four reinforced concrete grid walls with opening dimensions of 200 mm × 500 mm and a shear span ratio of 0.7 were designed and manufactured in this study. Experimental investigations were conducted on the structural performance of the walls under transverse static loads and transverse cyclic loads under different axial compression ratios. The force mechanism, monotonic load-displacement curves, hysteresis curves, and skeleton curves of the walls were analyzed; the results reveled the two-stage failure mode of the grid wall, for which the internal connecting beams failed first and the inter-grid split columns failed later. The results showed that increasing the axial compression ratio from 0.1 to 0.35 increased the load-bearing capacity of the grid wall by 38%, reduced the ductility coefficient by 9.3% under reciprocating load. Moreover, in static tests, the rate of post-peak degradation in the bearing capacity of walls with different axial compression ratios was almost the same; by appropriately setting the grid of reinforced concrete walls, the project changed the failure mode of the walls and improved their ductility.
  • loading
  • [1]
    PHILLIP W H,CHEN G,YASHINSKY M,et al. China earthquake reconnaissance report:performance of transportation structures during the May 12,2008,M7.9 Wechuan Earthquake[R]. Washington,D C:Federal Highway Administration,2011.
    [2]
    MASI A,CHIAUZZI L,SANTARSIERO G,et al. Seismic response of RC buildings during the Mw 6.0 August 24,2016 Central Italy earthquake:the Amatrice case study[J]. Springer Netherlands,2019,17:5631-5654.
    [3]
    金辰华,吴畅,潘钻峰,等. 高轴压比下小剪跨比剪力墙的抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构,2024,54(12):73-81.
    [4]
    陈忠汉. 钢筋砼带边框开洞剪力墙的抗剪承载力分析[J]. 建筑结构,1997(12):33-36.
    [5]
    熊二刚,郭帆,张萌,等. 新型装配式剪力墙水平连接装置的力学性能[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报,2022,54(11):112-121.
    [6]
    LI H N,LI B. Experimental study on seismic restoring performance of reinforced concrete shear walls[J]. Journal of Building Structures,2004,25(5):35-42.
    [7]
    LU X L,ZHOU Y,CHEN C. Research progress on innovative earthquake Hresilient structural systems[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics,2014,34(4):130-139.
    [8]
    孙建超,钱稼茹,方鄂华,等. 小剪跨比保温砌模混凝土墙抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2002,23(2):19-26.
    [9]
    王奇,钱稼茹,马宝民,等. 保温砌模混凝土网格墙抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2004,25(4):15-25.
    [10]
    周明杰,姜芳禄,王晓伟,等. 不同框格形式网格框架墙体的抗震性能分析[J]. 河北工业大学学报,2012,41(4):77-82.
    [11]
    王激扬,楼文娟,田中仁史. 开洞形式对混凝土剪力墙抗震性能的影响[J]. 建筑结构学报,2009,30(增刊2):41-46.
    [12]
    黄炜,姚谦峰,章宇明,等. 内填砌体的密肋复合墙体极限承载力计算[J]. 土木工程学报,2006(3):68-75.
    [13]
    张微敬,初晓. 不同网格间距的小剪跨比网格剪力墙抗震性能研究[J]. 世界地震工程,2023,39(1):89-99.
    [14]
    张海亮,刘金果,胡展孝,等. 装配式开洞砌体填充墙试验及建造技术[J]. 建筑施工,2022,44(10):2490-2494.
    [15]
    关永莹,赵木子,陈祥宇,等. 钢管混凝土框架-钢筋混凝土密肋剪力墙结构体系建模方法研究[J]. 工业建筑,2025,55(1):129-136.
    [16]
    中华人民共和囯住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土结构设计标准:GB/T 50010—2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2024.
    [17]
    中华人民共和囯住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土物理力学性能试验方法标准:GB/T 50081—2019[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2019.
    [18]
    中国国家标准化管理委员会. 金属材料 拉伸试验 第1部分:室温试验方法:GB/T 228.1—2021

    [S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2021.
    [19]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 钢筋混凝土用钢 第2部分:热轧带肋钢筋:GB/T 1499.2—2018

    [S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018.
    [20]
    中华人民共和囯住房和城乡建设部. 建筑抗震试验规程:JGJ/T 101—2015[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
    [21]
    American Society of Civil Engineering(ASCE). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings:A SCE/SEI 41-13[S]. Virginia:ASCE,2017.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (42) PDF downloads(3) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return