Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 54 Issue 4
Apr.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION  > 2024  >  54(4): 99-107
XIAO Congzhen, LI Jianhui, MA Tianyi, WEI Yue, WU Zhenhong, QIAO Baojuan. Current Situation and Development of Retrofitting and Performance Improvement for Existing Building Structures[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(1): 20-30. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23120812
Citation: YANG Dafeng, SUN Song, CHEN Feng, LIN Kangli, SHU Qianjin, CAO Cong. Research on the Influence of Coupling Effect Between Steel Valve Hall Structure and Equipment on the Seismic Response of 800 kV Wall Bushing[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(4): 99-107. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23112115
shu

Research on the Influence of Coupling Effect Between Steel Valve Hall Structure and Equipment on the Seismic Response of 800 kV Wall Bushing

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23112115

  • 1. Xuzhou Survey and Design Branch of State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Design Consulting Co., Ltd., Xuzhou 221000, china;

  • 2. China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, china

  • Received Date: 2023-11-21
    Available Online: 2024-05-29
    Abstract
  • Taking the 800 kV wall bushing of a typical ultra-high voltage valve hall as the research object, seven finite element models were established considering different coupling modes between the 800 kV bushing and the steel structure valve hall, valve tower, 400 kV wall bushing, and firewall. The seismic response laws of the wall bushing and its end plates were studied. The research results showed that the stress amplitude of end plates of the 800 kV wall bushing increaseed by 21.7% to 26.6%, while the lateral acceleration amplitude increased by 20.5% to 31.1%, after considering the coupling effect with the steel structure valve hall, firewall, and 400 kV wall bushing. The stress amplitude of the outer casing pipe was relatively larger, approximately 1.06-1.17 times that of the inner casing pipe. The coupling effect between the valve hall structure and the equipment had increased the stress amplitude of the inner casing pipe by 10.3-11.9%, while there was no significant impact on the stress of the outer casing pipe (with a maximum difference of only 0.62%). The coupling effect of structural equipment significantly increased the relative displacement between the conductive rod and the inner wall of the casing pipe, increasing the lateral relative displacement by 20.6-63.4% and the longitudinal relative displacement by 38.5-42.8%. Therefore, in the design, selection, and strength verification of wall bushings, the adverse effects of the coupling effect between the steel structure valve hall and the equipment should be comprehensively considered in order to obtain more scientific and accurate conclusions.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(15)
  • [1]
    谢强,李杰.电力系统自然灾害的现状与对策[J].自然灾害学报, 2006(4):126-131.
    [2]
    于永清,李光范,李鹏,等.四川电网汶川地震电力设施受灾调研分析[J].电网技术, 2008(11):5-10.
    [3]
    王晓游,谢强,罗兵,等.±800 kV穿墙套管的地震响应与振动控制[J].高压电器, 2018, 54(1):16-22.
    [4]
    VILLAVERDE R, PARDOEN G C, CARNALLA S. Ground motion amplification at flange level of bushings mounted on electric substation transformers[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2001, 30(5):621-632.
    [5]
    唐云,朱旺,薛志航,等.±1200 kV特高压直流穿墙套管抗震性能分析[J].高压电器, 2022, 58(8):41-49.
    [6]
    HE C, XIE Q, YANG ZY, et al. Seismic performance evaluation and improvement of ultra-high voltage wall bushing-valve hall system[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2019, 154:123-133.
    [7]
    XIE Q, LIANG H B, WANG X Y. Seismic performance improvement of±800 kV UHV DC wall busing using friction ring spring dampers[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2021, 37(2):1056-1077.
    [8]
    XIE Q, HE C, ZHOU Y. Seismic evaluation of ultra-high voltage wall bushing[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2019, 35(2):611-633.
    [9]
    罗兵,饶宏,卓然,等.±800 kV滇西北特高压直流工程穿墙套管抗震性能研究[J].南方电网技术, 2017, 11(12):1-8.
    [10]
    PAOLACCI F, GIANNINI R. Seismic reliability assessment of a high-voltage disconnect switch using an effective fragility analysis[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2009, 13(2):217-235.
    [11]
    ZAREEI S A, HOSSEINI M, GHAFORY-ASHTIANY M. Evaluation of power substation equipment seismic vulnerability by multivariate fragility analysis:a case study on a 420 kV circuit breaker[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 92:79-94.
    [12]
    ZAREEI S A, HOSSEINI M, GHAFORY-ASHTIANY M. Seismic failure probability of a 400 kV power transformer using analytical fragility curves[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2016, 70:273-289.
    [13]
    梁黄彬,谢强,何畅,等.±800 kV特高压直流穿墙套管的地震易损性分析[J].地震工程与工程振动, 2020, 40(2):91-100.
    [14]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.电力设施抗震设计规范:GB 50260-2013[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2013.
    [15]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计规范:GBJ 50011-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]GUO Wei, ZHANG Yipeng, WAN Yufeng, CHEN An, SUN Jing. A State-of-the-Art Review of Research and Application of FRP Composites in Railway Infrastructure[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(6): 190-196. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24040601
    [2]WU Ying, LI Aiqun. Application and Circled Layer Scene Construction of Digital Twin Technology from Coupling Perspective of "City-Building-People"[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(4): 180-189. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG23012403
    [3]Qi Yicong. REGENERATIVE DESIGN METHOD AND ANALYSIS OF INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(04): 40-44.
    [4]Shu Biqing, Zheng Juan. DETECTION APPRAISAL AND STRENGTHENING OF A BENT FRAME STRUCTURE PLANT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(06): 139-142. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201406030
    [5]Sun Changling, Wang Zhiyuan. THE EXAMPLE ABOUT THE ADAPTIVE REUSEOF OF AN INDUSTRIAL PLANT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(2): 168-171. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201302034
    [6]Xue Suduo, Zhang Yigang, Cao Zi, Li Xiongyan. PROSPECT AND FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF SEISMIC RESEARCH ON SPATIAL STRUCTURES OVER LAST THIRTY YEARS IN CHINA[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(6): 105-116. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201306022
    [7]Zhao Jida, Lan Tian. THIRTY YEARS PROGRESS AND FUTURE PROSPECT OF SPATIAL STRUCTURES IN CHINA[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(4): 131-138,164. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201304028
    [8]Cao Xia, Xie Dan, Jin Lingzhi. REINFORCEMENT AND RENOVATION OF THE OFFICE BUILDING OF A POLICE STATION IN GUILIN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(4): 143-146,64. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201204029
    [9]Tang Hongyuan, Wang Zeyun, Jia Yigang. ASSESSMENT AND STRENGTHEN FOR A CHEMICAL FIBRE FACTORY BUILDING SUBJECTED TO FIRE DISASTER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(7): 152-155,170. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201207026
    [10]Zhou Hongbing. APPRAISAL OF THE IMPACT OF FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION OF A HIGH-RISE BUILDING ON STRUCTURAL SAFETY OF THE ADJACENT BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(2): 116-119. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201002027
    [11]Yuan Chengfang, Niu Ditao, Wang Qinglin, Yuan Bo. SAFETY EVALUATION AND STRUCTURE STRENGTHENING OF A CHEMICAL PLANT SUBJECTED TO FIRE DISASTER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(6): 113-117. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201006026
    [12]Jiang Lixue, Zheng Qiaowen. SEISMIC ANALYSIS METHOD FOR RC FRAMES CONSIDERING INTERACTION BETWEEN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STRUCTURES AND ITS APPLICATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(5): 6-10. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200905002
    [13]Wang Junqiang. DAMAGES TO MULTISTORY BRICK-CONCRETE BUILDINGS AFTER WENCHUAN EARTHQUAKE AND THEIR APPRAISAL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(1): 47-49,59. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200901009
    [14]Zhang Kaichen, Wang Feng, Si Bo, Li Ming. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE CORBEL BETWEEN THE OLD COLUMN AND THE NEW BEAM FOR A REFORM PROJECT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(11): 126-128. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200911029
    [15]Zheng Qizhen, Bao Yongliang, Wei Lin. THE DETECTION & IDENTIFICATION ON THE MAJOR STRUCTURE OF PROTECTED HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANT BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(8): 1-3,7. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200908001
    [16]Shu Hongbo, Zheng Jianjun, Zhang Shaohua. QUALIFICATION AND REINFORCEMENT OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES AFTER FIRE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(8): 25-27. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200908007
    [17]Dong Hairong, Qi Shaoming, Sun Xiaolu, Wu Xin. STUDY ON TECHNOLOGY OF ENERGY-SAVING RECONSTRUCTION ON EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS IN THE COLD DISTRICT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(7): 4-6. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200907002
    [18]Tan Jun, Wang Ying, Zheng Wenzhong. DESIGN OF TWO TYPICAL POST-BUILT SUSPENDED STAIRCASES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(4): 119-123，86. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200804030
    [19]Zhong Wenle, Chen Pei, Jiang Fengchang, Yang Genhong, Lu Jianwang. STRENGTHENING AND RECONSTRUCTION A CHEMICAL WORKSHOP INTO 2-HLS90 CONCRETE-MIXING BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(2): 107-109. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200702027
    [20]Chun Qing, Qiu Hongxing, Huang Zhicheng, Pan Jianwu, Fang Zhibao. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON ANCHORAGE PERFORMANCE OF DOUBLE ADHESIVE ANCHORS FOR RC STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(2): 98-100. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200602029
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 李凯，刘博，陈必光，杨卓，翟博渊. 重复压浆钢管桩在既有建筑基础加固中的应用. 广州建筑. 2025(01): 14-18 .
    2. 蔡旭东. 建筑结构加固改造技术与方法浅析. 广州建筑. 2025(01): 45-49 .
    3. 翟长海，丁俊男，史铁花，王代玉，黄颖. 既有建筑抗震韧性提升方法研究. 地震工程与工程振动. 2025(01): 18-27 .
    4. 黄晓旭，胡彪，李中流. 基于PDCA闭环模式的案例教学法在工程结构鉴定与加固课程中的应用. 科教导刊. 2025(01): 38-41 .
    5. 张吾健. 可持续发展理念下既有建筑改造设计策略分析. 住宅与房地产. 2024(06): 128-130 .
    6. 顾辉军. 既有建筑加固技术探析与应用——以某多层厂房加固为例. 建筑施工. 2024(05): 676-683 .
    7. 文应，蔡俊辉，孙健，郑代炳，江康. 城市更新改造中既有建筑的结构加固要点与实践. 新型城镇化. 2024(06): 57-60 .
    8. 苗元耀. 既有建筑结构加固改造原则及技术分析. 工程技术研究. 2024(12): 34-36 .
    9. 张荻，李涛杨，李伟. 城市更新为城市核心区注入新活力——既有建筑隔震托换加固改造项目的更新实践. 中国勘察设计. 2024(09): 67-69 .
    10. 梁春敏. 医院既有建筑局部结构加固实施难点及解决策略探究. 中国建筑金属结构. 2024(11): 87-89 .
    11. 陈光华，谢洪涛，孙柏锋. 基于价值工程的既有建筑加固改造项目经济性及模式创新研究. 工程管理学报. 2024(06): 117-122 .
    12. 吴梓楠，韩小雷，李建乐，黄世怡，董优. 建筑结构BIM正向设计的发展困境、关键技术与应用实践. 建筑结构. 2024(24): 136-144+135 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-030255075100125
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.4 %FULLTEXT: 9.4 %META: 83.5 %META: 83.5 %PDF: 7.1 %PDF: 7.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 9.4 %其他: 9.4 %其他: 0.9 %其他: 0.9 %Baden: 0.4 %Baden: 0.4 %Central District: 0.6 %Central District: 0.6 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %Kennedy Town: 0.3 %Kennedy Town: 0.3 %三明: 0.1 %三明: 0.1 %上海: 6.4 %上海: 6.4 %东莞: 4.5 %东莞: 4.5 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %信阳: 0.1 %信阳: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %兰州: 0.4 %兰州: 0.4 %北京: 12.0 %北京: 12.0 %南京: 3.3 %南京: 3.3 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南昌: 0.3 %南昌: 0.3 %厦门: 0.1 %厦门: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %台州: 0.7 %台州: 0.7 %合肥: 0.7 %合肥: 0.7 %吉隆坡: 0.3 %吉隆坡: 0.3 %周口: 0.4 %周口: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %咸宁: 0.1 %咸宁: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %唐山: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %商丘: 0.1 %商丘: 0.1 %喀什: 0.3 %喀什: 0.3 %天津: 0.7 %天津: 0.7 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %安庆: 0.3 %安庆: 0.3 %安康: 0.4 %安康: 0.4 %安阳: 0.4 %安阳: 0.4 %宜春: 0.7 %宜春: 0.7 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %常德: 0.7 %常德: 0.7 %广州: 1.6 %广州: 1.6 %廊坊: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.3 %张家口: 0.6 %张家口: 0.6 %徐州: 0.6 %徐州: 0.6 %德阳: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %成都: 3.0 %成都: 3.0 %扬州: 0.6 %扬州: 0.6 %无锡: 0.3 %无锡: 0.3 %昆明: 1.6 %昆明: 1.6 %昭通: 0.1 %昭通: 0.1 %曲靖: 0.9 %曲靖: 0.9 %朝阳: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %杭州: 1.4 %杭州: 1.4 %松原: 0.4 %松原: 0.4 %柏林: 0.1 %柏林: 0.1 %武汉: 2.3 %武汉: 2.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %河内: 0.1 %河内: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %济南: 1.6 %济南: 1.6 %济宁: 0.1 %济宁: 0.1 %海口: 0.4 %海口: 0.4 %淄博: 0.3 %淄博: 0.3 %淮安: 0.3 %淮安: 0.3 %深圳: 3.0 %深圳: 3.0 %温州: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %漯河: 0.9 %漯河: 0.9 %漳州: 0.1 %漳州: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.9 %濮阳: 0.9 %烟台: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %益阳: 0.1 %益阳: 0.1 %眉山: 0.1 %眉山: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %福州: 1.0 %福州: 1.0 %芒廷维尤: 5.9 %芒廷维尤: 5.9 %芝加哥: 1.7 %芝加哥: 1.7 %苏州: 0.6 %苏州: 0.6 %荆门: 0.4 %荆门: 0.4 %莆田: 0.9 %莆田: 0.9 %蚌埠: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.3 %衡阳: 0.3 %衢州: 0.4 %衢州: 0.4 %西宁: 4.1 %西宁: 4.1 %西安: 1.6 %西安: 1.6 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %赣州: 0.1 %赣州: 0.1 %运城: 0.7 %运城: 0.7 %郑州: 1.2 %郑州: 1.2 %重庆: 1.3 %重庆: 1.3 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %金昌: 0.1 %金昌: 0.1 %银川: 0.4 %银川: 0.4 %镇江: 0.3 %镇江: 0.3 %长春: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长沙: 3.5 %长沙: 3.5 %阜新: 0.1 %阜新: 0.1 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %青岛: 0.7 %青岛: 0.7 %马鞍山: 0.3 %马鞍山: 0.3 %鹰潭: 0.1 %鹰潭: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %其他其他BadenCentral DistrictChinaKennedy Town三明上海东莞乌鲁木齐保定信阳六安兰州北京南京南宁南昌厦门台北台州合肥吉隆坡周口呼和浩特咸宁哈尔滨唐山商丘喀什天津太原威海宁波安庆安康安阳宜春宣城常德广州廊坊张家口徐州德阳成都扬州无锡昆明昭通曲靖朝阳杭州松原柏林武汉沈阳河内泉州济南济宁海口淄博淮安深圳温州湖州漯河漳州濮阳烟台珠海益阳眉山石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆门莆田蚌埠衡阳衢州西宁西安贵阳赣州运城郑州重庆金华金昌银川镇江长春长沙阜新阿姆斯特丹青岛马鞍山鹰潭齐齐哈尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (59) PDF downloads(0) Cited by(17)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return