Safety Risk Assessment Methods and Case Analysis of Cultural Heritage Buildings

TAN Zhicui; ZHANG Wenge; GUO Xiaodong; LIU Jia; LI Keke

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG24082101

Volume 55 Issue 12

Dec. 2025

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2025 > 55(12): 47-52

TAN Zhicui, ZHANG Wenge, GUO Xiaodong, LIU Jia, LI Keke. Safety Risk Assessment Methods and Case Analysis of Cultural Heritage Buildings[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(12): 47-52. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24082101

Citation:

TAN Zhicui, ZHANG Wenge, GUO Xiaodong, LIU Jia, LI Keke. Safety Risk Assessment Methods and Case Analysis of Cultural Heritage Buildings[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(12): 47-52. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24082101

Citation:

PDF( 728 KB)

Safety Risk Assessment Methods and Case Analysis of Cultural Heritage Buildings

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24082101

1. Inspection and Certification Co.，Ltd，，MCC，Beijing 100088，China;
2. Faculty of Architecture，Civil and Transportation Engineering，Beijing University of Technology，Beijing 100124，China;
3. Key Research Base of Safety Assessment and Disaster Risk Control of Ancient Wooden Buildings，State Administration of Cultural Heritage，Beijing 100124，China;
4. Beijing Sanmao Construction Engineering Testing and Appraisal Co.，Ltd.，Beijing 100088，China

Received Date: 2024-08-21
Available Online: 2026-01-06
Publish Date: 2025-12-20

Abstract

Abstract

Cultural heritage buildings face many risk factors. How to conduct scientific and reasonable safety risk assessment of cultural heritage buildings is one of the most popular research contents in the cultural heritage industry. The risk assessment is divided into three stages： risk identification， risk analysis and risk assessment. In the risk identification stage， the risks faced by cultural heritage buildings are divided into five categories， covering most of the risk factors. In the stage of risk analysis， risk analysis is carried out for each category according to the total damage situation， management situation， protective measures， external living conditions， damage probability and other factors， and the risk level and score of the classification are determined. In the risk assessment stage， the comprehensive assessment score is calculated according to the classified risk analysis and the classified weight value， and the overall risk level， risk status and repair suggestions are determined. The three-stage assessment method was used to assess the safety risk of some cultural heritage buildings. The assessment results were in good agreement with the actual survey situation， which could reflect the current safety risk level of cultural heritage buildings.
- cultural heritage buildings,
- security risk assessment,
- risk identification,
- risk analysis,
- risk assessment

FullText(HTML)

References(11)

References

[1]	国务院办公厅. 国务院办公厅关于印发《“十四五”文物保护和科技创新规划》的通知（国办发〔2021〕43号）[EB/OL].（2021-10-28）[2024-01-31]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2021-11/08/content_5649764.htm.
[2]	赵夏，乔云飞，郝爽. 不可移动文物自然灾害风险区划理论基础和案例分析[J]. 自然与文化遗产研究，2022，7（6）:88-96.
[3]	费智涛，郭小东，王志涛. 多源异构数据环境下不可移动文物灾害风险图构建方法研究[J]. 西北大学学报（自然科学版），2022，52（4）:700-709.
[4]	Jr. PEDERSOLI J L，STEFAN M. A guide to risk management of cultural heritage[M]. Canada:ICCROM& Government of Canada/Canadian Conservation Institute，2016.
[5]	JONATHAN R J，CARMEN M G，MARÍA D J D，et al. Heritage risk index:a multi-criteria decision-making tool to prioritize municipal historic preservation projects[J]. Frontiers of Architectural Research，2020，9（2）:403-418.
[6]	李晓武. 不可移动文物风险管理体系构建探讨[G]//滕磊，王时伟. 保护与发展:文化遗产学术论丛. 第1 辑. 北京:科学出版社，2022:24-31.
[7]	徐澯，宫阿都，包文轩. 基于机器学习的不可移动文物暴雨灾害风险评估:以山西省为例[J]. 自然灾害学报，2023，32（4）:25-35.
[8]	汪怡，梁龙，孙延忠，等. 山西省不可移动文物洪涝灾害风险研究[J]. 自然灾害学报，2022，31（3）:35-47.
[9]	董婉茹. 基于水文灾害风险评估的建筑遗产预防性保护措施研究[J]. 建筑与文化，2022（9）:168-170.
[10]	胡安雄，谢景荣. 文物建筑火灾风险及防控对策研究[J]. 中国文化遗产，2022，107（1）:66-71.
[11]	张正模，刘洪丽，郭青林，等. 莫高窟洞窟湿度对不同等级降雨的响应研究[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报（自然科学版），2023，55（3）:417-423.