Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
XIAO Congzhen, LI Jianhui, MA Tianyi, WEI Yue, WU Zhenhong, QIAO Baojuan. Current Situation and Development of Retrofitting and Performance Improvement for Existing Building Structures[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(1): 20-30. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23120812
Citation: WANG Yindong, LU Jianguo, WAN Xunsheng, TAN Lilin, DENG Fei, ZHOU Xiaoxun. Study on Characteristics of Hydro-Thermal Transfer and Freezing-Thawing of Soil-Rock Mixtures[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(3): 174-181. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22082708

Study on Characteristics of Hydro-Thermal Transfer and Freezing-Thawing of Soil-Rock Mixtures

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22082708
  • Received Date: 2022-08-27
    Available Online: 2024-05-29
  • The rock content in freezing-thawing cycles is one of the key factors influencing the hydro-thermal transfer and freezing-thaw transferring characteristics of soil-rock mixtures. To study the effect of freezing-thawing cycles on hydro-thermal transfer, frost heave and thawing settlement of soil-rock mixtures, the soil-rock mixtures composed by Qinghai-Tibet silty clay and gravel with different stone content ratios (10%, 25%, 40%) were selected as research objects, and 10 unidirectional freezing-thawing cycles were conducted. The results indicated that the differences in the temperature and unfrozen water content of soil-rock mixtures during the freezing-thaw cycles had a strong correlation with the rock content. With an increase in the rock content, the completely frozen time for soil-rock mixtures has been extended, and the variable rate of the unfrozen wate content decreased. The difference of buried depth mainly influenced the temperature transfer of soil-rock mixture, and had an indirect effect on the variation of volumetric unfrozen water. For the samples with stone contents of 10% and 40%, the displacement change was manifested as shrinkage during freezing and expansion after thawing, and with an increase in the stone content, the shrinkage of specimens during freezing tended to decrease.
  • [1]
    廖秋林,李晓,董艳辉,等.川藏公路林芝-八宿段地质灾害特征及形成机制初探[J].地质力学学报, 2004, 10(1):33-39.
    [2]
    中华人民共和国建设部.岩土工程勘察规范:GB 50021-2001[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.
    [3]
    LI X, LIAO Q L, HE J M. In situ tests and a stochastic structural model of rock and soil aggregate in the Three Gorges reservoir area, China[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2004, 41(3):494-500.
    [4]
    殷跃平.长江三峡库区移民迁建新址重大地质灾害及其防治研究[M].北京:地质出版社, 2004.
    [5]
    CHANG W J, THITIBHORN P. Effects of gravel content on shear resistance of rockly soils[J]. Engineering Geology, 2016, 207:78-90.
    [6]
    CHU F Y. Study on engineering characteristics of coarse-grained soil based on large-scale triaxial test[J]. Materials Science and Engineering Technology, 2014, 936:1395-1400.
    [7]
    ZHANG Z L, XU W J, XIA W, et al. Large-scale in-situ test for mechanical characterization of soil-rock mixture used in an embankment dam[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2016, 86:317-322.
    [8]
    王宇,李晓,赫建明,等.土石混合体细观特性研究现状及展望[J].工程地质学报, 2014, 22(1):112-123.
    [9]
    XU W J, HU L M, GAO W. Random generation of the meso-structure of a soil-rock mixture and its application in the study of the mechanical behavior in a landslide dam[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2016, 86:166-178.
    [10]
    舒志乐,刘新荣,刘保县,等.土石混合体粒度分形特性及其与含石量和强度的关系[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 41(3):1096-1101.
    [11]
    WANG T L, YUE Z R, MA C, et al. An experimental study on the frost heave properties of coarse grained soils[J]. Transportation Geotechnics, 2014, 1(3):137-144.
    [12]
    冯上鑫,柴军瑞,许增光,等.基于核磁共振技术研究渗流作用下土石混体细观结构的变化[J].岩土力学, 2018, 39(8):2886-2894.
    [13]
    ZHOU Z, YANG H, XING K, et al. Prediction models of the shear modulus of normal or frozen soil-rock mixtures[J]. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2018, 15(2):783-791.
    [14]
    BAGHERZADEH-KHALKHALI A, MIRGHASEMI A A. Numerical and experimental direct shear tests for coarse-grained soils[J]. Particuology, 2009, 7(1):83-91.
    [15]
    何鹏飞,马巍,穆彦虎,等.冻融循环对冻土-混凝土界面冻结强度影响的试验研究[J].岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(2):299-307.
    [16]
    贾学明,柴贺军,郑颖人.土石混合料大型直剪试验的颗粒离散元细观力学模拟研究[J].岩土力学, 2010, 31(9):2695-2703.
    [17]
    LI S H, ZHAO M H, WANG Y N, et al. A new numerical method for DEM-block and particle model[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2004, 41:414-418.
    [18]
    金磊,曾亚武,李欢,等.基于不规则颗粒离散元的土石混合体大三轴数值模拟[J].岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(5):829-838.
    [19]
    XING K, ZHOU Z, YANG H, et al. Macro-meso freeze-thaw damage mechanism of soil-rock mixtures with different rock contents[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2018, 21(1):9-19.
    [20]
    徐文杰,胡瑞林.虎跳峡龙蟠右岸土石混合体粒度分形特征研究[J].工程地质学报, 2006(4):496-501.
    [21]
    刘泉声,黄诗冰,康永水,等.裂隙岩体冻融损伤研究进展与思考[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(3):452-471.
    [22]
    刘泉声,黄诗冰,康永水,等.岩体冻融疲劳损伤模型与评价指标研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(6):1116-1127.
    [23]
    KONG Q Z, WANG R L, SONG G B, et al. Monitoring the soil freeze-thaw process using piezoceramic-based smart aggregate[J]. Journal of Cold Regions Engineering, 2014, 28(2):1-16.
    [24]
    HU T F, LIU J K ZHU B Z, et al. Study on sliding characteristics and controlling measures of colluvial landslides in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 143:1477-1484.
    [25]
    唐丽云,王鑫,邱培勇,等.冻土区土石混合体冻融交界面剪切性能研究[J].岩土力学, 2020, 41(10):3225-3235.
    [26]
    胡峰,李志清,孙凯,等.冻土石混合体、冰石混合物和冻土在压、拉作用下的破坏特征对比[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2021, 40(1):2923-2934.
    [27]
    LU J G, WAN X S, YAN Z R, et al. Hydro-thermal characteristics and deformation behaviors of silty clay subjected to freeze-thaw cycles[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022, 15(5):446-455.
    [28]
    中华人民共和国交通运输部.公路土工试验规程:JTG 3430-2020[S].北京:人民交通出版社, 2020.
    [29]
    LU J G, ZHANG M Y, ZHANG X Y, et al. Experimental study on the freezing-thawing deformation of a silty clay[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2018, 151:19-27.
    [30]
    ZHANG Y G, LU Y, LIU S H, et al. Volumetric behavior of an unsaturated clayey soil-rock mixture subjected to freeze-thaw cycles:a new insight[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2022, 201:103608-103617.
    [31]
    DAGESSE D F. Freezing cycle effects on water stability of soil aggregates[J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2013, 93(4):473-483.
    [32]
    PERFECT E, LOON W K P V, KAY B D, et al. Influence of ice segregation and solutes on soil structural stability[J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 1990, 70(4):571-581.
    [33]
    COUSSY O. Poromechanics of freezing materials[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2005, 53(8):1689-1718.
    [34]
    SUN K, ZHOU A N. A multisurface elastoplastic model for frozen soil[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2021, 16(11):3401-3424.
    [35]
    WANG S F, YANG Z H, YANG P. Structural change and volumetric shrinkage of clay due to freeze-thaw by 3D X-ray computed tomography[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2017, 138:108-116.
    [36]
    邱国庆,刘经仁,刘鸿绪.冻土学辞典(汉、英、俄对照)[M].兰州:甘肃科学技术出版社, 1994.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]GUO Wei, ZHANG Yipeng, WAN Yufeng, CHEN An, SUN Jing. A State-of-the-Art Review of Research and Application of FRP Composites in Railway Infrastructure[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(6): 190-196. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24040601
    [2]WU Ying, LI Aiqun. Application and Circled Layer Scene Construction of Digital Twin Technology from Coupling Perspective of "City-Building-People"[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(4): 180-189. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG23012403
    [3]Qi Yicong. REGENERATIVE DESIGN METHOD AND ANALYSIS OF INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(04): 40-44.
    [4]Shu Biqing, Zheng Juan. DETECTION APPRAISAL AND STRENGTHENING OF A BENT FRAME STRUCTURE PLANT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(06): 139-142. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201406030
    [5]Sun Changling, Wang Zhiyuan. THE EXAMPLE ABOUT THE ADAPTIVE REUSEOF OF AN INDUSTRIAL PLANT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(2): 168-171. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201302034
    [6]Xue Suduo, Zhang Yigang, Cao Zi, Li Xiongyan. PROSPECT AND FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF SEISMIC RESEARCH ON SPATIAL STRUCTURES OVER LAST THIRTY YEARS IN CHINA[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(6): 105-116. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201306022
    [7]Zhao Jida, Lan Tian. THIRTY YEARS PROGRESS AND FUTURE PROSPECT OF SPATIAL STRUCTURES IN CHINA[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(4): 131-138,164. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201304028
    [8]Cao Xia, Xie Dan, Jin Lingzhi. REINFORCEMENT AND RENOVATION OF THE OFFICE BUILDING OF A POLICE STATION IN GUILIN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(4): 143-146,64. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201204029
    [9]Tang Hongyuan, Wang Zeyun, Jia Yigang. ASSESSMENT AND STRENGTHEN FOR A CHEMICAL FIBRE FACTORY BUILDING SUBJECTED TO FIRE DISASTER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(7): 152-155,170. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201207026
    [10]Zhou Hongbing. APPRAISAL OF THE IMPACT OF FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION OF A HIGH-RISE BUILDING ON STRUCTURAL SAFETY OF THE ADJACENT BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(2): 116-119. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201002027
    [11]Yuan Chengfang, Niu Ditao, Wang Qinglin, Yuan Bo. SAFETY EVALUATION AND STRUCTURE STRENGTHENING OF A CHEMICAL PLANT SUBJECTED TO FIRE DISASTER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(6): 113-117. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201006026
    [12]Jiang Lixue, Zheng Qiaowen. SEISMIC ANALYSIS METHOD FOR RC FRAMES CONSIDERING INTERACTION BETWEEN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STRUCTURES AND ITS APPLICATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(5): 6-10. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200905002
    [13]Wang Junqiang. DAMAGES TO MULTISTORY BRICK-CONCRETE BUILDINGS AFTER WENCHUAN EARTHQUAKE AND THEIR APPRAISAL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(1): 47-49,59. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200901009
    [14]Zhang Kaichen, Wang Feng, Si Bo, Li Ming. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE CORBEL BETWEEN THE OLD COLUMN AND THE NEW BEAM FOR A REFORM PROJECT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(11): 126-128. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200911029
    [15]Zheng Qizhen, Bao Yongliang, Wei Lin. THE DETECTION & IDENTIFICATION ON THE MAJOR STRUCTURE OF PROTECTED HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANT BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(8): 1-3,7. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200908001
    [16]Shu Hongbo, Zheng Jianjun, Zhang Shaohua. QUALIFICATION AND REINFORCEMENT OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES AFTER FIRE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(8): 25-27. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200908007
    [17]Dong Hairong, Qi Shaoming, Sun Xiaolu, Wu Xin. STUDY ON TECHNOLOGY OF ENERGY-SAVING RECONSTRUCTION ON EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS IN THE COLD DISTRICT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(7): 4-6. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200907002
    [18]Tan Jun, Wang Ying, Zheng Wenzhong. DESIGN OF TWO TYPICAL POST-BUILT SUSPENDED STAIRCASES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(4): 119-123,86. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200804030
    [19]Zhong Wenle, Chen Pei, Jiang Fengchang, Yang Genhong, Lu Jianwang. STRENGTHENING AND RECONSTRUCTION A CHEMICAL WORKSHOP INTO 2-HLS90 CONCRETE-MIXING BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(2): 107-109. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200702027
    [20]Chun Qing, Qiu Hongxing, Huang Zhicheng, Pan Jianwu, Fang Zhibao. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON ANCHORAGE PERFORMANCE OF DOUBLE ADHESIVE ANCHORS FOR RC STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(2): 98-100. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200602029
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 李凯,刘博,陈必光,杨卓,翟博渊. 重复压浆钢管桩在既有建筑基础加固中的应用. 广州建筑. 2025(01): 14-18 .
    2. 蔡旭东. 建筑结构加固改造技术与方法浅析. 广州建筑. 2025(01): 45-49 .
    3. 翟长海,丁俊男,史铁花,王代玉,黄颖. 既有建筑抗震韧性提升方法研究. 地震工程与工程振动. 2025(01): 18-27 .
    4. 黄晓旭,胡彪,李中流. 基于PDCA闭环模式的案例教学法在工程结构鉴定与加固课程中的应用. 科教导刊. 2025(01): 38-41 .
    5. 张吾健. 可持续发展理念下既有建筑改造设计策略分析. 住宅与房地产. 2024(06): 128-130 .
    6. 顾辉军. 既有建筑加固技术探析与应用——以某多层厂房加固为例. 建筑施工. 2024(05): 676-683 .
    7. 文应,蔡俊辉,孙健,郑代炳,江康. 城市更新改造中既有建筑的结构加固要点与实践. 新型城镇化. 2024(06): 57-60 .
    8. 苗元耀. 既有建筑结构加固改造原则及技术分析. 工程技术研究. 2024(12): 34-36 .
    9. 张荻,李涛杨,李伟. 城市更新为城市核心区注入新活力——既有建筑隔震托换加固改造项目的更新实践. 中国勘察设计. 2024(09): 67-69 .
    10. 梁春敏. 医院既有建筑局部结构加固实施难点及解决策略探究. 中国建筑金属结构. 2024(11): 87-89 .
    11. 陈光华,谢洪涛,孙柏锋. 基于价值工程的既有建筑加固改造项目经济性及模式创新研究. 工程管理学报. 2024(06): 117-122 .
    12. 吴梓楠,韩小雷,李建乐,黄世怡,董优. 建筑结构BIM正向设计的发展困境、关键技术与应用实践. 建筑结构. 2024(24): 136-144+135 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-030255075100125
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.4 %FULLTEXT: 9.4 %META: 83.5 %META: 83.5 %PDF: 7.1 %PDF: 7.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 9.4 %其他: 9.4 %其他: 0.9 %其他: 0.9 %Baden: 0.4 %Baden: 0.4 %Central District: 0.6 %Central District: 0.6 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %Kennedy Town: 0.3 %Kennedy Town: 0.3 %三明: 0.1 %三明: 0.1 %上海: 6.4 %上海: 6.4 %东莞: 4.5 %东莞: 4.5 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %信阳: 0.1 %信阳: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %兰州: 0.4 %兰州: 0.4 %北京: 12.0 %北京: 12.0 %南京: 3.3 %南京: 3.3 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南昌: 0.3 %南昌: 0.3 %厦门: 0.1 %厦门: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %台州: 0.7 %台州: 0.7 %合肥: 0.7 %合肥: 0.7 %吉隆坡: 0.3 %吉隆坡: 0.3 %周口: 0.4 %周口: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %咸宁: 0.1 %咸宁: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %唐山: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %商丘: 0.1 %商丘: 0.1 %喀什: 0.3 %喀什: 0.3 %天津: 0.7 %天津: 0.7 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %安庆: 0.3 %安庆: 0.3 %安康: 0.4 %安康: 0.4 %安阳: 0.4 %安阳: 0.4 %宜春: 0.7 %宜春: 0.7 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %常德: 0.7 %常德: 0.7 %广州: 1.6 %广州: 1.6 %廊坊: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.3 %张家口: 0.6 %张家口: 0.6 %徐州: 0.6 %徐州: 0.6 %德阳: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %成都: 3.0 %成都: 3.0 %扬州: 0.6 %扬州: 0.6 %无锡: 0.3 %无锡: 0.3 %昆明: 1.6 %昆明: 1.6 %昭通: 0.1 %昭通: 0.1 %曲靖: 0.9 %曲靖: 0.9 %朝阳: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %杭州: 1.4 %杭州: 1.4 %松原: 0.4 %松原: 0.4 %柏林: 0.1 %柏林: 0.1 %武汉: 2.3 %武汉: 2.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %河内: 0.1 %河内: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %济南: 1.6 %济南: 1.6 %济宁: 0.1 %济宁: 0.1 %海口: 0.4 %海口: 0.4 %淄博: 0.3 %淄博: 0.3 %淮安: 0.3 %淮安: 0.3 %深圳: 3.0 %深圳: 3.0 %温州: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %漯河: 0.9 %漯河: 0.9 %漳州: 0.1 %漳州: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.9 %濮阳: 0.9 %烟台: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %珠海: 0.3 %益阳: 0.1 %益阳: 0.1 %眉山: 0.1 %眉山: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %福州: 1.0 %福州: 1.0 %芒廷维尤: 5.9 %芒廷维尤: 5.9 %芝加哥: 1.7 %芝加哥: 1.7 %苏州: 0.6 %苏州: 0.6 %荆门: 0.4 %荆门: 0.4 %莆田: 0.9 %莆田: 0.9 %蚌埠: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.3 %衡阳: 0.3 %衢州: 0.4 %衢州: 0.4 %西宁: 4.1 %西宁: 4.1 %西安: 1.6 %西安: 1.6 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %赣州: 0.1 %赣州: 0.1 %运城: 0.7 %运城: 0.7 %郑州: 1.2 %郑州: 1.2 %重庆: 1.3 %重庆: 1.3 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %金昌: 0.1 %金昌: 0.1 %银川: 0.4 %银川: 0.4 %镇江: 0.3 %镇江: 0.3 %长春: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长沙: 3.5 %长沙: 3.5 %阜新: 0.1 %阜新: 0.1 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %青岛: 0.7 %青岛: 0.7 %马鞍山: 0.3 %马鞍山: 0.3 %鹰潭: 0.1 %鹰潭: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %其他其他BadenCentral DistrictChinaKennedy Town三明上海东莞乌鲁木齐保定信阳六安兰州北京南京南宁南昌厦门台北台州合肥吉隆坡周口呼和浩特咸宁哈尔滨唐山商丘喀什天津太原威海宁波安庆安康安阳宜春宣城常德广州廊坊张家口徐州德阳成都扬州无锡昆明昭通曲靖朝阳杭州松原柏林武汉沈阳河内泉州济南济宁海口淄博淮安深圳温州湖州漯河漳州濮阳烟台珠海益阳眉山石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆门莆田蚌埠衡阳衢州西宁西安贵阳赣州运城郑州重庆金华金昌银川镇江长春长沙阜新阿姆斯特丹青岛马鞍山鹰潭齐齐哈尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (49) PDF downloads(2) Cited by(17)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return