Research on Risk Assessment Methods of Earthquake Disasters in Grotto Temple:Taking the Yungang Grottoes as an Example

GUO Xiaodong; SHI Zhanqi; LU Jiwen; ZHU Rui

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG23051515

Volume 54 Issue 10

Oct. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2024 > 54(10): 230-239

GUO Xiaodong, SHI Zhanqi, LU Jiwen, ZHU Rui. Research on Risk Assessment Methods of Earthquake Disasters in Grotto Temple:Taking the Yungang Grottoes as an Example[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(10): 230-239. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23051515

Citation:

GUO Xiaodong, SHI Zhanqi, LU Jiwen, ZHU Rui. Research on Risk Assessment Methods of Earthquake Disasters in Grotto Temple:Taking the Yungang Grottoes as an Example[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(10): 230-239. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23051515

Citation:

PDF( 9164 KB)

Research on Risk Assessment Methods of Earthquake Disasters in Grotto Temple:Taking the Yungang Grottoes as an Example

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23051515

1. Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;
2. Key Scientific Research Base of Safety Assessment and Disaster Mitigation for Traditional Timber Structure, State Administration for Cultural Heritage, Beijing 100124, China;
3. Yungang Grottoes Research Institute, Datong 037007, China

Received Date: 2023-05-15
Available Online: 2024-11-06

Abstract

Abstract

Earthquake disasters have a great impact on cultural heritage. In order to predict the impact of earthquake disasters on grotto temples, an earthquake disaster risk assessment model for grotto temples was established from four aspects: disaster-causing factors, disaster-pregnant environment, disaster-bearing bodies, and disaster prevention and mitigation capabilities. The evaluation index system,which consists of 23 factors such as peak ground motion acceleration and site category,was determined, and the Yungang Grottoes was taken as an example. The results showed that 44 % of the caves in the Yungang Grottoes had higher earthquake risk, mainly concentrated in the western area, showing a trend of high in the west and low in the east as a whole, which was in good agreement with the actual results. It showed that the model could quantitatively evaluate the earthquake disaster risk of grotto temples, and provide scientific basis for the preventive conservation and earthquake prevention and disaster reduction managements of grotto temples.
- grotto temple,
- earthquake disaster,
- risk assessment,
- Yungang Grottoes

FullText(HTML)

References(33)

References

[1]	杨格格, 杨艳昭, 游珍, 等. 中国陆域地震灾害的时空分布格局[J]. 地球科学进展, 2011, 26(5):548-555.
[2]	陈永明, 石玉成, 王旭东. 天水麦积山石窟地震构造环境评价[J]. 敦煌研究, 2005(5):83-87.
[3]	阎敏, 柏柯, 纪娟. 广元千佛崖石窟5·12特大地震"震损"调查及地质病害危险性评估[J]. 文博, 2011(6):74-79.
[4]	高忠伟, 王志涛, 苏经宇, 等. 文化遗产地震风险评估体系及指标研究[J]. 中国文物科学研究, 2010(3):49-52.
[5]	乔文慧, 王强. 城市文化遗产洪涝灾害风险评估模型构建:以广州市为例[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2020, 39(2):127-131.
[6]	陈平, 谢晓宁, 陈特. 木结构古建筑地震灾害风险评估[J]. 世界地震工程, 2015, 31(1):16-21.
[7]	吴在栋, 胡玉娟, 张明锋, 等. 基于GIS的历史文化街区火灾风险评估:以福州市三坊七巷为例[J]. 灾害学, 2016, 31(4):205-209.
[8]	ZHIQIAN G, WENWU C, JINGKE Z, et al. Hazard assessment of potentially dangerous bodies within a cliff based on the fuzzy-AHP method: a case study of the Mogao Grottoes, China[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2017, 76(3):1009-1020.
[9]	郭志谦. 敦煌莫高窟南区密集洞窟群稳定性及危岩体风险评估[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2018.
[10]	王金华,严绍军,任伟中,等. 石窟岩体结构稳定性分析评价系统研究[M]. 北京:中国地质大学出版社有限责任公司, 2013.
[11]	秋仁东, 石玉成. 地震荷载作用下石窟的震害特征及抗震加固[J]. 灾害学, 2006(1): 38-42.
[12]	石玉成, 王旭东. 甘肃地区石窟文物保护中的地震危害性估计[J]. 敦煌研究, 2005(5): 88-93.
[13]	陈永明, 石玉成, 王旭东. 天水麦积山石窟地震构造环境评价[J]. 敦煌研究, 2005(5): 83-87.
[14]	袁道阳, 石玉成, 王旭东. 敦煌莫高窟地区断裂新活动特征及其对石窟的影响[J]. 敦煌研究, 2000(1): 56-64.
[15]	IWASAKI Y, TANIMOTO C, ISHIKAWA Y, et al. Earthquake environments at Mogao Grottoes, Dunhuang, China[M].Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015.
[16]	付长华, 石玉成, 秋仁东. 地震荷载下龙门石窟围岩变形破坏机制的数值模拟[J]. 地震研究, 2011,34(2): 194-200.
[17]	李金龙. 金塔寺石窟岩体稳定性分析与加固措施[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2012.
[18]	王逢睿,肖碧.甘肃北石窟寺第165窟岩体稳定性分析研究[J].敦煌研究,2011(6):65-69,127.
[19]	史培军.再论灾害研究的理论与实践 [J].自然灾害学报, 1996 (4): 8-19.
[20]	中国地震局.中国地震动参数区划图:GB 18306—2015[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2015.
[21]	中华人民共和国国务院.破坏性地震应急条例[EB/OL]. [2021-04-23]. http://www. gov. cn/zhengce/2020-12/26/content_5574899. htm.
[22]	牟会宠. 石质文物保护的工程地质力学研究[M]. 北京:地震出版社, 2000.
[23]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.工程岩体分级标准:GB/T 50218—2014[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2014.
[24]	方云, 陈星, 刘俊红, 等. 云冈石窟危岩发育的成因分析[J]. 现代地质, 2011, 25(1):137-141.
[25]	李天祺, 董松源, 周太全. 云冈石窟在风化作用下岩体稳定性的数值模拟分析[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2012, 21(6):124-130.
[26]	彭宁波, 孙博, 王逢睿, 等. 危岩体在地震作用过程中的失稳模式及稳定性评价[J]. 地震工程学报, 2016, 38(6):916-921.
[27]	王茜. 石窟寺窟体破坏机理及稳定性分析[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学, 2020.
[28]	臧万军, 王峥峥. 山岭隧道洞身段震害规律与地震风险模糊综合评价分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2014, 51(1):45-53.
[29]	ZHAO B, MA Z. Influence of cavern spacing on the stability of large cavern groups in a hydraulic power station[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2009, 46(3):506-513.
[30]	付长华, 石玉成. 地震荷载下莫高窟围岩动态损伤特性研究[J]. 西北地震学报, 2004(3):75-82.
[31]	石玉成, 王旭东, 秋仁东, 等. 竖向地震荷载下人字批顶结构石窟的稳定性分析[J]. 世界地震工程, 2009, 25(4):148-152.
[32]	刘积魁. 云冈石窟9、10窟三维稳定性分析与地震动力响应模拟[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学(武汉), 2011.
[33]	PENG N, YAN Z, SUN B, et al. Dynamic responses of a grotto under strong earthquake, Yungang Grottoes, Shanxi province, China[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2013, 1558(1): 2305-2308.