Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 53 Issue 5
May  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION  > 2023  >  53(5): 17-27
Xu Qiang, Wu Shengxing. NON-LINEAR FEM ANALYSIS OF INTERACTION AMONG PILE-SUPPORT, PILES AND SOIL OF A CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(5): 16-19. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200505004
Citation: LIU Zidan, JIAO Wenshuai, CHENG Zhan, DU Guofeng. Research on the Axial Compression Behavior of Steel-Reinforced Ultra-High Performance Concrete-Filled Stainless Steel Tubular Columns[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(5): 17-27. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22072605
shu

Research on the Axial Compression Behavior of Steel-Reinforced Ultra-High Performance Concrete-Filled Stainless Steel Tubular Columns

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22072605

  • 1. School of Urban Construction, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434000, China;

  • 2. Zhongliang Holdings Group Company Limited, Shanghai 200333, China

  • Received Date: 2022-07-26
    Abstract
  • Concrete-filled stainless steel tubular columns show excellent prospects for application in corrosive environments such as harbor engineering and marine engineering. To further develop the performance of such structures, a composite structure, i. e. steel-reinforced ultra-high performance concrete-filled stainless steel tubular column was proposed in this paper. Meanwhile, six short and eight medium-length column specimens were designed and fabricated with the parameters of diameter to thickness ratio, length to diameter ratio, steel profile content ratios, etc. Axial compression experiments and finite element analysis were executed to investigate the failure mode and failure mechanism of the specimens, as well as the influence of relevant parameters on the mechanical performance of the specimens. The results showed that the bearing capacity and ductility of the specimens increased with the decreasing of the diameter to thickness ratios and length to diameter ratios, and increased with the increding of the steel profile content ratios and strength of the pre-embedded steel profile; the ductility of the specimen decreased with the increase in core concrete strength, but the bearing capacity was the opposite. Based on the experimental and finite element results, a prediction model for the bearing capacity of steel-reinforced ultra-high performance concrete-filled stainless steel tubular was proposed, providing a reference for the engineering application of such structures.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(35)
  • [1]
    韩林海.钢管混凝土结构:理论与实践[M].2版.北京:科学出版社,2007.
    [2]
    BEN Y, EHAB E. Experimental investigation of concrete-filled cold-formed high strength stainless steel tube columns[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2005, 62(5):484-492.
    [3]
    ELLOBODY E. Nonlinear behavior of concrete-filled stainless steel stiffened slender tube columns[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2007, 45(3):259-273.
    [4]
    张纪刚,舒凡,赵铁军,等.不锈钢管中管混凝土海洋平台导管腿轴压性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2018,39(增刊1):279-285.
    [5]
    刘艳芝,邓集钱,谭清华.内嵌十字型钢的方形劲性不锈钢管混凝土柱耐火性能[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2019,36(3):66-73.
    [6]
    李永进,廖飞宇,黄海清.矩形不锈钢管混凝土柱双向偏压力学性能试验研究[J].建筑钢结构进展,2018,20(2):60-66.
    [7]
    张建周,郭旺,安泽宇.型钢-PBL加劲型方不锈钢管混凝土轴压短柱非线性分析[J].建筑结构,2017,47(增刊2):249-254.
    [8]
    代鹏,杨璐,卫璇,等.不锈钢管混凝土短柱轴压承载力试验研究[J].工程力学,2019,36(增刊1):298-305.
    [9]
    马国梁. 不锈钢管再生混凝土轴压和弯曲性能研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2013.
    [10]
    廖飞宇.圆不锈钢管混凝土轴压力学性能的有限元分析[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2009,38(6):659-662.
    [11]
    徐晨豪,赵俊亮,金国平.圆不锈钢管混凝土轴压短柱三维有限元分析[J].混凝土,2017(7):44-46,49.
    [12]
    PATEL V, HASSANEIN M, THAI H T, et al. Behaviour of axially loaded circular concrete-filled bimetallic stainless-carbon steel tubular short columns[J]. Engineering Structures, 2017,147:583-597.
    [13]
    乔崎云,张雯雯,曹万林,等.薄壁不锈钢管-钢骨混凝土短柱轴压力学性能试验研究[J].工业建筑,2020,50(2):143-149.
    [14]
    王德辉,史才军,吴林妹.超高性能混凝土在中国的研究和应用[J].硅酸盐通报,2016,35(1):141-149.
    [15]
    韦建刚,罗霞,欧智菁,等.圆高强钢管超高性能混凝土短柱轴压性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2020, 41(11): 16-28.
    [16]
    孙墨林. 钢管约束型钢超高强混凝土短柱轴压受力性能研究[D]. 大连:大连理工大学, 2017.
    [17]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 钢管混凝土结构技术规范:GB 50936—2014[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2014.
    [18]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 金属材料 拉伸试验 第1部分:室温试验方法:GB/T 228.1—2021[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2021.
    [19]
    中国工程建设标准化协会. 超高性能混凝土(UHPC)技术要求:T/CECS 10107—2020[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2020.
    [20]
    陆纪平. FRP约束超高性能混凝土受压性能[D]. 南京:东南大学, 2020.
    [21]
    RAMBERG W, WILLIAM R O. Description of stress-strain curves by three parameters:No.NACA-TN-902[R]. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Technical Note, 1943.
    [22]
    BSI. Eurocode 3-Design of steel structures-part 1-4: general rules-supplementary rules for stainless steels:EN 1993-1-4[S].UK: British Standards Institution, 2006.
    [23]
    MANDER J, PRIESTLEY M. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1988, 114(8): 1804-1826.
    [24]
    GRAYBEAL B A. Compressive behavior of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete[J]. ACI Materials Journal, 2007, 104(2):146.
    [25]
    LIM J C, OZBAKKALOGLU T. Stress-strain model for normal-and light-weight concretes under uniaxial and triaxial compression[J]. Construction & Building Materials, 2014, 71: 492-509.
    [26]
    AHMED M, LIANG Q Q, PATEL V I, et al. Nonlinear analysis of rectangular concrete-filled double steel tubular short columns incorporating local buckling[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018,175:13-26.
    [27]
    LIANG Q Q. Performance-based analysis of concrete-filled steel tubular beam-columns, part I: theory and algorithms[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2009, 65(2):363-372.
    [28]
    LU Q R, XU L H, CHI Y, et al. A novel analysis-oriented theoretical model for steel tube confined ultra-high performance concrete[J/OL]. Composite Structures, 2021,264[2021-02-23].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113713.
    [29]
    HU H T, HUANG C S, WU M H, et al. Nonlinear analysis of axially loaded concrete-filled tube columns with confinement effect[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2003, 129(10):1322-1329.
    [30]
    LIANG Q Q, FRAGOMENI S. Nonlinear analysis of circular concrete-filled steel tubular short columns under axial loading[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2009, 65(12):2186-2196.
    [31]
    TANG J L, HINO S I, KURODA I, et al. Modeling of stress-strain relationships for steel and concrete in concrete filled circular steel tubular columns[J]. Steel Construction Engineering, 1996, 3(11):35-46.
    [32]
    HUANG W, FAN Z C, SHEN P L, et al. Experimental and numerical study on the compressive behavior of micro-expansive ultra-high-performance concrete-filled steel tube columns[J/OL].Construction and Building Materials, 2020,254[2020-04-30].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119150.
    [33]
    HAN L H, YAO G H, ZHONG T. Performance of concrete-filled thin-walled steel tubes under pure torsion[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2007, 45(1): 24-36.
    [34]
    TAN Q, GARDNER L, HAN L H, et al. Fire performance of steel reinforced concrete-filled stainless steel tubular (CFSST) columns with square cross-sections[J/OL]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2019,143[2019-05-26].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.106197.
    [35]
    GARDNER L, NETHERCOT D A. Numerical modeling of stainless steel structural components: a consistent approach[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004,130: 1586-1601.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]CHEN Zhijun, ZHU Chen, PAN Xiaodong, PAN Kun. Experimental Study on Parameters of the HSS Model for Taizhou Soft Clay[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(12): 186-193. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23071904
    [2]ZHANG Beibei, WU Tingliang, WANG Yusong, JIN Mingchao. Stability Analysis on Foundation Treatment for a Transverse Karst Cave in Guiyang[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(4): 133-139. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21032405
    [3]XIAO Jie, TAN Yuefeng, TONG Chao, YANG Heping, CHANG Jin, ZOU Weilie, CHEN Guanyi. Numerical Analysis for Shallow Landslides of Expansive Soil Slopes Based on Three Fields Coupling[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(7): 128-136,118. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzg21070206
    [4]BAI Zhengxian, CUI Hu, JIANG Ziqin, SHEN Cunjie, SU Lei, ZHANG Wenying. Influence of Different Parameters on Hysteretic Behavior of Corrugated Steel Plate Wall[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(11): 24-31,103. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21122105
    [5]LI Gang, ZHAO Wenbo. STUDY ON DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF NEW TYPES OF ASEISMIC SUPPORTS IN UTILITY TUNNELS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(7): 71-77,176. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20071312
    [6]YU Haifeng, HAO Mengtian, MA Jiansuo, YU Ke. QUASI-STATIC TEST AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF PREFABRICATED SHEAR WALL WITH VERTICAL CONNECTIONS OF EMBEDDED STEEL PLATE AND BOLT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(5): 24-30. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005005
    [7]Mei Yuan Hu Changming Wei Yifeng Zhao Nan Liu Dajiang Yuan Yili, . CENTRIFUGAL TEST AND STABILITY ANALYSIS OF A HIGH-FILLED COLLAPSIBLE LOESS SLOPE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(6): 93-97. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201506019
    [8]Chen Jingjing, Ru Zhongliang, Wei Zushuai. NUMERICAL MODELING OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURE BASED ON PORE PRESSURE COHESIVE CRACK[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(4): 103-106. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201504019
    [9]Guo Hongchao, Zhong Xuan. MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF Q460 EQUAL LEG ANGLE BASED ON THE TRANSMISSION TOWER STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(12): 162-166. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201312030
    [10]Li Yongjing, Zhang Jing, Zhang Xu. THE VIBRATION CONTROL EFFECT ANALYSIS OF TORSION COUPLING RESPONSE OF ECCENTRIC STRUCTURES WITH THE VISCOUS DAMPERS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(5): 68-72. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201305015
    [11]Huang Junjie, Su Qian, Zhou Heng, Zheng Jianbin. REINFORCEMENT DESIGN OF THE DISEASE PILE FOUNDATION OF EXISTING BRIDGE IN KARST AREA AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(7): 166-170. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201207029
    [12]Chen Lanyun, Shu Zhong, Yi Nangai. NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF VERTICAL BEARING CAPACITY OF POST-GROUTING BORED PILES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(7): 78-81. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201107018
    [13]Zhou Luping, Hang Yongshan. APPLICATION AND ANALYSIS OF INDUCING JOINT IN CHANGZHOU UNDERGROUND PROJECT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(11): 100-103. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201111022
    [14]Zhang Huile, Liu Jianguo, Zhang Huidong, Guo Dongmei, Zhao Yanfei. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF BEARING CAPACITY AND FAILURE MECHANISM OF HORIZONTAL JET GROUTING ARCH[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(9): 66-69,104. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201009017
    [15]Qin Jianjian, Che Jialing, Dong Pan, Wang Jing, Zhang Jun. STABILITY ANALYSIS OF COUPLER STEEL TUBE FALSEWORK UNDER DOUBLE-DIRECTION LOAD[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(2): 47-50,54. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201002011
    [16]Zhou Lianjun, Peng Zhenbin, He Zhongming, Peng Wenxiang. NUMERICAL ANALYSIS FOR SIZE EFFECT OF STRATIFIED ROCK MASS UNDER COMPRESSION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(5): 81-83,105. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200905017
    [17]Wang Aimin, Yao Qianfeng, Wu Minzhe. NONLINEAR NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF INFLUENCE OF FILLED-BLOCK ON BEHAVIOR OF MULTI-RIBBED COMPOSITE WALL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(1): 9-13. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200801003
    [18]Tian Ruijun, Du Xiuli, Peng Yijiang. NUMERICAL SIMULATION ON COMPRESSION FAILURE PROCESS OF CONCRETE AND SIZE EFFECT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(4): 68-72112. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200804018
    [19]Wang Yingge. FIELD TEST AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF INTERACTION OF PILE- RAFT FOUNDATION ULTRA - HIGH TUBE-IN-TUBE STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(5): 10-15. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200505003
    [20]Chen Limin, Chen Sizuo. NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON LOCAL STABILITY OF CYLINDRICAL SHELL UNDER AXIAL LOADS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(10): 69-72. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200510021
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-0302468
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 7.7 %FULLTEXT: 7.7 %META: 90.7 %META: 90.7 %PDF: 1.5 %PDF: 1.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 7.5 %其他: 7.5 %其他: 1.3 %其他: 1.3 %China: 1.8 %China: 1.8 %Egypt: 0.1 %Egypt: 0.1 %Happy Valley: 0.1 %Happy Valley: 0.1 %上海: 9.4 %上海: 9.4 %东京: 0.2 %东京: 0.2 %东莞: 1.9 %东莞: 1.9 %东营: 0.1 %东营: 0.1 %中山: 0.2 %中山: 0.2 %丽水: 0.4 %丽水: 0.4 %佛山: 0.2 %佛山: 0.2 %保定: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %兰州: 0.2 %兰州: 0.2 %北京: 4.0 %北京: 4.0 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 4.0 %南京: 4.0 %南宁: 0.8 %南宁: 0.8 %南昌: 1.2 %南昌: 1.2 %南阳: 0.1 %南阳: 0.1 %厦门: 0.9 %厦门: 0.9 %台州: 0.5 %台州: 0.5 %台湾省: 0.1 %台湾省: 0.1 %合肥: 0.8 %合肥: 0.8 %唐山: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %大连: 0.2 %大连: 0.2 %天津: 1.8 %天津: 1.8 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %孟买: 0.1 %孟买: 0.1 %宁德: 0.5 %宁德: 0.5 %宁波: 1.3 %宁波: 1.3 %安康: 0.8 %安康: 0.8 %宜春: 0.2 %宜春: 0.2 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 1.1 %广州: 1.1 %延安: 0.5 %延安: 0.5 %张家口: 0.2 %张家口: 0.2 %徐州: 0.6 %徐州: 0.6 %惠州: 0.2 %惠州: 0.2 %成都: 0.5 %成都: 0.5 %揭阳: 0.5 %揭阳: 0.5 %无锡: 0.5 %无锡: 0.5 %昆明: 1.1 %昆明: 1.1 %晋中: 0.1 %晋中: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 6.2 %杭州: 6.2 %枣庄: 0.1 %枣庄: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.1 %武汉: 3.9 %武汉: 3.9 %沈阳: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %济南: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %海口: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %淮南: 0.1 %淮南: 0.1 %深圳: 1.1 %深圳: 1.1 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.5 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %漯河: 0.7 %漯河: 0.7 %澳门: 0.1 %澳门: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.2 %濮阳: 0.2 %珠海: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.8 %石家庄: 0.8 %福州: 1.1 %福州: 1.1 %绵阳: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 15.6 %芒廷维尤: 15.6 %芝加哥: 1.4 %芝加哥: 1.4 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %荆门: 0.1 %荆门: 0.1 %莆田: 0.1 %莆田: 0.1 %衢州: 0.4 %衢州: 0.4 %西宁: 6.4 %西宁: 6.4 %西安: 0.4 %西安: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %赣州: 0.1 %赣州: 0.1 %赫尔辛基: 0.1 %赫尔辛基: 0.1 %达州: 0.2 %达州: 0.2 %运城: 1.9 %运城: 1.9 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 2.9 %郑州: 2.9 %鄂州: 0.5 %鄂州: 0.5 %重庆: 0.9 %重庆: 0.9 %金华: 0.4 %金华: 0.4 %长沙: 0.9 %长沙: 0.9 %阳泉: 0.5 %阳泉: 0.5 %随州: 0.1 %随州: 0.1 %青岛: 0.8 %青岛: 0.8 %鞍山: 0.1 %鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.6 %黄冈: 0.6 %黄石: 0.8 %黄石: 0.8 %黑尔福德: 0.1 %黑尔福德: 0.1 %其他其他ChinaEgyptHappy Valley上海东京东莞东营中山丽水佛山保定兰州北京十堰南京南宁南昌南阳厦门台州台湾省合肥唐山大连天津太原孟买宁德宁波安康宜春常州常德平顶山广州延安张家口徐州惠州成都揭阳无锡昆明晋中晋城朝阳杭州枣庄格兰特县武汉沈阳济南海口淮南深圳温州湖州湘潭漯河澳门濮阳珠海盐城石家庄福州绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆门莆田衢州西宁西安贵阳赣州赫尔辛基达州运城邯郸郑州鄂州重庆金华长沙阳泉随州青岛鞍山马鞍山黄冈黄石黑尔福德

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (209) PDF downloads(9) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return