Research on Deformations of Peaty Soil and Silt Based on High-Pressure Consolidation Tests

TANG Zhenjie; RUAN Yongfen; ZHOU Yuanhai; PAN Jiqiang; HUAI Yigao; LI Penghui

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG23060806

Volume 55 Issue 4

Apr. 2025

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2025 > 55(4): 148-153

TANG Zhenjie, RUAN Yongfen, ZHOU Yuanhai, PAN Jiqiang, HUAI Yigao, LI Penghui. Research on Deformations of Peaty Soil and Silt Based on High-Pressure Consolidation Tests[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(4): 148-153. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23060806

Citation:

TANG Zhenjie, RUAN Yongfen, ZHOU Yuanhai, PAN Jiqiang, HUAI Yigao, LI Penghui. Research on Deformations of Peaty Soil and Silt Based on High-Pressure Consolidation Tests[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(4): 148-153. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23060806

Citation:

PDF( 1539 KB)

Research on Deformations of Peaty Soil and Silt Based on High-Pressure Consolidation Tests

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23060806

1. Faculty of Architecture and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China;
2. Yunnan Yintuo Survey and Design Co., Ltd., Qujing 655000, China;
3. Kunming Prospecting Design Institute of China Nonferrous Metals Industry Co., Ltd., Kunming 650051, China;
4. Yunnan Provincial Institute of Highway Science and Technology, Kunming 650051, China

Received Date: 2023-06-08
Available Online: 2025-06-07
Publish Date: 2025-04-01

Abstract

Abstract

The method of calculating foundation settlement by the secant modulus method is becoming familiar to scholars for its unique advantages， but a large number of studies have found that the calculation results are small when using this method for foundation settlement calculation. This is because the traditional secant modulus method treats the relation between vertical stress and vertical strain in the lateral limit compression test as hyperbolic and ignores the reference configuration， which limits the applicability of the method and affects the calculation accuracy. The stress-strain curves of Kunming peaty soil and silt were fitted with various functions by conducting a large number of high-pressure consolidation tests. The test results showed that the stress-strain curves of Kunming peaty soil and silt in lateral limit conditions could be better characterized by Gunary’s model than the assumption of the hyperbolic model， and the foundation deformation equation considering the overburden load and burial depth change was established based on the improved the secant modulus method with the introduction of correction factor γ. It is found that the relation between secant moduli and burial depth varied greatly for different soils， among which the relation between secant moduli and burial depth of peaty soil was in accordance with ExpDec1 expression.
- road engineering,
- settlement calculation,
- secant modulus method,
- peaty soil,
- silt,
- Gunary’s model

FullText(HTML)

References(20)

References

[1]	徐明，宋二祥. 高填方长期工后沉降研究的综述［J］. 清华大学学报（自然科学版），2009，49（6）:786-789.
[2]	葛苗苗，李宁，郑建国，等. 基于一维固结试验的压实黄土蠕变模型［J］. 岩土力学，2015，36（11）:3164-3170，3306.
[3]	张沛然，黄雪峰，扈胜霞，等. 非饱和填土侧限压缩变形特性试验研究及应用初探［J］. 岩土力学，2018，39（2）:437-444.
[4]	王丽琴，邵生俊，王帅，等. 原状黄土的压缩曲线特性［J］. 岩土力学，2019，40（3）:1076-1084，1139.
[5]	YOUNG R N，NAGARAJ T S. Investigation of fabric and compressibility of a sensitive clay［C］// Proceedings of International Symposium on Soft Clay. Asian Intitute of Technology，1997:327-333.
[6]	DUNCAN J M. Limitation of conventional analysis of consolidation settlement［J］. Journal of Geotechnical Enoineering，ASCE，1998，124（4）:278-288.
[7]	BRIAUD J L，GIBBENS R. Predicted and measured behavior of five spread footings on sand［J/OL］. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，1999，125（9）［ 2023-06-08］. https://doi.org/10.1061/（ASCE）1090-0241（1999）125:9（787）.
[8]	LEE L，SALGADO R. Estimation of footing settlement in sand［J］. The International Journal of Geomechanics，2002，2（1）:1-28.
[9]	SARGAND S M，MASADA T，ABDALLA B. Evaluation of cone penetration test-based settlement prediction methods for shallow foundations on cohesionless soils at highway bridge construction sites［J］. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2003，129（10）:900-908.
[10]	ANDERSON J B，TOWNSEND F C，RAHELISON L. Load testing and settlement prediction of shallow foundation［J］. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2007，133（12）:1494-1502.
[11]	杨光华. 软土e-p曲线确定的简化方法及在非线性沉降计算中的应用［J］. 岩土力学，2008，29（6）:1706-1710.
[12]	曹文贵，邓湘君，张超. 基于Duncan-Chang模型的地基沉降分层总和分析方法探讨［J］. 岩土工程学报，2013，35（4）:643-649.
[13]	魏汝龙. 整理压缩试验资料的一种新方法［J］. 水利水运科学研究，1980（3）:90-93.
[14]	刘保健，张军丽. 土工压缩试验成果分析方法与应用［J］. 中国公路学报，1999（1）:39-43，102.
[15]	刘保健，谢永利，李又云. 公路软基在变荷载条件下的沉降计算［J］. 中国公路学报，2000（4）:23-27.
[16]	张茂花，谢永利，刘保健. 基于割线模量法的黄土增湿变形本构关系研究［J］. 岩石力学与工程学报，2006（3）:609-617.
[17]	丁洲祥，龚晓南，李又云，等. 割线模量法在沉降计算中存在的问题及改进探讨［J］. 岩土工程学报，2005（3）:313-316.
[18]	杨晶，白晓红. 压实黄土非线性压缩应力-应变关系在地基沉降计算中的应用［J］. 岩土力学，2015，36（4）:1002-1008.
[19]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 土工试验方法标准:GB/T 50123—2019［S］. 北京:中国计划出版社，1999
[20]	中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路土工试验规程:JTG 3430—2020［S］. 北京:人民交通出版社，2020.