Interfacial Bond Performance Experiment on High-Strength Steel Pipe Joints for Prefabricated Composite Structural Columns

ZHU Zhangfeng; RICHARD Liew; DU Yong; YAO Bing

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG21100816

Volume 53 Issue 4

Apr. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2023 > 53(4): 120-124,179

ZHU Zhangfeng, RICHARD Liew, DU Yong, YAO Bing. Interfacial Bond Performance Experiment on High-Strength Steel Pipe Joints for Prefabricated Composite Structural Columns[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(4): 120-124,179. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21100816

Citation:

ZHU Zhangfeng, RICHARD Liew, DU Yong, YAO Bing. Interfacial Bond Performance Experiment on High-Strength Steel Pipe Joints for Prefabricated Composite Structural Columns[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(4): 120-124,179. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21100816

Citation:

ZHU Zhangfeng, RICHARD Liew, DU Yong, YAO Bing. Interfacial Bond Performance Experiment on High-Strength Steel Pipe Joints for Prefabricated Composite Structural Columns[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(4): 120-124,179. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21100816

PDF( 4782 KB)

Interfacial Bond Performance Experiment on High-Strength Steel Pipe Joints for Prefabricated Composite Structural Columns

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21100816

1. College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China;
2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore

Received Date: 2021-10-08
Available Online: 2023-07-01

Abstract

Abstract

To determine the bond length and configuration of high-strength Q420 steel pipe joint for prefabricated composite structural columns, including the pipe sections of ϕ114×25, ϕ152×16 and ϕ194×10, push-out tests were conducted. The different bond lengths (600 mm and 800 mm), different bond materials (C35 concrete and M50 grout) and the setting of spiral rebars ϕ6@50 were considered. By comparing and analyzing the load displacement/slippage curves as well as bond strengths, the interfacial bond performance of steel pipe joints was discussed. The test and analysis results showed that 600 mm bond length could ensure that the joint had bond strength that could meet the requirements of the specification. The increase of bond length could delay the slip, but the bond strength decreased. The high-strength grout obviously increased the peak load, and had no obvious effect on the trend of the curve. The influence of slenderness ratio and diameter thickness ratio were not obvious. Under the same conditions, ϕ114×25 steel pipe could obtain the highest bond strength. Spiral rebars could effectively improve the bond strength and delay the interface slip,which should be recommended in engineering, due to its good behavior and easy construction.
- prefabricated composite structure,
- column joint,
- high-strength steel pipe,
- bond strength,
- grout,
- spiral rebar

FullText(HTML)

References(12)

References

[1]	王秋维, 王程伟, 刘乐, 等. 钢管混凝土界面黏结性能研究现状与分析进展[J]. 建筑结构, 2021, 51(12):91-97.
[2]	QU X S, CHEN Z H, NETHERCOT D A, et al. Load reversed push-out tests on rectangular CFST columns[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2013, 81:35-43.
[3]	ALY T, ELCHALAKANI M, THAYALAN P, et al. Incremental collapse threshold for pushout resistance of circular concrete filled steel tubular columns[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010, 66(1):11-18.
[4]	TAO Z, SONG T Y, UY B, et al. Bond behavior in concrete-filled steel tubes[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2016, 120:81-93.
[5]	刘永健, 刘君平, 池建军. 钢管混凝土界面抗剪黏结滑移力学性能试验[J]. 广西大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 35(1):17-23, 29.
[6]	CEN.Design of composite steel and concrete structures-part1-1:general rules and rules for buildings:Eurocode 4(EC4)[S]. Brussels:Commission of European Communities, 2004.
[7]	BSI.Steel concrete and composite bridges-part 5:code of practice for the design of composite bridges:BS 5400-5[S]. Britain:British Standard Institute, 2005.
[8]	Committee BD-090. Bridge design part 6:steel and composite construction:AS 5100. 6-2004[S]. Sydney:Standards Australia, 2004.
[9]	AISC.Specification for structural steel buildings:ANSI/AISC 360-16[S]. Chicago:American Institute of Steel Construction, 2016.
[10]	王秋维, 刘乐, 史庆轩, 等. 钢管活性粉末混凝土界面黏结强度计算方法研究[J]. 工程力学, 2020, 37(4):41-50.
[11]	周鹏华, 徐礼华, 谷雨珊, 等. 钢管与其核心自应力自密实高强混凝土的黏结性能[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2018, 51(9):782-789.
[12]	LYU W Q, HAN L H. Investigation on bond strength between recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) and steel tube in RAC-filled steel tubes[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2019,155:438-459.