Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 54 Issue 2
Feb.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION  > 2024  >  54(2): 98-105
XIAO Congzhen, LI Jianhui, MA Tianyi, WEI Yue, WU Zhenhong, QIAO Baojuan. Current Situation and Development of Retrofitting and Performance Improvement for Existing Building Structures[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(1): 20-30. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23120812
Citation: HUANG Xigui, LUO Shengchang, LI Lixiao. Research on Wind Speed Profile Characteristics of Typhoon Boundary Layer Based on Measured Data[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(2): 98-105. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23121101
shu

Research on Wind Speed Profile Characteristics of Typhoon Boundary Layer Based on Measured Data

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23121101

  • 1. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin university of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China;

  • 2. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China;

  • 3. Institute of Urban Smart Transportation & Safety Maintenance, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China

  • Received Date: 2023-12-11
    Available Online: 2024-04-23
    Abstract
  • The wind-resistant design of building structures in the typhoon affected area in the codes is carried out by analogy with the non-cyclonic wind field, however, many measured results show that there is a large difference between the typhoon wind profile and the profile of the non-cyclonic wind field, and the influencing factors and changing rules of the typhoon wind profile are still not clear at present. To clearly understand the profile characteristics of typhoons, many measured profile data of several typhoons were used for the analysis. The measured data were categorized by three factors, namely, the underlying surface categories, the typhoon structural partitions,and the wind speed, and the wind profile data of each category were comparatively analyzed, and the study showed that: the low-level jet phenomena in typhoon wind profiles was related to the underlying surface categories, the typhoon structural partitions, and the wind speed, the low-level jets were more likely to occur at exposure category A, B, larger wind speed, and in the back eyewall region in typhoon; there was a certain relationship between the gradient wind height of the typhoon wind profile and the type of underlying surface and average wind speed. The gradient wind height of exposure category A and B showed an increasing trend from the center of the typhoon outward, while the gradient wind height underground of exposure category C showed a decreasing and then increasing trend from the center of the typhoon outward.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(25)
  • [1]
    ELLIOTT R J R, STROBL E, SUN P. The local impact of typhoons on economic activity in China:A view from outer space[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2015, 88(7):50-66.
    [2]
    POWELL M D, VICKERY P J, REINHOLD T A. Reduced drag coefficient for high wind speeds in tropical cyclones[J]. Nature, 2003, 422:279-283.
    [3]
    HE Y, CHAN P, LI Q. Observational study on thermodynamic and kinematic structures of Typhoon Vicente (2012) at landfall[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 172:280-297.
    [4]
    LI L X, KAREEM A, HUNT J, et al. Observed sub-hectometer-scale low level jets in surface-layer velocity profiles of landfalling typhoons[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering Industrial Aerodynamics, 2019, 190:151-165.
    [5]
    FUJITA T T. Damage survey of hurricane andrew in south Florida[J]. Storm Data, 1992, 34(8):25-39.
    [6]
    WURMAN J, WINSLOW J. Intense sub-kilometer-scale boundary layer rolls observed in Hurricane Fran[J]. Science, 1998, 280(5363):555-557.
    [7]
    KITABATAKE N, TANAKA Y. Observed low level jets associated with Typhoon Higos (0221) over the Kanto Plain[J]. Sola, 2009(5):105-108.
    [8]
    NGO T T, LETCHFORD C W. Experimental study of topographic effects on gust wind speed[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering Industrial Aerodynamics, 2009, 97(9/10):426-438.
    [9]
    TSE K T, LI S W, CHAN P, et al. Wind profile observations in tropical cyclone events using wind-profilers and doppler SODARs[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2013, 115:93-103.
    [10]
    TSE K T, LI S, FUNG J C H. A comparative study of typhoon wind profiles derived from field measurements, meso-scale numerical simulations, and wind tunnel physical modeling[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2014, 131:46-58.
    [11]
    HE Y, CHAN P, LI Q. Observations of vertical wind profiles of tropical cyclones at coastal areas[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2016, 152:1-14.
    [12]
    SONG L, CHEN W, WANG B, et al. Characteristics of wind profiles in the landfalling typhoon boundary layer[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2016, 149:77-88.
    [13]
    HE J, HON K, LI Q, et al. Wind profile analysis for selected tropical cyclones over the South China Sea based on dropsonde measurements[J]. Atmsfera, 2022, 35(1):111-126.
    [14]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009-2012[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.
    [15]
    中国国家标准化管理委员会.台风涡旋风数据判别规范:GB/T 36745-2018[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2019.
    [16]
    HOLTHUIJSEN L H, POWELL M D, PIETRZAK J D. Wind and waves in extreme hurricanes[J/OL]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Oceans, 2012, 117(C9).[2012-09-01] https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC007983.
    [17]
    OWINOH A Z, HUNT J C, ORR A, et al. Effects of changing surface heat flux on atmospheric boundary-layer flow over flat terrain[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2005, 116(2):331-361.
    [18]
    MAHRT L, VICKERS D, SUN J L, et al. Determination of the surface drag coefficient[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2001, 99(2):249-276.
    [19]
    ZHU P, FURST J. On the parameterization of surface momentum transport via drag coefficient in low-wind conditions[J]. Geophys Res Lett, 2013, 40(11):2824-2828.
    [20]
    KEPERT J. The dynamics of boundary layer jets within the tropical cyclone core. Part I:Linear theory[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2001, 58(17):2469-2484.
    [21]
    KEPERT J, WANG Y. The dynamics of boundary layer jets within the tropical cyclone core. Part II:Nonlinear enhancement[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2001, 58(17):2485-2501.
    [22]
    MASHIKO W. Formation mechanism of a low-level jet during the passage of Typhoon Ma-on (2004) over the southern Kanto district[J]. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan Ser II, 2008, 86(1):183-202.
    [23]
    CARRIER G, HAMMOND A, GEORGE O. A model of the mature hurricane[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1971, 47(1):145-170.
    [24]
    SNAIKI R, WU T. A linear height-resolving wind field model for tropical cyclone boundary layer[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering Industrial Aerodynamics, 2017, 171:248-260.
    [25]
    FRANKLIN J L, BLACK M L, VALDE K. Eyewall wind profiles in hurricanes determined by GPS dropwindsondes; proceedings of the Preprints[C]//24th Conf on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology. Fort Lauderdale:the Units States of America, 2000.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]GUO Wei, ZHANG Yipeng, WAN Yufeng, CHEN An, SUN Jing. A State-of-the-Art Review of Research and Application of FRP Composites in Railway Infrastructure[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(6): 190-196. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24040601
    [2]WU Ying, LI Aiqun. Application and Circled Layer Scene Construction of Digital Twin Technology from Coupling Perspective of "City-Building-People"[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(4): 180-189. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG23012403
    [3]Qi Yicong. REGENERATIVE DESIGN METHOD AND ANALYSIS OF INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(04): 40-44.
    [4]Shu Biqing, Zheng Juan. DETECTION APPRAISAL AND STRENGTHENING OF A BENT FRAME STRUCTURE PLANT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(06): 139-142. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201406030
    [5]Sun Changling, Wang Zhiyuan. THE EXAMPLE ABOUT THE ADAPTIVE REUSEOF OF AN INDUSTRIAL PLANT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(2): 168-171. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201302034
    [6]Xue Suduo, Zhang Yigang, Cao Zi, Li Xiongyan. PROSPECT AND FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF SEISMIC RESEARCH ON SPATIAL STRUCTURES OVER LAST THIRTY YEARS IN CHINA[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(6): 105-116. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201306022
    [7]Zhao Jida, Lan Tian. THIRTY YEARS PROGRESS AND FUTURE PROSPECT OF SPATIAL STRUCTURES IN CHINA[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(4): 131-138,164. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201304028
    [8]Cao Xia, Xie Dan, Jin Lingzhi. REINFORCEMENT AND RENOVATION OF THE OFFICE BUILDING OF A POLICE STATION IN GUILIN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(4): 143-146,64. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201204029
    [9]Tang Hongyuan, Wang Zeyun, Jia Yigang. ASSESSMENT AND STRENGTHEN FOR A CHEMICAL FIBRE FACTORY BUILDING SUBJECTED TO FIRE DISASTER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(7): 152-155,170. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201207026
    [10]Zhou Hongbing. APPRAISAL OF THE IMPACT OF FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION OF A HIGH-RISE BUILDING ON STRUCTURAL SAFETY OF THE ADJACENT BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(2): 116-119. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201002027
    [11]Yuan Chengfang, Niu Ditao, Wang Qinglin, Yuan Bo. SAFETY EVALUATION AND STRUCTURE STRENGTHENING OF A CHEMICAL PLANT SUBJECTED TO FIRE DISASTER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(6): 113-117. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201006026
    [12]Jiang Lixue, Zheng Qiaowen. SEISMIC ANALYSIS METHOD FOR RC FRAMES CONSIDERING INTERACTION BETWEEN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STRUCTURES AND ITS APPLICATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(5): 6-10. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200905002
    [13]Wang Junqiang. DAMAGES TO MULTISTORY BRICK-CONCRETE BUILDINGS AFTER WENCHUAN EARTHQUAKE AND THEIR APPRAISAL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(1): 47-49,59. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200901009
    [14]Zhang Kaichen, Wang Feng, Si Bo, Li Ming. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE CORBEL BETWEEN THE OLD COLUMN AND THE NEW BEAM FOR A REFORM PROJECT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(11): 126-128. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200911029
    [15]Zheng Qizhen, Bao Yongliang, Wei Lin. THE DETECTION & IDENTIFICATION ON THE MAJOR STRUCTURE OF PROTECTED HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANT BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(8): 1-3,7. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200908001
    [16]Shu Hongbo, Zheng Jianjun, Zhang Shaohua. QUALIFICATION AND REINFORCEMENT OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES AFTER FIRE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(8): 25-27. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200908007
    [17]Dong Hairong, Qi Shaoming, Sun Xiaolu, Wu Xin. STUDY ON TECHNOLOGY OF ENERGY-SAVING RECONSTRUCTION ON EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS IN THE COLD DISTRICT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(7): 4-6. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200907002
    [18]Tan Jun, Wang Ying, Zheng Wenzhong. DESIGN OF TWO TYPICAL POST-BUILT SUSPENDED STAIRCASES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(4): 119-123，86. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200804030
    [19]Zhong Wenle, Chen Pei, Jiang Fengchang, Yang Genhong, Lu Jianwang. STRENGTHENING AND RECONSTRUCTION A CHEMICAL WORKSHOP INTO 2-HLS90 CONCRETE-MIXING BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(2): 107-109. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200702027
    [20]Chun Qing, Qiu Hongxing, Huang Zhicheng, Pan Jianwu, Fang Zhibao. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON ANCHORAGE PERFORMANCE OF DOUBLE ADHESIVE ANCHORS FOR RC STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(2): 98-100. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200602029
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 李凯，刘博，陈必光，杨卓，翟博渊. 重复压浆钢管桩在既有建筑基础加固中的应用. 广州建筑. 2025(01): 14-18 .
    2. 蔡旭东. 建筑结构加固改造技术与方法浅析. 广州建筑. 2025(01): 45-49 .
    3. 翟长海，丁俊男，史铁花，王代玉，黄颖. 既有建筑抗震韧性提升方法研究. 地震工程与工程振动. 2025(01): 18-27 .
    4. 黄晓旭，胡彪，李中流. 基于PDCA闭环模式的案例教学法在工程结构鉴定与加固课程中的应用. 科教导刊. 2025(01): 38-41 .
    5. 张吾健. 可持续发展理念下既有建筑改造设计策略分析. 住宅与房地产. 2024(06): 128-130 .
    6. 顾辉军. 既有建筑加固技术探析与应用——以某多层厂房加固为例. 建筑施工. 2024(05): 676-683 .
    7. 文应，蔡俊辉，孙健，郑代炳，江康. 城市更新改造中既有建筑的结构加固要点与实践. 新型城镇化. 2024(06): 57-60 .
    8. 苗元耀. 既有建筑结构加固改造原则及技术分析. 工程技术研究. 2024(12): 34-36 .
    9. 张荻，李涛杨，李伟. 城市更新为城市核心区注入新活力——既有建筑隔震托换加固改造项目的更新实践. 中国勘察设计. 2024(09): 67-69 .
    10. 梁春敏. 医院既有建筑局部结构加固实施难点及解决策略探究. 中国建筑金属结构. 2024(11): 87-89 .
    11. 陈光华，谢洪涛，孙柏锋. 基于价值工程的既有建筑加固改造项目经济性及模式创新研究. 工程管理学报. 2024(06): 117-122 .
    12. 吴梓楠，韩小雷，李建乐，黄世怡，董优. 建筑结构BIM正向设计的发展困境、关键技术与应用实践. 建筑结构. 2024(24): 136-144+135 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-030255075100125
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.4 %FULLTEXT: 9.4 %META: 83.5 %META: 83.5 %PDF: 7.1 %PDF: 7.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 9.4 %其他: 9.4 %其他: 0.9 %其他: 0.9 %Baden: 0.4 %Baden: 0.4 %Central District: 0.6 %Central District: 0.6 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %Kennedy Town: 0.3 %Kennedy Town: 0.3 %三明: 0.1 %三明: 0.1 %上海: 6.4 %上海: 6.4 %东莞: 4.5 %东莞: 4.5 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %信阳: 0.1 %信阳: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %兰州: 0.4 %兰州: 0.4 %北京: 12.0 %北京: 12.0 %南京: 3.3 %南京: 3.3 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南昌: 0.3 %南昌: 0.3 %厦门: 0.1 %厦门: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %台州: 0.7 %台州: 0.7 %合肥: 0.7 %合肥: 0.7 %吉隆坡: 0.3 %吉隆坡: 0.3 %周口: 0.4 %周口: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %咸宁: 0.1 %咸宁: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %唐山: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %商丘: 0.1 %商丘: 0.1 %喀什: 0.3 %喀什: 0.3 %天津: 0.7 %天津: 0.7 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %安庆: 0.3 %安庆: 0.3 %安康: 0.4 %安康: 0.4 %安阳: 0.4 %安阳: 0.4 %宜春: 0.7 %宜春: 0.7 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %常德: 0.7 %常德: 0.7 %广州: 1.6 %广州: 1.6 %廊坊: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.3 %张家口: 0.6 %张家口: 0.6 %徐州: 0.6 %徐州: 0.6 %德阳: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %成都: 3.0 %成都: 3.0 %扬州: 0.6 %扬州: 0.6 %无锡: 0.3 %无锡: 0.3 %昆明: 1.6 %昆明: 1.6 %昭通: 0.1 %昭通: 0.1 %曲靖: 0.9 %曲靖: 0.9 %朝阳: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %杭州: 1.4 %杭州: 1.4 %松原: 0.4 %松原: 0.4 %柏林: 0.1 %柏林: 0.1 %武汉: 2.3 %武汉: 2.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %河内: 0.1 %河内: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %济南: 1.6 %济南: 1.6 %济宁: 0.1 %济宁: 0.1 %海口: 0.4 %海口: 0.4 %淄博: 0.3 %淄博: 0.3 %淮安: 0.3 %淮安: 0.3 %深圳: 3.0 %深圳: 3.0 %温州: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %漯河: 0.9 %漯河: 0.9 %漳州: 0.1 %漳州: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.9 %濮阳: 0.9 %烟台: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %益阳: 0.1 %益阳: 0.1 %眉山: 0.1 %眉山: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %福州: 1.0 %福州: 1.0 %芒廷维尤: 5.9 %芒廷维尤: 5.9 %芝加哥: 1.7 %芝加哥: 1.7 %苏州: 0.6 %苏州: 0.6 %荆门: 0.4 %荆门: 0.4 %莆田: 0.9 %莆田: 0.9 %蚌埠: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.3 %衡阳: 0.3 %衢州: 0.4 %衢州: 0.4 %西宁: 4.1 %西宁: 4.1 %西安: 1.6 %西安: 1.6 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %赣州: 0.1 %赣州: 0.1 %运城: 0.7 %运城: 0.7 %郑州: 1.2 %郑州: 1.2 %重庆: 1.3 %重庆: 1.3 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %金昌: 0.1 %金昌: 0.1 %银川: 0.4 %银川: 0.4 %镇江: 0.3 %镇江: 0.3 %长春: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长沙: 3.5 %长沙: 3.5 %阜新: 0.1 %阜新: 0.1 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %青岛: 0.7 %青岛: 0.7 %马鞍山: 0.3 %马鞍山: 0.3 %鹰潭: 0.1 %鹰潭: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %其他其他BadenCentral DistrictChinaKennedy Town三明上海东莞乌鲁木齐保定信阳六安兰州北京南京南宁南昌厦门台北台州合肥吉隆坡周口呼和浩特咸宁哈尔滨唐山商丘喀什天津太原威海宁波安庆安康安阳宜春宣城常德广州廊坊张家口徐州德阳成都扬州无锡昆明昭通曲靖朝阳杭州松原柏林武汉沈阳河内泉州济南济宁海口淄博淮安深圳温州湖州漯河漳州濮阳烟台珠海益阳眉山石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆门莆田蚌埠衡阳衢州西宁西安贵阳赣州运城郑州重庆金华金昌银川镇江长春长沙阜新阿姆斯特丹青岛马鞍山鹰潭齐齐哈尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (116) PDF downloads(1) Cited by(17)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return