Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
ZHANG Shi, ZHANG Ailin, ZHANG Yanxia, XU Xiaoda, XIE Zhiqiang, XU Xinsheng. Experimental Research on Dynamic Properties of CFRP Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(2): 92-98,91. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22031203
Citation: ZHANG Shi, ZHANG Ailin, ZHANG Yanxia, XU Xiaoda, XIE Zhiqiang, XU Xinsheng. Experimental Research on Dynamic Properties of CFRP Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(2): 92-98,91. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22031203

Experimental Research on Dynamic Properties of CFRP Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22031203
  • Received Date: 2022-03-12
    Available Online: 2023-05-25
  • Publish Date: 2023-02-20
  • Through similarity analysis, the 1:4 scale model of CFRP (carbon fiber reinforced plastics) reinforced concrete frame structure was designed and manufactured, and the dynamic test of simulated seismic shaking table was carried out. Unidirectional, bidirectional and tridirectional seismic excitation was applied to test the dynamic characteristics of the structural model. The seismic performance of the CFRP reinforced concrete frame structure was investigated by analyzing the dynamic response and hysteretic performance of the structure under different levels of earthquake, such as acceleration, displacement and internal force. The results showed that with the enhancement of seismic excitation, the natural vibration period of the structure kept getting longer increasing 54% in the X direction and 60% in the Y direction from seven-degree to eight-degree earthquake action, indicating that the structural model had been damaged to varying degrees, resulting in continuous degradation of structural stiffness, increasing deformation and partial concrete crushing failure. However, the structure model still did not collapse after experiencing the rarely accurred earthquake with the peak acceleration of 0.788 g, and the maximum inter-storey displacement angle was less than 1/50, indicating that the structure model had good seismic performance and could meet the seismic fortifying level requirements of "not bad in small earthquakes, repairable in medium earthquakes, and not falling in large earthquakes".
  • [1]
    OTIENO M, IKOTUN J, BALLIM Y. Experimental investigations on the influence of cover depth and concrete quality on time to cover cracking due to carbonation-induced corrosion of steel in RC structures in an urban, inland environment[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 198(20):172-181.
    [2]
    JIE C, BO D, HE J, et al. Equivalent surface defect model for fatigue life prediction of steel reinforcing bars with pitting corrosion[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2018, 110(5):153-161.
    [3]
    CHOU J S, NGO N T, CHONG W K. The use of artificial intelligence combiners for modeling steel pitting risk and corrosion rate[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2017, 65:471-483.
    [4]
    尹世平,华云涛,徐世烺. FRP配筋混凝土结构研究进展及其应用[J].建筑结构学报, 2021, 42(1):134-150.
    [5]
    ZS A, LF A, DCF A, et al. Experimental study on the flexural behavior of concrete beams reinforced with bundled hybrid steel/FRP bars[J]. Engineering Structures,2019,197:109-443.
    [6]
    ESCORCIO P, FRANCA P M. Experimental study of a rehabilitation solution that uses GFRP bars to replace the steel bars of reinforced concrete beams[J]. Engineering Structures, 2016, 128:166-183.
    [7]
    丁驯,周叮,刘朵,等. 预张拉CFRP布增强加筋矩形板的动力特性分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2018, 37(6):124-129.
    [8]
    吴智深,汪昕,史健喆. 玄武岩纤维复合材料性能提升及其新型结构[J]. 工程力学, 2020, 37(5):1-14.
    [9]
    SUN Z Y, FU L C, FENG D C, et al. Experimental study on the flexural behavior of concrete beams reinforced with bundled hybrid steel/FRP bars[J/OL]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 197[2019-07-25].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109443.
    [10]
    董志强,吴刚. FRP筋增强混凝土结构耐久性能研究进展[J]. 土木工程学报, 2019, 52(10):1-9

    , 29.
    [11]
    朱海堂,程晟钊,高丹盈,等. 玄武岩纤维增强聚合物筋钢纤维高强混凝土梁受弯试验及裂缝宽度计算方法研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2020, 41(6):133-142.
    [12]
    姚未来,江世永,飞渭,等. CFRP筋高韧性水泥基复合材料柱抗震性能试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2019, 38(9):199-207.
    [13]
    徐新生,纪涛,郑永峰. FRP筋混凝土梁挠度的特点及计算方法[J]. 工程力学,2009,26(增刊):71-75.
    [14]
    邓宗才,高磊,王献云. GFRP筋混凝土柱抗震性能试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30(10):53-61.
    [15]
    FUKUYAMA H, MASUDA Y. Structural performances of concrete frame with FRP reinforcement[M]. London:Edited by Taerwe, 1995.
    [16]
    张洪达. FRP筋混凝土框架结构抗震性能有限元分析[D]. 济南:济南大学, 2014.
    [17]
    SHARBATDAR M K, SAATCIOGLU M, BENMOKRANE B. Seismic flexural behavior of concrete connections reinforced with CFRP bars and grids[J]. Composite Structures, 2011, 93(10):2439-2449.
    [18]
    张爱林,王小青,刘学春,等. 北京大兴国际机场航站楼大跨度钢结构整体缩尺模型振动台试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2021, 42(3):1-13.
    [19]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011-2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 王勋. 碳纤维材料粘贴加固损伤建筑钢结构梁受力性能研究. 粘接. 2025(02): 56-59 .
    2. 王景霞,牛志强. 镍含量对建筑用高强钢基复合材料耐久性的影响. 兵器材料科学与工程. 2025(03): 103-108 .
    3. 苗承佳. CFRP复合材料在不同运动器材中的结构性能及价值研究. 文体用品与科技. 2024(04): 175-177 .
    4. 毕超豪,赖华铭,张耿斌,颜天佑,何瑞,肖淑华,刘润安,卓柯先,蔡培德,郭永昌. 地聚物混凝土-玻璃纤维增强复合材料筋界面黏结行为的梁式试验研究. 工业建筑. 2024(06): 46-53 . 本站查看
    5. 张黎飞,张轩雨,张宁,周玲珠,郑愚,夏立鹏. 玻璃纤维增强复合材料弯折筋增强超高性能混凝土拉拔试验及受力模型研究. 工业建筑. 2024(06): 22-30 . 本站查看
    6. 刘浩忠. 基于工程造价的公路建设用碳纤维复材制备与性能研究. 化学与粘合. 2024(04): 373-376+387 .
    7. 胡汉敏,李尚辉. 建筑用钢-连续纤维复合筋的单向拉伸力学性能研究. 兵器材料科学与工程. 2024(06): 59-63 .
    8. 王科亮,张娟,郝骏,童晔,王帅. 钢筋混凝土框架结构外设隔震支座加固前后抗震性能模拟分析. 华南地震. 2024(04): 168-176 .

    Other cited types(1)

  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (124) PDF downloads(3) Cited by(9)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return