LIAN Ming, WU Weihao, ZHOU Yuhao. Finite Element Analysis of the Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Rocking Frame with Column Mid-Height Uplift System[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2026, 56(6): 35-45. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24022303
Citation:
LIAN Ming, WU Weihao, ZHOU Yuhao. Finite Element Analysis of the Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Rocking Frame with Column Mid-Height Uplift System[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2026, 56(6): 35-45. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24022303
LIAN Ming, WU Weihao, ZHOU Yuhao. Finite Element Analysis of the Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Rocking Frame with Column Mid-Height Uplift System[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2026, 56(6): 35-45. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24022303
Citation:
LIAN Ming, WU Weihao, ZHOU Yuhao. Finite Element Analysis of the Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Rocking Frame with Column Mid-Height Uplift System[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2026, 56(6): 35-45. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24022303
The controlled rocking steel frame with column-base uplift system not only improves the seismic performance of the structure but also increases the overturning moment generated by second-order effects, thereby increasing the risk of structural overturning and limiting the full utilization of its structural seismic performance. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a controlled rocking steel frame with column mid-height uplift system. This system features a liftable rocking form with relaxed constraints at the mid-height of the ground-floor columns, causing the upper and lower segments of the columns to bend in opposite curvatures. This creates a reverse bending point at the column's mid-height, reducing the rocking of the upper structure under seismic actions, consequently mitigating the risk of structural overturning. Utilizing the finite element software OpenSEES, a finite element model for controlled rocking steel frames with column mid-height uplift system was developed. Based on this model, time-history analyses under minor, moderate, major, and extreme seismic events were performed for four structural configurations: the steel frame structure, the braced-steel frame structure, the self-centering rocking frame with column-base uplift system, and the self-centering rocking frame with column mid-height uplift system. The seismic performance of these structures was compared and analyzed based on the maximum inter-story drift ratio, top-story displacement response, inter-story drift concentration factor, residual inter-story drift ratio, and the distribution of plastic hinges. The analysis results indicated that the rocking frame with column mid-height uplift system demonstrated superior control over the maximum inter-story drift ratio, top-story displacement, and residual inter-story drift ratio compared to the other structures. Additionally, it optimized the plastic hinge development pattern of the ssystem during earthquakes, providing a higher safety margin against strong seismic actions.
HOUSNER G W.The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,1963(2):403-417.
[3]
MIDORIKAWA M,AZUHATA T,ISHIHARA T,et al.Shaking table tests on seismicresponse of steel braced frames with column uplift[J].Earthquake Engineering &Structural Dynamics,2010,35(14):1767-1785.
[4]
SAUSE R,RICLES J M,ROKE D A,et al.Large-scale experimental studies of damage-free self-centering concentrically-braced frame under seismic loading[C]//Structures Congress.Orlando:2010.
[5]
POLLINO M,SABZEHZAR S,QU B,et al.Research needs for seismic rehabilitation of sub-standard buildings using stiff rocking cores[C]//Structures Congress 2013:Bridging Your Passion with Your Profession.Pittsburgh:2013.