International Experiences and Development Trends of Healthy Campus Evaluation Systems

XU Jiejing; LIU Kai; QIU Wenhang

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG23111302

Volume 55 Issue 11

Nov. 2025

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2025 > 55(11): 1-10

XU Jiejing, LIU Kai, QIU Wenhang. International Experiences and Development Trends of Healthy Campus Evaluation Systems[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(11): 1-10. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23111302

Citation:

XU Jiejing, LIU Kai, QIU Wenhang. International Experiences and Development Trends of Healthy Campus Evaluation Systems[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(11): 1-10. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23111302

XU Jiejing, LIU Kai, QIU Wenhang. International Experiences and Development Trends of Healthy Campus Evaluation Systems[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(11): 1-10. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23111302

Citation:

XU Jiejing, LIU Kai, QIU Wenhang. International Experiences and Development Trends of Healthy Campus Evaluation Systems[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(11): 1-10. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23111302

PDF( 956 KB)

International Experiences and Development Trends of Healthy Campus Evaluation Systems

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23111302

XU Jiejing^1,2,
LIU Kai^1,2,
QIU Wenhang^{3
,
,}

1. School of Architecture & Urban Planning, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China;
2. Hubei Engineering and Technology Research Center of Urbanization, Wuhan 430074, China;
3. CentralSouth Architectural Design Institute Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430074, China

Received Date: 2023-11-13
Available Online: 2026-01-06
Publish Date: 2025-11-20

Abstract

Abstract

It is important to explore the development process and main trends of healthy campus evaluation systems in order to guide the construction of healthy campuses and support the healthy growth of students. By reviewing and comparing healthy campus evaluation systems in China and other countries， this study focuses on the progress in terms of evaluation targets， content， and outcomes. It summarizes three trends in the development of healthy campus evaluation systems： the differentiation of evaluation targets， the diversification of evaluation content， and the variation in evaluation outcomes. Furthermore， it offers insights for China's healthy campus evaluation system， including considering people from different educational stages， constructing a systematic evaluation index system， and strengthening the implementation of evaluation systems.
- healthy campus,
- evaluation system,
- healthy building,
- green building,
- healthy city,
- health promotion

FullText(HTML)

References(24)

References

[1]	杨一兵，王静雷，石文惠，等. 2013—2018年全民健康生活方式行动健康支持性环境建设趋势分析[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制，2019，27（10 ）:732-735.
[2]	王兰，蒋希冀，叶丹. 中国健康城市规划研究热点与进展:基于Citespace的文献计量分析[J]. 城市发展研究，2020，27（11）:8-14.
[3]	仲继寿. 健康住宅的研究理念与技术体系[J]. 建筑学报，2004（4）:11-13.
[4]	王清勤，孟冲，李国柱. T/ASC 02—2016《健康建筑评价标准》编制介绍[J]. 建筑科学，2017，33（2）:163-166.
[5]	王清勤，邓月超，李国柱，等. 我国健康建筑发展的现状与展望[J]. 科学通报，2020，65（4）:246-255.
[6]	中共中央国务院.“健康中国2030”规划纲要[EB/OL].（2016-10-25 ）[2023-11-01]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2016-10/25/content_5124174.html.
[7]	杨娇，张群，成辉，等. 美国WELL建筑标准与中国健康建筑评价标准比较分析[J]. 建筑科学，2018，34（8）:112-117.
[8]	中国建筑学会. 关于发布中国建筑学会标准《健康建筑评价标准》的公告[EB/OL].（2017-01-06）[2023-11-01]. http://www.chinaasc.org/news/115327.html.
[9]	刘剀，徐结晶，邱文航. 健康幼儿园建筑评价指标体系研究[J]. 世界建筑，2023（9）:80-83.
[10]	中国建筑学会. 健康建筑评价标准:T/A SC 02—2021[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社，2021.
[11]	李锦，顾语琪，雷诚. 面向健康校园的大学环境更新设计策略研究:以苏州大学本部校区为例[J]. 华中建筑，2022，40（1）:64-68.
[12]	王清勤.“健康+疫情防控”定义建筑新属性[J]. 建设科技，2020（6）:10-11.
[13]	李栋，韩颂，李丰婧. 健康城市评价体系的回顾与展望[J]. 西部人居环境学刊，2023，38（2）:17-23.
[14]	Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method. Building research establishment environmental assessment method[EB/OL].[2023-11-01]. https://files.bregroup.com/breeam/technicalmanuals/BREEAM_INC-Manual-English.pdf.
[15]	Green Building Council US. Leadership in energy& environment design+Cv4.1[EB/OL].[2023-11-01]. https://www.usgbc.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/LEED%20v4.1%20BDC%20190409_ clean.pdf.
[16]	Japan Sustainable Building Consortium. Comprehensive assessment system for building environmental efficiency[EB/OL].[2023-11-01]. https://www.ibec.or.jp/CASBEE/english/download/CASBEE-BD（NC）e_2014manual.pdf.
[17]	DGNB GMBH. DGNB[EB/OL].[2023-11-01]. https://www.dgnb-system.de/de/gebaeude/neubau/version-2023.
[18]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 绿色校园评价标准:GB/T 51356—2019[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社，2019.
[19]	The CHPS National Technical Committee. Collaborative for high performance schools criteria（CHPS CRITERIA）[EB/OL].[2023-11-01]. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/642de662bb454d02a92440d4/t/644ab8a80931317c3ff1d15c/1682618539169/US-CHPS+Criteria+v2.0+2020_0.pdf.
[20]	The State of Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction（OSPI）. Washington sustainable schools protocol[EB/OL].[2023-11-01]. https://www.k12.wa.us/sites/default/files/public/schfacilities/pubdocs/WSSP%202018%20Final.pdf.
[21]	SAADATIAN O，SALLEH E，TAHIR O M，et al. A survey on campus sustainability assessment framework（CSAF）in Malaysia[J]. Design + Built Journal，2011（4）:9-12.
[22]	International University Sports Federation（FISU）. Healthy campus standard[EB/OL].[2023-11-01]. https://www.fisu.net/medias/fichiers/healthycampus_regulations_30.pdf.
[23]	钱俊伟，郑重，安钰峰. 新时代中国“健康校园”体系的理论与实践:以北京大学为例[J]. 北京体育大学学报，2021，44（9）:145-155.
[24]	李泽，张瑶. 社区建成环境对儿童健康影响的进展研究:基于体力活动视角的文献述评及展望[J]. 南方建筑，2020（5）:112-119.