Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Li Yi, Zhao Wen, Yan Yunqi. METHOD OF CONTINUAL ANALYSIS FOR SYSTEM RELIABILITY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(10): 26-28,39. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200510009
Citation: DU Wei, WANG Wenfu, FANG Minjie, ZHOU Hua, WEI Hua, WANG Qinghe. Design Methods for Static Performance of Steel-Bars Truss Slabs Considering Effects of Profiled Steel Sheets[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(6): 153-160. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22110911

Design Methods for Static Performance of Steel-Bars Truss Slabs Considering Effects of Profiled Steel Sheets

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22110911
  • Received Date: 2022-11-09
    Available Online: 2023-08-18
  • To investigate the effects of profiled steel sheets on the flexural capacity, short-term and long-term stiffness of steel-bars truss slabs, typical design methods for reinforced concrete slabs and composite steel-concrete slabs were first summarised and evaluated, and benchmarked against the test results reported by the authors and other researchers. Design procedures were then proposed for steel-bars truss slabs considering the influence of profiled steel sheets. The results indicated that the profiled steel sheets in steel-bars truss slabs could reach their yield strength under ultimate limit state, and therefore an increase of 47.0%-60.3% in the flexural capacity was observed for steel-bars truss slabs when compared to slab samples without profiled steel sheets; the contribution of profiled steel sheets to the short-term stiffness was significant, and the increase magnitudes were 112.1%-180.0%, despite the strains of profiled steel sheets under the normal service load were smaller than expected; the sealing effect of profiled steel sheets resulted in uneven distribution of shrinkage deformation of concrete along the height of cross section, and an additional 119.7% deflection could be obtained accordingly. Span-to-depth ratio and ambient relative humidity were the key factors that influenced the shrinkage performance of steel-bars truss slabs, and the proposed design procedures accounting for non-uniform shrinkage distributions showed good accuracy with the test results, with the ratio of 0.951-0.979 and the correlation coefficient R2 of 0.657-0.873.
  • [1]
    WANG Q, RANZI G, WANG Y Y, et al. Long-term behaviour of simply-supported steel-bars truss slabs with recycled coarse aggregate [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 116(7): 335-346.
    [2]
    张恺. 钢筋桁架再生混凝土组合板长期性能研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2015.
    [3]
    何守民. 钢筋桁架组合楼板刚度试验研究[D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2013.
    [4]
    陈玲珠, 李国强, 蒋首超, 等. 高温下钢筋桁架楼承板中栓钉抗剪性能研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2015, 36(5): 116-123.
    [5]
    胡宪鑫. 钢筋桁架混凝土楼板受力性能分析[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2015.
    [6]
    丁军伟. 钢筋桁架混凝土双向组合楼板振动舒适度的试验研究[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学, 2013.
    [7]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 组合楼板设计与施工规范: CECS 273∶2010[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2010.
    [8]
    王庆贺. 考虑非均匀收缩影响的钢-再生混凝土组合板长期性能[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2017: 90-96.
    [9]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土结构设计规范: GB 50010—2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2017.
    [10]
    American Concrete Institute(ACI). Committee 318. Building code requirements for reinforced concrete:ACI 318-89[S]. Detroit: ACI, 1989.
    [11]
    European Committee for Standardization (ECS). Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures: EN 1992-1-1[S]. Brussles, Belgium: ECS, 2000.
    [12]
    Standards Association of Australia. Concrete structures: AS 3600-2009[S]. Sydney: Standards Association of Australia, 2009.
    [13]
    American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Composite steel floor deck-slabs: ANSI/SDI C-2011[S]. Washington D C: ANSI, 2011.
    [14]
    European Committee for Standardization (ECS). Eurocode 4: design of composite steel and concrete structures: EN 1994-1-1[S]. Brussles, Belgium: ECS, 2004.
    [15]
    Standards Association of Australia. Composite structures: AS/NZS 2327[S]. Sydney: Standards Association of Australia, 2017.
    [16]
    完海鹰, 车建萍, 赵磊. 压型钢板对钢筋桁架楼板承载力影响的试验研究[J]. 建筑技术, 2014, 45(3): 265-268.
    [17]
    魏盟,王庆贺,王玉银,等. 考虑非均匀收缩影响的钢-混凝土组合板长期挠度设计方法研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2017,38(增刊1): 9-17.
    [18]
    National Bureau of Statistics of China. Statistical yearbook of China 2017: average relative humidity of major cities [EB/OL]. [2017-10-21]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2017/indexch.htm.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHOU Wansen, ZHONG Jufang, ZHANG Yanhong, HU Xiao. Research on Time-Frequency Parameter Prediction Models of Ground Motion[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(12): 177-185. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22110105
    [2]SUN Xiaoyun, HUANG Linjie, ZENG Bin, SHI Zheng, XIE Qin. Analysis of Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Concrete Frame Structures Characterized by Low Prestressing and Slope Friction[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(10): 38-45. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24091003
    [3]SUI Weining, MA Yong, YANG Haitao, WU Jinguo. Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of a New Connection Joint Between PC External Wall Panel and Steel Frame with Frictional Energy Dissipation[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(5): 109-117. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22011501
    [4]LIU Hang, LI Mu, YANG Xuezhong, HAN Mingjie, TIAN Yuji. Experimental Research on Seismic Performance of Self-centering Prefabricated RC Frame Structures[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(1): 65-73. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21062601
    [5]HUANG Linjie, ZENG Bin, ZHOU Zhen, ZHANG Wenqing, SANG Chenxu, ZHANG Jingru. Influence of Joint Stiffness After Gap Opening on Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Prestressed Concrete Frames with Variable Friction Dampers[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(12): 88-93. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22072916
    [6]CHANG Zhaoqun, LIU Boquan, HAN Meng, BAI Tao, XING Guohua, WANG Shuangbing. DESIGN AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF AN INNOVATIVE SELF-CENTERING FRICTION DAMPER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(9): 138-142,221. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20080402
    [7]HUANG Ming, LIU Ye, DING Yi, LYU Qingfang. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON SELF-CENTERING CLB ROCKING WALL EQUIPPED WITH CFD[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(10): 40-46,61. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21042509
    [8]HAN Tengfei, XU Gang, LI Liang, LI Xiaodong, XI Xiangdong. RESEARCH AND APPLICATION OF SHEAR RESISTANCE OF FRICTION CONNECTION WITH HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(11): 133-136. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201909120001
    [9]HUANG, Linjie, ZHOU, Zhen. INVESTIGATION ON INFLUENCE OF INFILL WALLS ON HIGHER MODE EFFECT OF SELF-CENTERING PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRAME STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(1): 34-39. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202001007
    [10]MENG, Shaoping, CAI, Xiaoning. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON PRESTRESSED SELF-RESETTING CONCRETE FRAME STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(1): 1-6. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202001001
    [11]MA, Junfeng, ZHOU, Zhen. HYSTERICAL BEHAVIOR OF AN UPPER-BOTTOM FRICTION DAMPER SELF-CENTERING PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM-COLUMN CONNECTION WITH HIDDEN CORBEL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(1): 16-21,124. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202001004
    [14]Liu Pengfei, Zhao Qilin, Jiang Kebin, Gao Hesheng. THEORETIC RESEARCH ON FRICTION LOSS OF PRE-STRESS IN LARGE-SPAN CONCRETE BRIDGE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(10): 64-67. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201110016
    [15]Wu Yingjun, Chen Zhihua, LüQing. RESEARCH AND APPLICATION OF ROLL CABLE-STRUT JOINT IN SUSPEND-DOME[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(8): 27-29,34. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201008007
    [16]Wu Zhuanqin, Zeng Zhaobo, Shang Renjie, Liu Jingliang. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON FRICTION COEFFICIENT OF RETARD-BONDED PRESTRESSING STRAND[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(11): 20-23. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200811006
    [17]Cai Jiangyong. IMPROVING SUGGESTION ON CALCULATION METHOD OF FRICTION LOSS IN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(4): 94-95,75. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200404029
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 张文超,李帅. 结构抗震时程分析输入地震波选择方法研究. 砖瓦. 2024(07): 73-75 .

    Other cited types(4)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-0302.557.51012.5
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 14.4 %FULLTEXT: 14.4 %META: 84.0 %META: 84.0 %PDF: 1.5 %PDF: 1.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.2 %其他: 8.2 %China: 1.5 %China: 1.5 %上海: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %保定: 0.5 %保定: 0.5 %信阳: 0.5 %信阳: 0.5 %北京: 4.1 %北京: 4.1 %南通: 0.5 %南通: 0.5 %南阳: 0.5 %南阳: 0.5 %厦门: 0.5 %厦门: 0.5 %台州: 0.5 %台州: 0.5 %呼和浩特: 0.5 %呼和浩特: 0.5 %嘉兴: 0.5 %嘉兴: 0.5 %大庆: 0.5 %大庆: 0.5 %天津: 0.5 %天津: 0.5 %太原: 0.5 %太原: 0.5 %宁波: 0.5 %宁波: 0.5 %宿州: 1.0 %宿州: 1.0 %常德: 0.5 %常德: 0.5 %廊坊: 1.0 %廊坊: 1.0 %延安: 0.5 %延安: 0.5 %张家口: 5.2 %张家口: 5.2 %无锡: 1.5 %无锡: 1.5 %昆明: 0.5 %昆明: 0.5 %晋城: 0.5 %晋城: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %杭州: 1.5 %杭州: 1.5 %桂林: 0.5 %桂林: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %深圳: 0.5 %深圳: 0.5 %潍坊: 0.5 %潍坊: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 11.9 %芒廷维尤: 11.9 %芝加哥: 3.1 %芝加哥: 3.1 %苏州: 0.5 %苏州: 0.5 %蚌埠: 1.0 %蚌埠: 1.0 %西宁: 34.5 %西宁: 34.5 %西安: 0.5 %西安: 0.5 %贵阳: 1.5 %贵阳: 1.5 %运城: 5.7 %运城: 5.7 %邯郸: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %郑州: 1.5 %郑州: 1.5 %金华: 0.5 %金华: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %阳泉: 2.1 %阳泉: 2.1 %黄冈: 0.5 %黄冈: 0.5 %其他China上海保定信阳北京南通南阳厦门台州呼和浩特嘉兴大庆天津太原宁波宿州常德廊坊延安张家口无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州桂林沈阳深圳潍坊芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州蚌埠西宁西安贵阳运城邯郸郑州金华长沙阳泉黄冈

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (144) PDF downloads(8) Cited by(5)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return