CAO Shengxi, ZHANG Tao, XUE Rui, GAO Peng. LANDSCAPE PLANNING OF CHONGLI WINTER OLYMPICS SCENIC BYWAY BASED ON GIS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(10): 62-65. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21033103
Citation:
CAO Shengxi, ZHANG Tao, XUE Rui, GAO Peng. LANDSCAPE PLANNING OF CHONGLI WINTER OLYMPICS SCENIC BYWAY BASED ON GIS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2021, 51(10): 62-65. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21033103
CAO Shengxi, ZHANG Tao, XUE Rui, GAO Peng. LANDSCAPE PLANNING OF CHONGLI WINTER OLYMPICS SCENIC BYWAY BASED ON GIS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(10): 62-65. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21033103
Citation:
CAO Shengxi, ZHANG Tao, XUE Rui, GAO Peng. LANDSCAPE PLANNING OF CHONGLI WINTER OLYMPICS SCENIC BYWAY BASED ON GIS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2021, 51(10): 62-65. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21033103
LANDSCAPE PLANNING OF CHONGLI WINTER OLYMPICS SCENIC BYWAY BASED ON GIS
Received Date: 2021-03-31Available Online:
2022-02-21
Abstract
In recent years, scenic byway has developed vigorously in China.However, there is a lack of rational analysis and cognition for the use of landscape resources along the scenic byway.Taking Chongli Winter Olympic scenic bayway as an example, the paper analyzed the landscape resources around the byway based on GIS, evaluated and classified the landscape resources elements by using the analytic hierarchy process, and obtained the weight factors.The planning zoning of scenic road was scientifically obtained based on the result of weight overlapping, the route selection of bicycle lane was determined, and the best locations of wetland post stations and forest post stations were selected.
References
[1]
余青, 樊欣, 刘志敏.国外风景道的理论与实践[J].旅游学刊, 2006, 21(5):91-96.
[2]
余青, 莫文静.风景道建设是人类生态文明的发展趋势[J].综合运输, 2011(1):74-78.
[3]
克莱尔·A·冈恩, 特格特·瓦尔.旅游规划理论与案例[M].4版.大连:东北财经大学出版社, 2004.
[4]
张淑萍.美国风景道研究:理论与实践[J].世界地理研究, 2010, 19(3):114-120.
[5]
周珈伊.风景道建设研究与实践[D].杭州:浙江农林大学, 2018.
[6]
谢莎.风景道景观评价指标体系研究[D].长沙:湖南师范大学, 2012.
[7]
刘意.风景道体系构建研究[D].成都:成都理工大学, 2017.
[8]
刘卫东.土地资源学[M].上海:复旦大学出版社, 2010.
[9]
苏会, 杨效忠, 李龙.基于层次分析法的廊道旅游资源评价体系:以大别山风景道为例[J].淮南师范学院学报, 2019, 21(5):24-29.
[10]
唐晓岚, 刘小涵, 刘政.基于GIS_AHP的皖南山区风景道选线研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 41(5):25-31.
[11]
王佳利.基于GIS的上杭县袍岭山地公园生态敏感性评价研究[D].长沙:中南林业科技大学, 2019.
Relative Articles
[1] ZHANG Feng, WANG Jian. Research on the Construction and Application of Landscape Design Evaluation Models Under the Concept of Low Impact Development [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(2): 92-100. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23102907
[2] DONG Hongjie, ZENG Suiping, ZENG Jian, ZHANG Xin. Study on Spatial Pattern Evolutions and Driving Forces of Village and Small-Town Settlements Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data: a Case Study of Chengde Central District and Its Surroundings [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(3): 62-71. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21050202
[3] WU Jinliao. Research on Comprehensive Evaluation Method for Long-Span Steel Structure Monitoring Based on AHP [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(6): 218-223,24. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG23042307
[4] XIAO Jiaqi, XUAN Wei, KONG Ziran, ZHAO Liwei, YAO Yuchao. Research on Correlation Mechanism of Commercial Space Vitality Based on Multi-Source Data [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(6): 59-65. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22082309
[5] LIN Yongjun, XIAO Tianxu, ZHANG Zengpeng, XIE Yuanang. Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method for Safety of Concrete Frame Structures Based on AHP-Membership Theory [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(10): 28-38,45. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22041612
[6] LIANG Rui, LIANG Zhicheng, JINAG Haiyan, QIU Yunye. RESEARCH ON PUBLICNESS EVALUATION OF BUILDING ATTACHED OPEN SPACES IN HIGH-DENSITY BLOCKES [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(8): 39-44. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21022002
[7] LI Jiang, SHEN Yu. RESEARCH ON RENEWAL STRATEGIES OF OLD COMMUNITIES IN BEIJING FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF AHP [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(10): 66-73,80. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzg20061210
[8] MIAO Yankai, LUO Pingjia, CHANG Jiang. APPLICATION OF GIS IN CHINESE TRADITIONAL VILLAGE RESEARCH [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(1): 24-29. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20011801
[9] ZHOU Zaihui, REN Yunying. ANALYSIS OF URBAN SPATIAL FORMS IN WUWEI FROM 1990 TO 2016 [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(7): 120-126. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG19113048
[10] FANG Wujun, LI Weiwen, CAO Wenzhao. DURABILITY EVALUATION AND EFFECT FACTOR ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES IN SHENZHEN [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(6): 117-122. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202006019
[11] Lin Zurui Ma Tao Chang Jiang Yu Yang, . RESEARCH ON EVALUATION SYSTEM OF INFRASTRUCTURE COORDINATED DEVELOPMENT IN TRADITIONAL VILLAGES [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(10): 53-60. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201510010
[12] Li Zhiqiang, He Mingsheng, Zheng Shansuo. ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS-BASED OC-GA ALGORITHM FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF SRC FRAME COLUMN [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(1): 166-172. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201501034
[13] Jia Xinxin, Lin Baogang, Yang hongbo. LANDSCAPE RENOVATION PLANNING OF OLD INDUSTRIAL ZONE OF DAHUA COTTON MILL IN XI’AN [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(02): 31-36. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201402008
[14] Zhou Changdong, Bai Xiaobing, Zhao Feng. RAPID IDENTIFICATION OF RC SINGLE-FACTORY BUILDING AFTER EARTHQUAKE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(4): 42-49. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201104010
[15] Yang Jianxin, Yang Jianping, Zhou Chenghua. APPLICATION OF FUZZY MATHEMATICS AND METHOD OF APH IN SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF BLAST FURNACE SYSTEMS [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(6): 108-111. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200906026
[16] Chen Xing-hai, Jiang Yuan-yuan, Li Guo-zhu. STUDY ON APPRAISAL METHOD OF HOUSING DEGREE OF AGEING [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(6): 35-37,95. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200606012
[17] Wang Jianhua. ASSESSMENT ON COMPREHENSIVE ENERGY-CONSERVING RESULT OF BUILDINGS [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(1): 19-21. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200601007
[18] Wang Guangyue, Liu Jian. CREY RELATIVE DEGREE DECISION MAKING MODEL BASED ON COMBINATORIAL WEIGHT AND ITS APPLICATION [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(4): 61-65. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200404018
[19] Su Wei, Wang Jing. COMPREHENSIVE OPTIMUM SEEKING METHOD OF ATTRIBUTE MATHEMATICS AND HIERARCHY FOR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING SCHEME [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(8): 14-16,18. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200408004
[20] Liao Ying, Xia Haili. APPLICATION OF AHP METHOD AND FUZZY COMPLEX EVALUATION METHOD TO OPTIMIZING ANALYSIS OF BRACING SYSTEM FOR DEEP EXCAVATION [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(9): 26-29,35. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200409008
Cited by Periodical cited type(8) 1. 白君亭，孙睿，陈靖雯，兰思仁，李霄鹤. 多元数据支持下福州市乡村风景道选线规划研究. 中国园林. 2024(05): 63-69 . 2. 魏正通，何传涛，孟令冉，吴军. 基于眼动实验的风景道景观评价与设计策略研究. 山东师范大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(03): 233-242 . 3. 曹胜昔，张涛，张玉坤，张兴. 基于LID的黄土地区景观水体修复策略探析. 工业建筑. 2023(02): 72-78+41 . 4. 邹诚，李霄鹤，玄锦，周银茁，王巧云，陈冰滢. 多元数据支持的福州市自驾游风景道选线研究. 西南大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(07): 183-198 . 5. 宋如飞. 基于GIS技术的土地空间信息查询系统设计. 现代电子技术. 2023(17): 107-110 . 6. 刘晓青，张继之. 基于GIS的城市植物景观空间层次规划模型仿真. 计算机仿真. 2023(08): 178-181+195 . 7. 岳军红，李梅，郭剑. 地理信息系统在景观规划设计中的发展与应用. 鞋类工艺与设计. 2022(03): 156-158 . 8. 曹胜昔. 北京2022冬奥会张家口赛区生态风景廊道数据基底建设方法与应用. 世界建筑. 2022(06): 12-16 .
Other cited types(6)
Proportional views
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Amount of access Chart context menu Abstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads Statistics Abstract Views HTML Views PDF Downloads 2024-05 2024-06 2024-07 2024-08 2024-09 2024-10 2024-11 2024-12 2025-01 2025-02 2025-03 2025-04 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Class Distribution FULLTEXT : 14.7 % FULLTEXT : 14.7 % META : 82.5 % META : 82.5 % PDF : 2.8 % PDF : 2.8 % FULLTEXT META PDF Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Area Distribution 其他 : 4.5 % 其他 : 4.5 % China : 2.3 % China : 2.3 % 东莞 : 3.4 % 东莞 : 3.4 % 北京 : 2.8 % 北京 : 2.8 % 十堰 : 0.6 % 十堰 : 0.6 % 南京 : 1.7 % 南京 : 1.7 % 南宁 : 0.6 % 南宁 : 0.6 % 南通 : 0.6 % 南通 : 0.6 % 台州 : 2.8 % 台州 : 2.8 % 大庆 : 0.6 % 大庆 : 0.6 % 天津 : 1.1 % 天津 : 1.1 % 宣城 : 0.6 % 宣城 : 0.6 % 宿州 : 1.1 % 宿州 : 1.1 % 常德 : 0.6 % 常德 : 0.6 % 广州 : 0.6 % 广州 : 0.6 % 张家口 : 5.1 % 张家口 : 5.1 % 成都 : 0.6 % 成都 : 0.6 % 扬州 : 0.6 % 扬州 : 0.6 % 无锡 : 0.6 % 无锡 : 0.6 % 晋城 : 0.6 % 晋城 : 0.6 % 朝阳 : 0.6 % 朝阳 : 0.6 % 杭州 : 0.6 % 杭州 : 0.6 % 梧州 : 0.6 % 梧州 : 0.6 % 武汉 : 1.1 % 武汉 : 1.1 % 沈阳 : 0.6 % 沈阳 : 0.6 % 济南 : 1.1 % 济南 : 1.1 % 深圳 : 0.6 % 深圳 : 0.6 % 湖州 : 1.1 % 湖州 : 1.1 % 漯河 : 0.6 % 漯河 : 0.6 % 益阳 : 0.6 % 益阳 : 0.6 % 秦皇岛 : 1.1 % 秦皇岛 : 1.1 % 芒廷维尤 : 10.7 % 芒廷维尤 : 10.7 % 莆田 : 0.6 % 莆田 : 0.6 % 衡水 : 1.1 % 衡水 : 1.1 % 西宁 : 27.7 % 西宁 : 27.7 % 贵阳 : 4.0 % 贵阳 : 4.0 % 运城 : 7.9 % 运城 : 7.9 % 连云港 : 0.6 % 连云港 : 0.6 % 邯郸 : 0.6 % 邯郸 : 0.6 % 郑州 : 3.4 % 郑州 : 3.4 % 重庆 : 0.6 % 重庆 : 0.6 % 镇江 : 0.6 % 镇江 : 0.6 % 阳泉 : 1.7 % 阳泉 : 1.7 % 青岛 : 0.6 % 青岛 : 0.6 % 马鞍山 : 0.6 % 马鞍山 : 0.6 % 其他 China 东莞 北京 十堰 南京 南宁 南通 台州 大庆 天津 宣城 宿州 常德 广州 张家口 成都 扬州 无锡 晋城 朝阳 杭州 梧州 武汉 沈阳 济南 深圳 湖州 漯河 益阳 秦皇岛 芒廷维尤 莆田 衡水 西宁 贵阳 运城 连云港 邯郸 郑州 重庆 镇江 阳泉 青岛 马鞍山
本站查看
Login
Register
E-alert
DownLoad: