Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 56 Issue 4
Apr.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
MA Pengtao, CHEN Fubin, ZHANG Tao, ZHOU Jinfang. Non-Gaussian Extreme Wind Pressure and Peak Factor Predictions for a Long-Span Cantilevered Roof[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2026, 56(4): 22-30. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23052206
Citation: MA Pengtao, CHEN Fubin, ZHANG Tao, ZHOU Jinfang. Non-Gaussian Extreme Wind Pressure and Peak Factor Predictions for a Long-Span Cantilevered Roof[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2026, 56(4): 22-30. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23052206

Non-Gaussian Extreme Wind Pressure and Peak Factor Predictions for a Long-Span Cantilevered Roof

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23052206
  • Received Date: 2023-05-22
    Available Online: 2026-06-06
  • Publish Date: 2026-04-20
  • By conducting wind tunnel pressure measurement test based on a rigid model of a long-span cantilevered roof, the estimation of non-Gaussian extreme wind pressure on the roof surface and the prediction of peak factors were studied. The time series of wind pressure on the roof surface was obtained through experiments, and the distribution characteristics of the mean wind pressure coefficient, fluctuating wind pressure coefficient, skewness, and kurtosis on the roof surface were analyzed under typical wind directions of 0 °, 45 °, and 90 °. The Gaussian peak factor method and the revised Hermite series method were used to calculate the peak factor at typical measuring points, respectively. The non-Gaussian characteristics and wind pressure fitting at typical measuring points were evaluated based on five probability density functions, and the minimum wind pressure estimation was obtained using the revised Hermite series method and the existing extreme wind pressure evaluation method, respectively. Finally, the peak factor was predicted using a general regression neural network. The results showed that the minimum wind pressure on the roof surface was significant under typical wind directions of 0°, 45°, and 90°, and the long tail of the wind pressure distribution was measured in the negative direction; the Gaussian peak factor method was found to frequently underestimate the peak factor of non-Gaussian wind pressure; the revised Hermite series method estimated the peak factor more accurately and performed best in wind pressure fitting, especially in the negative pressure long tail section; the revised Hermite series method obtained better minimum estimates; the general regression neural network based on the fourth-order statistics of wind pressure time history exhibited good prediction performance.
  • loading
  • [1]
    DAVENPORT A G. Note on the distribution of the largest value of a random function with application to gust loading[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers,1964,28(2):187-196.
    [2]
    KUMAR K,STATHOPOULOS T. Wind loads on low building roofs[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,ASCE,2000,126(8):944-956.
    [3]
    孙瑛,武岳,林志兴,等. 大跨屋盖结构风压脉动的非高斯特性[J]. 土木工程学报,2007,40(4):1-5.
    [4]
    叶继红,侯信真. 大跨屋盖脉动风压的非高斯特性研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2010,29(7):9-15.
    [5]
    李志国,彭宇轩,秦川,等. 大跨曲面屋盖脉动风荷载非高斯分布特性试验研究[J]. 工业建筑,2021,51(7):84-89.
    [6]
    HUANG D M,CHEN G L. Wind pressure distribution,non-Gaussian characteristics,and conical vortices of a large-span roof with variable arc angles[J]. Journal of Building Engineering,2022,46:104929.
    [7]
    夏俞超,陈水福. 复杂屋盖结构表面风压的非高斯特性研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2019,38(2):123-130.
    [8]
    KAREEM A. Surge response statistics of tension leg platforms under wind and wave loads:a statistical quadratization approach[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics,1995,10(4):225-240.
    [9]
    SADEK F,SIMIU E. Peak non-gaussian wind effects for database-assisted low-rise building design[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics,ASCE,2002,128(5):530-539.
    [10]
    全涌,顾明,陈斌,等. 非高斯风压的极值计算方法[J]. 力学学报,2010,42(3):560-566.
    [11]
    SIMIU E. Extreme wind distribution tails:a“peaks over threshold” approach[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,ASCE,1996,122(5):539-547.
    [12]
    KWON K D,KAREEM A. Peak factors for non-gaussian load effects revisited[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,ASCE,2011,137(12):1308-1314.
    [13]
    杨雄伟,周强,李明水,等. 复杂曲面屋盖脉动风压的非高斯特性及峰值因子研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2021,40(10):315-322.
    [14]
    林强,刘敏,杨庆山,等. 非高斯风压峰值因子估计:基于矩的转换过程法的对比研究[J]. 工程力学,2020,37(4):78-86.
    [15]
    吴凤波,郭增伟,刘敏,等. 非高斯风压极值估计:基于无可行区限制的传递函数对比研究[J]. 工程力学,2022,39(9):170-178.
    [16]
    吴凤波,姜言,彭留留,等. 基于矩的传递函数模型的“不兼容”非高斯风压过程模拟研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2022,41(24):142-149.
    [17]
    汪大海,黄洪量,邓宇帆,等. 大型户外广告牌面板极值风压分布的试验研究[J]. 计算力学学报,2022,39(2):250-256.
    [18]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 屋盖结构风荷载标准:JGJ/T 481—2019[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2019.
    [19]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009—2012[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012.
    [20]
    GIOFFRE M,GUSELLA V,GRIGORIU M. Non-gaussian wind pressure on prismatic buildings. Ⅱ:numerical simulation[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,ASCE,2001,127(9):990-995.
    [21]
    马兴亮. 建筑结构表面风压非高斯特性分析方法研究[D]. 大连:大连理工大学,2019.
    [22]
    CHOI M,SWEETMAN B. The Hermite moment model for highly skewed response with application to tension leg platforms[J]. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering,ASME,2010,132(2):021102.
    [23]
    DING J,CHEN X Z. Assessment of methods for extreme value analysis of non-Gaussian wind effects with short term time history samples[J]. Engineering Structures,2014,80:75-88.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (29) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return