Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 54 Issue 2
Feb.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION  > 2024  >  54(2): 1-7
SONG Jun, MIAO Huiquan, ZHONG Zilan, DING Yanqiong, ZHAO Mi, DU Xiuli. Comparisons of Seismic Hazard Analysis Methods for Engineering Sites[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(2): 1-7. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23120204
Citation: SONG Jun, MIAO Huiquan, ZHONG Zilan, DING Yanqiong, ZHAO Mi, DU Xiuli. Comparisons of Seismic Hazard Analysis Methods for Engineering Sites[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(2): 1-7. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23120204
shu

Comparisons of Seismic Hazard Analysis Methods for Engineering Sites

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23120204

  • 1. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;

  • 2. School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, China

  • Received Date: 2023-12-02
    Available Online: 2024-04-23
    Abstract
  • In view of the existing various seismic hazard analysis methods, the seismic hazard analysis method based on historical seismic intensity data and the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis method to analyze the seismic hazards of the main urban area in Beijing was taken, and the peak ground acceleration with a probability of exceeding 10% in 50 years was obtained. The results showed that the peak ground acceleration of the main urban area in Beijing was of obvious spatial variability, which was gradually increasing from the west of the city to the east; the results obtained from those two methods were reliable and the differences were slight. The methods had their own characteristics, the former had fewer assumptions including site effects and was moderately difficult to calculate, but the application range was limited; the latter was integrated influences of various factors, with multiple assumptions and high computational complexity, but be widely used. Those two methods could provide reference to seismic hazard assessment.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(22)
  • [1]
    CHEN K P, TSAI Y B, CHENG C T, et al. Estimated seismic intensity distributions for earthquakes in Taiwan from 1900 to 2008[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2010, 100(6):2905-2913.
    [2]
    刘静伟,王振明,谢富仁.京津唐地区地震灾害和危险性评估[J].地球物理学报, 2010, 53(2):318-325.
    [3]
    刘静伟.基于历史地震烈度资料的地震危险性评估方法研究[D].北京:中国地震局地质研究所, 2011.
    [4]
    STEIN R S, TODA S, PARSONS T, et al. A new probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for greater Tokyo RID A-3424-2008[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A:Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2006, 364(1845):1965-1986.
    [5]
    BOZKURT S B, STEIN R S, TODA S. Forecasting probabilistic seismic shaking for greater Tokyo from 400 years of intensity observations[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2007, 23(3):525-546.
    [6]
    WEICHERT D H, MILNE W G. On Canadian methodologies of probabilistic seismic risk estimation[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 1979, 69:1549-1566.
    [7]
    ROBIN K, MCGUIRE. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis:early history[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2008, 37:329-338.
    [8]
    蔡青雅.地震区划方法对比研究[D].廊坊:中国地震局工程力学研究所, 2016.
    [9]
    胡聿贤.地震安全性评价技术教程[M].北京:地震出版社, 1999.
    [10]
    卢寿德.工程场地地震安全性评价[M].北京:中国标准出版社, 2006.
    [11]
    国家地震局.中国地震烈度区划图[S].北京:地震出版社, 1991.
    [12]
    中国地震局.中国地震动参数区划图:GB 18306-2001[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2001.
    [13]
    全国地震标准化技术委员会.中国地震动参数区划图:GB 18306-2015[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2015.
    [14]
    全国地震标准化技术委员会.工程场地地震安全性评价:GB 17741-2005[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2005.
    [15]
    国家地震局震害防御司.中国历史强震目录(公元前23世纪-1911年)[M].北京:地震出版社, 1999.
    [16]
    中国地震局震害防御司.中国近代地震目录(公元1912-1990年, Ms ≥ 4.7)[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社, 1999.
    [17]
    李善邦.中国地震目录[M].北京:科学出版社, 1971.
    [18]
    国家地震局震害防御司.中国地震区划文集[M].北京:地震出版社, 1993.
    [19]
    MILNE W G, DAVENPORT A G. Distribution of earthquake risk in Canada[J]. Bulletin on the Seismological Society of America, 1969, 59(2):729-754.
    [20]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
    [21]
    丁宝荣,孙景江,杜轲,等.地震烈度与峰值加速度、峰值速度相关性研究[J].地震工程与工程振动, 2017, 37(2):26-36.
    [22]
    高孟潭. GB 18306-2015《中国地震动参数区划图》宣贯教材[M].北京:中国质检出版社, 2015.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHANG Ailin, YANG Shuo, JIANG Ziqin, ZHANG Wenying, LIU Jie, YANG Xiaofeng. Seismic Fragility Analysis of Steel Frame Structure with Lateral Resistance Energy-Consuming Device[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(5): 101-108. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21122104
    [2]WANG Yaoshu, TANG Yong, ZHONG Meiling, SUN Yan, FU Yingying. Spatial Narrative of Memorial Landscapes from the Donghekou Site Park of Earthquake in Qingchuan[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(4): 62-66,21. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21020501
    [3]ZHAO Zihan, XIAO Kai, XIAO Yiqing, LI Chao, ZHANG Wentong. Fragility Analysis of Transmission Towers with a Strong Wind Based on First-Passage Failure Criterion[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(4): 15-21. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20121012
    [4]MEN Jinjie, ZHONG Xin, XUE Chen, LAN Tao, LI Ran, ZHANG Liang. Comfortable Level Analysis on Floors of Prefabricated Box-Plate Steel Structures with TMD and Their Vibration Control Study[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(1): 50-56. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22041411
    [5]MAO Dong-xu, LIU Zu-qiang, XUE Jian-yang, ZHANG Feng-liang, CHEN Li-ying. Research on Simplified Method of Seismic Response Analysis Method for Steel Reinforced Concrete Spatial Frames with Special-Shaped Columns[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(9): 161-169. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzg20112911
    [11]Shu Xingping Liao Rongting Lu Beirong, . TEST AND ANALYSIS FOR COMFORT DEGREE FLOOR VIBRATION INDUCED HUMAN OF XIAO TIANCHENG BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(10): 36-41. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201510007
    [13]Sun Guojun, Chen Zhihua, Liu Zhansheng. CABLE SUPPORTED PLANE STRUCTURE AND ITS ELASTOPLASTIC ANALYSIS UNDER BEYOND SNOW LOAD[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(8): 20-26. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201008006
    [14]Bai Xiao-hong, Bai Guo-liang, Wu Tao. 3-D SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF R.C.FRAME-BENT STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(11): 34-37. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200711010
    [15]Liu Jinrong, Deng Yongsheng, Jiang Chun, Yang Jianjiang. STUDY ON SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERION OF EXISTING STRUCTURE IN RE-SERVICE PERIOD[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(5): 23-25. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200705006
    [16]Shui Weihou, Zhu Jianfeng. EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF VIBRATION DURING 10 000kN·m HIGH ENERGY LEVEL DYNAMIC COMPACTION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(1): 37-39. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200601012
    [17]Zhu Yanzhi, Wang Junlin. NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF ELASTOPLASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE FOR COMPOSITE FOUNDATION TAKING ACCOUNT OF ANISOTROPY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(6): 45-48,10. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200506013
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(0)

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04050100150200
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.3 %FULLTEXT: 9.3 %META: 86.9 %META: 86.9 %PDF: 3.8 %PDF: 3.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 6.2 %其他: 6.2 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %China: 0.4 %China: 0.4 %上海: 3.2 %上海: 3.2 %东营: 0.2 %东营: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %佛山: 0.6 %佛山: 0.6 %兰州: 0.6 %兰州: 0.6 %北京: 12.1 %北京: 12.1 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南京: 4.6 %南京: 4.6 %南宁: 0.8 %南宁: 0.8 %南昌: 1.2 %南昌: 1.2 %厦门: 0.8 %厦门: 0.8 %合肥: 1.2 %合肥: 1.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %咸阳: 0.2 %咸阳: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %商丘: 0.4 %商丘: 0.4 %大连: 1.4 %大连: 1.4 %天津: 3.2 %天津: 3.2 %太原: 1.6 %太原: 1.6 %安康: 0.4 %安康: 0.4 %宜昌: 0.2 %宜昌: 0.2 %宜春: 0.4 %宜春: 0.4 %巴音郭楞: 0.2 %巴音郭楞: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常德: 0.8 %常德: 0.8 %平顶山: 0.2 %平顶山: 0.2 %广州: 0.6 %广州: 0.6 %延安: 0.2 %延安: 0.2 %徐州: 0.2 %徐州: 0.2 %成都: 1.6 %成都: 1.6 %扬州: 0.8 %扬州: 0.8 %无锡: 2.6 %无锡: 2.6 %昆明: 1.2 %昆明: 1.2 %杭州: 0.8 %杭州: 0.8 %柳州: 0.2 %柳州: 0.2 %武汉: 3.0 %武汉: 3.0 %沈阳: 0.6 %沈阳: 0.6 %济南: 1.0 %济南: 1.0 %淮南: 0.2 %淮南: 0.2 %深圳: 0.6 %深圳: 0.6 %漯河: 0.8 %漯河: 0.8 %烟台: 0.2 %烟台: 0.2 %石家庄: 1.4 %石家庄: 1.4 %福州: 0.6 %福州: 0.6 %芒廷维尤: 14.1 %芒廷维尤: 14.1 %芝加哥: 1.8 %芝加哥: 1.8 %苏州: 0.8 %苏州: 0.8 %菏泽: 0.2 %菏泽: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %西宁: 14.5 %西宁: 14.5 %西安: 2.0 %西安: 2.0 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %达州: 0.4 %达州: 0.4 %运城: 1.2 %运城: 1.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 1.0 %郑州: 1.0 %重庆: 2.0 %重庆: 2.0 %长沙: 1.2 %长沙: 1.2 %陇南: 0.2 %陇南: 0.2 %青岛: 0.6 %青岛: 0.6 %马鞍山: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.2 %其他其他China上海东营临汾佛山兰州北京十堰南京南宁南昌厦门合肥呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨商丘大连天津太原安康宜昌宜春巴音郭楞常州常德平顶山广州延安徐州成都扬州无锡昆明杭州柳州武汉沈阳济南淮南深圳漯河烟台石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州菏泽衡阳西宁西安贵阳达州运城邯郸郑州重庆长沙陇南青岛马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (431) PDF downloads(20) Cited by(1)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return