Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 56 Issue 6
Jun.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIAN Ming, WU Weihao, ZHOU Yuhao. Finite Element Analysis of the Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Rocking Frame with Column Mid-Height Uplift System[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2026, 56(6): 35-45. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24022303
Citation: LIAN Ming, WU Weihao, ZHOU Yuhao. Finite Element Analysis of the Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Rocking Frame with Column Mid-Height Uplift System[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2026, 56(6): 35-45. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24022303

Finite Element Analysis of the Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Rocking Frame with Column Mid-Height Uplift System

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24022303
  • Received Date: 2024-02-23
    Available Online: 2026-07-06
  • The controlled rocking steel frame with column-base uplift system not only improves the seismic performance of the structure but also increases the overturning moment generated by second-order effects, thereby increasing the risk of structural overturning and limiting the full utilization of its structural seismic performance. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a controlled rocking steel frame with column mid-height uplift system. This system features a liftable rocking form with relaxed constraints at the mid-height of the ground-floor columns, causing the upper and lower segments of the columns to bend in opposite curvatures. This creates a reverse bending point at the column's mid-height, reducing the rocking of the upper structure under seismic actions, consequently mitigating the risk of structural overturning. Utilizing the finite element software OpenSEES, a finite element model for controlled rocking steel frames with column mid-height uplift system was developed. Based on this model, time-history analyses under minor, moderate, major, and extreme seismic events were performed for four structural configurations: the steel frame structure, the braced-steel frame structure, the self-centering rocking frame with column-base uplift system, and the self-centering rocking frame with column mid-height uplift system. The seismic performance of these structures was compared and analyzed based on the maximum inter-story drift ratio, top-story displacement response, inter-story drift concentration factor, residual inter-story drift ratio, and the distribution of plastic hinges. The analysis results indicated that the rocking frame with column mid-height uplift system demonstrated superior control over the maximum inter-story drift ratio, top-story displacement, and residual inter-story drift ratio compared to the other structures. Additionally, it optimized the plastic hinge development pattern of the ssystem during earthquakes, providing a higher safety margin against strong seismic actions.
  • loading
  • [1]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计标准:GB/T 50011—2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2024.
    [2]
    HOUSNER G W.The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,1963(2):403-417.
    [3]
    MIDORIKAWA M,AZUHATA T,ISHIHARA T,et al.Shaking table tests on seismicresponse of steel braced frames with column uplift[J].Earthquake Engineering &Structural Dynamics,2010,35(14):1767-1785.
    [4]
    SAUSE R,RICLES J M,ROKE D A,et al.Large-scale experimental studies of damage-free self-centering concentrically-braced frame under seismic loading[C]//Structures Congress.Orlando:2010.
    [5]
    POLLINO M,SABZEHZAR S,QU B,et al.Research needs for seismic rehabilitation of sub-standard buildings using stiff rocking cores[C]//Structures Congress 2013:Bridging Your Passion with Your Profession.Pittsburgh:2013.
    [6]
    武大洋.近场地震作用下轻型自复位消能摇摆刚架减震性能分析[D].兰州:兰州理工大学,2013.
    [7]
    张文津,李国强,孙飞飞,等.双段消能摇摆结构体系弹性地震反应的简化分析模型及参数分析[J].建筑钢结构进展,2020,22(5):43-50.
    [8]
    张国伟,丁梦婷,赵旭洋,等.摇摆防屈曲支撑RC框架抗震性能研究[J].工程抗震与加固改造,2021,43(2):30-37.
    [9]
    沈金生,刘利伟,贾少卓,等.外附耗能摇摆钢框架结构抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构,2022,52(14):93-97.
    [10]
    王伟,代春雪,胡书领.考虑高阶振型的自复位双核摇摆模块钢框架的性能化设计方法[J/OL].工程力学,2025[ 2025-09-23].https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2595.O3.20240116.0953.004.
    [11]
    王枫智.柱脚抬升式摇摆中心支撑框架抗震性能研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2021.
    [12]
    杨溥,李英民,赖明. 结构时程分析法输入地震波的选择控制指标[J].土木工程学报,2000,33(6):33-37.
    [13]
    Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.PEER ground motion database[EB/OL].[ 2024-02-23].https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.
    [14]
    曲哲,和田章,叶列平.摇摆墙在框架结构抗震加固中的应用[J].建筑结构学报,2011,32(9):11-19.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (26) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return