Comparisons of Seismic Performances of Subway Stations Between Composite Structure and Reinforced-Concrete Structure Based on Daikai Station

ZHANG Xiaodong

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG22090514

Volume 53 Issue 7

Jul. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2023 > 53(7): 139-146

Chen Huai, Sheng Zhaohui. SEISMIC ISOLATION ANALYSIS OF MEGA-FRAME-SUB-TRUSS-FRAME SYSTEM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(2): 76-79. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200902011

Citation:

ZHANG Xiaodong. Comparisons of Seismic Performances of Subway Stations Between Composite Structure and Reinforced-Concrete Structure Based on Daikai Station[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(7): 139-146. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22090514

Chen Huai, Sheng Zhaohui. SEISMIC ISOLATION ANALYSIS OF MEGA-FRAME-SUB-TRUSS-FRAME SYSTEM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(2): 76-79. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200902011

Citation:

PDF( 6956 KB)

Comparisons of Seismic Performances of Subway Stations Between Composite Structure and Reinforced-Concrete Structure Based on Daikai Station

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22090514

ZHANG Xiaodong

Beijing Tiecheng Construction Supervision Co., Ltd., Beijing 100855, China

Received Date: 2022-09-05

Abstract

Abstract

In order to investigate the seismic performance of the steel-concrete composite structure subway station, based on Daikai Station, which was seriously damaged in the Hanshin earthquake in 1995, the seismic damage response of the reinforced concrete subway station in the Hanshin earthquake was first simulated and analyzed by using the ABAQUS software, and then compared with the actual damage phenomenon of Daikai Station to verify the accuracy and reliability of the finite element model. Under the assumption that all other parameters remained constant, Daikai Station's central column, roof, and beam were substituted with steel-concrete composite members, and two distinct composite structure subway station finite element models were established. The inter-storey drift angle of the side wall and the horizontal displacement time-history curve of the central column and other indicators were compared with the seismic damage simulation findings of Daikai Station, and the seismic performance difference of the subway station under different structural forms was investigated. The results showed that the subway station construction with solely concrete-filled steel tubular columns had the best seismic performance, with the horizontal displacement of the central column being around 21% less than the other two structures; at the peak acceleration moment, the inter-story displacement angle of the side wall was about 25% to 28% smaller than that of the steel-concrete composite structure and approximately 12% to 13% smaller than that of Daikai Station's structure.
- steel-concrete composite structure,
- Daikai Station,
- seismic performance,
- finite element analysis

FullText(HTML)

References(20)

References

[1]	庄海洋, 程绍革, 陈国兴. 阪神地震中大开地铁车站震害机制数值仿真分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(1):245-250.
[2]	蒋录珍, 陈隽, 李杰. 1995年阪神地震中大开车站破坏机理分析[J]. 世界地震工程, 2015, 31(3):236-242.
[3]	HUO H, BOBERT A,FERNÁNDEZ G, et al. Load transfer mechanisms between underground structure and surrounding ground:evaluation of the failure of the Daikai Station[J]. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(12):1522-1533.
[4]	PARRA-MONTESINOS G J, BOBET A, RAMIREZ J A. Evaluation of soil-structure interaction and structural collapse in Daikai Subway Station during Kobe earthquake[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2006, 103(1):113-122.
[5]	杜修力,王刚,路德春. 日本阪神地震中大开地铁车站地震破坏机理分析[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报,2016,36(2):165-171.
[6]	杜修力, 马超, 路德春, 等. 大开地铁车站地震破坏模拟与机理分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2017, 50(1):53-62 ,69.
[7]	李洋, 许成顺, 杜修力. 阪神地震中大开地铁车站和区间隧道破坏差异成因研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2020, 40(3):326-336.
[8]	XU Z, DU X, XU C, et al. Numerical analyses of seismic performance of underground and aboveground structures with friction pendulum bearings[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2020,130(3):1-14.
[9]	MA C, LU D C, DU X L. Seismic performance upgrading for underground structures by introducing sliding isolation bearings[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2018,74:1-9.
[10]	陶连金,安军海,葛楠. 地铁车站工程应用双向RFPS支座隔震效果研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2016,36(1):52-58.
[11]	许成顺,汪洋筱珊,杜修力,等. 分体柱在地下车站结构中的减震效果研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2021,43(4):624-633.
[12]	李忠献. 钢筋混凝土分体柱理论与技术[J]. 工程力学, 2005, 22(增刊):128-140.
[13]	LI S, ZHUANG H Y, WANG W, et al. Effect of different types of middle columns on the seismic performance of single-story subway station structure[J].Shock and Vibration, 2021(8):1-18.
[14]	曹炳政, 罗奇峰, 马硕, 等. 神户大开地铁车站的地震反应分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2002, 22(4):102-107.
[15]	LUBLINER J, OLIVER J, OLLER S, et al. A plastic-damage model for concrete[J]. International Journal of Solids & Structures, 1989, 25(3):299-326.
[16]	LEE J, FENVES G L. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1998, 124(8):892-900.
[17]	American Concrete Institute(ACI). Building code requirements for structural concrete 1:ACI 318-19[S].Farmington Hills:ACI, 2019.
[18]	刘威. 钢管混凝土局部受压时的工作机理研究[D]. 福州:福州大学,2005.
[19]	KATWAL U, TAO Z, HASSAN M K. Finite element modelling of steel-concrete composite beams with profiled steel sheeting[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2018, 146(7):1-15.
[20]	Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. PEER NGA strong motion database[EB/OL]. 2005-04-08[2022-09-05].https://peer.Berkeley.edu/n-ga.

Relative Articles

[1]	LAN Xiang, PAN Wen, SU Hexian, LAI Zhengcong, YU Wenzheng. Study on Seismic Simulation Shaking Table Tests of a Complex Museum with Combined Seismic Isolation and Shock Absorpation Structure[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(1): 121-129. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22011107
[2]	YU Wen-zheng, SUN Bo-feng, YING Wei, DONG Ting-shun. Research on Seismic Isolation and Seismic Reduction of High-Rise Buildings Bases in High Intensity Area[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(9): 94-100,107. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzg21052302
[3]	ZHOU Zhiguang, CHEN Hao, ZHAO Jinyi. Study on Shaking Table Test of Nuclear Structure Considering SSI Effect and Isolation[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(6): 87-92. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG19100102
[4]	TANG Kangsheng, WU Yan, SHENG Tao, CHEN Xiaoming. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON BASE ISOLATION MODEL OF OVER-TRACK HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS USING A NEW TYPE OF BEARING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(5): 76-81,163. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20052403
[5]	Zhuang Peng, Xue Suduo, Han Miao. SEISMIC ISOLATION ANALYSIS OF SMA SPRING-FRICTION BEARINGS IN DOUBLE LAYER SPHERICAL LATTICE SHELL STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(1): 43-49. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201501008
[6]	Zhuang Peng, Xue Suduo, Song Feida. SEISMIC ISOLATION CONTROL OF LATTICE GRID ROOF WITH SUBSTRUCTURE USING FRICTION PENDULUM SYSTEM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(3): 33-38,48. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201203006
[7]	Han Jun, Li Yingmin, Liu Liping, LüHui. NUMERICAL ANALYSIS ON THE DAMPING EFFECT OF STRUCTURE WITH TUNED LIQUID DAMPERS SUBJECTED TO SEISMIC EXCITATIONS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(4): 55-59,74. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201004013
[8]	Liu Jingsong, Qiu Tao, Wang Cuikun, Liu Junjin. SHAKING TABLE EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON AN IRREGULAR TALL BUILDING STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(7): 30-33. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200807007
[9]	Xin Li, Liang Xingwen. DIRECT DISPLACEMENT-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN METHOD OF HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(7): 6-10,53. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200807002
[10]	Dong Jing, Zhang Jianrong, Wu Jin. PULLOUT TEST AND FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF ADHESIVE ANCHORAGE SYSTEM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(2): 103-106,102. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200702026
[11]	Zhong Zhenyu. THE EFFECT OF DAMPING SYSTEM PARAMETERS OF CONVERSION LAYER FOR BOTTOM FRAME ON ASEISMIC PERFORMANCE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(7): 44-46. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200707014
[12]	Li Jianpu, Li Zhenzhong. DIFFERENT MEASURE METHODS USED TOGETHER FOR ONE HIGH-RISE BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(2): 112-114. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200702029
[13]	Yang Xiaoming, Zhou Dongming, Li Haifeng. THE SEISMIC CONSTRUCTIONAL DISPOSALON THE COLUMN BASE JOINT OF STEEL FRAME ADDING STORY ON THE TOP OF A TALL BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(9): 113-114,118. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200709026
[14]	Wang Fa-wu, Tang Gan, Yang Jie. OPTIMAL LATERAL DEFLECTION DESIGN OF TALL BUILDINGS OF FRAMES AND SHEAR WALLS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(6): 38-42. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200606013
[15]	Zhang Congjun, Li Aiqun, Zhao Ming. SUMMARY OF RESEARCH ON AND APPLICATIONS OF PASSIVE ENERGY DISSIPATION SYSTEMS OF MILD STEEL DAMPER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(9): 17-21.
[16]	Zhao Yuxing, Zhang Xiaojie. A STRUCTURALLY TECTONIC TREATMENT FOR SPLIT-LEVEL HIGH-RISE BUILDING OR SPLIT-LEVEL TIER BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(6): 95-97. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200506028
[17]	Shi Yongjiu, Deng Xiaowei, Wang Yuanqing. STUDY ON OVERLAP-CONNECTED GLASS CURTAIN WALL AND BEARING CAPACITY OF ITS GLASS PANEL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(2): 11-15. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200502003
[18]	Chang Yejun, Xu Qingzheng, Zhang Fuyou, Cheng Wenrang. THE REDUCTION PRINCIPLE OF EARTHQUAKE AND CALCULATION OF SEISMIC COEFFICIENT OF ENGINEERING STRUCTURE USING VISCOELASTIC DAMPER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(6): 21-25. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200506006
[19]	Huang Wei, Feng Dingguo. TEST AND RESEARCH ON SLIDING AND SHOCK INSULATION OF LARGE BAY REINFORCED CONCRETE AND BRICK CONSTRUCTION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(12): 47-50,79. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200512014
[20]	Zhang Yuliang, Tang Yuchuan. ELASTO-PLASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES WITH A DDING DAMPING AND STIFFNESS DEVICES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(9): 45-46,50. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200409013