Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Nie lin, Yang Tao, Zhou Depei, Liu Yongjiang. ESTIMATE OF SLOPE DYNAMICAL STABILITY BASED ON EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE ANALYSIS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(11): 82-86. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201211018
Citation: ZHANG Hong, BAI Guanglin, DAI Ya, WANG Bo, ZHAO Jiahao, SHU Qianjin. Experimental Research on Unconfined Compressive Properties of Marine Clay Stabilized Reinforced by Polypropylene Fibers and Cement[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(2): 223-232. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24072602

Experimental Research on Unconfined Compressive Properties of Marine Clay Stabilized Reinforced by Polypropylene Fibers and Cement

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24072602
  • Received Date: 2024-07-26
    Available Online: 2025-04-02
  • In order to study the effect of cement and polypropylene fibers combined stabilization on the mechanical properties of marine silt soft soil, factors such as cement content (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%), fiber length (6, 9, 12, 15 mm), and fiber content (0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%) were considered. Unconfined compressive tests were conducted on marine silt soft soil stabilized with fibers and cement. The optimal fiber length and fiber content were selected, and the soil at the crack site was collected for SEM and XRD analysis. The experimental results showed that the failure modes of the only cement-stabilized soil and the cement and fiber combined stalilization soil were brittle failure and plastic failure, respectively, and the latter also had a relatively large residual strength; with the increase of fiber content, the strength of the stablized soil first increased and then decreased, and there exists an optimal content; when the cement content did not exceed 15%, the optimal fiber content was 0.4%. When the cement content was 20%, the optimal fiber content was 0.2%; compared with other lengths of fibers (6, 9, 15 mm), fibers with a length of 12 mm had the best stabilization effect on cement soil; with the increase of cement content, the strength of the stabilized soil increased almost linearly. When the cement content increased from 5% to 20%, the strength of the non-fiber soil increased by 15% to 20%, while the strength of the soil added with polypropylene fibers increases by 15% to 20%. From microscopic analysis, it could be concluded that the strength of cement stabilized soil mainly comes from the bonding effect of hydrates produced by the hydration of cement and water in the sludge.
  • [1]
    刘宝生,唐朝生,李建,等. 纤维加筋土工程性质研究进展[J]. 工程地质学报,2013,21(4):540-547.
    [2]
    MAHER M H,HO Y C. Mechanical properties of kaolinite/fiber soil composite[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1994,120(8):1381-1393.
    [3]
    ALRASHIDI M J K,ALRASHIDI M.Durability and mechanistic characteristics of fiber reinforced soil-cement mixtures[J].The International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2006, 7(1) : 53-62.
    [4]
    BENMOKRANE B, ELGABBAS F, AHMED E A,et al. Characterization and comparative durability study of glass/vinylester, basalt/vinylester, and basalt/epoxy FRP Bars[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2015, 19(6), 04015008.
    [5]
    李广信,陈轮,郑继勤,等. 纤维加筋粘性土的试验研究[J]. 水利学报,1995(6):31-36.
    [6]
    陈轮,李广信. 纤维加筋粘性土的抗拉和抗裂性能研究[J]. 地基处理,1992,3(2):25-31.
    [7]
    KUMAR A,WALIA B S,MOHAN J.Compressive strength of fiber reinforced highly compressible clay [J].Construction and Building Materials,2006,20(10):1063-1068.
    [8]
    GHAVAMI K,TOLEDO F R,BARBOSA N P.Behaviour of composite soil reinforced with natural fibres [J].Cement and Concrete Composites,1999,21(1): 39-48.
    [9]
    KHATTAK M J,ALRASHIDI M. Mechanistic characteristics of processed cellulose-fiber reinforced soil-cement mixtures[C]// Geo-Frontiers Congress.United States: ASCE,2005.
    [10]
    薛臻.纤维加筋土工程性质国内外研究进展[J]. 四川建材,2018,44(8):61-62.
    [11]
    闫宁霞,娄宗科.掺纤维固化土强度变化的研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2006(8):146-148.
    [12]
    薛志佳,罗江,高建强,等.混入聚丙烯纤维电渗法加固波士顿蓝黏土模型试验[J/OL].工程地质学报,1-12[2025-02-28

    ].https://inds.cnki.net/kcms/detail?v=kJNa6IlOxAgH/jJYzjanx5%2byjhkNp2hRW4NeTG5mlpR997a6YRY1bbvLYeHpVC6i MZJWb3ejW%2bsK7coLggW7dyYcEGiX3J8ezjkDApZYHNU=.
    [13]
    杨博瀚,翁兴中,刘军忠,等.改性聚丙烯纤维和水泥加固黄土的力学性能[J]. 建筑材料学报,2016,19(4):694-701.
    [14]
    唐朝生,施斌,高玮,等. 含砂量对聚丙烯纤维加筋黏性土强度影响的研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2007(增刊1):2968-2973.
    [15]
    佟钰,刘阳,罗超,等. 聚丙烯纤维改性水泥土的力学性能研究[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版),2020,36(3):507-513.
    [16]
    夏智.聚丙烯纤维混凝土基本力学性能试验研究[J/OL].武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版),1-9[2025-02-28].https://inds.cnki.net/kcms/detail?v=kJNa6IlOxAgH/jJYzjanx5%2byjhkNp2hRW4NeTG5mlpSWrvloFluYC6ciC2YohpC4S k9FMF4U0XRXF%2bTNGZ58b%2bybtusGjMRedqtpZtmGGgM=.
    [17]
    张刚,衣松杰,胡敏,等. 聚丙烯纤维对掺再生集料水泥混凝土力学强度的影响[J]. 科学技术创新,2024(8):135-138.
    [18]
    肖庆一,苏刚,张宝虎,等. 聚丙烯纤维对二灰稳定红黏土路用性能的影响及微观机理分析[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 41(5): 34-42.
    [19]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.土工试验方法标准:GB/T 50123—2019[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2019.
    [20]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.水泥土配合比设计规程:JGJ/T 233—2011[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (31) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return