Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 54 Issue 6
Jun.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION  > 2024  >  54(6): 46-53
CHEN, Gong, XIE. MICRO RENEWAL OF PUBLIC SPACE IN OLD COMMUNITIES BASED ON SHARING CONCEPT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(1): 80-83,90. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202001014
Citation: BI Chaohao, LAI Huaming, ZHANG Gengbin, YAN Tianyou, HE Rui, XIAO Shuhua, LIU Run'an, ZHUO Kexian, CAI Peide, GUO Yongchang. Research on Interfacial Bonding Performance Between Geopolymer Concrete and GFRP Bars Based on Beam Test[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(6): 46-53. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23051401
shu

Research on Interfacial Bonding Performance Between Geopolymer Concrete and GFRP Bars Based on Beam Test

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23051401

  • 1. Guangzhou Power Supply Bureau of Guangdong Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510000, China;

  • 2. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510000, China

  • Received Date: 2023-05-14
    Available Online: 2024-06-24
    Abstract
  • In the context of the "dual-carbon goals" strategy, the use of green and low-carbon geopolymer concrete instead of high-carbon emission Portland cement concrete is currently a hot research topic. This paper focused on fly ash-based geopolymer concrete and conducted a beam test to study the interfacial bonding performance between geopolymer concrete and glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bas under bending and tensile loads. The influence of different concrete strengths or types on the interfacial bonding performance between geopolymer concrete and GFRP bars was determined. The results showed that due to the difference in mechanical properties between geopolymer concrete and Portland cement concrete, although they showed similar failure modes in the tests with GFRP bars, the failure mechanism at the interface varied with different concrete strengths, and the bonding stiffness and strength also changed accordingly. Finally, the XUE model and Bimodal model were modified for shape factor, and a bond-slip constitutive model suitable for the interface between geopolymer concrete and GFRP bars was established through comparative analysis.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(18)
  • [1]
    中国建筑材料工业碳排放报告(2020年度)[J]. 中国建材, 2021(4):59-62.
    [2]
    丁美荣. 水泥行业碳排放现状分析与减排关键路径探讨[J]. 中国水泥, 2021(7):46-49.
    [3]
    孙瑜, 王强, 童翊轩, 等. 带铝肋先张预应力复材筋混凝土梁的长期刚度[J]. 工业建筑, 2021,51(10):9-13.
    [4]
    张石, 张爱林, 张艳霞, 等. 碳纤维增强复合材料筋混凝土框架结构动力性能试验研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2023,53(2):92-98.
    [5]
    赵建伟, 崔潮, 戈娅萍, 等. 地质聚合物的土木工程耐久性能的研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2016,35(9):2832-2840.
    [6]
    范小春, 徐伟, 陈远程, 等. BFRP筋碱激发混凝土粘结性能试验研究与数值模拟[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022,41(6):1896-1911.
    [7]
    LI J, GRAVINA R J, SMITH S T, et al. Bond strength and bond stress-slip analysis of FRP bar to concrete incorporating environmental durability[J/OL]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020,261[2023-05-16]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119860.
    [8]
    Rilem. RILEM Technical Recommendations for the testing and use of construction materials[M]. London: Taylor and Francis, 1994.
    [9]
    Association C S. Design and construction of building component with fiber-reinforced polymers: CAN/CSA S806-12[S]. Rexdale, Ontario, Canada: 2012.
    [10]
    中国国家标准化管理委员会. 纤维增强复合材料筋基本力学性能试验方法:GB/T 30022—2013[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014.
    [11]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土物理力学性能试验方法标准:GB/T 50081—2019[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2019.
    [12]
    American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and poisson’s ratio of concrete in compression:C469/C469M-22[S]. West Conshohocken: ASTM, 2022.
    [13]
    American Concrete Institute. Guide test methods for fibre-reinforced polymers (FRPs) for reinforcing or strengthening concrete structures:ACI 440.3R-12[R]. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI, 2012.
    [14]
    VELJKOVIC A, CARVELLI V, HAFFKE M M, et al. Concrete cover effect on the bond of GFRP bar and concrete under static loading[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2017,124:40-53.
    [15]
    PAN J, WU Y. Analytical modeling of bond behavior between FRP plate and concrete[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2014,61:17-25.
    [16]
    COSENZA E, MANFREDI G, REALFONZO R. Behavior and modeling of bond of FRP rebars to concrete[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 1997,1(2):40-51.
    [17]
    薛伟辰, 王圆, 方志庆. 黏砂变形GFRP筋与约束混凝土之间的黏结性能[J]. 建筑材料学报, 2013,16(1):6-11.
    [18]
    WEI W, LIU F, XIONG Z, et al. Bond performance between fibre-reinforced polymer bars and concrete under pull-out tests[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019,227,116803.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]XUE Qianming, HUANG Yuehao, SHANG Yongtao. Research on Micro-Renewal and Optimization Design of Lanzhou Railway Station Area Under Catalyst Linkage[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(5): 86-94. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23060709
    [2]ZHANG Xia, ZHAO Xue, LIAO Zixiang. Application of Affordance Theory to the Community-Based Renewal of Industrial Relics and Strategies: Taking Wuhan City as an Example[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(12): 45-53. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG23083006
    [3]JIN Liansheng, CHEN Chen. Protection and Renewal Strategies of Santaizi Worker’s Community in Shenyang from a Perspective of Community Co-Governance Systems[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(1): 72-81. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21012706
    [4]ZHANG Hongbo, YANG Yujia. Deconstructive Study on Public Space of Jinjiang Timber Cabin Village in Jilin Based on the Pattern Language[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(7): 64-73. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22060804
    [5]REN Zhen, KOU Juntao, WANG Yu, CHI Miaomiao. Research on the Regeneration Design of Industrial Remain Sites from the Perspective of Landscape Urbanism: A Case Study of the Old Brewery in Pingyuan County[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(10): 17-22. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22062304
    [6]CAO Ying, YANG Jinpeng, WANG Yu, ZHANG Nan. Protection and Reuse of Mining Heritage Based on Community Renewal: Taking the Zhongfu Mining Heritage in Jiaozuo as an Example[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(1): 52-58. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20102504
    [7]LYU Chang, WEI Chunyu. TAKING TIANHAN CULTURAL PARK AS AN EXAMPLE: RESEARCH ON THE CURRENT SITUATION AND DESIGN OF CONTEMPORARY VILLAGE MUSEUM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(10): 74-80. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzg21022003
    [8]QIAO Zhi, JIA Xinxin, HUANG Jingfan, FAN Wenlu. STUDY ON THE AGING SPACE ACTIVATION AND FACILITIES RENEWAL OF XI'AN TEXTILE CITY INDUSTRIAL COMMUNITY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF COLLECTIVE MEMORY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(2): 89-97. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202002013
    [9]CHEN Jing, HAO Xinyi, YANG Li. STUDY ON THE SPATIAL FORM OF SILO-CAVE VILLAGE IN THE WEST OF HENAN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(5): 8-12. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005002
    [12]Deng Yuanyuan, Chang Jiang. MICRO SPATIAL COGNITIVE OF INHABITANT IN OLD COMMUNITY: THE INVESTIGATION FOR THE WORKER COMMUNITY OF THE 2ND MACHINERY PLANT IN JIAWANG DISTRICT，XUZHOU[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(05): 40-44.
    [13]Sun Jian, Zhao Lin. THE RENOVATION OF QINGDAO SMALL HARBOR[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(1): 156-159. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201301035
    [14]Wang Xixi, Chen Xingzhu. RESUSCITATION OF THE HEART OF CITY:RENOVATION OF LES HALLES,PARIS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(3): 56-59. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201203011
    [15]Wang Lu, Xu Jia, Tuo Wanyong, Li Yuhua. ANALYSIS OF PLANNING AND SIGHT DESIGN FOR GANGHUA GARDEN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(11): 45-48. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201211010
    [16]Dong Jie, Su Jihong, Wang Shiyang, Zou Dan. CONSTRUCTION STRATEGY OF CONTEMPOARY INDUSTRIAL PARKS BASED ON VITALITY MOULDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(8): 4-7. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201108002
    [17]He Wei. RESEARCH AND INTEGRATION DESIGN OF OLD AND NEW CAMPUS PUBLIC SPACE IN HUNAN UNIVERSITY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(5): 47-49. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201105011
    [18]Wang Yi, Chen Jing. THE EXPLORATION AND PRACTICE OF INDUSTRIAL PARKS UNDER THE CONCEPTION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(12): 37-40. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200812011
    [19]Shi Qi-lei. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL BUILDING FOR THE PLAcS NO. 306 HOSPITAL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(10): 29-31. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200610009
    [20]Zhang Sanming, Wu Qian. RECONSTRUCTION DESIGN OF ACOUSTICAL ENVIRONMENT OF INTERIOR PUBLIC SPACE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(2): 31-33. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200602009
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(15)

    1. 高雅薇，孙伟，官卫华. 基于多主体治理视角的城市更新研究进展与展望. 现代城市研究. 2024(06): 1-7+45 .
    2. 余文志豪，孙靓，刘梦昭，姚彧之，蔡祎文. 基于空间激活的武汉保成路社区入口改造. 山西建筑. 2023(07): 39-42 .
    3. 王崎. 基于微更新的住区开放空间适老性研究进展及趋势. 低温建筑技术. 2023(04): 30-33 .
    4. 张思源. 老旧小区首层自发加建研究——以柳州机车车辆有限公司东社区为例. 城市建筑. 2023(22): 182-185 .
    5. 潘博，田从祥，王文斌. 基于“共享”理念下老旧社区公共空间更新探索——以荆州市荆州古城便河社区为例. 四川建材. 2022(02): 51-52+54 .
    6. 宋鹏波，孙涛，郑云峰. 基于UCD理念的老旧社区公共空间景观微改造创新设计研究——以武汉市武展社区为例. 中国勘察设计. 2022(09): 87-90 .
    7. 陈晓菲，冉圣林，马青松. 大街区视角下城镇老旧小区改造策略研究. 住区. 2022(04): 6-14 .
    8. 张恒瑜，张忠峰，赵红霞. 城市微更新背景下基于“共享”理念的老城区公共空间改造. 现代园艺. 2022(21): 95-97 .
    9. 陈明晨，李凯怡，何雪倩. 共享养老模式下老旧社区口袋公园的设计探析. 科学技术创新. 2022(36): 155-158 .
    10. 宁晓蕾. 共享理念下老旧社区公共空间微更新. 海峡科技与产业. 2022(12): 104-106 .
    11. 孟军. 社区微更新视角下南阳老旧社区体育设施优化配置研究. 体育风尚. 2021(02): 132-133 .
    12. 凌云. 社区更新中的可持续发展策略研究——以美国纽约为例. 建筑与文化. 2021(06): 58-59 .
    13. 黄芸璟，彭震宇. 基于城市闲置空间的智慧共享研究——以重庆市住宅空间为例. 国土资源信息化. 2021(04): 22-27+21 .
    14. 吴文勇. 垃圾分类背景下城市公共垃圾桶视觉设计研究. 包装工程. 2021(18): 287-291 .
    15. 李馨瞳. 西安市老旧社区微更新改造理念与策略研究. 绿色科技. 2020(18): 199-200+232 .

    Other cited types(40)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-0305101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 19.0 %FULLTEXT: 19.0 %META: 80.1 %META: 80.1 %PDF: 0.9 %PDF: 0.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 3.4 %其他: 3.4 %其他: 1.2 %其他: 1.2 %China: 1.2 %China: 1.2 %Hong Kong, China: 0.9 %Hong Kong, China: 0.9 %[]: 0.6 %[]: 0.6 %上海: 2.8 %上海: 2.8 %东莞: 0.6 %东莞: 0.6 %北京: 8.9 %北京: 8.9 %南京: 1.2 %南京: 1.2 %南通: 0.3 %南通: 0.3 %台州: 0.6 %台州: 0.6 %合肥: 0.6 %合肥: 0.6 %嘉兴: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %大连: 1.2 %大连: 1.2 %天津: 0.6 %天津: 0.6 %太原: 0.6 %太原: 0.6 %宿州: 0.3 %宿州: 0.3 %广州: 0.6 %广州: 0.6 %张家口: 0.9 %张家口: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %扬州: 0.6 %扬州: 0.6 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %朝阳: 1.2 %朝阳: 1.2 %杭州: 3.7 %杭州: 3.7 %武汉: 1.2 %武汉: 1.2 %泰安: 0.3 %泰安: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %济宁: 0.3 %济宁: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.9 %湖州: 0.9 %漯河: 1.2 %漯河: 1.2 %珠海: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %福州: 0.9 %福州: 0.9 %芒廷维尤: 45.9 %芒廷维尤: 45.9 %荆州: 0.3 %荆州: 0.3 %菏泽: 0.3 %菏泽: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %西宁: 4.9 %西宁: 4.9 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %运城: 2.8 %运城: 2.8 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 3.1 %郑州: 3.1 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %镇江: 0.3 %镇江: 0.3 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %阳泉: 0.6 %阳泉: 0.6 %其他其他ChinaHong Kong, China[]上海东莞北京南京南通台州合肥嘉兴大连天津太原宿州广州张家口成都扬州晋城朝阳杭州武汉泰安济南济宁温州湖州漯河珠海石家庄福州芒廷维尤荆州菏泽衢州西宁贵阳运城邯郸郑州重庆镇江长沙阳泉

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (134) PDF downloads(7) Cited by(55)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return