Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 54 Issue 9
Sep.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION  > 2024  >  54(9): 133-140
XIAO Congzhen, LI Jianhui, MA Tianyi, WEI Yue, WU Zhenhong, QIAO Baojuan. Current Situation and Development of Retrofitting and Performance Improvement for Existing Building Structures[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(1): 20-30. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23120812
Citation: YANG Hangdong. Experimental Research on Seismic Performance of Prefabricated CFST Composite Column-Reinforced Concrete Beam Joints[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(9): 133-140. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23082308
shu

Experimental Research on Seismic Performance of Prefabricated CFST Composite Column-Reinforced Concrete Beam Joints

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23082308

  • China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Group Co., Xi'an 710043, China

  • Received Date: 2023-08-23
    Available Online: 2024-10-18
    Abstract
  • In order to study the seismic performance of prefabricated joints in underground space structures, a new type of prefabricated CFST composite column-reinforced concrete beam joint was designed and fabricated and compared with the cast-in-place CFST composite column-reinforced concrete beam joint. Quasi-static load tests were conducted on two types of joints. The hysteresis curves, skeleton scurves, stiffness degradation curves, energy dissipation capacity, ductility, and other indicators of the two types of joints were compared and analyzed. The results showed that both types of joints were subjected to bending failure in the plastic hinge area of the beam end and the ultimate displacement of the assembled joint was 47.6% higher than that of the cast-in-place joint, but the difference in ultimate bearing capacity between the two joints was not significant. The stiffness of the final joints was reached failure by about 10% of the initial stiffness, and the joints underwent significant nonlinear deformation and damage. The final cumulative total energy consumption of cast-in-place and prefabricated joints reached 35.69 kN·m and 58.77 kN·m, respectively. The prefabricated joint was greater than that of the cast-in-place joint, which was 1.65 times the cast-in-place joint. The yield and ultimate displacement of the prefabricated joint had increased by 30.68% and 32.47% respectively compared with the cast-in-place joint. The difference in yield and ultimate load between the two types of joints was not significant, and the ductility coefficients of prefabricated joints was slightly higher than cast-in-place joints. The ductility of the prefabricated joint was better than the cast-in-place joint.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(24)
  • [1]
    韩林海, 徐蕾. 带保护层方钢管混凝土柱耐火极限的试验研究[J]. 福州大学学报, 2000(6): 63-69.
    [2]
    程文瀼, 高仲学, 苏毅, 等. 钢骨混凝土柱框架节点的试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2002,23(2): 36-40.
    [3]
    范业庶. 钢管混凝土核心柱与预应力混凝土梁节点低周反复荷载试验研究[D]. 南宁:广西大学, 2002.
    [4]
    聂建国, 王宇航, 陶慕轩, 等. 钢管混凝土叠合柱-钢筋混凝土梁外加强环节点抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2012, 33(7): 88-97.
    [5]
    谭文勇. 钢筋混凝土梁-钢管混凝土叠合柱外加强环式节点受力性能有限元分析[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2016, 38(3): 61-65.
    [6]
    ARAVIND R P S, JOANNA P S. Experimental study on reinforced concrete beam and composite column joint with square steel cage[J]. Emerging Trends in Advanced Science, 2014(622): 81-88.
    [7]
    周颖, 于海燕, 钱江, 等. 钢管混凝土叠合柱节点环梁试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2015, 36(2): 69-78.
    [8]
    王琨, 智海祥, 曹大富, 等. 预应力型钢混凝土梁-钢管混凝土叠合柱框架节点抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2018, 39(12): 29-38.
    [9]
    王琨, 查志远, 刘宏潮, 等.预应力型钢混凝土梁-钢管混凝土叠合柱框架中节点受剪性能分析[J]. 工程力学, 2020, 37(8): 89-101.
    [10]
    廖飞宇, 赵剑, 尧国皇, 等. 钢管混凝土叠合柱-混凝土梁节点滞回性能的有限元分析[J]. 建筑钢结构进展, 2019, 21(5): 1-12

    ,19.
    [11]
    王静峰, 王翰斓, 郭磊, 等.预制钢管混凝土叠合柱与PEC梁螺栓连接节点受力性能分析[J]. 建筑钢结构进展, 2022, 24(7): 49-56.
    [12]
    凌育洪, 温新贵, 郑文丽, 等.新型叠合柱-混凝土梁边节点的受力性能试验研究[J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(1): 38-49.
    [13]
    王素裹, 祁皑. 宽扁梁与普通梁框架结构实现"强柱弱梁"的对比研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2013, 33(6): 95-101.
    [14]
    刘庆文, 王方斌. 预应力混凝土扁梁框架节点抗震性能试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动, 2016, 36(2): 42-48.
    [15]
    郭靳时, 胡新民. 钢筋混凝土扁梁边节点抗震性能拟静力试验研究[J]. 低温建筑技术, 2020, 42(3): 66-69.
    [16]
    范永龙. 钢筋混凝土框架宽扁梁-柱边节点抗震性能研究[D].合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2022.
    [17]
    JIANG Q, XUAN D C, CHONG X, et al. Seismic performance of RC interior wide beam-column joints[J]. Structures, 2023, 48: 373-389.
    [18]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土物理力学性能试验方法标准: GB/T 50081—2019 [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2019.
    [19]
    全国钢标准化技术委员会. 钢筋混凝土用钢材试验方法: GB/T 28900—2012 [S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
    [20]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 金属材料 拉伸试验 第1部分:室温试验方法:GB/T 228—2021[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021.
    [21]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑抗震试验规程:JGJ/T 101—2015[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
    [22]
    唐九如. 钢筋混凝土框架节点抗震 [M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 1989.
    [23]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土结构设计规范:GB 50010—2010[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
    [24]
    ZHANG J X,PEI Z H,RONG X. Experimental seismic study of an innovative precast steel-concrete composite beam-column joint[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2022,161,107420.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]GUO Wei, ZHANG Yipeng, WAN Yufeng, CHEN An, SUN Jing. A State-of-the-Art Review of Research and Application of FRP Composites in Railway Infrastructure[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(6): 190-196. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24040601
    [2]WU Ying, LI Aiqun. Application and Circled Layer Scene Construction of Digital Twin Technology from Coupling Perspective of "City-Building-People"[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(4): 180-189. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG23012403
    [3]Qi Yicong. REGENERATIVE DESIGN METHOD AND ANALYSIS OF INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(04): 40-44.
    [4]Shu Biqing, Zheng Juan. DETECTION APPRAISAL AND STRENGTHENING OF A BENT FRAME STRUCTURE PLANT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(06): 139-142. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201406030
    [5]Sun Changling, Wang Zhiyuan. THE EXAMPLE ABOUT THE ADAPTIVE REUSEOF OF AN INDUSTRIAL PLANT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(2): 168-171. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201302034
    [6]Xue Suduo, Zhang Yigang, Cao Zi, Li Xiongyan. PROSPECT AND FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF SEISMIC RESEARCH ON SPATIAL STRUCTURES OVER LAST THIRTY YEARS IN CHINA[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(6): 105-116. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201306022
    [7]Zhao Jida, Lan Tian. THIRTY YEARS PROGRESS AND FUTURE PROSPECT OF SPATIAL STRUCTURES IN CHINA[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(4): 131-138,164. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201304028
    [8]Cao Xia, Xie Dan, Jin Lingzhi. REINFORCEMENT AND RENOVATION OF THE OFFICE BUILDING OF A POLICE STATION IN GUILIN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(4): 143-146,64. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201204029
    [9]Tang Hongyuan, Wang Zeyun, Jia Yigang. ASSESSMENT AND STRENGTHEN FOR A CHEMICAL FIBRE FACTORY BUILDING SUBJECTED TO FIRE DISASTER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(7): 152-155,170. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201207026
    [10]Zhou Hongbing. APPRAISAL OF THE IMPACT OF FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION OF A HIGH-RISE BUILDING ON STRUCTURAL SAFETY OF THE ADJACENT BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(2): 116-119. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201002027
    [11]Yuan Chengfang, Niu Ditao, Wang Qinglin, Yuan Bo. SAFETY EVALUATION AND STRUCTURE STRENGTHENING OF A CHEMICAL PLANT SUBJECTED TO FIRE DISASTER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(6): 113-117. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201006026
    [12]Jiang Lixue, Zheng Qiaowen. SEISMIC ANALYSIS METHOD FOR RC FRAMES CONSIDERING INTERACTION BETWEEN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STRUCTURES AND ITS APPLICATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(5): 6-10. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200905002
    [13]Wang Junqiang. DAMAGES TO MULTISTORY BRICK-CONCRETE BUILDINGS AFTER WENCHUAN EARTHQUAKE AND THEIR APPRAISAL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(1): 47-49,59. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200901009
    [14]Zhang Kaichen, Wang Feng, Si Bo, Li Ming. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE CORBEL BETWEEN THE OLD COLUMN AND THE NEW BEAM FOR A REFORM PROJECT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(11): 126-128. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200911029
    [15]Zheng Qizhen, Bao Yongliang, Wei Lin. THE DETECTION & IDENTIFICATION ON THE MAJOR STRUCTURE OF PROTECTED HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANT BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(8): 1-3,7. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200908001
    [16]Shu Hongbo, Zheng Jianjun, Zhang Shaohua. QUALIFICATION AND REINFORCEMENT OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES AFTER FIRE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(8): 25-27. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200908007
    [17]Dong Hairong, Qi Shaoming, Sun Xiaolu, Wu Xin. STUDY ON TECHNOLOGY OF ENERGY-SAVING RECONSTRUCTION ON EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS IN THE COLD DISTRICT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(7): 4-6. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200907002
    [18]Tan Jun, Wang Ying, Zheng Wenzhong. DESIGN OF TWO TYPICAL POST-BUILT SUSPENDED STAIRCASES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(4): 119-123，86. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200804030
    [19]Zhong Wenle, Chen Pei, Jiang Fengchang, Yang Genhong, Lu Jianwang. STRENGTHENING AND RECONSTRUCTION A CHEMICAL WORKSHOP INTO 2-HLS90 CONCRETE-MIXING BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(2): 107-109. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200702027
    [20]Chun Qing, Qiu Hongxing, Huang Zhicheng, Pan Jianwu, Fang Zhibao. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON ANCHORAGE PERFORMANCE OF DOUBLE ADHESIVE ANCHORS FOR RC STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(2): 98-100. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200602029
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 李凯，刘博，陈必光，杨卓，翟博渊. 重复压浆钢管桩在既有建筑基础加固中的应用. 广州建筑. 2025(01): 14-18 .
    2. 蔡旭东. 建筑结构加固改造技术与方法浅析. 广州建筑. 2025(01): 45-49 .
    3. 翟长海，丁俊男，史铁花，王代玉，黄颖. 既有建筑抗震韧性提升方法研究. 地震工程与工程振动. 2025(01): 18-27 .
    4. 黄晓旭，胡彪，李中流. 基于PDCA闭环模式的案例教学法在工程结构鉴定与加固课程中的应用. 科教导刊. 2025(01): 38-41 .
    5. 张吾健. 可持续发展理念下既有建筑改造设计策略分析. 住宅与房地产. 2024(06): 128-130 .
    6. 顾辉军. 既有建筑加固技术探析与应用——以某多层厂房加固为例. 建筑施工. 2024(05): 676-683 .
    7. 文应，蔡俊辉，孙健，郑代炳，江康. 城市更新改造中既有建筑的结构加固要点与实践. 新型城镇化. 2024(06): 57-60 .
    8. 苗元耀. 既有建筑结构加固改造原则及技术分析. 工程技术研究. 2024(12): 34-36 .
    9. 张荻，李涛杨，李伟. 城市更新为城市核心区注入新活力——既有建筑隔震托换加固改造项目的更新实践. 中国勘察设计. 2024(09): 67-69 .
    10. 梁春敏. 医院既有建筑局部结构加固实施难点及解决策略探究. 中国建筑金属结构. 2024(11): 87-89 .
    11. 陈光华，谢洪涛，孙柏锋. 基于价值工程的既有建筑加固改造项目经济性及模式创新研究. 工程管理学报. 2024(06): 117-122 .
    12. 吴梓楠，韩小雷，李建乐，黄世怡，董优. 建筑结构BIM正向设计的发展困境、关键技术与应用实践. 建筑结构. 2024(24): 136-144+135 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-030255075100125
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.4 %FULLTEXT: 9.4 %META: 83.5 %META: 83.5 %PDF: 7.1 %PDF: 7.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 9.4 %其他: 9.4 %其他: 0.9 %其他: 0.9 %Baden: 0.4 %Baden: 0.4 %Central District: 0.6 %Central District: 0.6 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %Kennedy Town: 0.3 %Kennedy Town: 0.3 %三明: 0.1 %三明: 0.1 %上海: 6.4 %上海: 6.4 %东莞: 4.5 %东莞: 4.5 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %信阳: 0.1 %信阳: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %兰州: 0.4 %兰州: 0.4 %北京: 12.0 %北京: 12.0 %南京: 3.3 %南京: 3.3 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南昌: 0.3 %南昌: 0.3 %厦门: 0.1 %厦门: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %台州: 0.7 %台州: 0.7 %合肥: 0.7 %合肥: 0.7 %吉隆坡: 0.3 %吉隆坡: 0.3 %周口: 0.4 %周口: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %咸宁: 0.1 %咸宁: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %唐山: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %商丘: 0.1 %商丘: 0.1 %喀什: 0.3 %喀什: 0.3 %天津: 0.7 %天津: 0.7 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %安庆: 0.3 %安庆: 0.3 %安康: 0.4 %安康: 0.4 %安阳: 0.4 %安阳: 0.4 %宜春: 0.7 %宜春: 0.7 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %常德: 0.7 %常德: 0.7 %广州: 1.6 %广州: 1.6 %廊坊: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.3 %张家口: 0.6 %张家口: 0.6 %徐州: 0.6 %徐州: 0.6 %德阳: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %成都: 3.0 %成都: 3.0 %扬州: 0.6 %扬州: 0.6 %无锡: 0.3 %无锡: 0.3 %昆明: 1.6 %昆明: 1.6 %昭通: 0.1 %昭通: 0.1 %曲靖: 0.9 %曲靖: 0.9 %朝阳: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %杭州: 1.4 %杭州: 1.4 %松原: 0.4 %松原: 0.4 %柏林: 0.1 %柏林: 0.1 %武汉: 2.3 %武汉: 2.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %河内: 0.1 %河内: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %济南: 1.6 %济南: 1.6 %济宁: 0.1 %济宁: 0.1 %海口: 0.4 %海口: 0.4 %淄博: 0.3 %淄博: 0.3 %淮安: 0.3 %淮安: 0.3 %深圳: 3.0 %深圳: 3.0 %温州: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %漯河: 0.9 %漯河: 0.9 %漳州: 0.1 %漳州: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.9 %濮阳: 0.9 %烟台: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %益阳: 0.1 %益阳: 0.1 %眉山: 0.1 %眉山: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %福州: 1.0 %福州: 1.0 %芒廷维尤: 5.9 %芒廷维尤: 5.9 %芝加哥: 1.7 %芝加哥: 1.7 %苏州: 0.6 %苏州: 0.6 %荆门: 0.4 %荆门: 0.4 %莆田: 0.9 %莆田: 0.9 %蚌埠: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.3 %衡阳: 0.3 %衢州: 0.4 %衢州: 0.4 %西宁: 4.1 %西宁: 4.1 %西安: 1.6 %西安: 1.6 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %赣州: 0.1 %赣州: 0.1 %运城: 0.7 %运城: 0.7 %郑州: 1.2 %郑州: 1.2 %重庆: 1.3 %重庆: 1.3 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %金昌: 0.1 %金昌: 0.1 %银川: 0.4 %银川: 0.4 %镇江: 0.3 %镇江: 0.3 %长春: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长沙: 3.5 %长沙: 3.5 %阜新: 0.1 %阜新: 0.1 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %青岛: 0.7 %青岛: 0.7 %马鞍山: 0.3 %马鞍山: 0.3 %鹰潭: 0.1 %鹰潭: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %其他其他BadenCentral DistrictChinaKennedy Town三明上海东莞乌鲁木齐保定信阳六安兰州北京南京南宁南昌厦门台北台州合肥吉隆坡周口呼和浩特咸宁哈尔滨唐山商丘喀什天津太原威海宁波安庆安康安阳宜春宣城常德广州廊坊张家口徐州德阳成都扬州无锡昆明昭通曲靖朝阳杭州松原柏林武汉沈阳河内泉州济南济宁海口淄博淮安深圳温州湖州漯河漳州濮阳烟台珠海益阳眉山石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆门莆田蚌埠衡阳衢州西宁西安贵阳赣州运城郑州重庆金华金昌银川镇江长春长沙阜新阿姆斯特丹青岛马鞍山鹰潭齐齐哈尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (46) PDF downloads(1) Cited by(17)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return