Stability Evaluation of Working Faces of Shield Tunnels in Karst Based on Cloud Model and D-S Evidence Theory

WANG Xiang; CHEN Fada; WU Xianguo; FENG Zongbao; CHEN Hongyu

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG22011206

Volume 53 Issue 11

Nov. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2023 > 53(11): 65-72

Andres Quiros Zhang Shuai Cheng Xiaohui, . STUDY OF THE MICP INJECTION IN UNSATURATED SANDY SOILS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(7): 28-30. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201507006

Citation:

WANG Xiang, CHEN Fada, WU Xianguo, FENG Zongbao, CHEN Hongyu. Stability Evaluation of Working Faces of Shield Tunnels in Karst Based on Cloud Model and D-S Evidence Theory[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(11): 65-72. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22011206

Andres Quiros Zhang Shuai Cheng Xiaohui, . STUDY OF THE MICP INJECTION IN UNSATURATED SANDY SOILS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(7): 28-30. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201507006

Citation:

PDF( 2101 KB)

Stability Evaluation of Working Faces of Shield Tunnels in Karst Based on Cloud Model and D-S Evidence Theory

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22011206

1. Guiyang Urban Rail Transit Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550091, China;
2. School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China;
3. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore

Received Date: 2022-01-12

Abstract

Abstract

During tunnelling with tunnel boring machines in karst, the complex geological environment has a larger impact on the stability of working faces of tunnels, which would caused risks such as destabilization of working faces. To accurately evaluate the stability of working faces and reduce construction risks, a safety evaluation method based on the cloud model and the D-S evidence theory was proposed to consider the complexity of effect factors, which could solve the problem of fuzzy uncertainty and high conflict of evaluation information. Based on a large number of engineering practices and literature research, a set of stability evaluation systems and criteria for working faces was established from 3 aspects: karst, construction and the influence of surrounding rock. The cloud model was used to obtain the correlation degree of evaluation indexes for risk levels and then transformed into basic probability assignment, and the D-S evidence theory was used to fuse and update the multi-source evidence information to realize the real-time evaluation for safety risk of working faces and determine the sensitivity factors based on the global sensitivity. The results of the practical application indicated that the stability grade for working faces of the evaluated section was Ⅱ and could keep relative stability, that was consistent with the actual construction situation.
- karst,
- shield tunnel,
- stability of working face,
- cloud model,
- D-S evidence theory,
- sensitivity analysis

FullText(HTML)

References(27)

References

[1]	安永林,欧阳鹏博,岳健,等.基于强度折减法的隧道掌子面稳定性及破坏形态[J].矿业工程研究, 2018, 33(1):39-44.
[2]	郭佳奇,陈建勋,陈帆,等.岩溶隧道断续节理掌子面突水判据及灾变过程[J].中国公路学报, 2018, 31(10):118-129.
[3]	王志杰,高靖遥,张鹏,等.基于突变理论的高压岩溶隧道掌子面稳定性研究[J].岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(1):95-103.
[4]	王秀英,李凯,王丽娟,等.软弱围岩隧道掌子面极限支护压力研究[J].铁道学报, 2019, 41(9):110-117.
[5]	李姝,吕城.考虑孔隙水压力和非线性M-C准则的深埋隧道掌子面稳定性分析[J].公路, 2019, 64(12):322-327.
[6]	杨文钰,郑俊杰,章荣军,等.考虑黏土土性参数与支护压力变异性的盾构掌子面稳定性分析[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文):2021,6(27):1-11.
[7]	PATERNESI A, SCHWEIGER H F, SCARPELLI G. Numerical analyses of stability and deformation behavior of reinforced and unreinforced tunnel faces[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2017, 88:256-266.
[8]	XUE Y G, LI X, QIU D H, et al. Stability evaluation for the excavation face of shield tunnel across the Yangtze River by multi-factor analysis[J]. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2019, 19(3):283-293.
[9]	LI W, ZHANG C P, TAN Z B, et al. Effect of the seepage flow on the face stability of a shield tunnel[J/OL]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 112[2022-01-12]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.103900.
[10]	汤扬屹,吴贤国,陈虹宇,等.基于云模型与D-S证据理论的盾构施工隧道管片上浮风险评价[J].隧道建设(中英文), 2019, 39(12):2011-2019.
[11]	邢晓敏,徐海瑞,廖孟柯,等.基于云模型和D-S证据理论的配电终端健康状态综合评估方法[J].电力系统保护与控制, 2021, 49(13):72-81.
[12]	国强,李明松,周凯.基于势距图与改进云模型的多模雷达分选[J].吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022(8):1904-1911.
[13]	高磊,鲍学英,李爱春.基于DSR-云模型的高地温隧道施工安全评价[J].现代隧道技术, 2021, 58(3):43-51 ,78.
[14]	周恩帆,马俊,周永杰,等.一种D-S证据理论的多传感器数据融合算法[J].小型微型计算机系统,2022(43):795-807.
[15]	刘敦文,贾昊燃,周唱晓,等.基于云模型的盾构隧道开挖面稳定性评价[J].北京交通大学学报, 2019, 43(3):43-49.
[16]	吴贤国,王洪涛,何云.基于模糊物元的岩溶隧道开挖稳定性评价[J].中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(1):99-104.
[17]	周艺.隧道掌子面稳定性分析及其控制技术研究[D].成都:西南交通大学, 2010.
[18]	刘大刚,姚萌,张霄.郑万高铁大断面岩质隧道掌子面稳定性评价及控制措施[J].隧道建设(中英文), 2018, 38(8):1311-1315.
[19]	魏琨.中山中路隧道掌子面稳定性与变形控制技术研究[D].重庆:重庆交通大学, 2014.
[20]	周雪,左忠义,程伟.基于组合赋权云模型的铁路旅客运输安全评价[J].中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(增刊1):158-164.
[21]	刘英杰,丁静媛,薛智文.基于云模型与PSR模型的长江三角洲水资源承载力评价[J].华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 42(2):42-49,75.
[22]	姚春桥,王金峰,杨赛,等.基于云模型和改进证据理论的盾构下穿铁路安全风险评价[J].铁道建筑, 2021, 61(5):60-65.
[23]	吴贤国,刘茜,陈虹宇,等.基于模糊贝叶斯证据理论的盾构下穿既有隧道安全风险评价[J].隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41(5):713-720.
[24]	陶鹏,张洋瑞,李兵,等.基于D-S理论多源信息融合的电气设备故障诊断模型[J].计算机应用与软件, 2021, 38(7):73-79.
[25]	XIE S Y, CHEN Y N, DONG S H, et al. Risk assessment of an oil depot using the improved multi-sensor fusion approach based on the cloud model and the belief Jensen-Shannon divergence[J/OL]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2020, 67[2022-01-12]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104214 Get rights and content.
[26]	FENG L Y, ZHANG L M. Assessment of tunnel face stability subjected to an adjacent tunnel[J/OL]. Reliability Engineering&System Safety, 2021, 205[2022-01-12]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107228.
[27]	KEYVANFAR A, SHAFAGHAT A, ISMAIL N, et al. Multifunctional retention pond for stormwater management:A decision-support model using Analytical Network Process (ANP) and Global Sensitivity Analysis (GSA)[J/OL]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 124[2022-01-12]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107317.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHU Qi, XU Maohu, YE Lihao, CAI Wei, XIE Wen. Experimental Research on Bending Fatigue Performance of UHPC-T Beams and Evaluation of Their Residual Bearing Capacity[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(11): 131-138. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22071309
[2]	LAN Tao, DING Min, ZHUANG Jinzhao, QIN Guangchong, QIAO Haiyang, YAO Yaming, ZHANG Yan. Influence of Local High Temperature on Pushover Analysis of Structures[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(7): 93-97. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzg20042008
[3]	CHEN Yong, JIAN Bin, LIU Chong. RESEARCH ON SEISMIC PERFORMANCES OF FIRST ASEISMIC GRADE FRAMES WITH PSRC VIERENDEEL TRUSS TRANSFER STORIES UNDER MAIN-AFTER SHOCKS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(8): 45-52,105. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20071008
[4]	HUANG Xin, LI Yi, ZHU Xudong, HU Xueying, LYU Yang. DAMAGE ANALYSIS OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING STRUCTURES WITH ASYMMETRIC VERTICAL SETBACKS UNDER RARE EARTHQUAKE ACTION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(6): 79-84. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202006013
[6]	Shu Xingping Liu Zelong Lu Beirong Yao Yao, . NONLINEAR DYNAMIC ELASTO-PLASTIC TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS OF PREFABRICATED STEEL FRAME STRUCTURE WITH INCLINED SUPPORT JOINTS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(10): 1-6. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201510001
[7]	Li Hongxing, Gao Wei, Zhao Chunlian, Li Guoqiang, Dong Lühe, Sun Feifei. APPLICATION OF BUCKLING-RESTRAINED BRACES ( BRB) IN RC FRAME-BENT MAIN BUILDING STRUCTURE FOR LARGE THERMAL POWER PLANTS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(08): 98-102.
[8]	Zhang Teng, Wu Xiaohan, He Jinsheng. ELASTO-PLASTIC TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(06): 90-94. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201406021
[9]	Huang Wei, Xue Weiwei, Zhang Chenghua, Li Yunzhang. PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF SOIL-PILE-ECO-COMPOSITE WALLS INTERACTION SYSTEM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(12): 79-83. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201112018
[10]	Song Yuanqi, Wang Xiaogang, Wen Yanfeng, Liang Yuanzhong, Gong Huguang. ELASTOPLASTIC TIME-HISTORY ANALYSIS OF FRAME-BENT STRUCTURE FOR MAIN MILL BUILDING OF LARGE-SCALE THERMAL POWER PLANT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(1): 51-54. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201001014
[11]	Bai Xiaohong, Bai Guoliang. EXPERIMENTAL AND THEORETICAL STUDY ON THE DEFORMATION PROPERTY OF THE FRAME-BENT STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(7): 31-35. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201007010
[12]	Yang Youfa, Feng Zhongjie, Li Yuanchu. PUSH-OVER ANALYSIS OF THE HIGH-RISE FRAME-CORE WALL STRUCTURES WITH STRENGTHENED STOREYS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(10): 35-39. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200910011
[13]	Yin Jiang, Yi Weijian. THE MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSIS WITH THE CONSIDERATION OF THE VERTICAL SEISMIC EFFECTS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(5): 39-46. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200905008
[14]	Xin Li, Liang Xingwen. DIRECT DISPLACEMENT-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN METHOD OF HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(7): 6-10,53. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200807002
[15]	Yan Weiming, Zhang Chunke, Peng Lingyun, Yao Yi. A NEW TYPE OF SHEARING LEAD DAMPER AND ITS APPLICATION IN MILL BUILDINGS FOR A THERMAL POWER PLANT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(7): 41-44,49. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200807010
[16]	Rong Qiang, Cheng Wenrang. ELASTOPLASTIC TIME-HISTORY ANALYSIS OF RUBBER-FRICTION PARALLEL ISOLATION SYSTEM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(2): 47-49,46. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200702012
[17]	Wang Xin-ling, Yang Jian-zhong, Zhang Yan, Bi Shu-ping. THE PUSHOVER ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION OF ENERGY DISSIPATION MECHANISM FOR CHEVRON BRACING COMPOUND STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(11): 42-46. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200711012
[18]	Wan Li, Jian Bin. PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF FRAME STRUCTURES WITH UNBONDED PRESTRESSED FLOOR[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(2): 22-27,21. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200702006
[19]	Qin Cong-lv, Qian Lei, Gan Gang, Zhang Ai-hui. SEISMIC DESIGN OF AN APARTMENT BUILDING WITH BOTTOM WEAK STORY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(10): 36-38. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200610011
[20]	Duan Hongxia, Li Zhengliang. RESEARCH ON DESIGN MEASURES FOR SEISMIC RESISTANCE OF RC MEGA-FRAME STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(1): 22-26. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200601008