Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
HUANG Xigui, LUO Shengchang, LI Lixiao. Research on Wind Speed Profile Characteristics of Typhoon Boundary Layer Based on Measured Data[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(2): 98-105. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23121101
Citation: HUANG Xigui, LUO Shengchang, LI Lixiao. Research on Wind Speed Profile Characteristics of Typhoon Boundary Layer Based on Measured Data[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(2): 98-105. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23121101

Research on Wind Speed Profile Characteristics of Typhoon Boundary Layer Based on Measured Data

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23121101
  • Received Date: 2023-12-11
    Available Online: 2024-04-23
  • The wind-resistant design of building structures in the typhoon affected area in the codes is carried out by analogy with the non-cyclonic wind field, however, many measured results show that there is a large difference between the typhoon wind profile and the profile of the non-cyclonic wind field, and the influencing factors and changing rules of the typhoon wind profile are still not clear at present. To clearly understand the profile characteristics of typhoons, many measured profile data of several typhoons were used for the analysis. The measured data were categorized by three factors, namely, the underlying surface categories, the typhoon structural partitions,and the wind speed, and the wind profile data of each category were comparatively analyzed, and the study showed that: the low-level jet phenomena in typhoon wind profiles was related to the underlying surface categories, the typhoon structural partitions, and the wind speed, the low-level jets were more likely to occur at exposure category A, B, larger wind speed, and in the back eyewall region in typhoon; there was a certain relationship between the gradient wind height of the typhoon wind profile and the type of underlying surface and average wind speed. The gradient wind height of exposure category A and B showed an increasing trend from the center of the typhoon outward, while the gradient wind height underground of exposure category C showed a decreasing and then increasing trend from the center of the typhoon outward.
  • [1]
    ELLIOTT R J R, STROBL E, SUN P. The local impact of typhoons on economic activity in China:A view from outer space[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2015, 88(7):50-66.
    [2]
    POWELL M D, VICKERY P J, REINHOLD T A. Reduced drag coefficient for high wind speeds in tropical cyclones[J]. Nature, 2003, 422:279-283.
    [3]
    HE Y, CHAN P, LI Q. Observational study on thermodynamic and kinematic structures of Typhoon Vicente (2012) at landfall[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 172:280-297.
    [4]
    LI L X, KAREEM A, HUNT J, et al. Observed sub-hectometer-scale low level jets in surface-layer velocity profiles of landfalling typhoons[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering Industrial Aerodynamics, 2019, 190:151-165.
    [5]
    FUJITA T T. Damage survey of hurricane andrew in south Florida[J]. Storm Data, 1992, 34(8):25-39.
    [6]
    WURMAN J, WINSLOW J. Intense sub-kilometer-scale boundary layer rolls observed in Hurricane Fran[J]. Science, 1998, 280(5363):555-557.
    [7]
    KITABATAKE N, TANAKA Y. Observed low level jets associated with Typhoon Higos (0221) over the Kanto Plain[J]. Sola, 2009(5):105-108.
    [8]
    NGO T T, LETCHFORD C W. Experimental study of topographic effects on gust wind speed[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering Industrial Aerodynamics, 2009, 97(9/10):426-438.
    [9]
    TSE K T, LI S W, CHAN P, et al. Wind profile observations in tropical cyclone events using wind-profilers and doppler SODARs[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2013, 115:93-103.
    [10]
    TSE K T, LI S, FUNG J C H. A comparative study of typhoon wind profiles derived from field measurements, meso-scale numerical simulations, and wind tunnel physical modeling[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2014, 131:46-58.
    [11]
    HE Y, CHAN P, LI Q. Observations of vertical wind profiles of tropical cyclones at coastal areas[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2016, 152:1-14.
    [12]
    SONG L, CHEN W, WANG B, et al. Characteristics of wind profiles in the landfalling typhoon boundary layer[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2016, 149:77-88.
    [13]
    HE J, HON K, LI Q, et al. Wind profile analysis for selected tropical cyclones over the South China Sea based on dropsonde measurements[J]. Atmsfera, 2022, 35(1):111-126.
    [14]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009-2012[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.
    [15]
    中国国家标准化管理委员会.台风涡旋风数据判别规范:GB/T 36745-2018[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2019.
    [16]
    HOLTHUIJSEN L H, POWELL M D, PIETRZAK J D. Wind and waves in extreme hurricanes[J/OL]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Oceans, 2012, 117(C9).[2012-09-01] https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC007983.
    [17]
    OWINOH A Z, HUNT J C, ORR A, et al. Effects of changing surface heat flux on atmospheric boundary-layer flow over flat terrain[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2005, 116(2):331-361.
    [18]
    MAHRT L, VICKERS D, SUN J L, et al. Determination of the surface drag coefficient[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2001, 99(2):249-276.
    [19]
    ZHU P, FURST J. On the parameterization of surface momentum transport via drag coefficient in low-wind conditions[J]. Geophys Res Lett, 2013, 40(11):2824-2828.
    [20]
    KEPERT J. The dynamics of boundary layer jets within the tropical cyclone core. Part I:Linear theory[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2001, 58(17):2469-2484.
    [21]
    KEPERT J, WANG Y. The dynamics of boundary layer jets within the tropical cyclone core. Part II:Nonlinear enhancement[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2001, 58(17):2485-2501.
    [22]
    MASHIKO W. Formation mechanism of a low-level jet during the passage of Typhoon Ma-on (2004) over the southern Kanto district[J]. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan Ser II, 2008, 86(1):183-202.
    [23]
    CARRIER G, HAMMOND A, GEORGE O. A model of the mature hurricane[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1971, 47(1):145-170.
    [24]
    SNAIKI R, WU T. A linear height-resolving wind field model for tropical cyclone boundary layer[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering Industrial Aerodynamics, 2017, 171:248-260.
    [25]
    FRANKLIN J L, BLACK M L, VALDE K. Eyewall wind profiles in hurricanes determined by GPS dropwindsondes; proceedings of the Preprints[C]//24th Conf on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology. Fort Lauderdale:the Units States of America, 2000.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]QIU Bin, LEI Honggang, SHEN Yu, JI Xuanzhe. Fatigue Load Spectrum Research of the Grid Structure Under Suspension Crane Loading[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(12): 143-151. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21102408
    [2]HU Yang, WANG Qingfa, ZHENG Yu, WANG Xiuli, WU Kaikai. Analysis and Field Test Research on Construction Process of Cable Supported Grid Structure[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(1): 122-128. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21110408
    [3]YI Guixiang, DUAN Weiyang, WANG Yue, SHI Xiajie, LI Jiaxing. PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF IMPROVEMENT PROFILED STEEL SHEET ROOFS WITH STANDING SEAM 360 PANELS AGAINST SUPER TYPHOONS BASED ON WIND-UPLIFT RESISTANCE TESTS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(12): 79-83. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21120604
    [4]LIU Jianhong, YANG Bo, JIE Lianbin, SHU Qianjin, ZHONG Chongshuo, YUAN Guanglin. BEARING PERFORMANCES AND SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF TRANSMISSION TOWER-LINE SYSTEMS IN MINING AREAS UNDER SURFACE HORIZONTAL DEFORMATION AND BOUNDARY LAYER WIND[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(11): 90-99. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21080302
    [5]CHEN Zhengfa, ZHANG Jie, YAN Zhiguo, BIAN Minghui. STUDY OF WATER AND EARTH PRESSURE MODES ON SHIELD TUNNELS IN WATER-RICH DIORITE STRATA[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(7): 25-30. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21031806
    [6]MA Yunlong, WANG Xiuli, FENG Zhujun, GOU Baolong, HOU Hongjie. RESEARCH ON STRENGTHENING DESIGN FOR JACKING OF A LONG-SPAN STEEL PLANT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(11): 205-210. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21061602
    [7]LIU Weiran, YU Haifeng, HUANG Jun, YU Yue, DU Shoujun, GAO Renqing, CHEN Zengshun, WANG Qihua, LIU Ze. MEASUREMENT AND FORCED ANALYSIS OF FORMWORK SUPPORTING FRAME WITH NEW PULLEY-CLIP STYLE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(9): 118-121,146. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201904210001
    [8]LI Zhaoyang, PAN Xinzhong, YU Bo. NONLINEAR ANALYSIS AND FIELD TEST VERIFICATION OF STEEL TUBULAR SCAFFOLDS UNDER CONSTRUCTION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(9): 112-117. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201904160007
    [10]Yin Zhixiang Hou Liyang, . RESEARCH ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF WIND-LOAD ON SUSPENDED RETICULATED SHELL UNDER TYPHOON[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(6): 133-136. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201506026
    [11]Hu Changming, Liu Fengyun, Yang Jianhua, Zhao Yunbo, Ren Wenjun, Cai Suping. ON-SITE MEASUREMENT AND ANSYS ANALYSIS OF CANTILEVER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(4): 136-142. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201504026
    [12]Zheng Lianqiong, Cai Xuefeng, Zhuang Jinping, Zhou Jizhong, Tuo Mingbei. ON-SITE MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF SUPER HIGH OR LARGE-SPAN FORMWORK SUPPORT WITH FASTENER STEEL TUBE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(7): 96-100. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201307022
    [13]Chen Xu. STUDY ON FIELD MEASUREMENT OF HIGH-FORMWORK WITH A HEIGHT OF 15 m[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(8): 106-108. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201308023
    [14]Zhuang Jinping, Cai Xuefeng, Lin Zengzhong, Zhou Jizhong, Lin Huaqiang. SITE MEASUREMENT AND DISCUSSION ON MODIFYING METHOD OF BEARING CAPACITY FORMULA OF SUPER HIGH OR LARGE-SPAN FORM STRUT SYSTEM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(9): 94-99. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201109021
    [15]Wang Xin, Yang Shirong, Feng Yonggang. THE ON-SITE TEST OF PUMPING PRESSURE OF CONCRETE-FILLED STEEL TUBE PUMPING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(12): 98-101. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200912024
    [16]Wang Yingge. FIELD TEST AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF INTERACTION OF PILE- RAFT FOUNDATION ULTRA - HIGH TUBE-IN-TUBE STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(5): 10-15. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200505003
    [17]Qi Liangfeng, Zhang Baoying, Jian Hao. IN-SITU MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF RAFT'S INTERNAL FORCES OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING WITH PILE-RAFT FOUNDATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(1): 45-49. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200401013
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(0)

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 11.9 %FULLTEXT: 11.9 %META: 87.4 %META: 87.4 %PDF: 0.7 %PDF: 0.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.7 %其他: 14.7 %北京: 6.3 %北京: 6.3 %南京: 2.1 %南京: 2.1 %嘉兴: 0.7 %嘉兴: 0.7 %天津: 0.7 %天津: 0.7 %常州: 0.7 %常州: 0.7 %常德: 0.7 %常德: 0.7 %广州: 3.5 %广州: 3.5 %张家口: 3.5 %张家口: 3.5 %扬州: 0.7 %扬州: 0.7 %昆明: 0.7 %昆明: 0.7 %杭州: 0.7 %杭州: 0.7 %格兰特县: 2.1 %格兰特县: 2.1 %深圳: 2.8 %深圳: 2.8 %温州: 0.7 %温州: 0.7 %漯河: 2.1 %漯河: 2.1 %芒廷维尤: 26.6 %芒廷维尤: 26.6 %芝加哥: 15.4 %芝加哥: 15.4 %茂名: 0.7 %茂名: 0.7 %葵涌: 0.7 %葵涌: 0.7 %西宁: 6.3 %西宁: 6.3 %西安: 0.7 %西安: 0.7 %运城: 3.5 %运城: 3.5 %郑州: 0.7 %郑州: 0.7 %重庆: 0.7 %重庆: 0.7 %长沙: 1.4 %长沙: 1.4 %雅安: 0.7 %雅安: 0.7 %其他北京南京嘉兴天津常州常德广州张家口扬州昆明杭州格兰特县深圳温州漯河芒廷维尤芝加哥茂名葵涌西宁西安运城郑州重庆长沙雅安

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (124) PDF downloads(1) Cited by(1)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return