Research on Spatial Governance Mechanism for Urban Regeneration of Industrial Historical Districts from a Public Interest Perspective

CHU Tong; ZHOU Minghao; WU Jiang

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG24030514

Volume 55 Issue 2

Feb. 2025

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2025 > 55(2): 60-72

CHU Tong, ZHOU Minghao, WU Jiang. Research on Spatial Governance Mechanism for Urban Regeneration of Industrial Historical Districts from a Public Interest Perspective[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(2): 60-72. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24030514

Citation:

CHU Tong, ZHOU Minghao, WU Jiang. Research on Spatial Governance Mechanism for Urban Regeneration of Industrial Historical Districts from a Public Interest Perspective[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(2): 60-72. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24030514

Citation:

PDF( 13962 KB)

Research on Spatial Governance Mechanism for Urban Regeneration of Industrial Historical Districts from a Public Interest Perspective

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24030514

CHU Tong¹,
ZHOU Minghao^{1,2,3
,},
WU Jiang^{1,2,3
,}

1. College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
2. Elaberated Urban Governance Institute, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Shanghai Urban Renewal and Space Optimization Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received Date: 2024-03-05
Available Online: 2025-04-02

Abstract

Abstract

With the deepening of globalisation, global cities are facing increasingly fierce competitions such as culture, talents and capital, and the level of urban governance has become the key to attracting resources. Urban regeneration is an important opportunity to improve urban development and governance level in China, among which the historical industrial district is a representative of the importance, complexity and urgency, and the multiple-stakeholder collaboration is a key approach to realise the public interest. This paper focusesd on the regeneration mechanisms, influencing factors and improving strategies for realising public interests in urban regeneration of historical industrial districts with the participation of multi-stakeholders. Taking the two rounds of urban regeneration of Red Town site in Shanghai and EC1 in Łódź, Poland as examples, it established the framework of "Participating Actors-Policy System-Regeneration Effect" to sort out the mechanism of multi-actor collaboration and the policy system; evaluate the effectiveness of regeneration was evaluated from the perspective of public interest. The framework of "Participating Actors-Renewal System-Renewal Effect" was established to sort out the mechanism of multi-actor collaboration and policy system; the effectiveness of its comprehensive dimensions of regeneration was evaluated from the perspective of public interest, exploring the factors influencing the spatial governance mechanism of urban regeneration on the realisation of public interest in industrial historical districts and the strategies, and drawing on the experience from international cases, in order to contribute to the realisation of high-quality and sustainable development oriented to public interest in Chinese cities.
- public interest,
- historical industrial district,
- urban regeneration mechanism,
- stakeholder relationships,
- institutional system,

FullText(HTML)

References(47)

References

[1]	Mori Memorial Foundation. Global power city index (GPCI) 2024 [R]. Tokyo: Mori Memorial Foundation, 2024.
[2]	Arcadis. The sustainable cities index 2024 [R]. Amsterdam: Arcadis, 2024.
[3]	Kearney. Global cities report 2024 [R]. Chicago: Kearney, 2024.
[4]	丁凡, 伍江. 上海城市更新演变及新时期的文化转向[J]. 住宅科技, 2018, 38(11): 1-9.
[5]	阳建强. 走向持续的城市更新:基于价值取向与复杂系统的理性思考[J]. 城市规划, 2018, 42(6): 68-78.
[6]	阳建强, 陈月. 1949—2019年中国城市更新的发展与回顾[J]. 城市规划, 2020, 44(2): 9-19 ,31.
[7]	陈浩,张京祥,吴启焰.转型期城市空间再开发中非均衡博弈的透视: 政治经济学的视角 [J].城市规划学刊,2010(5):33-40.
[8]	翟斌庆, 伍美琴. 城市更新理念与中国城市现实[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2009(2): 75-82.
[9]	张松. 历史城市保护学导论[M]. 上海:同济大学出版社, 2022.
[10]	刘伯英,李匡.工业遗产的构成与价值评价方法[J].建筑创作,2006(9):24-30.
[11]	孟璠磊, 扈亚宁. 工业遗产临时性利用开发:以阿姆斯特丹西煤气厂为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 2022, 37(6): 127-133.
[12]	徐苏斌,青木信夫. 从经济和文化双重视角考察工业遗产的价值框架[J]. 科技导报, 2019, 37(8): 49-60.
[13]	徐苏斌,仲丹丹,胡阔雷.青岛工业遗产保护再利用模式的选择机制研究[J].工业建筑, 2016, 46(2):18-22.
[14]	周忠凯,张猛,郭立强,等.乡村产业遗存建筑的适应性再利用探索:以威海荫子村金辰机械厂改造设计为例[J].华中建筑, 2023,41(12): 58-64.
[15]	刘宇. 后工业时代我国工业建筑遗产保护与再利用策略研究[D].天津:天津大学,2017.
[16]	仲丹丹. 我国工业遗产保护再利用与文化产业结合发展之动因研究[D].天津:天津大学,2017.
[17]	楚童,赵誉行,孙淼.产业变迁对工业遗存改造中物质真实性影响研究[J].工业建筑, 2021,51(9):75-81.
[18]	刘容.场所精神:中国城市工业遗产保护的核心价值选择[J].东南文化,2013(1):17-22.
[19]	张更立. 走向三方合作的伙伴关系:西方城市更新政策的演变及其对中国的启示[J]. 城市发展研究, 2004(4): 26-32.
[20]	田莉, 陶然, 梁印龙. 城市更新困局下的实施模式转型:基于空间治理的视角[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2020(3): 41-47.
[21]	杨婧, 秦波. 公共价值视域下的城市更新:现实困境、理论逻辑与治理路径[J]. 城市规划, 2024, 48(4): 25-33.
[22]	王若冰. 我国城市更新中保障公共利益的制度探讨[J]. 城市规划, 2022, 46(9): 115-122.
[23]	唐燕. 我国城市更新制度建设的关键维度与策略解析[J]. 国际城市规划,2022,37(1): 1-8.
[24]	HOWARD E. Garden cities of tomorrow[M]. Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing LLC,2010.
[25]	CORBUSIER L. The athens charter[M]. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1973: 1-34.
[26]	李强, 肖劲松. 城市规划中的公共利益[J]. 城市发展研究, 2021, 28(10): 105-110.
[27]	石楠. 试论城市规划中的公共利益[J]. 城市规划, 2004(6): 20-31.
[28]	李云, 文灏颖, 罗佳, 等. 公共物品供给视角下保障公共利益的政策演进与实践:以深圳市城市更新为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2024(2): 71-79.
[29]	张帆, 葛岩. 治理视角下城市更新相关主体的角色转变探讨:以上海为例[J].上海城市规划, 2019(5): 57-61.
[30]	郭旭, 田莉. "自上而下"还是"多元合作":存量建设用地改造的空间治理模式比较[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2018(1): 66-72.
[31]	顾岳汶, 吕萍. 产权博弈视角下存量低效工业用地更新机制研究:以深圳市新型产业用地改革为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2021, 28(1): 71-77.
[32]	陈易. 转型期中国城市更新的空间治理研究:机制与模式[D]. 南京:南京大学, 2016.
[33]	阳建强, 唐斌. 城市更新制度状况分析及其改进与优化[J]. 上海城市规划, 2023(4): 1-7.
[34]	GERRING J. Case study research: principles and practices[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[35]	红纺文化发展有限公司. 红纺十年[M]. 上海:同济大学出版社, 2015.
[36]	NOWAKOWSKA A, WALCZAK B. Dziedzictwo przemysłowe jako kapitałterytorialny. Przykład Łodzi[J]. Gospodarka w Praktyce i Teorii, 2016, 45(4): 45-56.
[37]	ZAGUłA A, GRZELAKOWSKI T. The revitalisation of old factories area on the chosen example from Lodz[C]// IOP Conference Series. Prague, Czech Republic: 2021.
[38]	BENABDELAZIZ-TAIR F. Poland urban renewal: former power plant gives Lodz energy[R]. Luxembourg: European Investment Bank, 2016.
[39]	MILES M. Interruptions: testing the rhetoric of culturally led urban development[J]. Urban Studies, 2005, 42(5/6): 889-911.
[40]	Rzeczpospolita Polska. Ustawa z dnia 9 paz＇dziernika 2015 r. o rewitalizacji[S]. Dziennik Ustaw 2015, poz. 1777.
[41]	Ministerstwo Infrastruktury i Rozwoju. Wytyczne w zakresie rewitalizacji w programach operacyjnych na lata 2014—2020[R]. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Infrastruktury i Rozwoju, 2015.
[42]	CYSEK-PAWLAK M, KRZYSZTOFIK S. Integrated approach as a means of leading the degraded post-industrial areas out of crisis: a case study of lodz[G]//World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering Architecture Urban Planning Symposium-Wmcaus. Bristol: IoP Publishing Ltd., 2017, 245, 082036.
[43]	MASIEREK E. Urban regeneration of brownfield sites and its impact on their immediate surroundings: a case study of Lodz (Poland)[J]. Regional and Local Studies, 2021,22(83):37-59.
[44]	梁印龙. 城市更新中公共利益捕获与耗散的机制解释:基于产权"公共领域"理论的租差优化模型[J]. 城市规划, 2023, 47(4): 86-92 ,114.
[45]	彭恺. 新马克思主义视角下我国治理型城市更新模式:空间利益主体角色及合作伙伴关系重构[J]. 规划师, 2018, 34(6): 5-11.
[46]	CHEN J, WANG Y. Ambiguous property rights as a double-edged sword: a case study of industrial land redevelopment in Shanghai, China[J]. Cities, 2022, 126, 103686.
[47]	WANG Y, CHEN J. Privatizing the urban commons under ambiguous property rights in China: is marketization a remedy to the tragedy of the commons?[J]. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 2021, 80(2): 503-547.