Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
GUO Yongcheng, CHEN Zuogui. RESEARCH OF UNLOADING RATES OF CONFINING PRESSURE UNDER PORE WATER PRESSURE CYCLES ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF SANDSTONE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(6): 93-97,174. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202006015
Citation: HUANG Ming, LIU Ye, DING Yi, LYU Qingfang. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON SELF-CENTERING CLB ROCKING WALL EQUIPPED WITH CFD[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(10): 40-46,61. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21042509

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON SELF-CENTERING CLB ROCKING WALL EQUIPPED WITH CFD

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21042509
  • Received Date: 2021-04-25
    Available Online: 2022-02-21
  • Low-cycle repeated loading tests were carried out on the single-story single-span CLB rocking wall which is equipped with CFD, hysteretic curves and skeleton curves were drawn, and the problem of stiffness degradation was investigated. Based on the test results, the main body of rocking wall equipped with CFD was not damaged significantly, and the damage mode of the specimen was mainly the fracture of the bamboo material at the upper joint and the pre-stressed reinforcement anchor plate. The delayed hysteresis curve of the specimen without setting the damper was approximately bilinear, and the hysteresis curve after setting the damper was "flag shaped". Moreover, with the reduction of the moment contribution ratio, the hysteresis curve became more and more full, and the specimen still had a good strength after undergoing secondary loading. Moreover, when the specimen was subjected to secondary loading without repair, the stiffness will decreased.
  • [1]
    KURAMA Y C, PESSIKI S, SAUSE R, et al.Seismic Behavior and Design of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls[J].PCI Journal, 1999, 44(3):72-89.
    [2]
    KURAMA Y C.Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls with Supplemental Viscous Damping[J].ACI Structural Journal, 2000, 97(4):648-658.
    [3]
    HOLDEN T, RESTREPO J, MANDER J B.Seismic Performance of Precast Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Walls[J].Journal of Structural Engineering, 2003, 129(3):286-296.
    [4]
    RESTREPO J I, RAHMAN A.Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Structural Walls Incorporating Energy Dissipators[J].Journal of Structural Engineering, 2007, 133(11):1560-1570.
    [5]
    SARTI F, PALERMO A, PAMPANIN S.Development and Testing of an Alternative Dissipative Posttensioned Rocking Timber Wall with Boundary Columns[J/OL].Journal of Structural Engineering, 2016, 142(4).https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001390.
    [6]
    FITZGERALD D, MILLER T H, SINHA A, et al.Cross-Laminated Timber Rocking Walls with Slip-Friction Connections[J/OL].Engineering Structures, 2020, 220.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110973.
    [7]
    WANG Z, LI H, FEI B, et al.Axial Compressive Performance of Laminated Bamboo Column with Aramid Fiber Reinforced Polymer[J/OL].Composite Structures, 2021, 258.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113398.
    [8]
    LI H, QIU Z, WU G, et al.Slenderness Ratio Effect on Eccentric Compression Properties of Parallel Bamboo Strand Lumber Columns[J/OL].Journal of Structural Engineering, 2019, 145(8).https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002372.
    [9]
    LYU Q, WANG W, LIU Y.Study on Thermal Insulation Performance of Cross-Laminated Bamboo Wall[J].Journal of Renewable Materials, 2019, 7(11):1231-50.
    [10]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.木材顺纹抗拉强度试验方法:GB/T 1938-2009[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.
    [11]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.木材横纹抗拉强度试验方法:GB/T 14017-2009[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.
    [12]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.木材顺纹抗压强度试验方法:GB/T 1935-2009[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.
    [13]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.木材顺纹抗压弹性模量测定方法:GB/T 15777-2017[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2017.
    [14]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.木材横纹抗压强度试验方法:GB/T 1939-2009[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.
    [15]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.木材横纹抗压弹性模量测定方法:GB/T 1943-2009[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.
    [16]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.木材抗弯强度试验方法:GB/T 1936.1-2009[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.
    [17]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.木材抗弯弹性模量测定方法:GB/T 1936.2-2009[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.
    [18]
    卫佩行, 王泉中, 周定国.分离刚度法测试杨木单板层积材木梁剪切模量的试验研究[J].土木建筑与环境工程, 2012, 34(增刊2):177-180.
    [19]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.金属材料弹性模量和泊松比试验方法:GB/T 22315-2008[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2008.
    [20]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.金属材料拉伸试验第1部分:室温试验方法:GB/T 228.1-2010[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2010.
    [21]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.预应力混凝土用螺纹钢筋:GB/T 20065-2016[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2016.
    [22]
    Standards Council.New Zealand Standard Concrete Structures Standard:NZS 3101:2006[S].Wellington:Standards New Zealand, 2006.
    [23]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震试验规程:JGJ/T 101-2015[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2015.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(0)

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-0502468
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 14.2 %FULLTEXT: 14.2 %META: 84.3 %META: 84.3 %PDF: 1.5 %PDF: 1.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.2 %其他: 8.2 %Albania: 0.7 %Albania: 0.7 %China: 5.2 %China: 5.2 %Georgia: 1.5 %Georgia: 1.5 %[]: 0.7 %[]: 0.7 %包头: 0.7 %包头: 0.7 %北京: 2.2 %北京: 2.2 %南京: 1.5 %南京: 1.5 %宿州: 1.5 %宿州: 1.5 %常德: 0.7 %常德: 0.7 %延安: 0.7 %延安: 0.7 %张家口: 2.2 %张家口: 2.2 %扬州: 0.7 %扬州: 0.7 %晋城: 0.7 %晋城: 0.7 %朝阳: 0.7 %朝阳: 0.7 %杭州: 0.7 %杭州: 0.7 %沈阳: 2.2 %沈阳: 2.2 %漯河: 0.7 %漯河: 0.7 %芒廷维尤: 16.4 %芒廷维尤: 16.4 %衢州: 2.2 %衢州: 2.2 %西宁: 30.6 %西宁: 30.6 %贵阳: 0.7 %贵阳: 0.7 %达州: 3.0 %达州: 3.0 %运城: 10.4 %运城: 10.4 %邯郸: 0.7 %邯郸: 0.7 %郑州: 1.5 %郑州: 1.5 %阳泉: 1.5 %阳泉: 1.5 %驻马店: 0.7 %驻马店: 0.7 %其他AlbaniaChinaGeorgia[]包头北京南京宿州常德延安张家口扬州晋城朝阳杭州沈阳漯河芒廷维尤衢州西宁贵阳达州运城邯郸郑州阳泉驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (112) PDF downloads(2) Cited by(2)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return