Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
CHEN, Gong, XIE. MICRO RENEWAL OF PUBLIC SPACE IN OLD COMMUNITIES BASED ON SHARING CONCEPT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(1): 80-83,90. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202001014
Citation: YANG Hangdong. Experimental Research on Seismic Performance of Prefabricated CFST Composite Column-Reinforced Concrete Beam Joints[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(9): 133-140. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23082308

Experimental Research on Seismic Performance of Prefabricated CFST Composite Column-Reinforced Concrete Beam Joints

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23082308
  • Received Date: 2023-08-23
    Available Online: 2024-10-18
  • In order to study the seismic performance of prefabricated joints in underground space structures, a new type of prefabricated CFST composite column-reinforced concrete beam joint was designed and fabricated and compared with the cast-in-place CFST composite column-reinforced concrete beam joint. Quasi-static load tests were conducted on two types of joints. The hysteresis curves, skeleton scurves, stiffness degradation curves, energy dissipation capacity, ductility, and other indicators of the two types of joints were compared and analyzed. The results showed that both types of joints were subjected to bending failure in the plastic hinge area of the beam end and the ultimate displacement of the assembled joint was 47.6% higher than that of the cast-in-place joint, but the difference in ultimate bearing capacity between the two joints was not significant. The stiffness of the final joints was reached failure by about 10% of the initial stiffness, and the joints underwent significant nonlinear deformation and damage. The final cumulative total energy consumption of cast-in-place and prefabricated joints reached 35.69 kN·m and 58.77 kN·m, respectively. The prefabricated joint was greater than that of the cast-in-place joint, which was 1.65 times the cast-in-place joint. The yield and ultimate displacement of the prefabricated joint had increased by 30.68% and 32.47% respectively compared with the cast-in-place joint. The difference in yield and ultimate load between the two types of joints was not significant, and the ductility coefficients of prefabricated joints was slightly higher than cast-in-place joints. The ductility of the prefabricated joint was better than the cast-in-place joint.
  • [1]
    韩林海, 徐蕾. 带保护层方钢管混凝土柱耐火极限的试验研究[J]. 福州大学学报, 2000(6): 63-69.
    [2]
    程文瀼, 高仲学, 苏毅, 等. 钢骨混凝土柱框架节点的试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2002,23(2): 36-40.
    [3]
    范业庶. 钢管混凝土核心柱与预应力混凝土梁节点低周反复荷载试验研究[D]. 南宁:广西大学, 2002.
    [4]
    聂建国, 王宇航, 陶慕轩, 等. 钢管混凝土叠合柱-钢筋混凝土梁外加强环节点抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2012, 33(7): 88-97.
    [5]
    谭文勇. 钢筋混凝土梁-钢管混凝土叠合柱外加强环式节点受力性能有限元分析[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2016, 38(3): 61-65.
    [6]
    ARAVIND R P S, JOANNA P S. Experimental study on reinforced concrete beam and composite column joint with square steel cage[J]. Emerging Trends in Advanced Science, 2014(622): 81-88.
    [7]
    周颖, 于海燕, 钱江, 等. 钢管混凝土叠合柱节点环梁试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2015, 36(2): 69-78.
    [8]
    王琨, 智海祥, 曹大富, 等. 预应力型钢混凝土梁-钢管混凝土叠合柱框架节点抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2018, 39(12): 29-38.
    [9]
    王琨, 查志远, 刘宏潮, 等.预应力型钢混凝土梁-钢管混凝土叠合柱框架中节点受剪性能分析[J]. 工程力学, 2020, 37(8): 89-101.
    [10]
    廖飞宇, 赵剑, 尧国皇, 等. 钢管混凝土叠合柱-混凝土梁节点滞回性能的有限元分析[J]. 建筑钢结构进展, 2019, 21(5): 1-12

    ,19.
    [11]
    王静峰, 王翰斓, 郭磊, 等.预制钢管混凝土叠合柱与PEC梁螺栓连接节点受力性能分析[J]. 建筑钢结构进展, 2022, 24(7): 49-56.
    [12]
    凌育洪, 温新贵, 郑文丽, 等.新型叠合柱-混凝土梁边节点的受力性能试验研究[J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(1): 38-49.
    [13]
    王素裹, 祁皑. 宽扁梁与普通梁框架结构实现"强柱弱梁"的对比研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2013, 33(6): 95-101.
    [14]
    刘庆文, 王方斌. 预应力混凝土扁梁框架节点抗震性能试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动, 2016, 36(2): 42-48.
    [15]
    郭靳时, 胡新民. 钢筋混凝土扁梁边节点抗震性能拟静力试验研究[J]. 低温建筑技术, 2020, 42(3): 66-69.
    [16]
    范永龙. 钢筋混凝土框架宽扁梁-柱边节点抗震性能研究[D].合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2022.
    [17]
    JIANG Q, XUAN D C, CHONG X, et al. Seismic performance of RC interior wide beam-column joints[J]. Structures, 2023, 48: 373-389.
    [18]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土物理力学性能试验方法标准: GB/T 50081—2019 [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2019.
    [19]
    全国钢标准化技术委员会. 钢筋混凝土用钢材试验方法: GB/T 28900—2012 [S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
    [20]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 金属材料 拉伸试验 第1部分:室温试验方法:GB/T 228—2021[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021.
    [21]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑抗震试验规程:JGJ/T 101—2015[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
    [22]
    唐九如. 钢筋混凝土框架节点抗震 [M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 1989.
    [23]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土结构设计规范:GB 50010—2010[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
    [24]
    ZHANG J X,PEI Z H,RONG X. Experimental seismic study of an innovative precast steel-concrete composite beam-column joint[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2022,161,107420.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]XUE Qianming, HUANG Yuehao, SHANG Yongtao. Research on Micro-Renewal and Optimization Design of Lanzhou Railway Station Area Under Catalyst Linkage[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(5): 86-94. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23060709
    [2]ZHANG Xia, ZHAO Xue, LIAO Zixiang. Application of Affordance Theory to the Community-Based Renewal of Industrial Relics and Strategies: Taking Wuhan City as an Example[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(12): 45-53. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG23083006
    [3]JIN Liansheng, CHEN Chen. Protection and Renewal Strategies of Santaizi Worker’s Community in Shenyang from a Perspective of Community Co-Governance Systems[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(1): 72-81. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21012706
    [4]ZHANG Hongbo, YANG Yujia. Deconstructive Study on Public Space of Jinjiang Timber Cabin Village in Jilin Based on the Pattern Language[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(7): 64-73. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22060804
    [5]REN Zhen, KOU Juntao, WANG Yu, CHI Miaomiao. Research on the Regeneration Design of Industrial Remain Sites from the Perspective of Landscape Urbanism: A Case Study of the Old Brewery in Pingyuan County[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(10): 17-22. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22062304
    [6]CAO Ying, YANG Jinpeng, WANG Yu, ZHANG Nan. Protection and Reuse of Mining Heritage Based on Community Renewal: Taking the Zhongfu Mining Heritage in Jiaozuo as an Example[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(1): 52-58. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20102504
    [7]LYU Chang, WEI Chunyu. TAKING TIANHAN CULTURAL PARK AS AN EXAMPLE: RESEARCH ON THE CURRENT SITUATION AND DESIGN OF CONTEMPORARY VILLAGE MUSEUM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(10): 74-80. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzg21022003
    [8]QIAO Zhi, JIA Xinxin, HUANG Jingfan, FAN Wenlu. STUDY ON THE AGING SPACE ACTIVATION AND FACILITIES RENEWAL OF XI'AN TEXTILE CITY INDUSTRIAL COMMUNITY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF COLLECTIVE MEMORY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(2): 89-97. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202002013
    [9]CHEN Jing, HAO Xinyi, YANG Li. STUDY ON THE SPATIAL FORM OF SILO-CAVE VILLAGE IN THE WEST OF HENAN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(5): 8-12. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005002
    [12]Deng Yuanyuan, Chang Jiang. MICRO SPATIAL COGNITIVE OF INHABITANT IN OLD COMMUNITY: THE INVESTIGATION FOR THE WORKER COMMUNITY OF THE 2ND MACHINERY PLANT IN JIAWANG DISTRICT,XUZHOU[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(05): 40-44.
    [13]Sun Jian, Zhao Lin. THE RENOVATION OF QINGDAO SMALL HARBOR[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(1): 156-159. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201301035
    [14]Wang Xixi, Chen Xingzhu. RESUSCITATION OF THE HEART OF CITY:RENOVATION OF LES HALLES,PARIS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(3): 56-59. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201203011
    [15]Wang Lu, Xu Jia, Tuo Wanyong, Li Yuhua. ANALYSIS OF PLANNING AND SIGHT DESIGN FOR GANGHUA GARDEN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(11): 45-48. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201211010
    [16]Dong Jie, Su Jihong, Wang Shiyang, Zou Dan. CONSTRUCTION STRATEGY OF CONTEMPOARY INDUSTRIAL PARKS BASED ON VITALITY MOULDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(8): 4-7. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201108002
    [17]He Wei. RESEARCH AND INTEGRATION DESIGN OF OLD AND NEW CAMPUS PUBLIC SPACE IN HUNAN UNIVERSITY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(5): 47-49. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201105011
    [18]Wang Yi, Chen Jing. THE EXPLORATION AND PRACTICE OF INDUSTRIAL PARKS UNDER THE CONCEPTION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(12): 37-40. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200812011
    [19]Shi Qi-lei. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL BUILDING FOR THE PLAcS NO. 306 HOSPITAL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(10): 29-31. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200610009
    [20]Zhang Sanming, Wu Qian. RECONSTRUCTION DESIGN OF ACOUSTICAL ENVIRONMENT OF INTERIOR PUBLIC SPACE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(2): 31-33. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200602009
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(15)

    1. 高雅薇,孙伟,官卫华. 基于多主体治理视角的城市更新研究进展与展望. 现代城市研究. 2024(06): 1-7+45 .
    2. 余文志豪,孙靓,刘梦昭,姚彧之,蔡祎文. 基于空间激活的武汉保成路社区入口改造. 山西建筑. 2023(07): 39-42 .
    3. 王崎. 基于微更新的住区开放空间适老性研究进展及趋势. 低温建筑技术. 2023(04): 30-33 .
    4. 张思源. 老旧小区首层自发加建研究——以柳州机车车辆有限公司东社区为例. 城市建筑. 2023(22): 182-185 .
    5. 潘博,田从祥,王文斌. 基于“共享”理念下老旧社区公共空间更新探索——以荆州市荆州古城便河社区为例. 四川建材. 2022(02): 51-52+54 .
    6. 宋鹏波,孙涛,郑云峰. 基于UCD理念的老旧社区公共空间景观微改造创新设计研究——以武汉市武展社区为例. 中国勘察设计. 2022(09): 87-90 .
    7. 陈晓菲,冉圣林,马青松. 大街区视角下城镇老旧小区改造策略研究. 住区. 2022(04): 6-14 .
    8. 张恒瑜,张忠峰,赵红霞. 城市微更新背景下基于“共享”理念的老城区公共空间改造. 现代园艺. 2022(21): 95-97 .
    9. 陈明晨,李凯怡,何雪倩. 共享养老模式下老旧社区口袋公园的设计探析. 科学技术创新. 2022(36): 155-158 .
    10. 宁晓蕾. 共享理念下老旧社区公共空间微更新. 海峡科技与产业. 2022(12): 104-106 .
    11. 孟军. 社区微更新视角下南阳老旧社区体育设施优化配置研究. 体育风尚. 2021(02): 132-133 .
    12. 凌云. 社区更新中的可持续发展策略研究——以美国纽约为例. 建筑与文化. 2021(06): 58-59 .
    13. 黄芸璟,彭震宇. 基于城市闲置空间的智慧共享研究——以重庆市住宅空间为例. 国土资源信息化. 2021(04): 22-27+21 .
    14. 吴文勇. 垃圾分类背景下城市公共垃圾桶视觉设计研究. 包装工程. 2021(18): 287-291 .
    15. 李馨瞳. 西安市老旧社区微更新改造理念与策略研究. 绿色科技. 2020(18): 199-200+232 .

    Other cited types(40)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-0305101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 19.0 %FULLTEXT: 19.0 %META: 80.1 %META: 80.1 %PDF: 0.9 %PDF: 0.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 3.4 %其他: 3.4 %其他: 1.2 %其他: 1.2 %China: 1.2 %China: 1.2 %Hong Kong, China: 0.9 %Hong Kong, China: 0.9 %[]: 0.6 %[]: 0.6 %上海: 2.8 %上海: 2.8 %东莞: 0.6 %东莞: 0.6 %北京: 8.9 %北京: 8.9 %南京: 1.2 %南京: 1.2 %南通: 0.3 %南通: 0.3 %台州: 0.6 %台州: 0.6 %合肥: 0.6 %合肥: 0.6 %嘉兴: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %大连: 1.2 %大连: 1.2 %天津: 0.6 %天津: 0.6 %太原: 0.6 %太原: 0.6 %宿州: 0.3 %宿州: 0.3 %广州: 0.6 %广州: 0.6 %张家口: 0.9 %张家口: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %扬州: 0.6 %扬州: 0.6 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %朝阳: 1.2 %朝阳: 1.2 %杭州: 3.7 %杭州: 3.7 %武汉: 1.2 %武汉: 1.2 %泰安: 0.3 %泰安: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %济宁: 0.3 %济宁: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.9 %湖州: 0.9 %漯河: 1.2 %漯河: 1.2 %珠海: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %福州: 0.9 %福州: 0.9 %芒廷维尤: 45.9 %芒廷维尤: 45.9 %荆州: 0.3 %荆州: 0.3 %菏泽: 0.3 %菏泽: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %西宁: 4.9 %西宁: 4.9 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %运城: 2.8 %运城: 2.8 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 3.1 %郑州: 3.1 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %镇江: 0.3 %镇江: 0.3 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %阳泉: 0.6 %阳泉: 0.6 %其他其他ChinaHong Kong, China[]上海东莞北京南京南通台州合肥嘉兴大连天津太原宿州广州张家口成都扬州晋城朝阳杭州武汉泰安济南济宁温州湖州漯河珠海石家庄福州芒廷维尤荆州菏泽衢州西宁贵阳运城邯郸郑州重庆镇江长沙阳泉

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (46) PDF downloads(1) Cited by(55)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return