Evaluation of Comprehensive Performance of Beautiful Rural Houses Based on Architectural Ontology

ZHANG Zhaochang; FAN Xuhong; SHI Qiyin; XI Zhuo

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG21052801

Volume 52 Issue 4

Jul. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2022 > 52(4): 1-9

ZHANG Zhaochang, FAN Xuhong, SHI Qiyin, XI Zhuo. Evaluation of Comprehensive Performance of Beautiful Rural Houses Based on Architectural Ontology[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(4): 1-9. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21052801

Citation:

ZHANG Zhaochang, FAN Xuhong, SHI Qiyin, XI Zhuo. Evaluation of Comprehensive Performance of Beautiful Rural Houses Based on Architectural Ontology[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(4): 1-9. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21052801

Citation:

PDF( 5722 KB)

Evaluation of Comprehensive Performance of Beautiful Rural Houses Based on Architectural Ontology

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21052801

1. Key Laboratory of C&PC Structures of the Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China;
2. National Prestress Engineering Research Center, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China;
3. Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China

Received Date: 2021-05-28
Available Online: 2022-07-25

Abstract

Abstract

Housing performance evaluation is the basis and key for the improvement of the performance of beautiful rural houses under the national village revitalization strategy. Moreover, the performance of beautiful rural houses not only includes "safety and functionality" (basic requirements), but also emphasizes "beauty and livability" (development requirements). Thus, from the perspective of "architectural ontology", a comprehensive performance evaluation system for beautiful rural houses was put forward, which could be used to evaluate the overall performance level of house and indentify the focuses of performance improvement. Focusing on the construction goal of safety, comfort, beauty, and livability of beautiful rural houses, the system constructed and quantized four characteristic indexes "locality, safety, functionality and comfort" and 18 sub-factor layer indexes, covering many fields such as architecture, structure, water and electricity, fire protection, ect.,so that the housing performance evaluation was more comprehensive and objective. In view of the large amount and wide range of rural houses, the two-level progressive evaluation strategy of "overall evaluation and special evaluation" was proposed. Secondly, according to the characteristics of each layer, the integrated weighting method was used to determine the index weight, which showed that the key indexes included structural safety, use function, thermal and humidity environment, etc. Moreover, a score probability distribution method was proposed to determine the four evaluation levels of house. Finally, taking the houses in different places,different ages, before and after reconstruction, it was shown that the system had strong feasibility and practicability for the comprehensive and efficient evaluation of housing performance; the houses built after 2000 should focus on improving the performance of local characteristics, thermal and humidity environment, etc.
- beautiful rural houses,
- comprehensive performance,
- two-level evaluation,
- architectural ontology,
- local characteristics

FullText(HTML)

References(34)

References

[1]	国家发展改革委.全国农村经济发展"十三五"规划[EB/OL].https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/ghwb/201611/t20161117_962203.html?code=&state=123.
[2]	中共中央、国务院.乡村振兴战略规划(2018-2022年)[EB/OL].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-09/26/content_5325534.htm.
[3]	中共中央、国务院.中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和二○三五年远景目标的建议[EB/OL].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-03/13/content_5592681.htm.
[4]	中国工程建设标准化协会.既有村镇住宅功能评价标准:CECS 324:2012[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2012.
[5]	中国工程建设标准化协会.既有村镇住宅建筑安全性评定标准:CECS 326:2012[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2012.
[6]	孙颖,车冠宇,李爱芳.中外住宅性能评价体系的发展与比较研究[J].华中建筑,2016(8):34-37.
[7]	中华人民共和国建设部.住宅性能评定技术标准:GB/T 50362-2005[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2005.
[8]	GWON S C.A study on characteristics of regional rural housing through a field survey:focused on energy business support villages[J].The Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea,2016,18(3):29-37.
[9]	LIU A Y,LI X H.Research on the construction of a comprehensive performance evaluation index system of an integrated construction supply Chain[C]//The 2015 International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management,Environment and the Sustainable Building.Sweden:2015:178-186.
[10]	YIN K,WEN M P,ZHANG F F.Research on the evaluation method of rural hollowing based on RS and a case study of the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region in China[C]//SPIE Conference on Earth Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing.2016.
[11]	段绪胜,杜善梁,王少杰,等.基于组合赋权的鲁中山区石木结构传统民居性能评价模型与应用[J].数学的实践与认识,2019,49(21):180-188.
[12]	中国国家标准化管理委员会.美丽乡村建设评价:GB/T 37072-2018[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018.
[13]	郑滋阳.乡土建筑:当代的保护与利用:以镇江东乡地区乡土建筑为例[J].建筑与文化,2019(10):233-236.
[14]	刘怡,雷耀丽.乡土建筑遗产视角下传统窑洞民居的价值特征保护:以陕北地区大型地主庄园为例[J].建筑与文化,2020(10):108-110.
[15]	陶斌,高宜生,白穆.遗产保护视角下济南高新东区小龙堂村乡土建筑特征与价值评价[J].住区,2020(1):154-159.
[16]	汪德根,吕庆月,吴永发,等.中国传统民居建筑风貌地域分异特征与形成机理[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(9):1864-1885.
[17]	周晶,李天.传统民居与乡土建筑[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,2013.
[18]	谢玉明.中国传统建筑细部设计[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001.
[19]	葛学礼,朱立新,于文.我国村镇建筑防灾研究概述[J].自然灾害学报,2014,23(2):8-14.
[20]	郑东,吕勇,周莉莉.新农村工业化住宅建设与"美丽乡村"的改造研究:基于浙江省宁波市1329套农村自建房的实践调查与思考[J].工程技术,2017,12(2):47-48.
[21]	孟淼.我国村镇建设安全现状调查及问题分析[D].北京:清华大学,2008.
[22]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.农村危房改造基本安全技术导则[EB/OL].https://www.mohurd.gov.cn/gongkai/fdzdgknr/tzgg/201909/20190919_241886.html.
[23]	胡大柱,张方灯,肖小月,等.我国西南地区村镇建筑现状调研与统计分析[J].工程抗震与加固改造,2015,37(3):113-120.
[24]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.农村防火规范:GB 50039-2010[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2010.
[25]	鹿勤.《绿色建筑评价标准》:节地与室外环境[J].建设科技,2015(4):16-22.
[26]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.民用建筑热工设计规范:GB 50176-2016[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2016.
[27]	国家卫生健康委员会.农村住宅卫生规范:GB 9981-2012[S].北京:中国标准出版,2012.
[28]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.绿色建筑评价标准:GB/T 50378-2019[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2019.
[29]	刘加平.建筑物理[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2014.
[30]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.民用建筑设计统一标准:GB 50352-2019[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2019.
[31]	张兆昌.乡村房屋性能提升的指标体系与关键建造技术的研究[D].镇江:江苏大学,2017.
[32]	国家环境保护总局.室内空气质量标准:GB/T 18883-2020[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2020.
[33]	邱菀华.管理决策与应用熵学[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2002:226-227.
[34]	杜栋,庞庆华,吴炎.现代综合评价方法与案例精选[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2008:12-21.