Research on the Seismic Performance of a Large-Section Rectangular Prefabricated Metro Station Structure Constructed by Pipe Jacking

WU Yongzhao; JIANG Shouchao; ZHU Qikai; YANG Wensheng; LIU Shuya; YAO Haoyu; LIU Xian; ZHOU Shengyang

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG23122701

Volume 56 Issue 4

Apr. 2026

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2026 > 56(4): 256-265

WU Yongzhao, JIANG Shouchao, ZHU Qikai, YANG Wensheng, LIU Shuya, YAO Haoyu, LIU Xian, ZHOU Shengyang. Research on the Seismic Performance of a Large-Section Rectangular Prefabricated Metro Station Structure Constructed by Pipe Jacking[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2026, 56(4): 256-265. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23122701

Citation:

WU Yongzhao, JIANG Shouchao, ZHU Qikai, YANG Wensheng, LIU Shuya, YAO Haoyu, LIU Xian, ZHOU Shengyang. Research on the Seismic Performance of a Large-Section Rectangular Prefabricated Metro Station Structure Constructed by Pipe Jacking[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2026, 56(4): 256-265. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23122701

Citation:

WU Yongzhao, JIANG Shouchao, ZHU Qikai, YANG Wensheng, LIU Shuya, YAO Haoyu, LIU Xian, ZHOU Shengyang. Research on the Seismic Performance of a Large-Section Rectangular Prefabricated Metro Station Structure Constructed by Pipe Jacking[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2026, 56(4): 256-265. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23122701

PDF( 2352 KB)

Research on the Seismic Performance of a Large-Section Rectangular Prefabricated Metro Station Structure Constructed by Pipe Jacking

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23122701

1. Shenzhen Municipal Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518029, China;
2. Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received Date: 2023-12-27
Available Online: 2026-06-06
Publish Date: 2026-04-20

Abstract

Abstract

In order to study the seismic performance of a large-section rectangular prefabricated metro station structure constructed by pipe jacking， quasi-static tests were conducted on a 1∶5 scale model of the overall structure and a full-scale model of the longitudinal joint. The test results indicated that during the quasi-static test of the scaled model， the horizontal force at the initial appearance of cracks was approximately 7.5 times the design seismic action. When the top horizontal force at the top of the structure reached 9 times the design seismic action， the skeleton curve of the structure remained essentially in the elastic stage. The hysteresis curve of the joint generally presented a spindle shape， with a discernible descending section after reaching the peak load. Moreover， the joint maintained strong energy dissipation capacity after reaching the peak load， indicating satisfactory seismic performance. The lining structure and joint form adopted in the metro station are reasonable， and its seismic performance meets the design requirements.
- large-section,
- rectangular lining structure,
- overall structure,
- longitudinal joint,
- seismic performance

FullText(HTML)

References(19)

References

[1]	庄海洋，唐柏赞，余冰雁，等. 地下结构抗震与减隔震研究进展与展望［J］. 震灾防御技术，2023，18（1）：1-12.
[2]	AN X H，SHAWKY A A，MAEKAWA K. The collapse mechanism of a subway station during the great Hanshin earthquake［J］. Cement and Concrete Composites，1997，19（3）：241-257.
[3]	SAMATA S，OHUCHI H，MATSUDA T. A study of the damage of subway structures during the 1995 Hanshin-Awaji earthquake［J］. Cement and Concrete Composites，1997，19（3）：223-239.
[4]	崔光耀，伍修刚，王明年，等. 汶川8.0 级大地震公路隧道震害调查与震害特征［J］. 现代隧道技术，2017，54（2 ）：9-16.
[5]	蔡丽雯，黄勇，何静，等. 2022 年青海门源6.9 级地震交通系统震害与启示［J］. 地震工程与工程振动，2022，42（4 ）：8-16.
[6]	林刚，罗世培，倪娟. 地铁结构地震破坏及处理措施［J］. 现代隧道技术，2009，46（4）：36-41.
[7]	耿萍，何川，晏启祥. 隧道结构抗震分析方法现状与进展［J］. 土木工程学报，2013，46（增刊1）：262-268.
[8]	邹炎. 地下结构地震反应规律和抗震设计方法研究［D］. 哈尔滨：中国地震局工程力学研究所，2015.
[9]	许成顺，许紫刚，杜修力，等. 地下结构抗震简化分析方法比较研究［J］. 地震工程与工程振动，2017，37（2）：65-80.
[10]	JIANG L Z，CHEN J，LI J. Seismic response of underground utility tunnels:shaking table testing and FEM analysis［J］. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration，2010，9（4）：555-567.
[11]	白广斌，赵杰，汪宇. 地下结构工程抗震分析方法综述［J］. 防灾减灾学报，2012，28（1）：20-26.
[12]	杜修力，刘洪涛，路德春，等. 装配整体式地铁车站侧墙底节点抗震性能研究［J］. 土木工程学报，2017，50（4）：38-47.
[13]	杜修力，李洋，许成顺，等. 1995 年日本阪神地震大开地铁车站震害原因及成灾机理分析研究进展［J］. 岩土工程学报，2018，40（2 ）：223-236.
[14]	杜修力，刘洪涛，许成顺，等. 装配整体式地铁车站纵断面方向梁板柱中节点抗震性能研究［J］. 建筑结构学报，2019，40（9）：95-103.
[15]	川西智浩，清野純史，井澤淳. 開削トンネルの破壊箇所と耐力の関係把握のための静的載荷実験［C］// 第 33 回地震工学研宄凳表会講論文集. 2014，70（4）：1734-1741.
[16]	陈之毅，刘文博，陈炜. 多层地铁车站结构性能试验研究［J］. 同济大学学报（自然科学版），2020，48（6）：811-820.
[17]	孔令俊. 大型钢筋混凝土箱涵结构拟静力试验与数值分析［D］. 西安：西安建筑科技大学，2014.
[18]	吕西林，范力，赵斌. 装配式预制混凝土框架结构缩尺模型拟动力试验研究［J］. 建筑结构学报，2008，29（4）：58-65.
[19]	Applied Technology Council. Interim testing protocols for determining the seismic performance characteristics of structural and nonstructural components:FEMA 461-2007［S］． Redwood City：Applied Technology Council，2007.